Sum letters are not two different












10












$begingroup$


The following letters all have something in common which may not be obvious at a first glance:



A B D H P


No other letters share this attribute.



Hint




There are no misspellings or typos in the title of this question. Maybe a clue though.




More hints may follow if the question is not answered.



Some great answers so far all of which I have upvoted but none of which are exactly what I am looking for.



Hint 2




The number 0 and the character ( also have the same property. I only said no other letters share it ;-)




Hint 3




As correctly identified by @RedBaron the ASCII table is key here. There is a good reason why "sum" is mentioned in the title and there are two reasons why "two" is mentioned.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure B shouldn't be included too?
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    Apr 18 at 9:18










  • $begingroup$
    @Deusovi You are indeed correct. I had missed that. I'll update the question. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 9:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does a ! also share this property?
    $endgroup$
    – Eagle
    Apr 18 at 12:04










  • $begingroup$
    @Akari Yes it does. I have not listed them all.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:06
















10












$begingroup$


The following letters all have something in common which may not be obvious at a first glance:



A B D H P


No other letters share this attribute.



Hint




There are no misspellings or typos in the title of this question. Maybe a clue though.




More hints may follow if the question is not answered.



Some great answers so far all of which I have upvoted but none of which are exactly what I am looking for.



Hint 2




The number 0 and the character ( also have the same property. I only said no other letters share it ;-)




Hint 3




As correctly identified by @RedBaron the ASCII table is key here. There is a good reason why "sum" is mentioned in the title and there are two reasons why "two" is mentioned.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure B shouldn't be included too?
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    Apr 18 at 9:18










  • $begingroup$
    @Deusovi You are indeed correct. I had missed that. I'll update the question. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 9:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does a ! also share this property?
    $endgroup$
    – Eagle
    Apr 18 at 12:04










  • $begingroup$
    @Akari Yes it does. I have not listed them all.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:06














10












10








10





$begingroup$


The following letters all have something in common which may not be obvious at a first glance:



A B D H P


No other letters share this attribute.



Hint




There are no misspellings or typos in the title of this question. Maybe a clue though.




More hints may follow if the question is not answered.



Some great answers so far all of which I have upvoted but none of which are exactly what I am looking for.



Hint 2




The number 0 and the character ( also have the same property. I only said no other letters share it ;-)




Hint 3




As correctly identified by @RedBaron the ASCII table is key here. There is a good reason why "sum" is mentioned in the title and there are two reasons why "two" is mentioned.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The following letters all have something in common which may not be obvious at a first glance:



A B D H P


No other letters share this attribute.



Hint




There are no misspellings or typos in the title of this question. Maybe a clue though.




More hints may follow if the question is not answered.



Some great answers so far all of which I have upvoted but none of which are exactly what I am looking for.



Hint 2




The number 0 and the character ( also have the same property. I only said no other letters share it ;-)




Hint 3




As correctly identified by @RedBaron the ASCII table is key here. There is a good reason why "sum" is mentioned in the title and there are two reasons why "two" is mentioned.








logical-deduction pattern






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 18 at 12:23







ElPedro

















asked Apr 18 at 8:22









ElPedroElPedro

303210




303210








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure B shouldn't be included too?
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    Apr 18 at 9:18










  • $begingroup$
    @Deusovi You are indeed correct. I had missed that. I'll update the question. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 9:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does a ! also share this property?
    $endgroup$
    – Eagle
    Apr 18 at 12:04










  • $begingroup$
    @Akari Yes it does. I have not listed them all.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:06














  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure B shouldn't be included too?
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    Apr 18 at 9:18










  • $begingroup$
    @Deusovi You are indeed correct. I had missed that. I'll update the question. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 9:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does a ! also share this property?
    $endgroup$
    – Eagle
    Apr 18 at 12:04










  • $begingroup$
    @Akari Yes it does. I have not listed them all.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:06








5




5




$begingroup$
Are you sure B shouldn't be included too?
$endgroup$
– Deusovi
Apr 18 at 9:18




$begingroup$
Are you sure B shouldn't be included too?
$endgroup$
– Deusovi
Apr 18 at 9:18












$begingroup$
@Deusovi You are indeed correct. I had missed that. I'll update the question. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– ElPedro
Apr 18 at 9:19




$begingroup$
@Deusovi You are indeed correct. I had missed that. I'll update the question. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– ElPedro
Apr 18 at 9:19




1




1




$begingroup$
Does a ! also share this property?
$endgroup$
– Eagle
Apr 18 at 12:04




$begingroup$
Does a ! also share this property?
$endgroup$
– Eagle
Apr 18 at 12:04












$begingroup$
@Akari Yes it does. I have not listed them all.
$endgroup$
– ElPedro
Apr 18 at 12:06




$begingroup$
@Akari Yes it does. I have not listed them all.
$endgroup$
– ElPedro
Apr 18 at 12:06










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

The property seems to be related to:




Binary equivalents of the symbols/alphabets etc.




Explanation:




Binary equivalents for the following can be written as:

A -- 01000001

B -- 01000010

D -- 01000100

H -- 01001000

P -- 01010000

0 -- 00110000

( -- 00101000




So the property is,




The sum of digits in the binary equivalents is two




Or




The binary equivalents of all these have two 1s and six 0s.
Looking at the binary equivalents of the alphabets, one can see that no other alphabets share this property




The title (Thanks to @trolley813):




Two might refer to the sum of the digits, which is indeed two!
Title might mean that the sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [but is equal to two]






Old (and wrong) answer



The property is:




The index if each alphabet is equal to the sum of indices of the preceding alphabets in the sequence +1.




And,




There is no other alphabet with the index 1+2+4+8+16+1 = 32







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've got it. Binary was what I was looking for but there are some other interesting patterns came out of this puzzle. I have added another hint in case anyone wants to have a go without looking at your answer. For the same reason, I'll wait a couple of hours before I accept it. well done!
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Eagle Some refinement about the title, it probably should read "sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [i.e. equals to 2]"
    $endgroup$
    – trolley813
    Apr 19 at 10:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot @trolley813 ! I've edited it
    $endgroup$
    – Eagle
    Apr 19 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @trolley813 - Close but actually more of a play on words. Rot13(Fhz (Fbzr) yrggref ner abg gjb (gbb) qvssrerag) with Rot13(Fhz) and Rot13(gjb) giving clues to what I was looking for ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 19 at 14:51












  • $begingroup$
    A bit contrived, I know, but left room for a couple of hints.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 19 at 14:58



















19












$begingroup$

The property is that




each of their alphanumeric values (A=1, B=2, C=3...) is a power of 2.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That wasn't what I was looking for but is indeed true and is possibly a side effect of the answer that I was looking for so +1 but I won't mark it as accepted yet.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 9:23








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ElPedro: It is a side effect, but it hinges on rot13(jurer gur nycunorg fgnegf ba gur NFPVV gnoyr. Vtaber gur svefg ovg bs gur NFPVV inyhr (orpnhfr vg vf nyjnlf 1 naq arire punatrf sebz N gb M), ohg QB erzrzore gung vg nyjnlf pbagevohgrf gb bar bs gur gjb 1-ovgf va lbhe vagraqrq nafjre. Vtabevat gur svefg ovg, N rssrpgviryl fgnegf ng ahzrevpny inyhr 1, naq rirel "cbjre bs gjb" yrggre nqqf rknpgyl 1 1-ovg gb gur pbhag, juvpu rkcynvaf jul obgu nafjref ner pbeerpg. Vs N unq fgnegrq ba n qvssrerag NFPVV inyhr, vg znl abg unir orra gur pnfr.)
    $endgroup$
    – Flater
    Apr 19 at 8:21












  • $begingroup$
    @Flater - Thanks for the explanation. It makes complete sense. As I said, some pretty interesting things have come out of what I at first though was a pretty simple puzzle :)
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 19 at 14:43



















8












$begingroup$

Is it




All the letters, symbols in this group have ASCII codes of form $2^m + 2^n$ where m and n are integers




Thus we have




From ascii code table,
$A = 65 = 64 + 1 = 2^6 + 2^0$
$B = 66 = 64 + 2 = 2^6 + 2^1$
$D = 68 = 64 + 4 = 2^6 + 2^2$
$H = 72 = 64 + 8 = 2^6 + 2^3$
$P = 80 = 64 + 16 = 2^6 + 2^4$




Other letters don't share this property because




64 + 32 = 96 which does not correspond to any letter. The letter a begins at 97




For the newer hints




$0 = 48 = 32 + 16 = 2^5 + 2^4$
$( = 40 = 32 + 8 = 2^5 + 2^3$







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Obviously moving in the right direction with the ASCII table.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:20






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @ElPedro I guess Akari has formalized the informal property of my answer much better in his answer
    $endgroup$
    – RedBaron
    Apr 18 at 12:22








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Still a good answer though :)
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I like the format of this answer more than the accepted one, simply because that's how I internally rephrased the accepted answer before even reading this one :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Flater
    Apr 19 at 8:24



















6












$begingroup$

I think it's:




Each letter's alphanumeric value is double its predecessor, which also means, sum two times the alphanumeric value of the previous letter




This means that:




Starting from A=1 we get the sequence 1,2,4,8,16,... which corresponds to the sequence A,B,D,H,P







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Saeleas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome! Again, a great answer but not exactly what I am looking for. +1 all the same.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:14



















5












$begingroup$


Each time you add the position of the letter (A is 1 and B is 2), the next letter's position is the sum of the previous +1.
Thus, 1+2 is 3, +4 is 7, +8 is 15, +16 is 31. You can't continue the problem because there are only 26 letters in the alphabet.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




CStafford-14 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81925%2fsum-letters-are-not-two-different%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11












    $begingroup$

    The property seems to be related to:




    Binary equivalents of the symbols/alphabets etc.




    Explanation:




    Binary equivalents for the following can be written as:

    A -- 01000001

    B -- 01000010

    D -- 01000100

    H -- 01001000

    P -- 01010000

    0 -- 00110000

    ( -- 00101000




    So the property is,




    The sum of digits in the binary equivalents is two




    Or




    The binary equivalents of all these have two 1s and six 0s.
    Looking at the binary equivalents of the alphabets, one can see that no other alphabets share this property




    The title (Thanks to @trolley813):




    Two might refer to the sum of the digits, which is indeed two!
    Title might mean that the sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [but is equal to two]






    Old (and wrong) answer



    The property is:




    The index if each alphabet is equal to the sum of indices of the preceding alphabets in the sequence +1.




    And,




    There is no other alphabet with the index 1+2+4+8+16+1 = 32







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You've got it. Binary was what I was looking for but there are some other interesting patterns came out of this puzzle. I have added another hint in case anyone wants to have a go without looking at your answer. For the same reason, I'll wait a couple of hours before I accept it. well done!
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:26






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Eagle Some refinement about the title, it probably should read "sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [i.e. equals to 2]"
      $endgroup$
      – trolley813
      Apr 19 at 10:03






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thanks a lot @trolley813 ! I've edited it
      $endgroup$
      – Eagle
      Apr 19 at 11:15










    • $begingroup$
      @trolley813 - Close but actually more of a play on words. Rot13(Fhz (Fbzr) yrggref ner abg gjb (gbb) qvssrerag) with Rot13(Fhz) and Rot13(gjb) giving clues to what I was looking for ;-)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:51












    • $begingroup$
      A bit contrived, I know, but left room for a couple of hints.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:58
















    11












    $begingroup$

    The property seems to be related to:




    Binary equivalents of the symbols/alphabets etc.




    Explanation:




    Binary equivalents for the following can be written as:

    A -- 01000001

    B -- 01000010

    D -- 01000100

    H -- 01001000

    P -- 01010000

    0 -- 00110000

    ( -- 00101000




    So the property is,




    The sum of digits in the binary equivalents is two




    Or




    The binary equivalents of all these have two 1s and six 0s.
    Looking at the binary equivalents of the alphabets, one can see that no other alphabets share this property




    The title (Thanks to @trolley813):




    Two might refer to the sum of the digits, which is indeed two!
    Title might mean that the sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [but is equal to two]






    Old (and wrong) answer



    The property is:




    The index if each alphabet is equal to the sum of indices of the preceding alphabets in the sequence +1.




    And,




    There is no other alphabet with the index 1+2+4+8+16+1 = 32







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You've got it. Binary was what I was looking for but there are some other interesting patterns came out of this puzzle. I have added another hint in case anyone wants to have a go without looking at your answer. For the same reason, I'll wait a couple of hours before I accept it. well done!
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:26






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Eagle Some refinement about the title, it probably should read "sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [i.e. equals to 2]"
      $endgroup$
      – trolley813
      Apr 19 at 10:03






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thanks a lot @trolley813 ! I've edited it
      $endgroup$
      – Eagle
      Apr 19 at 11:15










    • $begingroup$
      @trolley813 - Close but actually more of a play on words. Rot13(Fhz (Fbzr) yrggref ner abg gjb (gbb) qvssrerag) with Rot13(Fhz) and Rot13(gjb) giving clues to what I was looking for ;-)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:51












    • $begingroup$
      A bit contrived, I know, but left room for a couple of hints.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:58














    11












    11








    11





    $begingroup$

    The property seems to be related to:




    Binary equivalents of the symbols/alphabets etc.




    Explanation:




    Binary equivalents for the following can be written as:

    A -- 01000001

    B -- 01000010

    D -- 01000100

    H -- 01001000

    P -- 01010000

    0 -- 00110000

    ( -- 00101000




    So the property is,




    The sum of digits in the binary equivalents is two




    Or




    The binary equivalents of all these have two 1s and six 0s.
    Looking at the binary equivalents of the alphabets, one can see that no other alphabets share this property




    The title (Thanks to @trolley813):




    Two might refer to the sum of the digits, which is indeed two!
    Title might mean that the sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [but is equal to two]






    Old (and wrong) answer



    The property is:




    The index if each alphabet is equal to the sum of indices of the preceding alphabets in the sequence +1.




    And,




    There is no other alphabet with the index 1+2+4+8+16+1 = 32







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The property seems to be related to:




    Binary equivalents of the symbols/alphabets etc.




    Explanation:




    Binary equivalents for the following can be written as:

    A -- 01000001

    B -- 01000010

    D -- 01000100

    H -- 01001000

    P -- 01010000

    0 -- 00110000

    ( -- 00101000




    So the property is,




    The sum of digits in the binary equivalents is two




    Or




    The binary equivalents of all these have two 1s and six 0s.
    Looking at the binary equivalents of the alphabets, one can see that no other alphabets share this property




    The title (Thanks to @trolley813):




    Two might refer to the sum of the digits, which is indeed two!
    Title might mean that the sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [but is equal to two]






    Old (and wrong) answer



    The property is:




    The index if each alphabet is equal to the sum of indices of the preceding alphabets in the sequence +1.




    And,




    There is no other alphabet with the index 1+2+4+8+16+1 = 32








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 19 at 11:15

























    answered Apr 18 at 9:49









    EagleEagle

    718226




    718226








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You've got it. Binary was what I was looking for but there are some other interesting patterns came out of this puzzle. I have added another hint in case anyone wants to have a go without looking at your answer. For the same reason, I'll wait a couple of hours before I accept it. well done!
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:26






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Eagle Some refinement about the title, it probably should read "sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [i.e. equals to 2]"
      $endgroup$
      – trolley813
      Apr 19 at 10:03






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thanks a lot @trolley813 ! I've edited it
      $endgroup$
      – Eagle
      Apr 19 at 11:15










    • $begingroup$
      @trolley813 - Close but actually more of a play on words. Rot13(Fhz (Fbzr) yrggref ner abg gjb (gbb) qvssrerag) with Rot13(Fhz) and Rot13(gjb) giving clues to what I was looking for ;-)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:51












    • $begingroup$
      A bit contrived, I know, but left room for a couple of hints.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:58














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You've got it. Binary was what I was looking for but there are some other interesting patterns came out of this puzzle. I have added another hint in case anyone wants to have a go without looking at your answer. For the same reason, I'll wait a couple of hours before I accept it. well done!
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:26






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Eagle Some refinement about the title, it probably should read "sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [i.e. equals to 2]"
      $endgroup$
      – trolley813
      Apr 19 at 10:03






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thanks a lot @trolley813 ! I've edited it
      $endgroup$
      – Eagle
      Apr 19 at 11:15










    • $begingroup$
      @trolley813 - Close but actually more of a play on words. Rot13(Fhz (Fbzr) yrggref ner abg gjb (gbb) qvssrerag) with Rot13(Fhz) and Rot13(gjb) giving clues to what I was looking for ;-)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:51












    • $begingroup$
      A bit contrived, I know, but left room for a couple of hints.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:58








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    You've got it. Binary was what I was looking for but there are some other interesting patterns came out of this puzzle. I have added another hint in case anyone wants to have a go without looking at your answer. For the same reason, I'll wait a couple of hours before I accept it. well done!
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:26




    $begingroup$
    You've got it. Binary was what I was looking for but there are some other interesting patterns came out of this puzzle. I have added another hint in case anyone wants to have a go without looking at your answer. For the same reason, I'll wait a couple of hours before I accept it. well done!
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:26




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Eagle Some refinement about the title, it probably should read "sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [i.e. equals to 2]"
    $endgroup$
    – trolley813
    Apr 19 at 10:03




    $begingroup$
    @Eagle Some refinement about the title, it probably should read "sum [of digits in] letters is not different from two [i.e. equals to 2]"
    $endgroup$
    – trolley813
    Apr 19 at 10:03




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot @trolley813 ! I've edited it
    $endgroup$
    – Eagle
    Apr 19 at 11:15




    $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot @trolley813 ! I've edited it
    $endgroup$
    – Eagle
    Apr 19 at 11:15












    $begingroup$
    @trolley813 - Close but actually more of a play on words. Rot13(Fhz (Fbzr) yrggref ner abg gjb (gbb) qvssrerag) with Rot13(Fhz) and Rot13(gjb) giving clues to what I was looking for ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 19 at 14:51






    $begingroup$
    @trolley813 - Close but actually more of a play on words. Rot13(Fhz (Fbzr) yrggref ner abg gjb (gbb) qvssrerag) with Rot13(Fhz) and Rot13(gjb) giving clues to what I was looking for ;-)
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 19 at 14:51














    $begingroup$
    A bit contrived, I know, but left room for a couple of hints.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 19 at 14:58




    $begingroup$
    A bit contrived, I know, but left room for a couple of hints.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 19 at 14:58











    19












    $begingroup$

    The property is that




    each of their alphanumeric values (A=1, B=2, C=3...) is a power of 2.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      That wasn't what I was looking for but is indeed true and is possibly a side effect of the answer that I was looking for so +1 but I won't mark it as accepted yet.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 9:23








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ElPedro: It is a side effect, but it hinges on rot13(jurer gur nycunorg fgnegf ba gur NFPVV gnoyr. Vtaber gur svefg ovg bs gur NFPVV inyhr (orpnhfr vg vf nyjnlf 1 naq arire punatrf sebz N gb M), ohg QB erzrzore gung vg nyjnlf pbagevohgrf gb bar bs gur gjb 1-ovgf va lbhe vagraqrq nafjre. Vtabevat gur svefg ovg, N rssrpgviryl fgnegf ng ahzrevpny inyhr 1, naq rirel "cbjre bs gjb" yrggre nqqf rknpgyl 1 1-ovg gb gur pbhag, juvpu rkcynvaf jul obgu nafjref ner pbeerpg. Vs N unq fgnegrq ba n qvssrerag NFPVV inyhr, vg znl abg unir orra gur pnfr.)
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      Apr 19 at 8:21












    • $begingroup$
      @Flater - Thanks for the explanation. It makes complete sense. As I said, some pretty interesting things have come out of what I at first though was a pretty simple puzzle :)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:43
















    19












    $begingroup$

    The property is that




    each of their alphanumeric values (A=1, B=2, C=3...) is a power of 2.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      That wasn't what I was looking for but is indeed true and is possibly a side effect of the answer that I was looking for so +1 but I won't mark it as accepted yet.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 9:23








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ElPedro: It is a side effect, but it hinges on rot13(jurer gur nycunorg fgnegf ba gur NFPVV gnoyr. Vtaber gur svefg ovg bs gur NFPVV inyhr (orpnhfr vg vf nyjnlf 1 naq arire punatrf sebz N gb M), ohg QB erzrzore gung vg nyjnlf pbagevohgrf gb bar bs gur gjb 1-ovgf va lbhe vagraqrq nafjre. Vtabevat gur svefg ovg, N rssrpgviryl fgnegf ng ahzrevpny inyhr 1, naq rirel "cbjre bs gjb" yrggre nqqf rknpgyl 1 1-ovg gb gur pbhag, juvpu rkcynvaf jul obgu nafjref ner pbeerpg. Vs N unq fgnegrq ba n qvssrerag NFPVV inyhr, vg znl abg unir orra gur pnfr.)
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      Apr 19 at 8:21












    • $begingroup$
      @Flater - Thanks for the explanation. It makes complete sense. As I said, some pretty interesting things have come out of what I at first though was a pretty simple puzzle :)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:43














    19












    19








    19





    $begingroup$

    The property is that




    each of their alphanumeric values (A=1, B=2, C=3...) is a power of 2.







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The property is that




    each of their alphanumeric values (A=1, B=2, C=3...) is a power of 2.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 18 at 9:20









    DeusoviDeusovi

    63.3k6216273




    63.3k6216273








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      That wasn't what I was looking for but is indeed true and is possibly a side effect of the answer that I was looking for so +1 but I won't mark it as accepted yet.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 9:23








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ElPedro: It is a side effect, but it hinges on rot13(jurer gur nycunorg fgnegf ba gur NFPVV gnoyr. Vtaber gur svefg ovg bs gur NFPVV inyhr (orpnhfr vg vf nyjnlf 1 naq arire punatrf sebz N gb M), ohg QB erzrzore gung vg nyjnlf pbagevohgrf gb bar bs gur gjb 1-ovgf va lbhe vagraqrq nafjre. Vtabevat gur svefg ovg, N rssrpgviryl fgnegf ng ahzrevpny inyhr 1, naq rirel "cbjre bs gjb" yrggre nqqf rknpgyl 1 1-ovg gb gur pbhag, juvpu rkcynvaf jul obgu nafjref ner pbeerpg. Vs N unq fgnegrq ba n qvssrerag NFPVV inyhr, vg znl abg unir orra gur pnfr.)
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      Apr 19 at 8:21












    • $begingroup$
      @Flater - Thanks for the explanation. It makes complete sense. As I said, some pretty interesting things have come out of what I at first though was a pretty simple puzzle :)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:43














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      That wasn't what I was looking for but is indeed true and is possibly a side effect of the answer that I was looking for so +1 but I won't mark it as accepted yet.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 9:23








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ElPedro: It is a side effect, but it hinges on rot13(jurer gur nycunorg fgnegf ba gur NFPVV gnoyr. Vtaber gur svefg ovg bs gur NFPVV inyhr (orpnhfr vg vf nyjnlf 1 naq arire punatrf sebz N gb M), ohg QB erzrzore gung vg nyjnlf pbagevohgrf gb bar bs gur gjb 1-ovgf va lbhe vagraqrq nafjre. Vtabevat gur svefg ovg, N rssrpgviryl fgnegf ng ahzrevpny inyhr 1, naq rirel "cbjre bs gjb" yrggre nqqf rknpgyl 1 1-ovg gb gur pbhag, juvpu rkcynvaf jul obgu nafjref ner pbeerpg. Vs N unq fgnegrq ba n qvssrerag NFPVV inyhr, vg znl abg unir orra gur pnfr.)
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      Apr 19 at 8:21












    • $begingroup$
      @Flater - Thanks for the explanation. It makes complete sense. As I said, some pretty interesting things have come out of what I at first though was a pretty simple puzzle :)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 19 at 14:43








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    That wasn't what I was looking for but is indeed true and is possibly a side effect of the answer that I was looking for so +1 but I won't mark it as accepted yet.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 9:23






    $begingroup$
    That wasn't what I was looking for but is indeed true and is possibly a side effect of the answer that I was looking for so +1 but I won't mark it as accepted yet.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 9:23






    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @ElPedro: It is a side effect, but it hinges on rot13(jurer gur nycunorg fgnegf ba gur NFPVV gnoyr. Vtaber gur svefg ovg bs gur NFPVV inyhr (orpnhfr vg vf nyjnlf 1 naq arire punatrf sebz N gb M), ohg QB erzrzore gung vg nyjnlf pbagevohgrf gb bar bs gur gjb 1-ovgf va lbhe vagraqrq nafjre. Vtabevat gur svefg ovg, N rssrpgviryl fgnegf ng ahzrevpny inyhr 1, naq rirel "cbjre bs gjb" yrggre nqqf rknpgyl 1 1-ovg gb gur pbhag, juvpu rkcynvaf jul obgu nafjref ner pbeerpg. Vs N unq fgnegrq ba n qvssrerag NFPVV inyhr, vg znl abg unir orra gur pnfr.)
    $endgroup$
    – Flater
    Apr 19 at 8:21






    $begingroup$
    @ElPedro: It is a side effect, but it hinges on rot13(jurer gur nycunorg fgnegf ba gur NFPVV gnoyr. Vtaber gur svefg ovg bs gur NFPVV inyhr (orpnhfr vg vf nyjnlf 1 naq arire punatrf sebz N gb M), ohg QB erzrzore gung vg nyjnlf pbagevohgrf gb bar bs gur gjb 1-ovgf va lbhe vagraqrq nafjre. Vtabevat gur svefg ovg, N rssrpgviryl fgnegf ng ahzrevpny inyhr 1, naq rirel "cbjre bs gjb" yrggre nqqf rknpgyl 1 1-ovg gb gur pbhag, juvpu rkcynvaf jul obgu nafjref ner pbeerpg. Vs N unq fgnegrq ba n qvssrerag NFPVV inyhr, vg znl abg unir orra gur pnfr.)
    $endgroup$
    – Flater
    Apr 19 at 8:21














    $begingroup$
    @Flater - Thanks for the explanation. It makes complete sense. As I said, some pretty interesting things have come out of what I at first though was a pretty simple puzzle :)
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 19 at 14:43




    $begingroup$
    @Flater - Thanks for the explanation. It makes complete sense. As I said, some pretty interesting things have come out of what I at first though was a pretty simple puzzle :)
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 19 at 14:43











    8












    $begingroup$

    Is it




    All the letters, symbols in this group have ASCII codes of form $2^m + 2^n$ where m and n are integers




    Thus we have




    From ascii code table,
    $A = 65 = 64 + 1 = 2^6 + 2^0$
    $B = 66 = 64 + 2 = 2^6 + 2^1$
    $D = 68 = 64 + 4 = 2^6 + 2^2$
    $H = 72 = 64 + 8 = 2^6 + 2^3$
    $P = 80 = 64 + 16 = 2^6 + 2^4$




    Other letters don't share this property because




    64 + 32 = 96 which does not correspond to any letter. The letter a begins at 97




    For the newer hints




    $0 = 48 = 32 + 16 = 2^5 + 2^4$
    $( = 40 = 32 + 8 = 2^5 + 2^3$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Obviously moving in the right direction with the ASCII table.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:20






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @ElPedro I guess Akari has formalized the informal property of my answer much better in his answer
      $endgroup$
      – RedBaron
      Apr 18 at 12:22








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Still a good answer though :)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:42






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I like the format of this answer more than the accepted one, simply because that's how I internally rephrased the accepted answer before even reading this one :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      Apr 19 at 8:24
















    8












    $begingroup$

    Is it




    All the letters, symbols in this group have ASCII codes of form $2^m + 2^n$ where m and n are integers




    Thus we have




    From ascii code table,
    $A = 65 = 64 + 1 = 2^6 + 2^0$
    $B = 66 = 64 + 2 = 2^6 + 2^1$
    $D = 68 = 64 + 4 = 2^6 + 2^2$
    $H = 72 = 64 + 8 = 2^6 + 2^3$
    $P = 80 = 64 + 16 = 2^6 + 2^4$




    Other letters don't share this property because




    64 + 32 = 96 which does not correspond to any letter. The letter a begins at 97




    For the newer hints




    $0 = 48 = 32 + 16 = 2^5 + 2^4$
    $( = 40 = 32 + 8 = 2^5 + 2^3$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Obviously moving in the right direction with the ASCII table.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:20






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @ElPedro I guess Akari has formalized the informal property of my answer much better in his answer
      $endgroup$
      – RedBaron
      Apr 18 at 12:22








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Still a good answer though :)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:42






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I like the format of this answer more than the accepted one, simply because that's how I internally rephrased the accepted answer before even reading this one :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      Apr 19 at 8:24














    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    Is it




    All the letters, symbols in this group have ASCII codes of form $2^m + 2^n$ where m and n are integers




    Thus we have




    From ascii code table,
    $A = 65 = 64 + 1 = 2^6 + 2^0$
    $B = 66 = 64 + 2 = 2^6 + 2^1$
    $D = 68 = 64 + 4 = 2^6 + 2^2$
    $H = 72 = 64 + 8 = 2^6 + 2^3$
    $P = 80 = 64 + 16 = 2^6 + 2^4$




    Other letters don't share this property because




    64 + 32 = 96 which does not correspond to any letter. The letter a begins at 97




    For the newer hints




    $0 = 48 = 32 + 16 = 2^5 + 2^4$
    $( = 40 = 32 + 8 = 2^5 + 2^3$







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Is it




    All the letters, symbols in this group have ASCII codes of form $2^m + 2^n$ where m and n are integers




    Thus we have




    From ascii code table,
    $A = 65 = 64 + 1 = 2^6 + 2^0$
    $B = 66 = 64 + 2 = 2^6 + 2^1$
    $D = 68 = 64 + 4 = 2^6 + 2^2$
    $H = 72 = 64 + 8 = 2^6 + 2^3$
    $P = 80 = 64 + 16 = 2^6 + 2^4$




    Other letters don't share this property because




    64 + 32 = 96 which does not correspond to any letter. The letter a begins at 97




    For the newer hints




    $0 = 48 = 32 + 16 = 2^5 + 2^4$
    $( = 40 = 32 + 8 = 2^5 + 2^3$








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 18 at 19:50









    Eagle

    718226




    718226










    answered Apr 18 at 12:15









    RedBaronRedBaron

    42636




    42636








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Obviously moving in the right direction with the ASCII table.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:20






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @ElPedro I guess Akari has formalized the informal property of my answer much better in his answer
      $endgroup$
      – RedBaron
      Apr 18 at 12:22








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Still a good answer though :)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:42






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I like the format of this answer more than the accepted one, simply because that's how I internally rephrased the accepted answer before even reading this one :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      Apr 19 at 8:24














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Obviously moving in the right direction with the ASCII table.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:20






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @ElPedro I guess Akari has formalized the informal property of my answer much better in his answer
      $endgroup$
      – RedBaron
      Apr 18 at 12:22








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Still a good answer though :)
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:42






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I like the format of this answer more than the accepted one, simply because that's how I internally rephrased the accepted answer before even reading this one :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Flater
      Apr 19 at 8:24








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Obviously moving in the right direction with the ASCII table.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:20




    $begingroup$
    Obviously moving in the right direction with the ASCII table.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:20




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    @ElPedro I guess Akari has formalized the informal property of my answer much better in his answer
    $endgroup$
    – RedBaron
    Apr 18 at 12:22






    $begingroup$
    @ElPedro I guess Akari has formalized the informal property of my answer much better in his answer
    $endgroup$
    – RedBaron
    Apr 18 at 12:22






    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Still a good answer though :)
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:42




    $begingroup$
    Still a good answer though :)
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:42




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I like the format of this answer more than the accepted one, simply because that's how I internally rephrased the accepted answer before even reading this one :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Flater
    Apr 19 at 8:24




    $begingroup$
    I like the format of this answer more than the accepted one, simply because that's how I internally rephrased the accepted answer before even reading this one :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Flater
    Apr 19 at 8:24











    6












    $begingroup$

    I think it's:




    Each letter's alphanumeric value is double its predecessor, which also means, sum two times the alphanumeric value of the previous letter




    This means that:




    Starting from A=1 we get the sequence 1,2,4,8,16,... which corresponds to the sequence A,B,D,H,P







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Saeleas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Welcome! Again, a great answer but not exactly what I am looking for. +1 all the same.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:14
















    6












    $begingroup$

    I think it's:




    Each letter's alphanumeric value is double its predecessor, which also means, sum two times the alphanumeric value of the previous letter




    This means that:




    Starting from A=1 we get the sequence 1,2,4,8,16,... which corresponds to the sequence A,B,D,H,P







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Saeleas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Welcome! Again, a great answer but not exactly what I am looking for. +1 all the same.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:14














    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    I think it's:




    Each letter's alphanumeric value is double its predecessor, which also means, sum two times the alphanumeric value of the previous letter




    This means that:




    Starting from A=1 we get the sequence 1,2,4,8,16,... which corresponds to the sequence A,B,D,H,P







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Saeleas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$



    I think it's:




    Each letter's alphanumeric value is double its predecessor, which also means, sum two times the alphanumeric value of the previous letter




    This means that:




    Starting from A=1 we get the sequence 1,2,4,8,16,... which corresponds to the sequence A,B,D,H,P








    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Saeleas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Saeleas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered Apr 18 at 9:58









    SaeleasSaeleas

    1612




    1612




    New contributor




    Saeleas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Saeleas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Saeleas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Welcome! Again, a great answer but not exactly what I am looking for. +1 all the same.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:14














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Welcome! Again, a great answer but not exactly what I am looking for. +1 all the same.
      $endgroup$
      – ElPedro
      Apr 18 at 12:14








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome! Again, a great answer but not exactly what I am looking for. +1 all the same.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:14




    $begingroup$
    Welcome! Again, a great answer but not exactly what I am looking for. +1 all the same.
    $endgroup$
    – ElPedro
    Apr 18 at 12:14











    5












    $begingroup$


    Each time you add the position of the letter (A is 1 and B is 2), the next letter's position is the sum of the previous +1.
    Thus, 1+2 is 3, +4 is 7, +8 is 15, +16 is 31. You can't continue the problem because there are only 26 letters in the alphabet.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    CStafford-14 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$


















      5












      $begingroup$


      Each time you add the position of the letter (A is 1 and B is 2), the next letter's position is the sum of the previous +1.
      Thus, 1+2 is 3, +4 is 7, +8 is 15, +16 is 31. You can't continue the problem because there are only 26 letters in the alphabet.







      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      CStafford-14 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$
















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$


        Each time you add the position of the letter (A is 1 and B is 2), the next letter's position is the sum of the previous +1.
        Thus, 1+2 is 3, +4 is 7, +8 is 15, +16 is 31. You can't continue the problem because there are only 26 letters in the alphabet.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        CStafford-14 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$




        Each time you add the position of the letter (A is 1 and B is 2), the next letter's position is the sum of the previous +1.
        Thus, 1+2 is 3, +4 is 7, +8 is 15, +16 is 31. You can't continue the problem because there are only 26 letters in the alphabet.








        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        CStafford-14 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        CStafford-14 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered Apr 18 at 11:41









        CStafford-14CStafford-14

        30710




        30710




        New contributor




        CStafford-14 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        CStafford-14 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        CStafford-14 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81925%2fsum-letters-are-not-two-different%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa