How to quickly solve partial fractions equation?
$begingroup$
Often I am dealing with an integral of let's say:
$$intfrac{dt}{(t-2)(t+3)}$$
or
$$int frac{dt}{t(t-4)}$$
or to make this a more general case in which I am interested the most:
$$int frac{dt}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} quad quad alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$$
Basically any integral with decomposed polynomial of second degree in the denominator. Obviously this leads to sum of two natural logarithms.
What I do is write down partial fractions equation and then solve system of linear equations (2 variables here):
$$frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} = frac{A}{t+alpha} + frac{B}{t+beta}$$
After solving this I end up with some $A, B$ coefficients and I can solve the integral.
Is there faster way to find $A, B$ ? Some algorithm or anything that I can follow and would always work for such case? Surely, solving that does not take much time but I just wonder if it could be done even faster.
(bonus question: what if there were more variables, like 3 variables?)
I would greatly appreciate all feedback as it could help me save countless number of minutes in the future.
calculus integration indefinite-integrals quadratics partial-fractions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Often I am dealing with an integral of let's say:
$$intfrac{dt}{(t-2)(t+3)}$$
or
$$int frac{dt}{t(t-4)}$$
or to make this a more general case in which I am interested the most:
$$int frac{dt}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} quad quad alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$$
Basically any integral with decomposed polynomial of second degree in the denominator. Obviously this leads to sum of two natural logarithms.
What I do is write down partial fractions equation and then solve system of linear equations (2 variables here):
$$frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} = frac{A}{t+alpha} + frac{B}{t+beta}$$
After solving this I end up with some $A, B$ coefficients and I can solve the integral.
Is there faster way to find $A, B$ ? Some algorithm or anything that I can follow and would always work for such case? Surely, solving that does not take much time but I just wonder if it could be done even faster.
(bonus question: what if there were more variables, like 3 variables?)
I would greatly appreciate all feedback as it could help me save countless number of minutes in the future.
calculus integration indefinite-integrals quadratics partial-fractions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Apr 12 at 1:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Often I am dealing with an integral of let's say:
$$intfrac{dt}{(t-2)(t+3)}$$
or
$$int frac{dt}{t(t-4)}$$
or to make this a more general case in which I am interested the most:
$$int frac{dt}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} quad quad alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$$
Basically any integral with decomposed polynomial of second degree in the denominator. Obviously this leads to sum of two natural logarithms.
What I do is write down partial fractions equation and then solve system of linear equations (2 variables here):
$$frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} = frac{A}{t+alpha} + frac{B}{t+beta}$$
After solving this I end up with some $A, B$ coefficients and I can solve the integral.
Is there faster way to find $A, B$ ? Some algorithm or anything that I can follow and would always work for such case? Surely, solving that does not take much time but I just wonder if it could be done even faster.
(bonus question: what if there were more variables, like 3 variables?)
I would greatly appreciate all feedback as it could help me save countless number of minutes in the future.
calculus integration indefinite-integrals quadratics partial-fractions
$endgroup$
Often I am dealing with an integral of let's say:
$$intfrac{dt}{(t-2)(t+3)}$$
or
$$int frac{dt}{t(t-4)}$$
or to make this a more general case in which I am interested the most:
$$int frac{dt}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} quad quad alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$$
Basically any integral with decomposed polynomial of second degree in the denominator. Obviously this leads to sum of two natural logarithms.
What I do is write down partial fractions equation and then solve system of linear equations (2 variables here):
$$frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)} = frac{A}{t+alpha} + frac{B}{t+beta}$$
After solving this I end up with some $A, B$ coefficients and I can solve the integral.
Is there faster way to find $A, B$ ? Some algorithm or anything that I can follow and would always work for such case? Surely, solving that does not take much time but I just wonder if it could be done even faster.
(bonus question: what if there were more variables, like 3 variables?)
I would greatly appreciate all feedback as it could help me save countless number of minutes in the future.
calculus integration indefinite-integrals quadratics partial-fractions
calculus integration indefinite-integrals quadratics partial-fractions
edited Apr 12 at 1:28
weno
asked Apr 12 at 1:15
wenoweno
44311
44311
$begingroup$
Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Apr 12 at 1:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Apr 12 at 1:25
$begingroup$
Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Apr 12 at 1:25
$begingroup$
Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Apr 12 at 1:25
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's your answer
for general $n$.
$dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
$.
Therefore
$1
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
=sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
$.
Setting
$x = a_i$
for each $i$,
all the terms
except the one with $k=i$
have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
so
$1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
$
so that
$b_i
=dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
$.
For $n=2$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
$.
For $n=3$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
$,
$b_3
=dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.
Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$
For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
$$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$
$$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):
$$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$
$$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$
Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:
$$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$
$$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$
Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:
$$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$
$$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:45
$begingroup$
Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
begin{equation}
frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
end{equation}
Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
begin{eqnarray}
frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
right)
end{eqnarray}
In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
{m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
xx1 =
Sum[
Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
];
ll
Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184487%2fhow-to-quickly-solve-partial-fractions-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's your answer
for general $n$.
$dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
$.
Therefore
$1
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
=sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
$.
Setting
$x = a_i$
for each $i$,
all the terms
except the one with $k=i$
have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
so
$1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
$
so that
$b_i
=dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
$.
For $n=2$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
$.
For $n=3$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
$,
$b_3
=dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's your answer
for general $n$.
$dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
$.
Therefore
$1
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
=sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
$.
Setting
$x = a_i$
for each $i$,
all the terms
except the one with $k=i$
have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
so
$1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
$
so that
$b_i
=dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
$.
For $n=2$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
$.
For $n=3$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
$,
$b_3
=dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's your answer
for general $n$.
$dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
$.
Therefore
$1
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
=sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
$.
Setting
$x = a_i$
for each $i$,
all the terms
except the one with $k=i$
have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
so
$1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
$
so that
$b_i
=dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
$.
For $n=2$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
$.
For $n=3$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
$,
$b_3
=dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
$.
$endgroup$
Here's your answer
for general $n$.
$dfrac1{prod_{k=1}^n (x-a_k)}
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_k}{x-a_k}
$.
Therefore
$1
=sum_{k=1}^n dfrac{b_kprod_{j=1}^n (x-a_j)}{x-a_k}
=sum_{k=1}^n b_kprod_{j=1, jne k}^n (x-a_j)
$.
Setting
$x = a_i$
for each $i$,
all the terms
except the one with $k=i$
have the factor $a_i-a_i$,
so
$1 = b_iprod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)
$
so that
$b_i
=dfrac1{prod_{j=1, jne i}^n (a_i-a_j)}
$.
For $n=2$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{a_1-a_2}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{a_2-a_1}
$.
For $n=3$,
$b_1
=dfrac1{(a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)}
$,
$b_2
=dfrac1{(a_2-a_1)(a_2-a_3)}
$,
$b_3
=dfrac1{(a_3-a_1)(a_3-a_2)}
$.
answered Apr 12 at 4:40
marty cohenmarty cohen
75.8k549130
75.8k549130
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.
Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$
For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
$$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$
$$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.
Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$
For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
$$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$
$$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.
Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$
For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
$$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$
$$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$
$endgroup$
If your fraction is in form of $$ frac {1}{(t-alpha_1)(t-alpha_2)(t-alpha_3)...(t-alpha_k)}$$ where the $alpha s$ are different, there is an easy way to find the partial fraction decomposition.
Let $t=alpha_i$ and cover $(t-alpha_i)$ while evaluating the above fraction to get your $A_i$
For example $$ frac{1}{(t-1)(t-3)(t+4)} = frac {A_1}{(t-1)} + frac{ A_2}{(t-3)} +frac { A_3}{(t+4)}$$
Where $$A_1 = frac {1}{(1-3)(1+4)}=frac{-1}{10}$$
$$A_2 = frac {1}{(3-1)(3+4)} = frac{1}{14}$$
$$A_3=frac {1}{(-4-1)(-4-3)}=frac{1}{35}$$
answered Apr 12 at 2:09
Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani
42.2k42061
42.2k42061
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):
$$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$
$$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$
Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:
$$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$
$$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$
Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:
$$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$
$$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:45
$begingroup$
Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):
$$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$
$$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$
Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:
$$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$
$$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$
Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:
$$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$
$$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:45
$begingroup$
Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):
$$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$
$$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$
Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:
$$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$
$$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$
Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:
$$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$
$$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$
$endgroup$
Unless I am misunderstanding the question, by "root rotation" (when $beta neq alpha$):
$$frac{1}{(t + alpha)(t + beta)} = frac{A}{t + alpha} + frac{B}{t + beta}$$
$$1 = A(t + beta) + B(t + alpha)$$
Evaluating $-beta$ for $t$:
$$1 = B(alpha - beta)$$
$$B = frac{1}{alpha - beta}$$
Similarly, for $A$, sub in $-alpha$:
$$1 = A(beta - alpha)$$
$$A = frac{1}{beta - alpha}$$
edited Apr 12 at 6:15
MichaelChirico
3,5381126
3,5381126
answered Apr 12 at 1:37
DairDair
2,00011124
2,00011124
$begingroup$
I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:45
$begingroup$
Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:45
$begingroup$
Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:47
$begingroup$
I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:45
$begingroup$
I'll be coming back to this post. This is what I was looking for.
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:45
$begingroup$
Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:47
$begingroup$
Unless that takes you too much time, would you be able to derive formulas for $A, B, C$, please? Function of form $frac{1}{(t+alpha)(t+beta)(t+gamma)}$ and $alpha neq beta neq gamma$
$endgroup$
– weno
Apr 12 at 1:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
begin{equation}
frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
end{equation}
Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
begin{eqnarray}
frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
right)
end{eqnarray}
In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
{m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
xx1 =
Sum[
Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
];
ll
Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
begin{equation}
frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
end{equation}
Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
begin{eqnarray}
frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
right)
end{eqnarray}
In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
{m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
xx1 =
Sum[
Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
];
ll
Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
begin{equation}
frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
end{equation}
Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
begin{eqnarray}
frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
right)
end{eqnarray}
In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
{m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
xx1 =
Sum[
Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
];
ll
Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.
$endgroup$
Let $n$,$m$ be integers such that $nge 2$ and $n-1 ge m ge 0$ .Then if the roots of the polynomial in question are all distinct the following formula holds:
begin{equation}
frac{x^m}{prodlimits_{j=1}^n (x-b_j)} = sumlimits_{i=1}^n frac{1}{x-b_i} cdot frac{b_i^m}{prodlimits_{j=1,jneq i}^n (b_i-b_j)}
end{equation}
Now, if the roots are not distinct then it gets more complicated but even at the outset it is clear that we can generate a similar formula by differentiating both sides with respect to the particular root a certain number of times. For example if $n=2$ and $m_1 ge 1$, $m_2 ge 1$ and $mge 0$ the following formula holds true:
begin{eqnarray}
frac{x^m}{(x-b_1)^{m_1} (x-b_2)^{m_2}}=sumlimits_{j=0}^m left( sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_1} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_2-1}(-1)^{m_2} b_1^j frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_1)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_1+b_2)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}+
sumlimits_{l_1=1}^{m_2} binom{m_1+m_2-1-l_1}{m_1-1}(-1)^{m_1} b_2^j
frac{1_{l_1=1} binom{m-1}{j-1} + 1_{l_1>1} binom{m}{j}}{(x-b_2)^{l_1-m+j} (-b_2+b_1)^{m_1+m_2-l_1}}
right)
end{eqnarray}
In[5732]:= ll = {}; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.; m = RandomInteger[{0, 10}];
For[count = 1, count <= 100, count++,
{m1, m2} = RandomInteger[{1, 5}, 2]; x =.; b1 =.; b2 =.;
xx1 =
Sum[
Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m2 - 1] ((-1)^
m2 b1^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b1)^(l1 - m + j) (-b1 + b2)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m1}, {j, 0, m}] +
Sum[ Binomial[m1 + m2 - 1 - l1, m1 - 1] ((-1)^
m1 b2^j If[l1 == 1, Binomial[m - 1, j - 1],
Binomial[m, j]])/((x - b2)^(l1 - m + j) (-b2 + b1)^(
m1 + m2 - l1)), {l1, 1, m2}, {j, 0, m}];
xx2 = x^m/((x - b1)^m1 (x - b2)^m2);
ll = Join[ll, {Simplify[xx1 - xx2]}];
];
ll
Out[5734]= {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
It would be interesting to derive similar formulae in the case $n > 2$.
answered Apr 12 at 10:22
PrzemoPrzemo
4,71811032
4,71811032
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184487%2fhow-to-quickly-solve-partial-fractions-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Also when I think about it, I wonder if there's even a general method (beyond the one you referred to). I can see very easily a general solution for when (i) the numerator is $1$ (ii) $alpha ne beta$ (iii) we only have a product of two factors in the denominator, but that's such a narrow set of circumstances that I wonder if it's worth it. Maybe someone has a more general form though.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Apr 12 at 1:25