General solution of $sin 2x+cos x=0$












2















Solve the trigonometric equation $sin 2x+cos x=0$




My Attempt
$$
2sin xcos x+cos x=0impliescos x=0 text{ or }sin x=frac{-1}{2}=sinfrac{-pi}{6}\
x=(2n+1)frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=npi+(-1)^nfrac{-pi}{6}\
x=npi+frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=2npi-frac{pi}{6}text{ or }x=2npi+pi+frac{pi}{6}
$$

Reference
$$
cos x=-sin 2x=cosBig(frac{pi}{2}+2xBig)implies x=2npipmBig(frac{pi}{2}+2xBig)\
-x=2npi+frac{pi}{2}text{ or }3x=2npi-frac{pi}{2}implies x=2mpi-frac{pi}{2}text{ or }x=frac{2mpi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}
$$

But my reference gives the solution $x=2npi-dfrac{pi}{2}$ or $x=dfrac{2npi}{3}-dfrac{pi}{6}$. I understand how it is reached and both represent the same solutions. But, how do I derive the solution in my reference from what I found in my attempt ? i.e.,




How to derive
$$
bigg[x=npi+frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=2npi-frac{pi}{6}text{ or }x=2npi+pi+frac{pi}{6}bigg]\
implies bigg[x=2npi-dfrac{pi}{2}text{ or }x=dfrac{2npi}{3}-dfrac{pi}{6}bigg]
$$











share|cite|improve this question
























  • The solution is given essentially by 4 points on the trigonometric circle and we can represent those 4 points in many different ways. Your solution is equivalent to the given one because they both represent teh same set of points.
    – gimusi
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:47










  • You can obtain the opposite implication by taking $n = 3k$, $n = 3k + 1$, or $n = 3k + 2$ in the formula $x = frac{2npi}{3} - frac{pi}{6}$.
    – N. F. Taussig
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:57
















2















Solve the trigonometric equation $sin 2x+cos x=0$




My Attempt
$$
2sin xcos x+cos x=0impliescos x=0 text{ or }sin x=frac{-1}{2}=sinfrac{-pi}{6}\
x=(2n+1)frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=npi+(-1)^nfrac{-pi}{6}\
x=npi+frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=2npi-frac{pi}{6}text{ or }x=2npi+pi+frac{pi}{6}
$$

Reference
$$
cos x=-sin 2x=cosBig(frac{pi}{2}+2xBig)implies x=2npipmBig(frac{pi}{2}+2xBig)\
-x=2npi+frac{pi}{2}text{ or }3x=2npi-frac{pi}{2}implies x=2mpi-frac{pi}{2}text{ or }x=frac{2mpi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}
$$

But my reference gives the solution $x=2npi-dfrac{pi}{2}$ or $x=dfrac{2npi}{3}-dfrac{pi}{6}$. I understand how it is reached and both represent the same solutions. But, how do I derive the solution in my reference from what I found in my attempt ? i.e.,




How to derive
$$
bigg[x=npi+frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=2npi-frac{pi}{6}text{ or }x=2npi+pi+frac{pi}{6}bigg]\
implies bigg[x=2npi-dfrac{pi}{2}text{ or }x=dfrac{2npi}{3}-dfrac{pi}{6}bigg]
$$











share|cite|improve this question
























  • The solution is given essentially by 4 points on the trigonometric circle and we can represent those 4 points in many different ways. Your solution is equivalent to the given one because they both represent teh same set of points.
    – gimusi
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:47










  • You can obtain the opposite implication by taking $n = 3k$, $n = 3k + 1$, or $n = 3k + 2$ in the formula $x = frac{2npi}{3} - frac{pi}{6}$.
    – N. F. Taussig
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:57














2












2








2








Solve the trigonometric equation $sin 2x+cos x=0$




My Attempt
$$
2sin xcos x+cos x=0impliescos x=0 text{ or }sin x=frac{-1}{2}=sinfrac{-pi}{6}\
x=(2n+1)frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=npi+(-1)^nfrac{-pi}{6}\
x=npi+frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=2npi-frac{pi}{6}text{ or }x=2npi+pi+frac{pi}{6}
$$

Reference
$$
cos x=-sin 2x=cosBig(frac{pi}{2}+2xBig)implies x=2npipmBig(frac{pi}{2}+2xBig)\
-x=2npi+frac{pi}{2}text{ or }3x=2npi-frac{pi}{2}implies x=2mpi-frac{pi}{2}text{ or }x=frac{2mpi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}
$$

But my reference gives the solution $x=2npi-dfrac{pi}{2}$ or $x=dfrac{2npi}{3}-dfrac{pi}{6}$. I understand how it is reached and both represent the same solutions. But, how do I derive the solution in my reference from what I found in my attempt ? i.e.,




How to derive
$$
bigg[x=npi+frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=2npi-frac{pi}{6}text{ or }x=2npi+pi+frac{pi}{6}bigg]\
implies bigg[x=2npi-dfrac{pi}{2}text{ or }x=dfrac{2npi}{3}-dfrac{pi}{6}bigg]
$$











share|cite|improve this question
















Solve the trigonometric equation $sin 2x+cos x=0$




My Attempt
$$
2sin xcos x+cos x=0impliescos x=0 text{ or }sin x=frac{-1}{2}=sinfrac{-pi}{6}\
x=(2n+1)frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=npi+(-1)^nfrac{-pi}{6}\
x=npi+frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=2npi-frac{pi}{6}text{ or }x=2npi+pi+frac{pi}{6}
$$

Reference
$$
cos x=-sin 2x=cosBig(frac{pi}{2}+2xBig)implies x=2npipmBig(frac{pi}{2}+2xBig)\
-x=2npi+frac{pi}{2}text{ or }3x=2npi-frac{pi}{2}implies x=2mpi-frac{pi}{2}text{ or }x=frac{2mpi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}
$$

But my reference gives the solution $x=2npi-dfrac{pi}{2}$ or $x=dfrac{2npi}{3}-dfrac{pi}{6}$. I understand how it is reached and both represent the same solutions. But, how do I derive the solution in my reference from what I found in my attempt ? i.e.,




How to derive
$$
bigg[x=npi+frac{pi}{2} text{ or }x=2npi-frac{pi}{6}text{ or }x=2npi+pi+frac{pi}{6}bigg]\
implies bigg[x=2npi-dfrac{pi}{2}text{ or }x=dfrac{2npi}{3}-dfrac{pi}{6}bigg]
$$








trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 25 '18 at 23:41

























asked Nov 25 '18 at 23:20









ss1729

1,818723




1,818723












  • The solution is given essentially by 4 points on the trigonometric circle and we can represent those 4 points in many different ways. Your solution is equivalent to the given one because they both represent teh same set of points.
    – gimusi
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:47










  • You can obtain the opposite implication by taking $n = 3k$, $n = 3k + 1$, or $n = 3k + 2$ in the formula $x = frac{2npi}{3} - frac{pi}{6}$.
    – N. F. Taussig
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:57


















  • The solution is given essentially by 4 points on the trigonometric circle and we can represent those 4 points in many different ways. Your solution is equivalent to the given one because they both represent teh same set of points.
    – gimusi
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:47










  • You can obtain the opposite implication by taking $n = 3k$, $n = 3k + 1$, or $n = 3k + 2$ in the formula $x = frac{2npi}{3} - frac{pi}{6}$.
    – N. F. Taussig
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:57
















The solution is given essentially by 4 points on the trigonometric circle and we can represent those 4 points in many different ways. Your solution is equivalent to the given one because they both represent teh same set of points.
– gimusi
Nov 25 '18 at 23:47




The solution is given essentially by 4 points on the trigonometric circle and we can represent those 4 points in many different ways. Your solution is equivalent to the given one because they both represent teh same set of points.
– gimusi
Nov 25 '18 at 23:47












You can obtain the opposite implication by taking $n = 3k$, $n = 3k + 1$, or $n = 3k + 2$ in the formula $x = frac{2npi}{3} - frac{pi}{6}$.
– N. F. Taussig
Nov 25 '18 at 23:57




You can obtain the opposite implication by taking $n = 3k$, $n = 3k + 1$, or $n = 3k + 2$ in the formula $x = frac{2npi}{3} - frac{pi}{6}$.
– N. F. Taussig
Nov 25 '18 at 23:57










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2














There are two ways to solve the equation.



Your method: $2sin xcos x+cos x=0$, so $cos x(2sin x+1)=0$. Thus we have either $cos x=0$ or $sin x=-1/2$. Thus
begin{align}
x&=frac{pi}{2}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi && text{(from $cos x=0$)} \[4px]
x&=-frac{pi}{6}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=frac{7pi}{6}+2npi && text{(from $sin x=-1/2$)}
end{align}

(you grouped together the families of solutions of $cos x$ and of $sin x=-1/2$, but I prefer to keep them separated). Good job.



Alternative method: $cos x=-sin2x=cos(frac{pi}{2}+2x)$. Therefore either
$$
x=frac{pi}{2}+2x+2npi to x=-frac{pi}{2}-2npi
$$

or
$$
x=-frac{pi}{2}-2x+2npi to 3x=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi to x=frac{2npi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}
$$



How do you recover the previous sets of solutions?



One set is already present. For the other three, consider the cases when $n=3k$, $n=3k+1$ or $n=3k+2$, with integer $k$. Then
begin{align}
n&=3k & x&=frac{6kpi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi-frac{pi}{6} \[4px]
n&=3k+1 & x&=frac{(6k+2)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{2pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{pi}{2}\[4px]
n&=3k+2 & x&=frac{(6k+4)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{4pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{7pi}{6}
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer























  • wht u have explained is clear. But I think if I try to do the opposite, it'd be much more complicated ?
    – ss1729
    Dec 3 '18 at 7:38



















0














You and your reference (assuming no typos) have omitted many solutions. For instance, $x = pi/2$, which you are missing, and $-pi/2$, which your reference is missing.



Assuming throughout that $k$ is any integer.



From $cos(x) = 0$, $x = pm cos^{-1}(0) + 2pi k$, giving the two solution families $x = pm frac{pi}{2} + 2pi k$. These can be written as a single family (note the coefficient of $k$): $frac{pi}{2} + pi k$, which is equivalent to $frac{-pi}{2} + pi k$. This equivalence is most likely what is going on between your solution and your reference's.



From $sin(x) = frac{-1}{2}$, $x = sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{-pi}{6} + 2 pi k$ or $x = pi - sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{7 pi}{6} + 2 pi k$. Taken together, you should recognize these as your solution and one of them you quote from your reference.



Are you sure you have copied your reference's entire answer and correctly copied its $k$ coefficients?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • The solution $x = frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = npi + frac{pi}{2}$. The solution $x = -frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = 2npi - frac{pi}{2}$.
    – N. F. Taussig
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:37










  • pls check I have edited to include the derivation of the form of the solutions in my reference.
    – ss1729
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:42










  • @ss1729 : Not to be too critical, but trying to tease out what you mean in your jumbles of words and expressions hasn't gotten any easier, even with several edits. There are now several examples of clearer writing present in the answers here. Could you write your answer in a manner that aids the reader?
    – Eric Towers
    Nov 26 '18 at 2:21



















0














We have that




  • $cos x = 0 implies x=frac{pi}2+kpi$


  • $sin x = -frac12 implies x=-frac{pi}6+2kpi quad lor quad x=-frac{5pi}6+2kpi$



which is equivalent to




  • $x=-frac{pi}2+2kpi$

  • $x=-frac{pi}6+frac23kpi$


to see that draw the solution points on the trigonometric circle.



enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer































    -2














    $$sin(2x)+cos(x)=0$$
    $$2sin(x)cos(x)+cos(x)=0$$
    $$cos(x)left(2sin(x)+1right)=0$$
    so you have two sets of solutions:
    $$cos(x)=0,,sin(x)=-frac{1}{2}$$
    EDIT:



    firstly they have:
    $$x=2npi-pi/2=pi(2n-1/2)$$
    and you have:
    $$x=(2n+1)pi/2$$
    let:
    $$pi/2(4n-1)=pi/2(2m+1)$$
    so:
    $$4n-1=2m+1$$
    $$m=(4n-2)/2=2n-1$$
    so for all integer values of $n$, $m$ is also an integer and so they are equivalent?






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 4




      You have not addressed the question.
      – N. F. Taussig
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:26










    • pls read OP. thats not my doubt, have mentioned that in my attempt. How do I show that the solution I derived in my attempt same as given in my reference ?
      – ss1729
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:27











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013564%2fgeneral-solution-of-sin-2x-cos-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    There are two ways to solve the equation.



    Your method: $2sin xcos x+cos x=0$, so $cos x(2sin x+1)=0$. Thus we have either $cos x=0$ or $sin x=-1/2$. Thus
    begin{align}
    x&=frac{pi}{2}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi && text{(from $cos x=0$)} \[4px]
    x&=-frac{pi}{6}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=frac{7pi}{6}+2npi && text{(from $sin x=-1/2$)}
    end{align}

    (you grouped together the families of solutions of $cos x$ and of $sin x=-1/2$, but I prefer to keep them separated). Good job.



    Alternative method: $cos x=-sin2x=cos(frac{pi}{2}+2x)$. Therefore either
    $$
    x=frac{pi}{2}+2x+2npi to x=-frac{pi}{2}-2npi
    $$

    or
    $$
    x=-frac{pi}{2}-2x+2npi to 3x=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi to x=frac{2npi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}
    $$



    How do you recover the previous sets of solutions?



    One set is already present. For the other three, consider the cases when $n=3k$, $n=3k+1$ or $n=3k+2$, with integer $k$. Then
    begin{align}
    n&=3k & x&=frac{6kpi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi-frac{pi}{6} \[4px]
    n&=3k+1 & x&=frac{(6k+2)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{2pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{pi}{2}\[4px]
    n&=3k+2 & x&=frac{(6k+4)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{4pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{7pi}{6}
    end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • wht u have explained is clear. But I think if I try to do the opposite, it'd be much more complicated ?
      – ss1729
      Dec 3 '18 at 7:38
















    2














    There are two ways to solve the equation.



    Your method: $2sin xcos x+cos x=0$, so $cos x(2sin x+1)=0$. Thus we have either $cos x=0$ or $sin x=-1/2$. Thus
    begin{align}
    x&=frac{pi}{2}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi && text{(from $cos x=0$)} \[4px]
    x&=-frac{pi}{6}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=frac{7pi}{6}+2npi && text{(from $sin x=-1/2$)}
    end{align}

    (you grouped together the families of solutions of $cos x$ and of $sin x=-1/2$, but I prefer to keep them separated). Good job.



    Alternative method: $cos x=-sin2x=cos(frac{pi}{2}+2x)$. Therefore either
    $$
    x=frac{pi}{2}+2x+2npi to x=-frac{pi}{2}-2npi
    $$

    or
    $$
    x=-frac{pi}{2}-2x+2npi to 3x=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi to x=frac{2npi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}
    $$



    How do you recover the previous sets of solutions?



    One set is already present. For the other three, consider the cases when $n=3k$, $n=3k+1$ or $n=3k+2$, with integer $k$. Then
    begin{align}
    n&=3k & x&=frac{6kpi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi-frac{pi}{6} \[4px]
    n&=3k+1 & x&=frac{(6k+2)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{2pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{pi}{2}\[4px]
    n&=3k+2 & x&=frac{(6k+4)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{4pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{7pi}{6}
    end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • wht u have explained is clear. But I think if I try to do the opposite, it'd be much more complicated ?
      – ss1729
      Dec 3 '18 at 7:38














    2












    2








    2






    There are two ways to solve the equation.



    Your method: $2sin xcos x+cos x=0$, so $cos x(2sin x+1)=0$. Thus we have either $cos x=0$ or $sin x=-1/2$. Thus
    begin{align}
    x&=frac{pi}{2}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi && text{(from $cos x=0$)} \[4px]
    x&=-frac{pi}{6}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=frac{7pi}{6}+2npi && text{(from $sin x=-1/2$)}
    end{align}

    (you grouped together the families of solutions of $cos x$ and of $sin x=-1/2$, but I prefer to keep them separated). Good job.



    Alternative method: $cos x=-sin2x=cos(frac{pi}{2}+2x)$. Therefore either
    $$
    x=frac{pi}{2}+2x+2npi to x=-frac{pi}{2}-2npi
    $$

    or
    $$
    x=-frac{pi}{2}-2x+2npi to 3x=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi to x=frac{2npi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}
    $$



    How do you recover the previous sets of solutions?



    One set is already present. For the other three, consider the cases when $n=3k$, $n=3k+1$ or $n=3k+2$, with integer $k$. Then
    begin{align}
    n&=3k & x&=frac{6kpi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi-frac{pi}{6} \[4px]
    n&=3k+1 & x&=frac{(6k+2)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{2pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{pi}{2}\[4px]
    n&=3k+2 & x&=frac{(6k+4)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{4pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{7pi}{6}
    end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer














    There are two ways to solve the equation.



    Your method: $2sin xcos x+cos x=0$, so $cos x(2sin x+1)=0$. Thus we have either $cos x=0$ or $sin x=-1/2$. Thus
    begin{align}
    x&=frac{pi}{2}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi && text{(from $cos x=0$)} \[4px]
    x&=-frac{pi}{6}+2npi &text{or}&& x&=frac{7pi}{6}+2npi && text{(from $sin x=-1/2$)}
    end{align}

    (you grouped together the families of solutions of $cos x$ and of $sin x=-1/2$, but I prefer to keep them separated). Good job.



    Alternative method: $cos x=-sin2x=cos(frac{pi}{2}+2x)$. Therefore either
    $$
    x=frac{pi}{2}+2x+2npi to x=-frac{pi}{2}-2npi
    $$

    or
    $$
    x=-frac{pi}{2}-2x+2npi to 3x=-frac{pi}{2}+2npi to x=frac{2npi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}
    $$



    How do you recover the previous sets of solutions?



    One set is already present. For the other three, consider the cases when $n=3k$, $n=3k+1$ or $n=3k+2$, with integer $k$. Then
    begin{align}
    n&=3k & x&=frac{6kpi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi-frac{pi}{6} \[4px]
    n&=3k+1 & x&=frac{(6k+2)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{2pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{pi}{2}\[4px]
    n&=3k+2 & x&=frac{(6k+4)pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{4pi}{3}-frac{pi}{6}=2kpi+frac{7pi}{6}
    end{align}







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 26 '18 at 0:11

























    answered Nov 25 '18 at 23:59









    egreg

    178k1484201




    178k1484201












    • wht u have explained is clear. But I think if I try to do the opposite, it'd be much more complicated ?
      – ss1729
      Dec 3 '18 at 7:38


















    • wht u have explained is clear. But I think if I try to do the opposite, it'd be much more complicated ?
      – ss1729
      Dec 3 '18 at 7:38
















    wht u have explained is clear. But I think if I try to do the opposite, it'd be much more complicated ?
    – ss1729
    Dec 3 '18 at 7:38




    wht u have explained is clear. But I think if I try to do the opposite, it'd be much more complicated ?
    – ss1729
    Dec 3 '18 at 7:38











    0














    You and your reference (assuming no typos) have omitted many solutions. For instance, $x = pi/2$, which you are missing, and $-pi/2$, which your reference is missing.



    Assuming throughout that $k$ is any integer.



    From $cos(x) = 0$, $x = pm cos^{-1}(0) + 2pi k$, giving the two solution families $x = pm frac{pi}{2} + 2pi k$. These can be written as a single family (note the coefficient of $k$): $frac{pi}{2} + pi k$, which is equivalent to $frac{-pi}{2} + pi k$. This equivalence is most likely what is going on between your solution and your reference's.



    From $sin(x) = frac{-1}{2}$, $x = sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{-pi}{6} + 2 pi k$ or $x = pi - sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{7 pi}{6} + 2 pi k$. Taken together, you should recognize these as your solution and one of them you quote from your reference.



    Are you sure you have copied your reference's entire answer and correctly copied its $k$ coefficients?






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • The solution $x = frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = npi + frac{pi}{2}$. The solution $x = -frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = 2npi - frac{pi}{2}$.
      – N. F. Taussig
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:37










    • pls check I have edited to include the derivation of the form of the solutions in my reference.
      – ss1729
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:42










    • @ss1729 : Not to be too critical, but trying to tease out what you mean in your jumbles of words and expressions hasn't gotten any easier, even with several edits. There are now several examples of clearer writing present in the answers here. Could you write your answer in a manner that aids the reader?
      – Eric Towers
      Nov 26 '18 at 2:21
















    0














    You and your reference (assuming no typos) have omitted many solutions. For instance, $x = pi/2$, which you are missing, and $-pi/2$, which your reference is missing.



    Assuming throughout that $k$ is any integer.



    From $cos(x) = 0$, $x = pm cos^{-1}(0) + 2pi k$, giving the two solution families $x = pm frac{pi}{2} + 2pi k$. These can be written as a single family (note the coefficient of $k$): $frac{pi}{2} + pi k$, which is equivalent to $frac{-pi}{2} + pi k$. This equivalence is most likely what is going on between your solution and your reference's.



    From $sin(x) = frac{-1}{2}$, $x = sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{-pi}{6} + 2 pi k$ or $x = pi - sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{7 pi}{6} + 2 pi k$. Taken together, you should recognize these as your solution and one of them you quote from your reference.



    Are you sure you have copied your reference's entire answer and correctly copied its $k$ coefficients?






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • The solution $x = frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = npi + frac{pi}{2}$. The solution $x = -frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = 2npi - frac{pi}{2}$.
      – N. F. Taussig
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:37










    • pls check I have edited to include the derivation of the form of the solutions in my reference.
      – ss1729
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:42










    • @ss1729 : Not to be too critical, but trying to tease out what you mean in your jumbles of words and expressions hasn't gotten any easier, even with several edits. There are now several examples of clearer writing present in the answers here. Could you write your answer in a manner that aids the reader?
      – Eric Towers
      Nov 26 '18 at 2:21














    0












    0








    0






    You and your reference (assuming no typos) have omitted many solutions. For instance, $x = pi/2$, which you are missing, and $-pi/2$, which your reference is missing.



    Assuming throughout that $k$ is any integer.



    From $cos(x) = 0$, $x = pm cos^{-1}(0) + 2pi k$, giving the two solution families $x = pm frac{pi}{2} + 2pi k$. These can be written as a single family (note the coefficient of $k$): $frac{pi}{2} + pi k$, which is equivalent to $frac{-pi}{2} + pi k$. This equivalence is most likely what is going on between your solution and your reference's.



    From $sin(x) = frac{-1}{2}$, $x = sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{-pi}{6} + 2 pi k$ or $x = pi - sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{7 pi}{6} + 2 pi k$. Taken together, you should recognize these as your solution and one of them you quote from your reference.



    Are you sure you have copied your reference's entire answer and correctly copied its $k$ coefficients?






    share|cite|improve this answer












    You and your reference (assuming no typos) have omitted many solutions. For instance, $x = pi/2$, which you are missing, and $-pi/2$, which your reference is missing.



    Assuming throughout that $k$ is any integer.



    From $cos(x) = 0$, $x = pm cos^{-1}(0) + 2pi k$, giving the two solution families $x = pm frac{pi}{2} + 2pi k$. These can be written as a single family (note the coefficient of $k$): $frac{pi}{2} + pi k$, which is equivalent to $frac{-pi}{2} + pi k$. This equivalence is most likely what is going on between your solution and your reference's.



    From $sin(x) = frac{-1}{2}$, $x = sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{-pi}{6} + 2 pi k$ or $x = pi - sin^{-1}left(frac{-1}{2}right) + 2pi k = frac{7 pi}{6} + 2 pi k$. Taken together, you should recognize these as your solution and one of them you quote from your reference.



    Are you sure you have copied your reference's entire answer and correctly copied its $k$ coefficients?







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 25 '18 at 23:35









    Eric Towers

    31.8k22265




    31.8k22265












    • The solution $x = frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = npi + frac{pi}{2}$. The solution $x = -frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = 2npi - frac{pi}{2}$.
      – N. F. Taussig
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:37










    • pls check I have edited to include the derivation of the form of the solutions in my reference.
      – ss1729
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:42










    • @ss1729 : Not to be too critical, but trying to tease out what you mean in your jumbles of words and expressions hasn't gotten any easier, even with several edits. There are now several examples of clearer writing present in the answers here. Could you write your answer in a manner that aids the reader?
      – Eric Towers
      Nov 26 '18 at 2:21


















    • The solution $x = frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = npi + frac{pi}{2}$. The solution $x = -frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = 2npi - frac{pi}{2}$.
      – N. F. Taussig
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:37










    • pls check I have edited to include the derivation of the form of the solutions in my reference.
      – ss1729
      Nov 25 '18 at 23:42










    • @ss1729 : Not to be too critical, but trying to tease out what you mean in your jumbles of words and expressions hasn't gotten any easier, even with several edits. There are now several examples of clearer writing present in the answers here. Could you write your answer in a manner that aids the reader?
      – Eric Towers
      Nov 26 '18 at 2:21
















    The solution $x = frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = npi + frac{pi}{2}$. The solution $x = -frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = 2npi - frac{pi}{2}$.
    – N. F. Taussig
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:37




    The solution $x = frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = npi + frac{pi}{2}$. The solution $x = -frac{pi}{2}$ is obtained by taking $n = 0$ in the solution $x = 2npi - frac{pi}{2}$.
    – N. F. Taussig
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:37












    pls check I have edited to include the derivation of the form of the solutions in my reference.
    – ss1729
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:42




    pls check I have edited to include the derivation of the form of the solutions in my reference.
    – ss1729
    Nov 25 '18 at 23:42












    @ss1729 : Not to be too critical, but trying to tease out what you mean in your jumbles of words and expressions hasn't gotten any easier, even with several edits. There are now several examples of clearer writing present in the answers here. Could you write your answer in a manner that aids the reader?
    – Eric Towers
    Nov 26 '18 at 2:21




    @ss1729 : Not to be too critical, but trying to tease out what you mean in your jumbles of words and expressions hasn't gotten any easier, even with several edits. There are now several examples of clearer writing present in the answers here. Could you write your answer in a manner that aids the reader?
    – Eric Towers
    Nov 26 '18 at 2:21











    0














    We have that




    • $cos x = 0 implies x=frac{pi}2+kpi$


    • $sin x = -frac12 implies x=-frac{pi}6+2kpi quad lor quad x=-frac{5pi}6+2kpi$



    which is equivalent to




    • $x=-frac{pi}2+2kpi$

    • $x=-frac{pi}6+frac23kpi$


    to see that draw the solution points on the trigonometric circle.



    enter image description here






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      0














      We have that




      • $cos x = 0 implies x=frac{pi}2+kpi$


      • $sin x = -frac12 implies x=-frac{pi}6+2kpi quad lor quad x=-frac{5pi}6+2kpi$



      which is equivalent to




      • $x=-frac{pi}2+2kpi$

      • $x=-frac{pi}6+frac23kpi$


      to see that draw the solution points on the trigonometric circle.



      enter image description here






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        We have that




        • $cos x = 0 implies x=frac{pi}2+kpi$


        • $sin x = -frac12 implies x=-frac{pi}6+2kpi quad lor quad x=-frac{5pi}6+2kpi$



        which is equivalent to




        • $x=-frac{pi}2+2kpi$

        • $x=-frac{pi}6+frac23kpi$


        to see that draw the solution points on the trigonometric circle.



        enter image description here






        share|cite|improve this answer














        We have that




        • $cos x = 0 implies x=frac{pi}2+kpi$


        • $sin x = -frac12 implies x=-frac{pi}6+2kpi quad lor quad x=-frac{5pi}6+2kpi$



        which is equivalent to




        • $x=-frac{pi}2+2kpi$

        • $x=-frac{pi}6+frac23kpi$


        to see that draw the solution points on the trigonometric circle.



        enter image description here







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 25 '18 at 23:37

























        answered Nov 25 '18 at 23:30









        gimusi

        1




        1























            -2














            $$sin(2x)+cos(x)=0$$
            $$2sin(x)cos(x)+cos(x)=0$$
            $$cos(x)left(2sin(x)+1right)=0$$
            so you have two sets of solutions:
            $$cos(x)=0,,sin(x)=-frac{1}{2}$$
            EDIT:



            firstly they have:
            $$x=2npi-pi/2=pi(2n-1/2)$$
            and you have:
            $$x=(2n+1)pi/2$$
            let:
            $$pi/2(4n-1)=pi/2(2m+1)$$
            so:
            $$4n-1=2m+1$$
            $$m=(4n-2)/2=2n-1$$
            so for all integer values of $n$, $m$ is also an integer and so they are equivalent?






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 4




              You have not addressed the question.
              – N. F. Taussig
              Nov 25 '18 at 23:26










            • pls read OP. thats not my doubt, have mentioned that in my attempt. How do I show that the solution I derived in my attempt same as given in my reference ?
              – ss1729
              Nov 25 '18 at 23:27
















            -2














            $$sin(2x)+cos(x)=0$$
            $$2sin(x)cos(x)+cos(x)=0$$
            $$cos(x)left(2sin(x)+1right)=0$$
            so you have two sets of solutions:
            $$cos(x)=0,,sin(x)=-frac{1}{2}$$
            EDIT:



            firstly they have:
            $$x=2npi-pi/2=pi(2n-1/2)$$
            and you have:
            $$x=(2n+1)pi/2$$
            let:
            $$pi/2(4n-1)=pi/2(2m+1)$$
            so:
            $$4n-1=2m+1$$
            $$m=(4n-2)/2=2n-1$$
            so for all integer values of $n$, $m$ is also an integer and so they are equivalent?






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 4




              You have not addressed the question.
              – N. F. Taussig
              Nov 25 '18 at 23:26










            • pls read OP. thats not my doubt, have mentioned that in my attempt. How do I show that the solution I derived in my attempt same as given in my reference ?
              – ss1729
              Nov 25 '18 at 23:27














            -2












            -2








            -2






            $$sin(2x)+cos(x)=0$$
            $$2sin(x)cos(x)+cos(x)=0$$
            $$cos(x)left(2sin(x)+1right)=0$$
            so you have two sets of solutions:
            $$cos(x)=0,,sin(x)=-frac{1}{2}$$
            EDIT:



            firstly they have:
            $$x=2npi-pi/2=pi(2n-1/2)$$
            and you have:
            $$x=(2n+1)pi/2$$
            let:
            $$pi/2(4n-1)=pi/2(2m+1)$$
            so:
            $$4n-1=2m+1$$
            $$m=(4n-2)/2=2n-1$$
            so for all integer values of $n$, $m$ is also an integer and so they are equivalent?






            share|cite|improve this answer














            $$sin(2x)+cos(x)=0$$
            $$2sin(x)cos(x)+cos(x)=0$$
            $$cos(x)left(2sin(x)+1right)=0$$
            so you have two sets of solutions:
            $$cos(x)=0,,sin(x)=-frac{1}{2}$$
            EDIT:



            firstly they have:
            $$x=2npi-pi/2=pi(2n-1/2)$$
            and you have:
            $$x=(2n+1)pi/2$$
            let:
            $$pi/2(4n-1)=pi/2(2m+1)$$
            so:
            $$4n-1=2m+1$$
            $$m=(4n-2)/2=2n-1$$
            so for all integer values of $n$, $m$ is also an integer and so they are equivalent?







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 25 '18 at 23:32

























            answered Nov 25 '18 at 23:25









            Henry Lee

            1,739218




            1,739218








            • 4




              You have not addressed the question.
              – N. F. Taussig
              Nov 25 '18 at 23:26










            • pls read OP. thats not my doubt, have mentioned that in my attempt. How do I show that the solution I derived in my attempt same as given in my reference ?
              – ss1729
              Nov 25 '18 at 23:27














            • 4




              You have not addressed the question.
              – N. F. Taussig
              Nov 25 '18 at 23:26










            • pls read OP. thats not my doubt, have mentioned that in my attempt. How do I show that the solution I derived in my attempt same as given in my reference ?
              – ss1729
              Nov 25 '18 at 23:27








            4




            4




            You have not addressed the question.
            – N. F. Taussig
            Nov 25 '18 at 23:26




            You have not addressed the question.
            – N. F. Taussig
            Nov 25 '18 at 23:26












            pls read OP. thats not my doubt, have mentioned that in my attempt. How do I show that the solution I derived in my attempt same as given in my reference ?
            – ss1729
            Nov 25 '18 at 23:27




            pls read OP. thats not my doubt, have mentioned that in my attempt. How do I show that the solution I derived in my attempt same as given in my reference ?
            – ss1729
            Nov 25 '18 at 23:27


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013564%2fgeneral-solution-of-sin-2x-cos-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa