Prove that image of a continuously differential path is a null set
$begingroup$
I got by the following exercise: prove that the image of a continuously differential path $gamma:[0,1] rightarrow R^2$ is a null set.
I know that I need to find some cover of intervals $I_j=[a_j,b_j]$ of the image that satisfy $$sum_{j=1}^infty |I_j| < epsilon$$ for any $epsilon>0$.
However, I am not really sure how to do it.
Any help would be appreciated.
calculus measure-theory multivariable-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I got by the following exercise: prove that the image of a continuously differential path $gamma:[0,1] rightarrow R^2$ is a null set.
I know that I need to find some cover of intervals $I_j=[a_j,b_j]$ of the image that satisfy $$sum_{j=1}^infty |I_j| < epsilon$$ for any $epsilon>0$.
However, I am not really sure how to do it.
Any help would be appreciated.
calculus measure-theory multivariable-calculus
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The measure on $mathbb{R}^2$ uses disks or rectangles, not intervals. The idea of the proof is that since paths are one dimensional, we can cover these paths with rectangles of negligible width and hence negligible area.
$endgroup$
– Aurel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:34
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure I need to use the fact that $gamma$ is continuously differential. So I can bound the differential by some positive constant $M$. But how do I proceed from here?
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I got by the following exercise: prove that the image of a continuously differential path $gamma:[0,1] rightarrow R^2$ is a null set.
I know that I need to find some cover of intervals $I_j=[a_j,b_j]$ of the image that satisfy $$sum_{j=1}^infty |I_j| < epsilon$$ for any $epsilon>0$.
However, I am not really sure how to do it.
Any help would be appreciated.
calculus measure-theory multivariable-calculus
$endgroup$
I got by the following exercise: prove that the image of a continuously differential path $gamma:[0,1] rightarrow R^2$ is a null set.
I know that I need to find some cover of intervals $I_j=[a_j,b_j]$ of the image that satisfy $$sum_{j=1}^infty |I_j| < epsilon$$ for any $epsilon>0$.
However, I am not really sure how to do it.
Any help would be appreciated.
calculus measure-theory multivariable-calculus
calculus measure-theory multivariable-calculus
asked Dec 11 '18 at 21:09
Gabi GGabi G
408110
408110
1
$begingroup$
The measure on $mathbb{R}^2$ uses disks or rectangles, not intervals. The idea of the proof is that since paths are one dimensional, we can cover these paths with rectangles of negligible width and hence negligible area.
$endgroup$
– Aurel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:34
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure I need to use the fact that $gamma$ is continuously differential. So I can bound the differential by some positive constant $M$. But how do I proceed from here?
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:33
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The measure on $mathbb{R}^2$ uses disks or rectangles, not intervals. The idea of the proof is that since paths are one dimensional, we can cover these paths with rectangles of negligible width and hence negligible area.
$endgroup$
– Aurel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:34
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure I need to use the fact that $gamma$ is continuously differential. So I can bound the differential by some positive constant $M$. But how do I proceed from here?
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:33
1
1
$begingroup$
The measure on $mathbb{R}^2$ uses disks or rectangles, not intervals. The idea of the proof is that since paths are one dimensional, we can cover these paths with rectangles of negligible width and hence negligible area.
$endgroup$
– Aurel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:34
$begingroup$
The measure on $mathbb{R}^2$ uses disks or rectangles, not intervals. The idea of the proof is that since paths are one dimensional, we can cover these paths with rectangles of negligible width and hence negligible area.
$endgroup$
– Aurel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:34
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure I need to use the fact that $gamma$ is continuously differential. So I can bound the differential by some positive constant $M$. But how do I proceed from here?
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:33
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure I need to use the fact that $gamma$ is continuously differential. So I can bound the differential by some positive constant $M$. But how do I proceed from here?
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:33
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $gamma: [0,1]toBbb{R}^n$ for $ngeq 2$ be continuously differentiable. Since it is continuously differentiable, it is Lipschitz continuous with Lipschitz constant $C$, i.e. there exists a $Cgeq 0$ such that for all $t_1,t_2in[0,1]$, $$| x_2-x_1| leq C|t_2-t_1|$$ where $x_i = gamma(t_i)$. This implies that $$gamma([t_1,t_2])subset
B(x_1,C|t_2-t_1|),$$ a closed ball centered at $x_1$ with radius $C|t_2-t_1|$.
Take $k+1$ equally spaced points along $[0,1]$ with $$0=t_0 < t_1 < dots < t_{k-1} < t_k = 1$$ Then, for each $i$, $$gamma([t_i,t_{i+1}])subset B(x_i,C|t_{i+1}-t_i|) = Bleft(x_i,frac{C}{k}right) := B_i$$ so that the curve $gamma([0,1]) subset bigcuplimits_{i}B_i$.
The volume of a ball with radius $r$ in $mathbb{R}^n$ is proportional to $r^n$, so the volume of each $B_i$ is proportional to $frac{1}{k^n}$. Then, the sum of the volumes is an upper bound for the volume of the union, and it is proportional to $$kcdot frac{1}{k^n} = frac{1}{k^{n-1}}$$ Then, as $ktoinfty$, the upper bound for the volume goes to $0$ as long as $ngeq 2$.
Thus, we can create closed ball cover of the curve with arbitrarily small volume, so the curve must be a null set.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! this is a really nice proof
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 12 '18 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sketch:
Denote by
$$ L = int_0^1 Vert gamma'(t) Vert dt $$
the length of our curve. Let $1>varepsilon>0$ and pick $delta>0$ such that
$$ vert x - y vert < delta Rightarrow Vert gamma(x) - gamma(y) Vert< varepsilon $$
this we can do as continuous functions on compact sets are uniformly continuous. Now set $y_j=gamma(frac{j}{n})$ and denote by $[y_j, y_{j+1}]$ the segment between $y_j$ and $y_{j+1}$, i.e.
$$ [y_j, y_{j+1}] := { tcdot y_{j} + (1-t) y_{j+1} : tin [0,1] }$$
Set
$$ p_n := bigcup_{j=0}^{n-1} [y_j, y_{j+1}].$$
This is a piecewise linear interpolation of our curve. Now we thicken this interpolation up, in such a way that it contains the original curve. For this pick $n>frac{1}{delta}$, then by uniform continuity every point on the image of the curve has distant at most $varepsilon$. Therefore, we have
$$A_n :={ xin mathbb{R}^2 : dist(x, p_n)leq varepsilon }supseteq Im(gamma)$$
Now we are left to show that the measure of $A_n$ is small. Indeed, I leave it to you to show that we have
$$ vert A_n vert leq varepsilon sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1} - y_j Vert + varepsilon^2 cdot pi leq (L+pi ) varepsilon$$
The idea behind the first inequality is that you thicken up in the orthogonal direction, thus you get the length of the segment times the maximal distance ($=varepsilon$) plus you get halves of balls at the beginning and the end of the linear interpolation. For the second inequality we used that $varepsilon<1$ (and thus $varepsilon^2 <varepsilon$) and the inequality
$$ L geq sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1}-y_j Vert. $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of applying fubini theorem to the characteristic function over the path !
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well, I haven't studied this theorem yet. I'm looking for another direction
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035827%2fprove-that-image-of-a-continuously-differential-path-is-a-null-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $gamma: [0,1]toBbb{R}^n$ for $ngeq 2$ be continuously differentiable. Since it is continuously differentiable, it is Lipschitz continuous with Lipschitz constant $C$, i.e. there exists a $Cgeq 0$ such that for all $t_1,t_2in[0,1]$, $$| x_2-x_1| leq C|t_2-t_1|$$ where $x_i = gamma(t_i)$. This implies that $$gamma([t_1,t_2])subset
B(x_1,C|t_2-t_1|),$$ a closed ball centered at $x_1$ with radius $C|t_2-t_1|$.
Take $k+1$ equally spaced points along $[0,1]$ with $$0=t_0 < t_1 < dots < t_{k-1} < t_k = 1$$ Then, for each $i$, $$gamma([t_i,t_{i+1}])subset B(x_i,C|t_{i+1}-t_i|) = Bleft(x_i,frac{C}{k}right) := B_i$$ so that the curve $gamma([0,1]) subset bigcuplimits_{i}B_i$.
The volume of a ball with radius $r$ in $mathbb{R}^n$ is proportional to $r^n$, so the volume of each $B_i$ is proportional to $frac{1}{k^n}$. Then, the sum of the volumes is an upper bound for the volume of the union, and it is proportional to $$kcdot frac{1}{k^n} = frac{1}{k^{n-1}}$$ Then, as $ktoinfty$, the upper bound for the volume goes to $0$ as long as $ngeq 2$.
Thus, we can create closed ball cover of the curve with arbitrarily small volume, so the curve must be a null set.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! this is a really nice proof
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 12 '18 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $gamma: [0,1]toBbb{R}^n$ for $ngeq 2$ be continuously differentiable. Since it is continuously differentiable, it is Lipschitz continuous with Lipschitz constant $C$, i.e. there exists a $Cgeq 0$ such that for all $t_1,t_2in[0,1]$, $$| x_2-x_1| leq C|t_2-t_1|$$ where $x_i = gamma(t_i)$. This implies that $$gamma([t_1,t_2])subset
B(x_1,C|t_2-t_1|),$$ a closed ball centered at $x_1$ with radius $C|t_2-t_1|$.
Take $k+1$ equally spaced points along $[0,1]$ with $$0=t_0 < t_1 < dots < t_{k-1} < t_k = 1$$ Then, for each $i$, $$gamma([t_i,t_{i+1}])subset B(x_i,C|t_{i+1}-t_i|) = Bleft(x_i,frac{C}{k}right) := B_i$$ so that the curve $gamma([0,1]) subset bigcuplimits_{i}B_i$.
The volume of a ball with radius $r$ in $mathbb{R}^n$ is proportional to $r^n$, so the volume of each $B_i$ is proportional to $frac{1}{k^n}$. Then, the sum of the volumes is an upper bound for the volume of the union, and it is proportional to $$kcdot frac{1}{k^n} = frac{1}{k^{n-1}}$$ Then, as $ktoinfty$, the upper bound for the volume goes to $0$ as long as $ngeq 2$.
Thus, we can create closed ball cover of the curve with arbitrarily small volume, so the curve must be a null set.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! this is a really nice proof
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 12 '18 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $gamma: [0,1]toBbb{R}^n$ for $ngeq 2$ be continuously differentiable. Since it is continuously differentiable, it is Lipschitz continuous with Lipschitz constant $C$, i.e. there exists a $Cgeq 0$ such that for all $t_1,t_2in[0,1]$, $$| x_2-x_1| leq C|t_2-t_1|$$ where $x_i = gamma(t_i)$. This implies that $$gamma([t_1,t_2])subset
B(x_1,C|t_2-t_1|),$$ a closed ball centered at $x_1$ with radius $C|t_2-t_1|$.
Take $k+1$ equally spaced points along $[0,1]$ with $$0=t_0 < t_1 < dots < t_{k-1} < t_k = 1$$ Then, for each $i$, $$gamma([t_i,t_{i+1}])subset B(x_i,C|t_{i+1}-t_i|) = Bleft(x_i,frac{C}{k}right) := B_i$$ so that the curve $gamma([0,1]) subset bigcuplimits_{i}B_i$.
The volume of a ball with radius $r$ in $mathbb{R}^n$ is proportional to $r^n$, so the volume of each $B_i$ is proportional to $frac{1}{k^n}$. Then, the sum of the volumes is an upper bound for the volume of the union, and it is proportional to $$kcdot frac{1}{k^n} = frac{1}{k^{n-1}}$$ Then, as $ktoinfty$, the upper bound for the volume goes to $0$ as long as $ngeq 2$.
Thus, we can create closed ball cover of the curve with arbitrarily small volume, so the curve must be a null set.
$endgroup$
Let $gamma: [0,1]toBbb{R}^n$ for $ngeq 2$ be continuously differentiable. Since it is continuously differentiable, it is Lipschitz continuous with Lipschitz constant $C$, i.e. there exists a $Cgeq 0$ such that for all $t_1,t_2in[0,1]$, $$| x_2-x_1| leq C|t_2-t_1|$$ where $x_i = gamma(t_i)$. This implies that $$gamma([t_1,t_2])subset
B(x_1,C|t_2-t_1|),$$ a closed ball centered at $x_1$ with radius $C|t_2-t_1|$.
Take $k+1$ equally spaced points along $[0,1]$ with $$0=t_0 < t_1 < dots < t_{k-1} < t_k = 1$$ Then, for each $i$, $$gamma([t_i,t_{i+1}])subset B(x_i,C|t_{i+1}-t_i|) = Bleft(x_i,frac{C}{k}right) := B_i$$ so that the curve $gamma([0,1]) subset bigcuplimits_{i}B_i$.
The volume of a ball with radius $r$ in $mathbb{R}^n$ is proportional to $r^n$, so the volume of each $B_i$ is proportional to $frac{1}{k^n}$. Then, the sum of the volumes is an upper bound for the volume of the union, and it is proportional to $$kcdot frac{1}{k^n} = frac{1}{k^{n-1}}$$ Then, as $ktoinfty$, the upper bound for the volume goes to $0$ as long as $ngeq 2$.
Thus, we can create closed ball cover of the curve with arbitrarily small volume, so the curve must be a null set.
answered Dec 11 '18 at 22:59
AlexanderJ93AlexanderJ93
6,173823
6,173823
$begingroup$
Thanks! this is a really nice proof
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 12 '18 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks! this is a really nice proof
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 12 '18 at 1:24
$begingroup$
Thanks! this is a really nice proof
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 12 '18 at 1:24
$begingroup$
Thanks! this is a really nice proof
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 12 '18 at 1:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sketch:
Denote by
$$ L = int_0^1 Vert gamma'(t) Vert dt $$
the length of our curve. Let $1>varepsilon>0$ and pick $delta>0$ such that
$$ vert x - y vert < delta Rightarrow Vert gamma(x) - gamma(y) Vert< varepsilon $$
this we can do as continuous functions on compact sets are uniformly continuous. Now set $y_j=gamma(frac{j}{n})$ and denote by $[y_j, y_{j+1}]$ the segment between $y_j$ and $y_{j+1}$, i.e.
$$ [y_j, y_{j+1}] := { tcdot y_{j} + (1-t) y_{j+1} : tin [0,1] }$$
Set
$$ p_n := bigcup_{j=0}^{n-1} [y_j, y_{j+1}].$$
This is a piecewise linear interpolation of our curve. Now we thicken this interpolation up, in such a way that it contains the original curve. For this pick $n>frac{1}{delta}$, then by uniform continuity every point on the image of the curve has distant at most $varepsilon$. Therefore, we have
$$A_n :={ xin mathbb{R}^2 : dist(x, p_n)leq varepsilon }supseteq Im(gamma)$$
Now we are left to show that the measure of $A_n$ is small. Indeed, I leave it to you to show that we have
$$ vert A_n vert leq varepsilon sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1} - y_j Vert + varepsilon^2 cdot pi leq (L+pi ) varepsilon$$
The idea behind the first inequality is that you thicken up in the orthogonal direction, thus you get the length of the segment times the maximal distance ($=varepsilon$) plus you get halves of balls at the beginning and the end of the linear interpolation. For the second inequality we used that $varepsilon<1$ (and thus $varepsilon^2 <varepsilon$) and the inequality
$$ L geq sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1}-y_j Vert. $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sketch:
Denote by
$$ L = int_0^1 Vert gamma'(t) Vert dt $$
the length of our curve. Let $1>varepsilon>0$ and pick $delta>0$ such that
$$ vert x - y vert < delta Rightarrow Vert gamma(x) - gamma(y) Vert< varepsilon $$
this we can do as continuous functions on compact sets are uniformly continuous. Now set $y_j=gamma(frac{j}{n})$ and denote by $[y_j, y_{j+1}]$ the segment between $y_j$ and $y_{j+1}$, i.e.
$$ [y_j, y_{j+1}] := { tcdot y_{j} + (1-t) y_{j+1} : tin [0,1] }$$
Set
$$ p_n := bigcup_{j=0}^{n-1} [y_j, y_{j+1}].$$
This is a piecewise linear interpolation of our curve. Now we thicken this interpolation up, in such a way that it contains the original curve. For this pick $n>frac{1}{delta}$, then by uniform continuity every point on the image of the curve has distant at most $varepsilon$. Therefore, we have
$$A_n :={ xin mathbb{R}^2 : dist(x, p_n)leq varepsilon }supseteq Im(gamma)$$
Now we are left to show that the measure of $A_n$ is small. Indeed, I leave it to you to show that we have
$$ vert A_n vert leq varepsilon sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1} - y_j Vert + varepsilon^2 cdot pi leq (L+pi ) varepsilon$$
The idea behind the first inequality is that you thicken up in the orthogonal direction, thus you get the length of the segment times the maximal distance ($=varepsilon$) plus you get halves of balls at the beginning and the end of the linear interpolation. For the second inequality we used that $varepsilon<1$ (and thus $varepsilon^2 <varepsilon$) and the inequality
$$ L geq sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1}-y_j Vert. $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sketch:
Denote by
$$ L = int_0^1 Vert gamma'(t) Vert dt $$
the length of our curve. Let $1>varepsilon>0$ and pick $delta>0$ such that
$$ vert x - y vert < delta Rightarrow Vert gamma(x) - gamma(y) Vert< varepsilon $$
this we can do as continuous functions on compact sets are uniformly continuous. Now set $y_j=gamma(frac{j}{n})$ and denote by $[y_j, y_{j+1}]$ the segment between $y_j$ and $y_{j+1}$, i.e.
$$ [y_j, y_{j+1}] := { tcdot y_{j} + (1-t) y_{j+1} : tin [0,1] }$$
Set
$$ p_n := bigcup_{j=0}^{n-1} [y_j, y_{j+1}].$$
This is a piecewise linear interpolation of our curve. Now we thicken this interpolation up, in such a way that it contains the original curve. For this pick $n>frac{1}{delta}$, then by uniform continuity every point on the image of the curve has distant at most $varepsilon$. Therefore, we have
$$A_n :={ xin mathbb{R}^2 : dist(x, p_n)leq varepsilon }supseteq Im(gamma)$$
Now we are left to show that the measure of $A_n$ is small. Indeed, I leave it to you to show that we have
$$ vert A_n vert leq varepsilon sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1} - y_j Vert + varepsilon^2 cdot pi leq (L+pi ) varepsilon$$
The idea behind the first inequality is that you thicken up in the orthogonal direction, thus you get the length of the segment times the maximal distance ($=varepsilon$) plus you get halves of balls at the beginning and the end of the linear interpolation. For the second inequality we used that $varepsilon<1$ (and thus $varepsilon^2 <varepsilon$) and the inequality
$$ L geq sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1}-y_j Vert. $$
$endgroup$
Sketch:
Denote by
$$ L = int_0^1 Vert gamma'(t) Vert dt $$
the length of our curve. Let $1>varepsilon>0$ and pick $delta>0$ such that
$$ vert x - y vert < delta Rightarrow Vert gamma(x) - gamma(y) Vert< varepsilon $$
this we can do as continuous functions on compact sets are uniformly continuous. Now set $y_j=gamma(frac{j}{n})$ and denote by $[y_j, y_{j+1}]$ the segment between $y_j$ and $y_{j+1}$, i.e.
$$ [y_j, y_{j+1}] := { tcdot y_{j} + (1-t) y_{j+1} : tin [0,1] }$$
Set
$$ p_n := bigcup_{j=0}^{n-1} [y_j, y_{j+1}].$$
This is a piecewise linear interpolation of our curve. Now we thicken this interpolation up, in such a way that it contains the original curve. For this pick $n>frac{1}{delta}$, then by uniform continuity every point on the image of the curve has distant at most $varepsilon$. Therefore, we have
$$A_n :={ xin mathbb{R}^2 : dist(x, p_n)leq varepsilon }supseteq Im(gamma)$$
Now we are left to show that the measure of $A_n$ is small. Indeed, I leave it to you to show that we have
$$ vert A_n vert leq varepsilon sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1} - y_j Vert + varepsilon^2 cdot pi leq (L+pi ) varepsilon$$
The idea behind the first inequality is that you thicken up in the orthogonal direction, thus you get the length of the segment times the maximal distance ($=varepsilon$) plus you get halves of balls at the beginning and the end of the linear interpolation. For the second inequality we used that $varepsilon<1$ (and thus $varepsilon^2 <varepsilon$) and the inequality
$$ L geq sum_{j=0}^{n-1} Vert y_{j+1}-y_j Vert. $$
answered Dec 11 '18 at 22:48
Severin SchravenSeverin Schraven
6,3381934
6,3381934
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of applying fubini theorem to the characteristic function over the path !
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well, I haven't studied this theorem yet. I'm looking for another direction
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of applying fubini theorem to the characteristic function over the path !
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well, I haven't studied this theorem yet. I'm looking for another direction
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of applying fubini theorem to the characteristic function over the path !
$endgroup$
Think of applying fubini theorem to the characteristic function over the path !
answered Dec 11 '18 at 21:38
MalikMalik
1068
1068
$begingroup$
Well, I haven't studied this theorem yet. I'm looking for another direction
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, I haven't studied this theorem yet. I'm looking for another direction
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:28
$begingroup$
Well, I haven't studied this theorem yet. I'm looking for another direction
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:28
$begingroup$
Well, I haven't studied this theorem yet. I'm looking for another direction
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035827%2fprove-that-image-of-a-continuously-differential-path-is-a-null-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The measure on $mathbb{R}^2$ uses disks or rectangles, not intervals. The idea of the proof is that since paths are one dimensional, we can cover these paths with rectangles of negligible width and hence negligible area.
$endgroup$
– Aurel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:34
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure I need to use the fact that $gamma$ is continuously differential. So I can bound the differential by some positive constant $M$. But how do I proceed from here?
$endgroup$
– Gabi G
Dec 11 '18 at 22:33