Finding sign of an angle without calculating the angle itself












0














Say we have an angle between vectors $P_1$ and $P_2$ in $mathbb R^2$ whose vertex, $O$, is at the origin. I would like to know the sign of the smallest signed angle between $P_1$ and $P_2$ such that $overrightarrow{O{P_1}}$ is rotated to become overlaid on $overrightarrow{O{P_2}}$. It is too computationally expensive for me to use trigonometric functions to calculate the angle itself and then find the sign. Is there a good way to do this?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Do you mean find the sine or the sign?
    – Seth
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:04










  • The sign as in positive or negative
    – rbjacob
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:06
















0














Say we have an angle between vectors $P_1$ and $P_2$ in $mathbb R^2$ whose vertex, $O$, is at the origin. I would like to know the sign of the smallest signed angle between $P_1$ and $P_2$ such that $overrightarrow{O{P_1}}$ is rotated to become overlaid on $overrightarrow{O{P_2}}$. It is too computationally expensive for me to use trigonometric functions to calculate the angle itself and then find the sign. Is there a good way to do this?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Do you mean find the sine or the sign?
    – Seth
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:04










  • The sign as in positive or negative
    – rbjacob
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:06














0












0








0







Say we have an angle between vectors $P_1$ and $P_2$ in $mathbb R^2$ whose vertex, $O$, is at the origin. I would like to know the sign of the smallest signed angle between $P_1$ and $P_2$ such that $overrightarrow{O{P_1}}$ is rotated to become overlaid on $overrightarrow{O{P_2}}$. It is too computationally expensive for me to use trigonometric functions to calculate the angle itself and then find the sign. Is there a good way to do this?










share|cite|improve this question















Say we have an angle between vectors $P_1$ and $P_2$ in $mathbb R^2$ whose vertex, $O$, is at the origin. I would like to know the sign of the smallest signed angle between $P_1$ and $P_2$ such that $overrightarrow{O{P_1}}$ is rotated to become overlaid on $overrightarrow{O{P_2}}$. It is too computationally expensive for me to use trigonometric functions to calculate the angle itself and then find the sign. Is there a good way to do this?







linear-algebra geometry rotations angle






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 26 '18 at 1:21









KReiser

9,31211435




9,31211435










asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:54









rbjacob

223




223












  • Do you mean find the sine or the sign?
    – Seth
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:04










  • The sign as in positive or negative
    – rbjacob
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:06


















  • Do you mean find the sine or the sign?
    – Seth
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:04










  • The sign as in positive or negative
    – rbjacob
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:06
















Do you mean find the sine or the sign?
– Seth
Nov 25 '18 at 23:04




Do you mean find the sine or the sign?
– Seth
Nov 25 '18 at 23:04












The sign as in positive or negative
– rbjacob
Nov 25 '18 at 23:06




The sign as in positive or negative
– rbjacob
Nov 25 '18 at 23:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Check the sign of the coefficient of $hat{k}$ of the cross product of both vectors.



For example, let $P_1=(5,0)$, $P_2=(-3,6)$ , $overrightarrow{OP_1}times overrightarrow{OP_2}=30hat{k}$, so it's a counterclockwise smallest turn. Switching both vectors will result in a negative coefficient for $hat{k}$, indicating a clockwise smallest turn.



Basically for $P_1(a,b), P_2(c,d)$, and turning from $overrightarrow{OP_1}$ to $overrightarrow{OP_2}$, you test sign of $ad-bc$ for the direction of smallest turn (positive for counterclockwise). In the case the result is $0$, either way is the same.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks, perfect
    – rbjacob
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:19






  • 1




    In other words, examine $det[P_1,P_2]$.
    – amd
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:56










  • @amd Thanks for the insight!
    – Lance
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:38











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013533%2ffinding-sign-of-an-angle-without-calculating-the-angle-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Check the sign of the coefficient of $hat{k}$ of the cross product of both vectors.



For example, let $P_1=(5,0)$, $P_2=(-3,6)$ , $overrightarrow{OP_1}times overrightarrow{OP_2}=30hat{k}$, so it's a counterclockwise smallest turn. Switching both vectors will result in a negative coefficient for $hat{k}$, indicating a clockwise smallest turn.



Basically for $P_1(a,b), P_2(c,d)$, and turning from $overrightarrow{OP_1}$ to $overrightarrow{OP_2}$, you test sign of $ad-bc$ for the direction of smallest turn (positive for counterclockwise). In the case the result is $0$, either way is the same.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks, perfect
    – rbjacob
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:19






  • 1




    In other words, examine $det[P_1,P_2]$.
    – amd
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:56










  • @amd Thanks for the insight!
    – Lance
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:38
















2














Check the sign of the coefficient of $hat{k}$ of the cross product of both vectors.



For example, let $P_1=(5,0)$, $P_2=(-3,6)$ , $overrightarrow{OP_1}times overrightarrow{OP_2}=30hat{k}$, so it's a counterclockwise smallest turn. Switching both vectors will result in a negative coefficient for $hat{k}$, indicating a clockwise smallest turn.



Basically for $P_1(a,b), P_2(c,d)$, and turning from $overrightarrow{OP_1}$ to $overrightarrow{OP_2}$, you test sign of $ad-bc$ for the direction of smallest turn (positive for counterclockwise). In the case the result is $0$, either way is the same.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks, perfect
    – rbjacob
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:19






  • 1




    In other words, examine $det[P_1,P_2]$.
    – amd
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:56










  • @amd Thanks for the insight!
    – Lance
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:38














2












2








2






Check the sign of the coefficient of $hat{k}$ of the cross product of both vectors.



For example, let $P_1=(5,0)$, $P_2=(-3,6)$ , $overrightarrow{OP_1}times overrightarrow{OP_2}=30hat{k}$, so it's a counterclockwise smallest turn. Switching both vectors will result in a negative coefficient for $hat{k}$, indicating a clockwise smallest turn.



Basically for $P_1(a,b), P_2(c,d)$, and turning from $overrightarrow{OP_1}$ to $overrightarrow{OP_2}$, you test sign of $ad-bc$ for the direction of smallest turn (positive for counterclockwise). In the case the result is $0$, either way is the same.






share|cite|improve this answer














Check the sign of the coefficient of $hat{k}$ of the cross product of both vectors.



For example, let $P_1=(5,0)$, $P_2=(-3,6)$ , $overrightarrow{OP_1}times overrightarrow{OP_2}=30hat{k}$, so it's a counterclockwise smallest turn. Switching both vectors will result in a negative coefficient for $hat{k}$, indicating a clockwise smallest turn.



Basically for $P_1(a,b), P_2(c,d)$, and turning from $overrightarrow{OP_1}$ to $overrightarrow{OP_2}$, you test sign of $ad-bc$ for the direction of smallest turn (positive for counterclockwise). In the case the result is $0$, either way is the same.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 25 '18 at 23:16

























answered Nov 25 '18 at 23:11









Lance

61229




61229












  • Thanks, perfect
    – rbjacob
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:19






  • 1




    In other words, examine $det[P_1,P_2]$.
    – amd
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:56










  • @amd Thanks for the insight!
    – Lance
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:38


















  • Thanks, perfect
    – rbjacob
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:19






  • 1




    In other words, examine $det[P_1,P_2]$.
    – amd
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:56










  • @amd Thanks for the insight!
    – Lance
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:38
















Thanks, perfect
– rbjacob
Nov 25 '18 at 23:19




Thanks, perfect
– rbjacob
Nov 25 '18 at 23:19




1




1




In other words, examine $det[P_1,P_2]$.
– amd
Nov 25 '18 at 23:56




In other words, examine $det[P_1,P_2]$.
– amd
Nov 25 '18 at 23:56












@amd Thanks for the insight!
– Lance
Nov 26 '18 at 0:38




@amd Thanks for the insight!
– Lance
Nov 26 '18 at 0:38


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013533%2ffinding-sign-of-an-angle-without-calculating-the-angle-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa