$A oplus B$ a direct sum of $R$-modules. Possible to have a submodule $X$ of $A oplus B$ s.t. $X cap A = 0 =...
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $A oplus B$ be a direct sum of left $R$-modules. Is it possible to have a non-zero submodule $X$ of $A oplus B$ such that $X cap A = 0 = X cap B$?
Perhaps not. A submodule of $A oplus B$ would be of the form $C oplus D$ with $C leq A$, $B leq D$, and both $C$ and $D$ would contain zero so wouldn't $C oplus {0} subset C oplus D cap A$?
abstract-algebra modules
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $A oplus B$ be a direct sum of left $R$-modules. Is it possible to have a non-zero submodule $X$ of $A oplus B$ such that $X cap A = 0 = X cap B$?
Perhaps not. A submodule of $A oplus B$ would be of the form $C oplus D$ with $C leq A$, $B leq D$, and both $C$ and $D$ would contain zero so wouldn't $C oplus {0} subset C oplus D cap A$?
abstract-algebra modules
3
Consider the case where A, B, and R are all the real numbers.
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 14:50
Hm, still can't think of anything, lol.
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 16:53
Well, in that case submodules are the same as subspaces. Does $mathbb{R}^2$ have subspaces that intersect trivially with the coordinate axes?
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 18:20
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $A oplus B$ be a direct sum of left $R$-modules. Is it possible to have a non-zero submodule $X$ of $A oplus B$ such that $X cap A = 0 = X cap B$?
Perhaps not. A submodule of $A oplus B$ would be of the form $C oplus D$ with $C leq A$, $B leq D$, and both $C$ and $D$ would contain zero so wouldn't $C oplus {0} subset C oplus D cap A$?
abstract-algebra modules
Let $A oplus B$ be a direct sum of left $R$-modules. Is it possible to have a non-zero submodule $X$ of $A oplus B$ such that $X cap A = 0 = X cap B$?
Perhaps not. A submodule of $A oplus B$ would be of the form $C oplus D$ with $C leq A$, $B leq D$, and both $C$ and $D$ would contain zero so wouldn't $C oplus {0} subset C oplus D cap A$?
abstract-algebra modules
abstract-algebra modules
asked Nov 18 at 14:43
Michael Vaughan
751111
751111
3
Consider the case where A, B, and R are all the real numbers.
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 14:50
Hm, still can't think of anything, lol.
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 16:53
Well, in that case submodules are the same as subspaces. Does $mathbb{R}^2$ have subspaces that intersect trivially with the coordinate axes?
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 18:20
add a comment |
3
Consider the case where A, B, and R are all the real numbers.
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 14:50
Hm, still can't think of anything, lol.
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 16:53
Well, in that case submodules are the same as subspaces. Does $mathbb{R}^2$ have subspaces that intersect trivially with the coordinate axes?
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 18:20
3
3
Consider the case where A, B, and R are all the real numbers.
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 14:50
Consider the case where A, B, and R are all the real numbers.
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 14:50
Hm, still can't think of anything, lol.
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 16:53
Hm, still can't think of anything, lol.
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 16:53
Well, in that case submodules are the same as subspaces. Does $mathbb{R}^2$ have subspaces that intersect trivially with the coordinate axes?
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 18:20
Well, in that case submodules are the same as subspaces. Does $mathbb{R}^2$ have subspaces that intersect trivially with the coordinate axes?
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 18:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It depends on $A$ and $B$ (and $R$).
For example, if $R$ is a field and $A,B$ are nonzero $R$-vector spaces, then there are ($1$-dimensional) vector subspaces of $Aoplus B$ not contained in $A$ or $B$.
On the other hand, if $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $A=mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$, $B=mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$, then the only nontrivial submodules of $Aoplus B=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$ are $A,B$ and $Aoplus B$.
I realize that containment wouldn't hold, but would the intersection be trivial?
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 15:17
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It depends on $A$ and $B$ (and $R$).
For example, if $R$ is a field and $A,B$ are nonzero $R$-vector spaces, then there are ($1$-dimensional) vector subspaces of $Aoplus B$ not contained in $A$ or $B$.
On the other hand, if $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $A=mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$, $B=mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$, then the only nontrivial submodules of $Aoplus B=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$ are $A,B$ and $Aoplus B$.
I realize that containment wouldn't hold, but would the intersection be trivial?
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 15:17
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
It depends on $A$ and $B$ (and $R$).
For example, if $R$ is a field and $A,B$ are nonzero $R$-vector spaces, then there are ($1$-dimensional) vector subspaces of $Aoplus B$ not contained in $A$ or $B$.
On the other hand, if $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $A=mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$, $B=mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$, then the only nontrivial submodules of $Aoplus B=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$ are $A,B$ and $Aoplus B$.
I realize that containment wouldn't hold, but would the intersection be trivial?
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 15:17
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
It depends on $A$ and $B$ (and $R$).
For example, if $R$ is a field and $A,B$ are nonzero $R$-vector spaces, then there are ($1$-dimensional) vector subspaces of $Aoplus B$ not contained in $A$ or $B$.
On the other hand, if $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $A=mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$, $B=mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$, then the only nontrivial submodules of $Aoplus B=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$ are $A,B$ and $Aoplus B$.
It depends on $A$ and $B$ (and $R$).
For example, if $R$ is a field and $A,B$ are nonzero $R$-vector spaces, then there are ($1$-dimensional) vector subspaces of $Aoplus B$ not contained in $A$ or $B$.
On the other hand, if $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $A=mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$, $B=mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$, then the only nontrivial submodules of $Aoplus B=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$ are $A,B$ and $Aoplus B$.
edited Nov 18 at 15:18
answered Nov 18 at 14:59
user10354138
6,8051623
6,8051623
I realize that containment wouldn't hold, but would the intersection be trivial?
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 15:17
add a comment |
I realize that containment wouldn't hold, but would the intersection be trivial?
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 15:17
I realize that containment wouldn't hold, but would the intersection be trivial?
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 15:17
I realize that containment wouldn't hold, but would the intersection be trivial?
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 15:17
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003616%2fa-oplus-b-a-direct-sum-of-r-modules-possible-to-have-a-submodule-x-of-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Consider the case where A, B, and R are all the real numbers.
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 14:50
Hm, still can't think of anything, lol.
– Michael Vaughan
Nov 18 at 16:53
Well, in that case submodules are the same as subspaces. Does $mathbb{R}^2$ have subspaces that intersect trivially with the coordinate axes?
– Matthew Towers
Nov 18 at 18:20