If the number $“1”$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach...












2












$begingroup$


I have a problem understand this math problem:




Write a number on the board. This number is either multiplied by $2$ or raised to a square. If the number $"1"$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach $2^{2018}?$




A) $15$



B) $16$



C) $17$



D) $18$



E) $12$



I can't solve this problem. Because I don't understand the question. Now, I need to understand the question. Then maybe I can.



Is there a problem in the question? The question unclear for me...Can you explain me, what is the meaning of the question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Rhys Hughes
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34










  • $begingroup$
    Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34










  • $begingroup$
    To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36










  • $begingroup$
    @EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Elementary
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
















2












$begingroup$


I have a problem understand this math problem:




Write a number on the board. This number is either multiplied by $2$ or raised to a square. If the number $"1"$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach $2^{2018}?$




A) $15$



B) $16$



C) $17$



D) $18$



E) $12$



I can't solve this problem. Because I don't understand the question. Now, I need to understand the question. Then maybe I can.



Is there a problem in the question? The question unclear for me...Can you explain me, what is the meaning of the question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Rhys Hughes
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34










  • $begingroup$
    Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34










  • $begingroup$
    To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36










  • $begingroup$
    @EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Elementary
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I have a problem understand this math problem:




Write a number on the board. This number is either multiplied by $2$ or raised to a square. If the number $"1"$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach $2^{2018}?$




A) $15$



B) $16$



C) $17$



D) $18$



E) $12$



I can't solve this problem. Because I don't understand the question. Now, I need to understand the question. Then maybe I can.



Is there a problem in the question? The question unclear for me...Can you explain me, what is the meaning of the question?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have a problem understand this math problem:




Write a number on the board. This number is either multiplied by $2$ or raised to a square. If the number $"1"$ is written at the beginning, at least how many steps should be taken to reach $2^{2018}?$




A) $15$



B) $16$



C) $17$



D) $18$



E) $12$



I can't solve this problem. Because I don't understand the question. Now, I need to understand the question. Then maybe I can.



Is there a problem in the question? The question unclear for me...Can you explain me, what is the meaning of the question?







algebra-precalculus contest-math exponentiation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 15 '18 at 23:34







Elementary

















asked Dec 15 '18 at 23:32









ElementaryElementary

360111




360111












  • $begingroup$
    What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Rhys Hughes
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34










  • $begingroup$
    Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34










  • $begingroup$
    To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36










  • $begingroup$
    @EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Elementary
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36


















  • $begingroup$
    What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Rhys Hughes
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34










  • $begingroup$
    Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:34










  • $begingroup$
    To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36










  • $begingroup$
    @EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
    $endgroup$
    – Elementary
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36
















$begingroup$
What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34






$begingroup$
What is meant by "raised to a square?" A perfect square? i.e. if we raise $n$ to a square, we take some integer $p$ and then find $n^{p^2}$? And if so, any $p$ can be chosen, or are we limited to only some?
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34






1




1




$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
$endgroup$
– Rhys Hughes
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34




$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer I would think "raised to a square" would be $nto n^2$
$endgroup$
– Rhys Hughes
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34












$begingroup$
Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34




$begingroup$
Given a number, you can perform two operations on it: double it or turn it into its square. Your initial number is one. How many operations at least do you need to turn it into $2^{2018}$?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Dec 15 '18 at 23:34












$begingroup$
To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36




$begingroup$
To get comfortable with the question, try it for smaller exponents. To get $2^1$ you just multiply the starting $1$ by two, so one step. to get $2^2$ you first multiply by two and then square, so two steps. Now you do $2^3,2^4, 2^5$ and so on until you get the hang of it.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36












$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
$endgroup$
– Elementary
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36




$begingroup$
@EeveeTrainer oh sorry, original question is not English. Please, edit...Yes, perfect square. $2rightarrow 2^2$
$endgroup$
– Elementary
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.



The best strategy is going backwards:
$$
2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
$$

Is this the most efficient way?



At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    6












    $begingroup$

    I think the problem means:




    Given the two functions
    $$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
    consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
    $$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
    What is the length of the shortest such sequence?




    For example, one sequence that qualifies is
    $$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
    But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
    $$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
    also works.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      3












      $begingroup$

      You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.



      But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.



      Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.



      Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        0












        $begingroup$

        It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$



        Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
        if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
        now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
        $$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
        So the answer is $17$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042072%2fif-the-number-1-is-written-at-the-beginning-at-least-how-many-steps-should%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.



          The best strategy is going backwards:
          $$
          2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
          xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
          xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
          xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
          xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
          xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
          $$

          Is this the most efficient way?



          At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$


















            1












            $begingroup$

            Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.



            The best strategy is going backwards:
            $$
            2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
            xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
            xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
            xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
            xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
            xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
            $$

            Is this the most efficient way?



            At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$
















              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.



              The best strategy is going backwards:
              $$
              2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
              xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
              xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
              xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
              xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
              xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
              $$

              Is this the most efficient way?



              At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Since you want to go to $2^{2018}$, it's easier to use exponents: the operations are doubling or adding $1$, start from $0$ and get to $2018$.



              The best strategy is going backwards:
              $$
              2018 xrightarrow{/2} 1009 xrightarrow{-1} 1008
              xrightarrow{/2} 504 xrightarrow{/2} 252 xrightarrow{/2} 126
              xrightarrow{/2} 63 xrightarrow{-1} 62 xrightarrow{/2} 31
              xrightarrow{-1} 30 xrightarrow{/2} 15 xrightarrow{-1} 14
              xrightarrow{/2} 7 xrightarrow{-1} 6 xrightarrow{/2} 3
              xrightarrow{-1} 2 xrightarrow{/2} 1 xrightarrow{-1} 0
              $$

              Is this the most efficient way?



              At odd numbers you have no choice. Suppose the number $n$ is even; if it is a multiple of $4$, $n=4k$, you get at $k$ in two steps and this is obviously the best choice: otherwise you have to subtract $1$ twice, divide by $2$, subtract $1$ and divide again by $2$ just to arrive at $k-1$, five steps against two for a very small gain; in the average, this method is worse. If $n=4k+2$ you can choose between dividing by $2$ and subtracting $1$ or subtracting $1$ twice and dividing by $2$: two steps in the former case, three in the latter.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Dec 16 '18 at 20:46









              egregegreg

              184k1486205




              184k1486205























                  6












                  $begingroup$

                  I think the problem means:




                  Given the two functions
                  $$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
                  consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
                  $$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
                  What is the length of the shortest such sequence?




                  For example, one sequence that qualifies is
                  $$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
                  But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
                  $$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
                  also works.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$


















                    6












                    $begingroup$

                    I think the problem means:




                    Given the two functions
                    $$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
                    consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
                    $$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
                    What is the length of the shortest such sequence?




                    For example, one sequence that qualifies is
                    $$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
                    But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
                    $$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
                    also works.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$
















                      6












                      6








                      6





                      $begingroup$

                      I think the problem means:




                      Given the two functions
                      $$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
                      consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
                      $$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
                      What is the length of the shortest such sequence?




                      For example, one sequence that qualifies is
                      $$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
                      But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
                      $$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
                      also works.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      I think the problem means:




                      Given the two functions
                      $$ f(x) = 2x \g(x) = x^2 $$
                      consider sequences of $f$s and $g$s such that,
                      $$ g(f(g(g(cdots(g(f(1)))cdots )))) = 2^{2018} $$
                      What is the length of the shortest such sequence?




                      For example, one sequence that qualifies is
                      $$ underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{2018;ftext{s}} $$
                      But that is not the shortest possible sequence, because
                      $$ gcirc underbrace{fcirc fcirc cdots circ f circ f}_{1009;ftext{s}} $$
                      also works.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Dec 16 '18 at 2:14

























                      answered Dec 15 '18 at 23:37









                      Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

                      241k17308549




                      241k17308549























                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.



                          But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.



                          Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.



                          Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            3












                            $begingroup$

                            You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.



                            But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.



                            Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.



                            Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              3












                              3








                              3





                              $begingroup$

                              You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.



                              But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.



                              Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.



                              Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              You start with $1$. Then you can double that to get $2$, double it again to get $4$, then again to get $8$ and once again to get $16$. It took four steps to get to $16=2^4$.



                              But I could also have started at 1, then doubled it to $2$, then squared it to $4$, then squared that to get $16$. This way it only took three steps to reach $16=2^4$.



                              Your problem asks you to get to $2^{2018}$ instead of $2^4$, but the idea is the same. Use these two operations to get there as fast as possible.



                              Hint: Write everything as powers of $2$, starting with $1=2^0$. That makes all the numbers that appear a lot easier to handle.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Dec 15 '18 at 23:40









                              ArthurArthur

                              117k7116200




                              117k7116200























                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$



                                  Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
                                  if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
                                  now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
                                  $$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
                                  So the answer is $17$.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$



                                    Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
                                    if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
                                    now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
                                    $$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
                                    So the answer is $17$.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$



                                      Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
                                      if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
                                      now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
                                      $$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
                                      So the answer is $17$.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      It is easy to see that at first we find a way to have $2$ so we multiply by $2$



                                      Now it is obvius that raising to the square is much easier to have a big number
                                      if we raise to the square we will have $2^2$
                                      now we will do a string of operations by multiplying or raising to the square
                                      $$1 - 2-2^2-2^3-2^6-2^7-2^{14}-2^{15}-2^{30}-2^{31}-2^{62}-2^{63}-2^{126}-2^{252}-2^{504}-2^{1008}-2^{1009}-2^{2018}$$
                                      So the answer is $17$.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Dec 25 '18 at 19:35









                                      user600785user600785

                                      11310




                                      11310






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042072%2fif-the-number-1-is-written-at-the-beginning-at-least-how-many-steps-should%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Plaza Victoria

                                          Puebla de Zaragoza

                                          Musa