Proof of $int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(x) dx = prod_{i = 1}^{d} int_{mathbb{R}} phi_i(x_i) dx_i$, where $f :=...
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $phi_1, ldots phi_d: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ be continuos and have compact support.
Show that for
$$
f := bigotimes_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i: mathbb{R}^d to mathbb{R},
(x_1, ldots, x_d) mapsto prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i)
$$
we have
$$
int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(x) dx = prod_{i = 1}^{d} int_{mathbb{R}} phi_i(x_i) dx_i
$$
Proof
Since $f$ is continuous and has a compact support as well, we get
begin{align*}
int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(x) dx
& = int_{text{supp}(f)} prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx
overset{(ast)}{=} int_{text{supp}(phi_d)} left( ldots left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx_1 right) ldots right) d x_d \
& overset{(star)}{=} left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} phi_1(x_1) dx_1 right) left( int_{text{supp}(phi_d)} left( ldots left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} prod_{i = 2}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx_2 right) ldots right) d x_d right) \
& = ldots
= prod_{i = 1}^{d} int_{mathbb{R}} phi_i(x_i) dx_i
end{align*}
My Question
I don't understand the steps $(ast)$ and especially $(star)$ . Can we just ''pull out'' a one-dimensional integral since it's just a constant?
The proof is from Otto Forster: Analyis 3 (in German) on page 3.
This was a homework assignment and the corrector gave full marks to this answer but suggested using induction instead of the $ldots$-step.
Could someone please show that induction in light of the question above?
Please bear in mind that this is from the very beginning of real analysis III and we have not learned measure theory yet.
real-analysis integration functional-analysis measure-theory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $phi_1, ldots phi_d: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ be continuos and have compact support.
Show that for
$$
f := bigotimes_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i: mathbb{R}^d to mathbb{R},
(x_1, ldots, x_d) mapsto prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i)
$$
we have
$$
int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(x) dx = prod_{i = 1}^{d} int_{mathbb{R}} phi_i(x_i) dx_i
$$
Proof
Since $f$ is continuous and has a compact support as well, we get
begin{align*}
int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(x) dx
& = int_{text{supp}(f)} prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx
overset{(ast)}{=} int_{text{supp}(phi_d)} left( ldots left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx_1 right) ldots right) d x_d \
& overset{(star)}{=} left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} phi_1(x_1) dx_1 right) left( int_{text{supp}(phi_d)} left( ldots left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} prod_{i = 2}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx_2 right) ldots right) d x_d right) \
& = ldots
= prod_{i = 1}^{d} int_{mathbb{R}} phi_i(x_i) dx_i
end{align*}
My Question
I don't understand the steps $(ast)$ and especially $(star)$ . Can we just ''pull out'' a one-dimensional integral since it's just a constant?
The proof is from Otto Forster: Analyis 3 (in German) on page 3.
This was a homework assignment and the corrector gave full marks to this answer but suggested using induction instead of the $ldots$-step.
Could someone please show that induction in light of the question above?
Please bear in mind that this is from the very beginning of real analysis III and we have not learned measure theory yet.
real-analysis integration functional-analysis measure-theory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $phi_1, ldots phi_d: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ be continuos and have compact support.
Show that for
$$
f := bigotimes_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i: mathbb{R}^d to mathbb{R},
(x_1, ldots, x_d) mapsto prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i)
$$
we have
$$
int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(x) dx = prod_{i = 1}^{d} int_{mathbb{R}} phi_i(x_i) dx_i
$$
Proof
Since $f$ is continuous and has a compact support as well, we get
begin{align*}
int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(x) dx
& = int_{text{supp}(f)} prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx
overset{(ast)}{=} int_{text{supp}(phi_d)} left( ldots left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx_1 right) ldots right) d x_d \
& overset{(star)}{=} left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} phi_1(x_1) dx_1 right) left( int_{text{supp}(phi_d)} left( ldots left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} prod_{i = 2}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx_2 right) ldots right) d x_d right) \
& = ldots
= prod_{i = 1}^{d} int_{mathbb{R}} phi_i(x_i) dx_i
end{align*}
My Question
I don't understand the steps $(ast)$ and especially $(star)$ . Can we just ''pull out'' a one-dimensional integral since it's just a constant?
The proof is from Otto Forster: Analyis 3 (in German) on page 3.
This was a homework assignment and the corrector gave full marks to this answer but suggested using induction instead of the $ldots$-step.
Could someone please show that induction in light of the question above?
Please bear in mind that this is from the very beginning of real analysis III and we have not learned measure theory yet.
real-analysis integration functional-analysis measure-theory
Let $phi_1, ldots phi_d: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ be continuos and have compact support.
Show that for
$$
f := bigotimes_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i: mathbb{R}^d to mathbb{R},
(x_1, ldots, x_d) mapsto prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i)
$$
we have
$$
int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(x) dx = prod_{i = 1}^{d} int_{mathbb{R}} phi_i(x_i) dx_i
$$
Proof
Since $f$ is continuous and has a compact support as well, we get
begin{align*}
int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(x) dx
& = int_{text{supp}(f)} prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx
overset{(ast)}{=} int_{text{supp}(phi_d)} left( ldots left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} prod_{i = 1}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx_1 right) ldots right) d x_d \
& overset{(star)}{=} left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} phi_1(x_1) dx_1 right) left( int_{text{supp}(phi_d)} left( ldots left( int_{text{supp}(phi_1)} prod_{i = 2}^{d} phi_i(x_i) dx_2 right) ldots right) d x_d right) \
& = ldots
= prod_{i = 1}^{d} int_{mathbb{R}} phi_i(x_i) dx_i
end{align*}
My Question
I don't understand the steps $(ast)$ and especially $(star)$ . Can we just ''pull out'' a one-dimensional integral since it's just a constant?
The proof is from Otto Forster: Analyis 3 (in German) on page 3.
This was a homework assignment and the corrector gave full marks to this answer but suggested using induction instead of the $ldots$-step.
Could someone please show that induction in light of the question above?
Please bear in mind that this is from the very beginning of real analysis III and we have not learned measure theory yet.
real-analysis integration functional-analysis measure-theory
real-analysis integration functional-analysis measure-theory
asked Nov 17 at 21:50
Viktor Glombik
489321
489321
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Yes, you can pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ because it is a constant. To use induction simply note that when you pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ you are left with a similar integral with $n-1$ variables instead of $n$. By induction hypothesis this integral w.r.t $n-1$ variables can be written as a product of $n-1$ integrals.
ok what about step $(ast)$?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 18 at 9:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Yes, you can pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ because it is a constant. To use induction simply note that when you pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ you are left with a similar integral with $n-1$ variables instead of $n$. By induction hypothesis this integral w.r.t $n-1$ variables can be written as a product of $n-1$ integrals.
ok what about step $(ast)$?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 18 at 9:15
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Yes, you can pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ because it is a constant. To use induction simply note that when you pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ you are left with a similar integral with $n-1$ variables instead of $n$. By induction hypothesis this integral w.r.t $n-1$ variables can be written as a product of $n-1$ integrals.
ok what about step $(ast)$?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 18 at 9:15
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Yes, you can pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ because it is a constant. To use induction simply note that when you pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ you are left with a similar integral with $n-1$ variables instead of $n$. By induction hypothesis this integral w.r.t $n-1$ variables can be written as a product of $n-1$ integrals.
Yes, you can pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ because it is a constant. To use induction simply note that when you pull out $intphi_1(x_1), dx_1$ you are left with a similar integral with $n-1$ variables instead of $n$. By induction hypothesis this integral w.r.t $n-1$ variables can be written as a product of $n-1$ integrals.
answered Nov 17 at 23:37
Kavi Rama Murthy
44.8k31852
44.8k31852
ok what about step $(ast)$?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 18 at 9:15
add a comment |
ok what about step $(ast)$?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 18 at 9:15
ok what about step $(ast)$?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 18 at 9:15
ok what about step $(ast)$?
– Viktor Glombik
Nov 18 at 9:15
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002856%2fproof-of-int-mathbbrd-fx-dx-prod-i-1d-int-mathbbr-phi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown