IC product lifetime as function of junction temperature











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












If an IC is rated for an absolute maximum junction temperature of say 170 Celsius, obviously it is not recommended to operate there - but how drastically is product lifetime impacted if we are close, say operating at junction temperature of 160. How severely does the IC lifetime get shortened as we get closer to the maximum junction temperature ?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite












    If an IC is rated for an absolute maximum junction temperature of say 170 Celsius, obviously it is not recommended to operate there - but how drastically is product lifetime impacted if we are close, say operating at junction temperature of 160. How severely does the IC lifetime get shortened as we get closer to the maximum junction temperature ?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite











      If an IC is rated for an absolute maximum junction temperature of say 170 Celsius, obviously it is not recommended to operate there - but how drastically is product lifetime impacted if we are close, say operating at junction temperature of 160. How severely does the IC lifetime get shortened as we get closer to the maximum junction temperature ?










      share|improve this question













      If an IC is rated for an absolute maximum junction temperature of say 170 Celsius, obviously it is not recommended to operate there - but how drastically is product lifetime impacted if we are close, say operating at junction temperature of 160. How severely does the IC lifetime get shortened as we get closer to the maximum junction temperature ?







      integrated-circuit thermal






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 23 at 23:10









      VanGo

      424415




      424415






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:




          1. Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life


          2. Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.



          The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation



          $ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $



          The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).



          MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage



          https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/






          share|improve this answer























          • I think that Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life is related to chemistry.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 24 at 11:27










          • I agree, this was then broadly applied. I have been looking into this recently wrt uprating. The problem is the mail is out of date
            – JonRB
            Nov 24 at 13:16






          • 1




            And to just put a number to it. $2^{frac{160-25}{15}}=512$. That means, if the device has a lifetime of 512 years at 25° C, then it will have a lifetime of 1 year at 160° C.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 25 at 2:49











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
          StackExchange.schematics.init();
          });
          }, "cicuitlab");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "135"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f408537%2fic-product-lifetime-as-function-of-junction-temperature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:




          1. Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life


          2. Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.



          The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation



          $ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $



          The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).



          MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage



          https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/






          share|improve this answer























          • I think that Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life is related to chemistry.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 24 at 11:27










          • I agree, this was then broadly applied. I have been looking into this recently wrt uprating. The problem is the mail is out of date
            – JonRB
            Nov 24 at 13:16






          • 1




            And to just put a number to it. $2^{frac{160-25}{15}}=512$. That means, if the device has a lifetime of 512 years at 25° C, then it will have a lifetime of 1 year at 160° C.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 25 at 2:49















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:




          1. Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life


          2. Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.



          The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation



          $ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $



          The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).



          MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage



          https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/






          share|improve this answer























          • I think that Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life is related to chemistry.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 24 at 11:27










          • I agree, this was then broadly applied. I have been looking into this recently wrt uprating. The problem is the mail is out of date
            – JonRB
            Nov 24 at 13:16






          • 1




            And to just put a number to it. $2^{frac{160-25}{15}}=512$. That means, if the device has a lifetime of 512 years at 25° C, then it will have a lifetime of 1 year at 160° C.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 25 at 2:49













          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted






          There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:




          1. Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life


          2. Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.



          The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation



          $ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $



          The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).



          MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage



          https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/






          share|improve this answer














          There are two rules of thumb when it comes to premature aging of electronics and temperature:




          1. Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life


          2. Every 15°C above 25°C halves its life.



          The 10°C is derived from a certain application of Arrhenius' equation



          $ AF = e^{ frac{E_a}{k}}(frac{1}{T_{use}}- frac{1}{T_{test}}) $



          The issue with this is the 10°C result was a very broad interpretation of the empirical results (no consideration was given to other failure modes).



          MIL-HDBK-217 took into account field data and concluded that 15°C is a figure more applicable to practical usage



          https://www.electronics-cooling.com/2017/08/10c-increase-temperature-really-reduce-life-electronics-half/







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 23 at 23:47

























          answered Nov 23 at 23:22









          JonRB

          13.1k22040




          13.1k22040












          • I think that Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life is related to chemistry.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 24 at 11:27










          • I agree, this was then broadly applied. I have been looking into this recently wrt uprating. The problem is the mail is out of date
            – JonRB
            Nov 24 at 13:16






          • 1




            And to just put a number to it. $2^{frac{160-25}{15}}=512$. That means, if the device has a lifetime of 512 years at 25° C, then it will have a lifetime of 1 year at 160° C.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 25 at 2:49


















          • I think that Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life is related to chemistry.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 24 at 11:27










          • I agree, this was then broadly applied. I have been looking into this recently wrt uprating. The problem is the mail is out of date
            – JonRB
            Nov 24 at 13:16






          • 1




            And to just put a number to it. $2^{frac{160-25}{15}}=512$. That means, if the device has a lifetime of 512 years at 25° C, then it will have a lifetime of 1 year at 160° C.
            – Harry Svensson
            Nov 25 at 2:49
















          I think that Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life is related to chemistry.
          – Harry Svensson
          Nov 24 at 11:27




          I think that Every 10°C above 25°C halves its life is related to chemistry.
          – Harry Svensson
          Nov 24 at 11:27












          I agree, this was then broadly applied. I have been looking into this recently wrt uprating. The problem is the mail is out of date
          – JonRB
          Nov 24 at 13:16




          I agree, this was then broadly applied. I have been looking into this recently wrt uprating. The problem is the mail is out of date
          – JonRB
          Nov 24 at 13:16




          1




          1




          And to just put a number to it. $2^{frac{160-25}{15}}=512$. That means, if the device has a lifetime of 512 years at 25° C, then it will have a lifetime of 1 year at 160° C.
          – Harry Svensson
          Nov 25 at 2:49




          And to just put a number to it. $2^{frac{160-25}{15}}=512$. That means, if the device has a lifetime of 512 years at 25° C, then it will have a lifetime of 1 year at 160° C.
          – Harry Svensson
          Nov 25 at 2:49


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f408537%2fic-product-lifetime-as-function-of-junction-temperature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa