large x and small x expansion for gamma-like function
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Find two approximations for the integral ($x>0$)
begin{equation}
I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta
end{equation}
one for small $x$ (keeping up to linear order in $x$) and one for large values of $x$ (keeping only the leading order term).
For the small x expansion, I tried using a Maclaurin series for the function in the exponential, and it seemed to work...I am unsure what to do for large x or how to check my answer. I know this is likely related to the Gamma/Gaussian function, but am fairly novice at problems of this form. Any help deeply appreciated!
sequences-and-series complex-analysis asymptotics gamma-function
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Find two approximations for the integral ($x>0$)
begin{equation}
I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta
end{equation}
one for small $x$ (keeping up to linear order in $x$) and one for large values of $x$ (keeping only the leading order term).
For the small x expansion, I tried using a Maclaurin series for the function in the exponential, and it seemed to work...I am unsure what to do for large x or how to check my answer. I know this is likely related to the Gamma/Gaussian function, but am fairly novice at problems of this form. Any help deeply appreciated!
sequences-and-series complex-analysis asymptotics gamma-function
1
For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:48
Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 21:52
1
Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:53
Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
– Antonio Vargas
Nov 18 at 3:13
My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:53
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Find two approximations for the integral ($x>0$)
begin{equation}
I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta
end{equation}
one for small $x$ (keeping up to linear order in $x$) and one for large values of $x$ (keeping only the leading order term).
For the small x expansion, I tried using a Maclaurin series for the function in the exponential, and it seemed to work...I am unsure what to do for large x or how to check my answer. I know this is likely related to the Gamma/Gaussian function, but am fairly novice at problems of this form. Any help deeply appreciated!
sequences-and-series complex-analysis asymptotics gamma-function
Find two approximations for the integral ($x>0$)
begin{equation}
I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta
end{equation}
one for small $x$ (keeping up to linear order in $x$) and one for large values of $x$ (keeping only the leading order term).
For the small x expansion, I tried using a Maclaurin series for the function in the exponential, and it seemed to work...I am unsure what to do for large x or how to check my answer. I know this is likely related to the Gamma/Gaussian function, but am fairly novice at problems of this form. Any help deeply appreciated!
sequences-and-series complex-analysis asymptotics gamma-function
sequences-and-series complex-analysis asymptotics gamma-function
edited Nov 22 at 0:52
asked Nov 17 at 21:44
niagarajohn
186
186
1
For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:48
Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 21:52
1
Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:53
Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
– Antonio Vargas
Nov 18 at 3:13
My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:53
|
show 1 more comment
1
For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:48
Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 21:52
1
Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:53
Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
– Antonio Vargas
Nov 18 at 3:13
My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:53
1
1
For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:48
For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:48
Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 21:52
Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 21:52
1
1
Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:53
Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:53
Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
– Antonio Vargas
Nov 18 at 3:13
Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
– Antonio Vargas
Nov 18 at 3:13
My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:53
My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:53
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.
Let's transform the integral first:
$$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$
Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).
Using the notation from the article, we have:
$$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$
Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.
Then we can represent:
$$int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
How about this:
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
$$theta=pi/2-phi$$
$$dtheta=-dphi$$
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$
EDIT:
taking the other approach, I have:
$$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
which can be re-written as:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
$$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
so:
$$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$
1
How does this help find the asymptotic?
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:58
You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
– Henry Lee
Nov 17 at 21:59
1
I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 23:26
^That didn't work...
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:56
Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
– Henry Lee
Nov 18 at 15:35
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.
Let's transform the integral first:
$$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$
Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).
Using the notation from the article, we have:
$$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$
Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.
Then we can represent:
$$int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.
Let's transform the integral first:
$$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$
Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).
Using the notation from the article, we have:
$$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$
Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.
Then we can represent:
$$int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.
Let's transform the integral first:
$$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$
Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).
Using the notation from the article, we have:
$$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$
Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.
Then we can represent:
$$int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$
For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.
Let's transform the integral first:
$$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$
Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).
Using the notation from the article, we have:
$$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$
Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.
Then we can represent:
$$int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$
edited Nov 19 at 11:31
answered Nov 19 at 10:59
Yuriy S
15.4k433115
15.4k433115
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
How about this:
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
$$theta=pi/2-phi$$
$$dtheta=-dphi$$
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$
EDIT:
taking the other approach, I have:
$$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
which can be re-written as:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
$$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
so:
$$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$
1
How does this help find the asymptotic?
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:58
You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
– Henry Lee
Nov 17 at 21:59
1
I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 23:26
^That didn't work...
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:56
Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
– Henry Lee
Nov 18 at 15:35
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
How about this:
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
$$theta=pi/2-phi$$
$$dtheta=-dphi$$
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$
EDIT:
taking the other approach, I have:
$$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
which can be re-written as:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
$$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
so:
$$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$
1
How does this help find the asymptotic?
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:58
You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
– Henry Lee
Nov 17 at 21:59
1
I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 23:26
^That didn't work...
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:56
Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
– Henry Lee
Nov 18 at 15:35
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
How about this:
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
$$theta=pi/2-phi$$
$$dtheta=-dphi$$
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$
EDIT:
taking the other approach, I have:
$$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
which can be re-written as:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
$$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
so:
$$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$
How about this:
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
$$theta=pi/2-phi$$
$$dtheta=-dphi$$
$$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$
EDIT:
taking the other approach, I have:
$$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
which can be re-written as:
$$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
$$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
so:
$$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$
edited Nov 18 at 17:08
answered Nov 17 at 21:57
Henry Lee
1,684218
1,684218
1
How does this help find the asymptotic?
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:58
You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
– Henry Lee
Nov 17 at 21:59
1
I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 23:26
^That didn't work...
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:56
Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
– Henry Lee
Nov 18 at 15:35
add a comment |
1
How does this help find the asymptotic?
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:58
You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
– Henry Lee
Nov 17 at 21:59
1
I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 23:26
^That didn't work...
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:56
Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
– Henry Lee
Nov 18 at 15:35
1
1
How does this help find the asymptotic?
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:58
How does this help find the asymptotic?
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:58
You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
– Henry Lee
Nov 17 at 21:59
You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
– Henry Lee
Nov 17 at 21:59
1
1
I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 23:26
I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 23:26
^That didn't work...
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:56
^That didn't work...
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:56
Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
– Henry Lee
Nov 18 at 15:35
Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
– Henry Lee
Nov 18 at 15:35
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002851%2flarge-x-and-small-x-expansion-for-gamma-like-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:48
Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 21:52
1
Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:53
Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
– Antonio Vargas
Nov 18 at 3:13
My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:53