Find a lower bound of 95% confidence for θ, of $U(0,θ)$ distribution











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider a random sample of observations of a $U(0,θ)$ distribution. Find a lower bound of 95% confidence for θ



My idea was:



Let $X_ {1}, X_ {2}, ..., X_ {N}$ be a random sample of a uniform population in the interval $(0, θ)$ and $X_ {n}$ the maximum.
So
$(frac{1}{a}) ^ n - (frac{1}{b}) ^ n$ is the confidence coefficient of the parameter.



But I do not know how to continue to solve this problem, can anybody help me?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Consider a random sample of observations of a $U(0,θ)$ distribution. Find a lower bound of 95% confidence for θ



    My idea was:



    Let $X_ {1}, X_ {2}, ..., X_ {N}$ be a random sample of a uniform population in the interval $(0, θ)$ and $X_ {n}$ the maximum.
    So
    $(frac{1}{a}) ^ n - (frac{1}{b}) ^ n$ is the confidence coefficient of the parameter.



    But I do not know how to continue to solve this problem, can anybody help me?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Consider a random sample of observations of a $U(0,θ)$ distribution. Find a lower bound of 95% confidence for θ



      My idea was:



      Let $X_ {1}, X_ {2}, ..., X_ {N}$ be a random sample of a uniform population in the interval $(0, θ)$ and $X_ {n}$ the maximum.
      So
      $(frac{1}{a}) ^ n - (frac{1}{b}) ^ n$ is the confidence coefficient of the parameter.



      But I do not know how to continue to solve this problem, can anybody help me?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Consider a random sample of observations of a $U(0,θ)$ distribution. Find a lower bound of 95% confidence for θ



      My idea was:



      Let $X_ {1}, X_ {2}, ..., X_ {N}$ be a random sample of a uniform population in the interval $(0, θ)$ and $X_ {n}$ the maximum.
      So
      $(frac{1}{a}) ^ n - (frac{1}{b}) ^ n$ is the confidence coefficient of the parameter.



      But I do not know how to continue to solve this problem, can anybody help me?







      statistical-inference parameter-estimation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 21 at 4:42









      Jazmín Jones

      519




      519






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          The maximum is a sufficient statistic here, so a good choice for a test statistic for your CI. (However I'm not sure what you mean with the $(1/a^n-1/b^n)$... it may just be terminology I'm not aware of).



          To get a CI we need to first find the distribution of the test statistic: $$ P(M_nle m) = P(Xle m)^n = (m/theta)^n.$$ Intuitively, we know the $theta>M_n$ so it makes sense to set the lower bound of the CI to be $M_n$ and then let the upper end of the interval be $M_n(1+c^*)$ for some choice of $c^*.$ (Note as always there is no unique confidence interval and this is just a sensible and convenient choice). Then we can choose $c^*$ so we have $1-alpha$ coverage (where $alpha=0.05)$: $$ 1-alpha=P(theta < (1+c^*)M_n) = 1- Pleft(M_nle frac{theta}{1+c^*}right)= 1-(1+c^*)^{-n}$$ which gives $$ c^* = alpha^{-1/n}-1$$



          EDIT



          It appears I misinterpreted the problem here. If we want a lower bound that has $1-alpha$ confidence (i.e. a minimal statistic $x$ such that $P(theta>x) le 1-alpha$) then we can choose $x=(1+c^*)M_n$ and choose $c^*$ such that $$ 1-alpha = P((1+c^*)M_n< theta)= (1+c^*)^{-n},$$ so this gives $$ c^* = (1-alpha)^{-1/n}-1,$$ which is a good deal smaller than the $c^*$ derived above for an upper bound.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • sorry, but what do you mean with CI?
            – Jazmín Jones
            Nov 21 at 5:41










          • @JazmínJones I mean confidence interval. Perhaps I misinterpreted the problem
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:43












          • @JazmínJones I edited in what I think is an answer to the problem. My interpretation is that you want to know how far above $M_n$ we can go while still having $ge 95%$ confidence that $theta$ is larger than this value. (My initial answer gives an upper bound instead.)
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:58













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007270%2ffind-a-lower-bound-of-95-confidence-for-%25ce%25b8-of-u0-%25ce%25b8-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          The maximum is a sufficient statistic here, so a good choice for a test statistic for your CI. (However I'm not sure what you mean with the $(1/a^n-1/b^n)$... it may just be terminology I'm not aware of).



          To get a CI we need to first find the distribution of the test statistic: $$ P(M_nle m) = P(Xle m)^n = (m/theta)^n.$$ Intuitively, we know the $theta>M_n$ so it makes sense to set the lower bound of the CI to be $M_n$ and then let the upper end of the interval be $M_n(1+c^*)$ for some choice of $c^*.$ (Note as always there is no unique confidence interval and this is just a sensible and convenient choice). Then we can choose $c^*$ so we have $1-alpha$ coverage (where $alpha=0.05)$: $$ 1-alpha=P(theta < (1+c^*)M_n) = 1- Pleft(M_nle frac{theta}{1+c^*}right)= 1-(1+c^*)^{-n}$$ which gives $$ c^* = alpha^{-1/n}-1$$



          EDIT



          It appears I misinterpreted the problem here. If we want a lower bound that has $1-alpha$ confidence (i.e. a minimal statistic $x$ such that $P(theta>x) le 1-alpha$) then we can choose $x=(1+c^*)M_n$ and choose $c^*$ such that $$ 1-alpha = P((1+c^*)M_n< theta)= (1+c^*)^{-n},$$ so this gives $$ c^* = (1-alpha)^{-1/n}-1,$$ which is a good deal smaller than the $c^*$ derived above for an upper bound.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • sorry, but what do you mean with CI?
            – Jazmín Jones
            Nov 21 at 5:41










          • @JazmínJones I mean confidence interval. Perhaps I misinterpreted the problem
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:43












          • @JazmínJones I edited in what I think is an answer to the problem. My interpretation is that you want to know how far above $M_n$ we can go while still having $ge 95%$ confidence that $theta$ is larger than this value. (My initial answer gives an upper bound instead.)
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:58

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          The maximum is a sufficient statistic here, so a good choice for a test statistic for your CI. (However I'm not sure what you mean with the $(1/a^n-1/b^n)$... it may just be terminology I'm not aware of).



          To get a CI we need to first find the distribution of the test statistic: $$ P(M_nle m) = P(Xle m)^n = (m/theta)^n.$$ Intuitively, we know the $theta>M_n$ so it makes sense to set the lower bound of the CI to be $M_n$ and then let the upper end of the interval be $M_n(1+c^*)$ for some choice of $c^*.$ (Note as always there is no unique confidence interval and this is just a sensible and convenient choice). Then we can choose $c^*$ so we have $1-alpha$ coverage (where $alpha=0.05)$: $$ 1-alpha=P(theta < (1+c^*)M_n) = 1- Pleft(M_nle frac{theta}{1+c^*}right)= 1-(1+c^*)^{-n}$$ which gives $$ c^* = alpha^{-1/n}-1$$



          EDIT



          It appears I misinterpreted the problem here. If we want a lower bound that has $1-alpha$ confidence (i.e. a minimal statistic $x$ such that $P(theta>x) le 1-alpha$) then we can choose $x=(1+c^*)M_n$ and choose $c^*$ such that $$ 1-alpha = P((1+c^*)M_n< theta)= (1+c^*)^{-n},$$ so this gives $$ c^* = (1-alpha)^{-1/n}-1,$$ which is a good deal smaller than the $c^*$ derived above for an upper bound.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • sorry, but what do you mean with CI?
            – Jazmín Jones
            Nov 21 at 5:41










          • @JazmínJones I mean confidence interval. Perhaps I misinterpreted the problem
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:43












          • @JazmínJones I edited in what I think is an answer to the problem. My interpretation is that you want to know how far above $M_n$ we can go while still having $ge 95%$ confidence that $theta$ is larger than this value. (My initial answer gives an upper bound instead.)
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:58















          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          The maximum is a sufficient statistic here, so a good choice for a test statistic for your CI. (However I'm not sure what you mean with the $(1/a^n-1/b^n)$... it may just be terminology I'm not aware of).



          To get a CI we need to first find the distribution of the test statistic: $$ P(M_nle m) = P(Xle m)^n = (m/theta)^n.$$ Intuitively, we know the $theta>M_n$ so it makes sense to set the lower bound of the CI to be $M_n$ and then let the upper end of the interval be $M_n(1+c^*)$ for some choice of $c^*.$ (Note as always there is no unique confidence interval and this is just a sensible and convenient choice). Then we can choose $c^*$ so we have $1-alpha$ coverage (where $alpha=0.05)$: $$ 1-alpha=P(theta < (1+c^*)M_n) = 1- Pleft(M_nle frac{theta}{1+c^*}right)= 1-(1+c^*)^{-n}$$ which gives $$ c^* = alpha^{-1/n}-1$$



          EDIT



          It appears I misinterpreted the problem here. If we want a lower bound that has $1-alpha$ confidence (i.e. a minimal statistic $x$ such that $P(theta>x) le 1-alpha$) then we can choose $x=(1+c^*)M_n$ and choose $c^*$ such that $$ 1-alpha = P((1+c^*)M_n< theta)= (1+c^*)^{-n},$$ so this gives $$ c^* = (1-alpha)^{-1/n}-1,$$ which is a good deal smaller than the $c^*$ derived above for an upper bound.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          The maximum is a sufficient statistic here, so a good choice for a test statistic for your CI. (However I'm not sure what you mean with the $(1/a^n-1/b^n)$... it may just be terminology I'm not aware of).



          To get a CI we need to first find the distribution of the test statistic: $$ P(M_nle m) = P(Xle m)^n = (m/theta)^n.$$ Intuitively, we know the $theta>M_n$ so it makes sense to set the lower bound of the CI to be $M_n$ and then let the upper end of the interval be $M_n(1+c^*)$ for some choice of $c^*.$ (Note as always there is no unique confidence interval and this is just a sensible and convenient choice). Then we can choose $c^*$ so we have $1-alpha$ coverage (where $alpha=0.05)$: $$ 1-alpha=P(theta < (1+c^*)M_n) = 1- Pleft(M_nle frac{theta}{1+c^*}right)= 1-(1+c^*)^{-n}$$ which gives $$ c^* = alpha^{-1/n}-1$$



          EDIT



          It appears I misinterpreted the problem here. If we want a lower bound that has $1-alpha$ confidence (i.e. a minimal statistic $x$ such that $P(theta>x) le 1-alpha$) then we can choose $x=(1+c^*)M_n$ and choose $c^*$ such that $$ 1-alpha = P((1+c^*)M_n< theta)= (1+c^*)^{-n},$$ so this gives $$ c^* = (1-alpha)^{-1/n}-1,$$ which is a good deal smaller than the $c^*$ derived above for an upper bound.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 21 at 5:53

























          answered Nov 21 at 5:35









          spaceisdarkgreen

          32k21652




          32k21652












          • sorry, but what do you mean with CI?
            – Jazmín Jones
            Nov 21 at 5:41










          • @JazmínJones I mean confidence interval. Perhaps I misinterpreted the problem
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:43












          • @JazmínJones I edited in what I think is an answer to the problem. My interpretation is that you want to know how far above $M_n$ we can go while still having $ge 95%$ confidence that $theta$ is larger than this value. (My initial answer gives an upper bound instead.)
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:58




















          • sorry, but what do you mean with CI?
            – Jazmín Jones
            Nov 21 at 5:41










          • @JazmínJones I mean confidence interval. Perhaps I misinterpreted the problem
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:43












          • @JazmínJones I edited in what I think is an answer to the problem. My interpretation is that you want to know how far above $M_n$ we can go while still having $ge 95%$ confidence that $theta$ is larger than this value. (My initial answer gives an upper bound instead.)
            – spaceisdarkgreen
            Nov 21 at 5:58


















          sorry, but what do you mean with CI?
          – Jazmín Jones
          Nov 21 at 5:41




          sorry, but what do you mean with CI?
          – Jazmín Jones
          Nov 21 at 5:41












          @JazmínJones I mean confidence interval. Perhaps I misinterpreted the problem
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 21 at 5:43






          @JazmínJones I mean confidence interval. Perhaps I misinterpreted the problem
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 21 at 5:43














          @JazmínJones I edited in what I think is an answer to the problem. My interpretation is that you want to know how far above $M_n$ we can go while still having $ge 95%$ confidence that $theta$ is larger than this value. (My initial answer gives an upper bound instead.)
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 21 at 5:58






          @JazmínJones I edited in what I think is an answer to the problem. My interpretation is that you want to know how far above $M_n$ we can go while still having $ge 95%$ confidence that $theta$ is larger than this value. (My initial answer gives an upper bound instead.)
          – spaceisdarkgreen
          Nov 21 at 5:58




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007270%2ffind-a-lower-bound-of-95-confidence-for-%25ce%25b8-of-u0-%25ce%25b8-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa