How to quickly solve partial fractions equation?












6












$begingroup$


Often I am dealing with an integral of let's say:



$$intfrac{dt}{(t-2)(t+3)}$$



or



$$int frac{dt}{t(t-4)}$$



or to make this a more general case in which I am interested the most:



$$int frac{dt}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} quad quad alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$$



Basically any integral with decomposed polynomial of second degree in the denominator. Obviously this leads to sum of two natural logarithms.



What I do is write down partial fractions equation and then solve system of linear equations (2 variables here):



$$frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} = frac{A}{t+alpha} + frac{B}{t+beta}$$



After solving this I end up with some $A, B$ coefficients and I can solve the integral.



Is there faster way to find $A, B$ ? Some algorithm or anything that I can follow and would always work for such case? Surely, solving that does not take much time but I just wonder if it could be done even faster.



(bonus question: what if there were more variables, like 3 variables?)



I would greatly appreciate all feedback as it could help me save countless number of minutes in the future.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Apr 12 at 1:25
















6












$begingroup$


Often I am dealing with an integral of let's say:



$$intfrac{dt}{(t-2)(t+3)}$$



or



$$int frac{dt}{t(t-4)}$$



or to make this a more general case in which I am interested the most:



$$int frac{dt}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} quad quad alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$$



Basically any integral with decomposed polynomial of second degree in the denominator. Obviously this leads to sum of two natural logarithms.



What I do is write down partial fractions equation and then solve system of linear equations (2 variables here):



$$frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} = frac{A}{t+alpha} + frac{B}{t+beta}$$



After solving this I end up with some $A, B$ coefficients and I can solve the integral.



Is there faster way to find $A, B$ ? Some algorithm or anything that I can follow and would always work for such case? Surely, solving that does not take much time but I just wonder if it could be done even faster.



(bonus question: what if there were more variables, like 3 variables?)



I would greatly appreciate all feedback as it could help me save countless number of minutes in the future.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Apr 12 at 1:25














6












6








6


3



$begingroup$


Often I am dealing with an integral of let's say:



$$intfrac{dt}{(t-2)(t+3)}$$



or



$$int frac{dt}{t(t-4)}$$



or to make this a more general case in which I am interested the most:



$$int frac{dt}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} quad quad alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$$



Basically any integral with decomposed polynomial of second degree in the denominator. Obviously this leads to sum of two natural logarithms.



What I do is write down partial fractions equation and then solve system of linear equations (2 variables here):



$$frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} = frac{A}{t+alpha} + frac{B}{t+beta}$$



After solving this I end up with some $A, B$ coefficients and I can solve the integral.



Is there faster way to find $A, B$ ? Some algorithm or anything that I can follow and would always work for such case? Surely, solving that does not take much time but I just wonder if it could be done even faster.



(bonus question: what if there were more variables, like 3 variables?)



I would greatly appreciate all feedback as it could help me save countless number of minutes in the future.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Often I am dealing with an integral of let's say:



$$intfrac{dt}{(t-2)(t+3)}$$



or



$$int frac{dt}{t(t-4)}$$



or to make this a more general case in which I am interested the most:



$$int frac{dt}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} quad quad alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$$



Basically any integral with decomposed polynomial of second degree in the denominator. Obviously this leads to sum of two natural logarithms.



What I do is write down partial fractions equation and then solve system of linear equations (2 variables here):



$$frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} = frac{A}{t+alpha} + frac{B}{t+beta}$$



After solving this I end up with some $A, B$ coefficients and I can solve the integral.



Is there faster way to find $A, B$ ? Some algorithm or anything that I can follow and would always work for such case? Surely, solving that does not take much time but I just wonder if it could be done even faster.



(bonus question: what if there were more variables, like 3 variables?)



I would greatly appreciate all feedback as it could help me save countless number of minutes in the future.







calculus integration indefinite-integrals quadratics partial-fractions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 12 at 1:28







weno

















asked Apr 12 at 1:15









wenoweno

44311




44311












  • $begingroup$
    Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Apr 12 at 1:25


















  • $begingroup$
    Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Apr 12 at 1:25
















$begingroup$
Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Apr 12 at 1:25




$begingroup$
Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Apr 12 at 1:25










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Here's your answer
for general $n$.



$dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
$
.



Therefore
$1
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
=sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
$
.



Setting
$x = a_i$
for each $i$,
all the terms
except the one with $k=i$
have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
so
$1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
$

so that
$b_i
=dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
$
.



For $n=2$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
$
,
$b_2
=dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
$
.



For $n=3$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
$
,
$b_2
=dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
$
,
$b_3
=dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
$
.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    8












    $begingroup$

    If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.



    Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$



    For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
    Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
    $$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$



    $$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      6












      $begingroup$

      Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):



      $$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$



      $$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$



      Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:



      $$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$



      $$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$



      Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:



      $$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$



      $$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
        $endgroup$
        – weno
        Apr 12 at 1:45










      • $begingroup$
        Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
        $endgroup$
        – weno
        Apr 12 at 1:47





















      1












      $begingroup$

      Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
      begin{equation}
      frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
      end{equation}

      Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
      begin{eqnarray}
      frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
      sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
      frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
      right)
      end{eqnarray}



      In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
      For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
      {m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
      xx1 =
      Sum[
      Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
      m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
      Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
      m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
      Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
      m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
      Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
      m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
      xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
      ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
      ];
      ll

      Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
      0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
      0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
      0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
      0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}


      It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$














        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184487%2fhow-to-quickly-solve-partial-fractions-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        6












        $begingroup$

        Here's your answer
        for general $n$.



        $dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
        =sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
        $
        .



        Therefore
        $1
        =sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
        =sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
        $
        .



        Setting
        $x = a_i$
        for each $i$,
        all the terms
        except the one with $k=i$
        have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
        so
        $1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
        $

        so that
        $b_i
        =dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
        $
        .



        For $n=2$,
        $b_1
        =dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
        $
        ,
        $b_2
        =dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
        $
        .



        For $n=3$,
        $b_1
        =dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
        $
        ,
        $b_2
        =dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
        $
        ,
        $b_3
        =dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
        $
        .






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          6












          $begingroup$

          Here's your answer
          for general $n$.



          $dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
          =sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
          $
          .



          Therefore
          $1
          =sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
          =sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
          $
          .



          Setting
          $x = a_i$
          for each $i$,
          all the terms
          except the one with $k=i$
          have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
          so
          $1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
          $

          so that
          $b_i
          =dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
          $
          .



          For $n=2$,
          $b_1
          =dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
          $
          ,
          $b_2
          =dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
          $
          .



          For $n=3$,
          $b_1
          =dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
          $
          ,
          $b_2
          =dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
          $
          ,
          $b_3
          =dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
          $
          .






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            6












            6








            6





            $begingroup$

            Here's your answer
            for general $n$.



            $dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
            =sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
            $
            .



            Therefore
            $1
            =sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
            =sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
            $
            .



            Setting
            $x = a_i$
            for each $i$,
            all the terms
            except the one with $k=i$
            have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
            so
            $1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
            $

            so that
            $b_i
            =dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
            $
            .



            For $n=2$,
            $b_1
            =dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
            $
            ,
            $b_2
            =dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
            $
            .



            For $n=3$,
            $b_1
            =dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
            $
            ,
            $b_2
            =dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
            $
            ,
            $b_3
            =dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
            $
            .






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Here's your answer
            for general $n$.



            $dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
            =sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
            $
            .



            Therefore
            $1
            =sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
            =sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
            $
            .



            Setting
            $x = a_i$
            for each $i$,
            all the terms
            except the one with $k=i$
            have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
            so
            $1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
            $

            so that
            $b_i
            =dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
            $
            .



            For $n=2$,
            $b_1
            =dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
            $
            ,
            $b_2
            =dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
            $
            .



            For $n=3$,
            $b_1
            =dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
            $
            ,
            $b_2
            =dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
            $
            ,
            $b_3
            =dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
            $
            .







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Apr 12 at 4:40









            marty cohenmarty cohen

            75.8k549130




            75.8k549130























                8












                $begingroup$

                If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.



                Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$



                For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
                Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
                $$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$



                $$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  8












                  $begingroup$

                  If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.



                  Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$



                  For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
                  Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
                  $$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$



                  $$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    8












                    8








                    8





                    $begingroup$

                    If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.



                    Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$



                    For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
                    Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
                    $$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$



                    $$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.



                    Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$



                    For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
                    Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
                    $$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$



                    $$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 12 at 2:09









                    Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani

                    42.2k42061




                    42.2k42061























                        6












                        $begingroup$

                        Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):



                        $$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$



                        $$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$



                        Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:



                        $$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$



                        $$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$



                        Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:



                        $$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$



                        $$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$













                        • $begingroup$
                          I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
                          $endgroup$
                          – weno
                          Apr 12 at 1:45










                        • $begingroup$
                          Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
                          $endgroup$
                          – weno
                          Apr 12 at 1:47


















                        6












                        $begingroup$

                        Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):



                        $$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$



                        $$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$



                        Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:



                        $$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$



                        $$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$



                        Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:



                        $$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$



                        $$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$













                        • $begingroup$
                          I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
                          $endgroup$
                          – weno
                          Apr 12 at 1:45










                        • $begingroup$
                          Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
                          $endgroup$
                          – weno
                          Apr 12 at 1:47
















                        6












                        6








                        6





                        $begingroup$

                        Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):



                        $$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$



                        $$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$



                        Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:



                        $$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$



                        $$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$



                        Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:



                        $$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$



                        $$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):



                        $$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$



                        $$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$



                        Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:



                        $$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$



                        $$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$



                        Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:



                        $$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$



                        $$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$







                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited Apr 12 at 6:15









                        MichaelChirico

                        3,5381126




                        3,5381126










                        answered Apr 12 at 1:37









                        DairDair

                        2,00011124




                        2,00011124












                        • $begingroup$
                          I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
                          $endgroup$
                          – weno
                          Apr 12 at 1:45










                        • $begingroup$
                          Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
                          $endgroup$
                          – weno
                          Apr 12 at 1:47




















                        • $begingroup$
                          I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
                          $endgroup$
                          – weno
                          Apr 12 at 1:45










                        • $begingroup$
                          Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
                          $endgroup$
                          – weno
                          Apr 12 at 1:47


















                        $begingroup$
                        I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
                        $endgroup$
                        – weno
                        Apr 12 at 1:45




                        $begingroup$
                        I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
                        $endgroup$
                        – weno
                        Apr 12 at 1:45












                        $begingroup$
                        Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
                        $endgroup$
                        – weno
                        Apr 12 at 1:47






                        $begingroup$
                        Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
                        $endgroup$
                        – weno
                        Apr 12 at 1:47













                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
                        begin{equation}
                        frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
                        end{equation}

                        Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
                        begin{eqnarray}
                        frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
                        sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
                        frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
                        right)
                        end{eqnarray}



                        In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
                        For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
                        {m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
                        xx1 =
                        Sum[
                        Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
                        m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
                        Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
                        m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
                        Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
                        m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
                        Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
                        m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
                        xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
                        ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
                        ];
                        ll

                        Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                        0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                        0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                        0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                        0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}


                        It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
                          begin{equation}
                          frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
                          end{equation}

                          Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
                          begin{eqnarray}
                          frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
                          sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
                          frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
                          right)
                          end{eqnarray}



                          In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
                          For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
                          {m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
                          xx1 =
                          Sum[
                          Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
                          m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
                          Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
                          m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
                          Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
                          m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
                          Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
                          m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
                          xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
                          ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
                          ];
                          ll

                          Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                          0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                          0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                          0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                          0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}


                          It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
                            begin{equation}
                            frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
                            end{equation}

                            Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
                            begin{eqnarray}
                            frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
                            sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
                            frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
                            right)
                            end{eqnarray}



                            In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
                            For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
                            {m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
                            xx1 =
                            Sum[
                            Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
                            m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
                            Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
                            m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
                            Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
                            m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
                            Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
                            m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
                            xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
                            ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
                            ];
                            ll

                            Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                            0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                            0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                            0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                            0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}


                            It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
                            begin{equation}
                            frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
                            end{equation}

                            Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
                            begin{eqnarray}
                            frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
                            sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
                            frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
                            right)
                            end{eqnarray}



                            In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
                            For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
                            {m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
                            xx1 =
                            Sum[
                            Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
                            m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
                            Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
                            m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
                            Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
                            m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
                            Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
                            m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
                            xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
                            ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
                            ];
                            ll

                            Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                            0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                            0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                            0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
                            0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}


                            It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Apr 12 at 10:22









                            PrzemoPrzemo

                            4,71811032




                            4,71811032






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184487%2fhow-to-quickly-solve-partial-fractions-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Plaza Victoria

                                Puebla de Zaragoza

                                Musa