If the number $“1”$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach...
$begingroup$
I have a problem understand this math problem:
Write a number on the board. This number is either multiplied by $2$ or raised to a square. If the number $"1"$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach $2^{2018}?$
A) $15$
B) $16$
C) $17$
D) $18$
E) $12$
I can't solve this problem. Because I don't understand the question. Now, I need to understand the question. Then maybe I can.
Is there a problem in the question? The question unclear for me...Can you explain me, what is the meaning of the question?
algebra-precalculus contest-math exponentiation
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have a problem understand this math problem:
Write a number on the board. This number is either multiplied by $2$ or raised to a square. If the number $"1"$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach $2^{2018}?$
A) $15$
B) $16$
C) $17$
D) $18$
E) $12$
I can't solve this problem. Because I don't understand the question. Now, I need to understand the question. Then maybe I can.
Is there a problem in the question? The question unclear for me...Can you explain me, what is the meaning of the question?
algebra-precalculus contest-math exponentiation
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
$endgroup$
– Rhys Hughes
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
$endgroup$
– Elementary
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have a problem understand this math problem:
Write a number on the board. This number is either multiplied by $2$ or raised to a square. If the number $"1"$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach $2^{2018}?$
A) $15$
B) $16$
C) $17$
D) $18$
E) $12$
I can't solve this problem. Because I don't understand the question. Now, I need to understand the question. Then maybe I can.
Is there a problem in the question? The question unclear for me...Can you explain me, what is the meaning of the question?
algebra-precalculus contest-math exponentiation
$endgroup$
I have a problem understand this math problem:
Write a number on the board. This number is either multiplied by $2$ or raised to a square. If the number $"1"$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach $2^{2018}?$
A) $15$
B) $16$
C) $17$
D) $18$
E) $12$
I can't solve this problem. Because I don't understand the question. Now, I need to understand the question. Then maybe I can.
Is there a problem in the question? The question unclear for me...Can you explain me, what is the meaning of the question?
algebra-precalculus contest-math exponentiation
algebra-precalculus contest-math exponentiation
edited Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
Elementary
asked Dec 15 '18 at 23:32
ElementaryElementary
360111
360111
$begingroup$
What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
$endgroup$
– Rhys Hughes
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
$endgroup$
– Elementary
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
$endgroup$
– Rhys Hughes
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
$endgroup$
– Elementary
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
$begingroup$
What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
1
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
$endgroup$
– Rhys Hughes
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
$endgroup$
– Rhys Hughes
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
$begingroup$
To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
$endgroup$
– Elementary
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
$endgroup$
– Elementary
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.
The best strategy is going backwards:
$$
2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
$$
Is this the most efficient way?
At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the problem means:
Given the two functions
$$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
$$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
What is the length of the shortest such sequence?
For example, one sequence that qualifies is
$$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
$$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
also works.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.
But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.
Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.
Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$
Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
$$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
So the answer is $17$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042072%2fif-the-number-1-is-written-at-the-beginning-at-least-how-many-steps-should%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.
The best strategy is going backwards:
$$
2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
$$
Is this the most efficient way?
At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.
The best strategy is going backwards:
$$
2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
$$
Is this the most efficient way?
At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.
The best strategy is going backwards:
$$
2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
$$
Is this the most efficient way?
At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.
$endgroup$
Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.
The best strategy is going backwards:
$$
2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
$$
Is this the most efficient way?
At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.
answered Dec 16 '18 at 20:46
egregegreg
184k1486205
184k1486205
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the problem means:
Given the two functions
$$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
$$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
What is the length of the shortest such sequence?
For example, one sequence that qualifies is
$$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
$$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
also works.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the problem means:
Given the two functions
$$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
$$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
What is the length of the shortest such sequence?
For example, one sequence that qualifies is
$$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
$$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
also works.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the problem means:
Given the two functions
$$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
$$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
What is the length of the shortest such sequence?
For example, one sequence that qualifies is
$$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
$$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
also works.
$endgroup$
I think the problem means:
Given the two functions
$$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
$$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
What is the length of the shortest such sequence?
For example, one sequence that qualifies is
$$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
$$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
also works.
edited Dec 16 '18 at 2:14
answered Dec 15 '18 at 23:37
Henning MakholmHenning Makholm
241k17308549
241k17308549
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.
But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.
Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.
Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.
But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.
Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.
Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.
But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.
Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.
Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.
$endgroup$
You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.
But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.
Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.
Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.
answered Dec 15 '18 at 23:40
ArthurArthur
117k7116200
117k7116200
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$
Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
$$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
So the answer is $17$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$
Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
$$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
So the answer is $17$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$
Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
$$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
So the answer is $17$.
$endgroup$
It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$
Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
$$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
So the answer is $17$.
answered Dec 25 '18 at 19:35
user600785user600785
11310
11310
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042072%2fif-the-number-1-is-written-at-the-beginning-at-least-how-many-steps-should%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
1
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
$endgroup$
– Rhys Hughes
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34
$begingroup$
To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
$endgroup$
– Elementary
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36