Angle of a triangle inscribed in a square












4












$begingroup$


Say we have a square $ABCD$. Put points $E$ and $F$ on sides $AB$ and $BC$ respectively, so that $BE = BF$. Let $BN$ be the altitude in triangle $BCE$. What is $angle DNF$?



I'm inclined to say that it's a right angle because that's what it looks like from what I've drawn, but I have no idea how to proceed.












share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I have given an argument why your conjecture is true. I am more interested in why you looked at this problem and how you came up with this neat little conjecture.
    $endgroup$
    – user17762
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:29










  • $begingroup$
    If you want a purely Euclidean-geometry proof, you might start by noting the similarity of triangles $EBC$, $ENB$, and $BNC$, and then trying to prove that triangles $BNF$ and $CND$ are similar. I'm not sure exactly how the proof will go, but it feels doable.
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:32










  • $begingroup$
    @Marvis I'm in a 2nd year geometry course, and this is part of my homework due on Friday. I'm being a keener and getting it done early :) I just guessed on the right angle part.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:46
















4












$begingroup$


Say we have a square $ABCD$. Put points $E$ and $F$ on sides $AB$ and $BC$ respectively, so that $BE = BF$. Let $BN$ be the altitude in triangle $BCE$. What is $angle DNF$?



I'm inclined to say that it's a right angle because that's what it looks like from what I've drawn, but I have no idea how to proceed.












share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I have given an argument why your conjecture is true. I am more interested in why you looked at this problem and how you came up with this neat little conjecture.
    $endgroup$
    – user17762
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:29










  • $begingroup$
    If you want a purely Euclidean-geometry proof, you might start by noting the similarity of triangles $EBC$, $ENB$, and $BNC$, and then trying to prove that triangles $BNF$ and $CND$ are similar. I'm not sure exactly how the proof will go, but it feels doable.
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:32










  • $begingroup$
    @Marvis I'm in a 2nd year geometry course, and this is part of my homework due on Friday. I'm being a keener and getting it done early :) I just guessed on the right angle part.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:46














4












4








4





$begingroup$


Say we have a square $ABCD$. Put points $E$ and $F$ on sides $AB$ and $BC$ respectively, so that $BE = BF$. Let $BN$ be the altitude in triangle $BCE$. What is $angle DNF$?



I'm inclined to say that it's a right angle because that's what it looks like from what I've drawn, but I have no idea how to proceed.












share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Say we have a square $ABCD$. Put points $E$ and $F$ on sides $AB$ and $BC$ respectively, so that $BE = BF$. Let $BN$ be the altitude in triangle $BCE$. What is $angle DNF$?



I'm inclined to say that it's a right angle because that's what it looks like from what I've drawn, but I have no idea how to proceed.









geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 23 '18 at 10:15









Glorfindel

3,41381930




3,41381930










asked Jun 5 '12 at 5:07









CharlieCharlie

9237




9237












  • $begingroup$
    I have given an argument why your conjecture is true. I am more interested in why you looked at this problem and how you came up with this neat little conjecture.
    $endgroup$
    – user17762
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:29










  • $begingroup$
    If you want a purely Euclidean-geometry proof, you might start by noting the similarity of triangles $EBC$, $ENB$, and $BNC$, and then trying to prove that triangles $BNF$ and $CND$ are similar. I'm not sure exactly how the proof will go, but it feels doable.
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:32










  • $begingroup$
    @Marvis I'm in a 2nd year geometry course, and this is part of my homework due on Friday. I'm being a keener and getting it done early :) I just guessed on the right angle part.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:46


















  • $begingroup$
    I have given an argument why your conjecture is true. I am more interested in why you looked at this problem and how you came up with this neat little conjecture.
    $endgroup$
    – user17762
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:29










  • $begingroup$
    If you want a purely Euclidean-geometry proof, you might start by noting the similarity of triangles $EBC$, $ENB$, and $BNC$, and then trying to prove that triangles $BNF$ and $CND$ are similar. I'm not sure exactly how the proof will go, but it feels doable.
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:32










  • $begingroup$
    @Marvis I'm in a 2nd year geometry course, and this is part of my homework due on Friday. I'm being a keener and getting it done early :) I just guessed on the right angle part.
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie
    Jun 5 '12 at 5:46
















$begingroup$
I have given an argument why your conjecture is true. I am more interested in why you looked at this problem and how you came up with this neat little conjecture.
$endgroup$
– user17762
Jun 5 '12 at 5:29




$begingroup$
I have given an argument why your conjecture is true. I am more interested in why you looked at this problem and how you came up with this neat little conjecture.
$endgroup$
– user17762
Jun 5 '12 at 5:29












$begingroup$
If you want a purely Euclidean-geometry proof, you might start by noting the similarity of triangles $EBC$, $ENB$, and $BNC$, and then trying to prove that triangles $BNF$ and $CND$ are similar. I'm not sure exactly how the proof will go, but it feels doable.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Jun 5 '12 at 5:32




$begingroup$
If you want a purely Euclidean-geometry proof, you might start by noting the similarity of triangles $EBC$, $ENB$, and $BNC$, and then trying to prove that triangles $BNF$ and $CND$ are similar. I'm not sure exactly how the proof will go, but it feels doable.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Jun 5 '12 at 5:32












$begingroup$
@Marvis I'm in a 2nd year geometry course, and this is part of my homework due on Friday. I'm being a keener and getting it done early :) I just guessed on the right angle part.
$endgroup$
– Charlie
Jun 5 '12 at 5:46




$begingroup$
@Marvis I'm in a 2nd year geometry course, and this is part of my homework due on Friday. I'm being a keener and getting it done early :) I just guessed on the right angle part.
$endgroup$
– Charlie
Jun 5 '12 at 5:46










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

$angle DNF = 90^circ Longleftrightarrow angle BNF = angle CND$. It suffics to prove that $triangle BNF sim triangle CND$.
Well, it's trivial:
$angle NBF = angle BEC = angle NCD$ and $displaystyle frac{NB}{BF} = frac{NB}{BE} = sinangle NEB = cosangle NCB = frac{NC}{CB} = frac{NC}{CD}$. Q.E.D






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That $NB/BE = NC/CB$ follows from the similarity of right triangles $ENB$ and $BNC$ without need for trigonometry. Nice proof!
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Jun 5 '12 at 7:16










  • $begingroup$
    @RahulNarain Trigonometry is an abbreviation of similiar triangles here because we don't use angle transformation formulas such as $sin(alpha+beta)=cdots$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yai0Phah
    Jun 5 '12 at 7:20












  • $begingroup$
    Indeed; what I meant to say was that the use of trigonometric notation is not needed. It suggests that more powerful machinery is being employed than actually is.
    $endgroup$
    – Rahul
    Jun 5 '12 at 9:12



















2












$begingroup$

enter image description here



Firstly We can write

(1) Oklid relation from $triangle CNB$



$h^2=m(k+x)$



(2) Pisagor relation from $triangle DPN$



$a^2=(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2$



(3) Pisagor relation from $triangle FRN$



$b^2=h^2+k^2$



(4) Pisagor relation from $triangle DCF$



$c^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$





if DNF triange is a right triangle,It must satisfy $a^2+b^2=c^2$.



$(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



$(x+k)^2+(x+k+m)^2-2h(x+k+m)+h^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



$(x+k)^2-2h(x+k+m)+2h^2+k^2=x^2$



$xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+h^2=0$



$xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+m(k+x)=0$



$-h(x+k+m)+(k+m)(k+x)=0$



$frac{x+k}{x+k+m}=frac{h}{k+m}$



This result is equal to the rates of thales formula for similar triangles $triangle CRN sim triangle CBE$



Thus $a^2+b^2=c^2$ is correct for $triangle DNF$ .






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Let us do it through coordinate geometry. Let $B$ be the origin. Lets fix the coordinates first. $$A = (0,a)\ B = (0,0) \ C = (a,0)\ D = (a,a)$$ Since $E$ and $F$ are equidistant from $B$, lets say $$F = (b,0)\ E = (0,b)$$ where $0 leq b leq a$. The equation of the line $CE$ is $dfrac{x}{a} + dfrac{y}{b} = 1$. The equation of $BN$ is $y = dfrac{a}{b}x$. This gives us the coordinate of $N$ as $left( dfrac{ab^2}{a^2 + b^2},dfrac{a^2b}{a^2 + b^2} right)$.



    The slope of $FN$ is $m_1 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - 0}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-b} = dfrac{a^2}{ab - a^2 - b^2}$.



    The slope of $DN$ is $m_2 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - a}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-a} = dfrac{ab - a^2 - b^2}{b^2 - a^2 - b^2} = - left(dfrac{ab-a^2-b^2}{a^2} right)$.



    Hence, the product of the slopes is $m_1m_2 = -1$. Hence your conjecture is indeed correct. I am waiting for someone to post a nicer geometric argument.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      HINT: Try to resort to Homothetic transformation and you're done immediately. Another way is to connect $N$ to the middle of the $DF$ (let's call that point $M$) and prove that you have there $NM$=$DM$=$MF$ (here you may resort to Apollonius' theorem). You also could resort to the cyclic quadrilaterals as another approaching way.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$














        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154087%2fangle-of-a-triangle-inscribed-in-a-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2












        $begingroup$

        $angle DNF = 90^circ Longleftrightarrow angle BNF = angle CND$. It suffics to prove that $triangle BNF sim triangle CND$.
        Well, it's trivial:
        $angle NBF = angle BEC = angle NCD$ and $displaystyle frac{NB}{BF} = frac{NB}{BE} = sinangle NEB = cosangle NCB = frac{NC}{CB} = frac{NC}{CD}$. Q.E.D






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          That $NB/BE = NC/CB$ follows from the similarity of right triangles $ENB$ and $BNC$ without need for trigonometry. Nice proof!
          $endgroup$
          – Rahul
          Jun 5 '12 at 7:16










        • $begingroup$
          @RahulNarain Trigonometry is an abbreviation of similiar triangles here because we don't use angle transformation formulas such as $sin(alpha+beta)=cdots$.
          $endgroup$
          – Yai0Phah
          Jun 5 '12 at 7:20












        • $begingroup$
          Indeed; what I meant to say was that the use of trigonometric notation is not needed. It suggests that more powerful machinery is being employed than actually is.
          $endgroup$
          – Rahul
          Jun 5 '12 at 9:12
















        2












        $begingroup$

        $angle DNF = 90^circ Longleftrightarrow angle BNF = angle CND$. It suffics to prove that $triangle BNF sim triangle CND$.
        Well, it's trivial:
        $angle NBF = angle BEC = angle NCD$ and $displaystyle frac{NB}{BF} = frac{NB}{BE} = sinangle NEB = cosangle NCB = frac{NC}{CB} = frac{NC}{CD}$. Q.E.D






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          That $NB/BE = NC/CB$ follows from the similarity of right triangles $ENB$ and $BNC$ without need for trigonometry. Nice proof!
          $endgroup$
          – Rahul
          Jun 5 '12 at 7:16










        • $begingroup$
          @RahulNarain Trigonometry is an abbreviation of similiar triangles here because we don't use angle transformation formulas such as $sin(alpha+beta)=cdots$.
          $endgroup$
          – Yai0Phah
          Jun 5 '12 at 7:20












        • $begingroup$
          Indeed; what I meant to say was that the use of trigonometric notation is not needed. It suggests that more powerful machinery is being employed than actually is.
          $endgroup$
          – Rahul
          Jun 5 '12 at 9:12














        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        $angle DNF = 90^circ Longleftrightarrow angle BNF = angle CND$. It suffics to prove that $triangle BNF sim triangle CND$.
        Well, it's trivial:
        $angle NBF = angle BEC = angle NCD$ and $displaystyle frac{NB}{BF} = frac{NB}{BE} = sinangle NEB = cosangle NCB = frac{NC}{CB} = frac{NC}{CD}$. Q.E.D






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $angle DNF = 90^circ Longleftrightarrow angle BNF = angle CND$. It suffics to prove that $triangle BNF sim triangle CND$.
        Well, it's trivial:
        $angle NBF = angle BEC = angle NCD$ and $displaystyle frac{NB}{BF} = frac{NB}{BE} = sinangle NEB = cosangle NCB = frac{NC}{CB} = frac{NC}{CD}$. Q.E.D







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jun 5 '12 at 7:06









        Yai0PhahYai0Phah

        4,78511356




        4,78511356












        • $begingroup$
          That $NB/BE = NC/CB$ follows from the similarity of right triangles $ENB$ and $BNC$ without need for trigonometry. Nice proof!
          $endgroup$
          – Rahul
          Jun 5 '12 at 7:16










        • $begingroup$
          @RahulNarain Trigonometry is an abbreviation of similiar triangles here because we don't use angle transformation formulas such as $sin(alpha+beta)=cdots$.
          $endgroup$
          – Yai0Phah
          Jun 5 '12 at 7:20












        • $begingroup$
          Indeed; what I meant to say was that the use of trigonometric notation is not needed. It suggests that more powerful machinery is being employed than actually is.
          $endgroup$
          – Rahul
          Jun 5 '12 at 9:12


















        • $begingroup$
          That $NB/BE = NC/CB$ follows from the similarity of right triangles $ENB$ and $BNC$ without need for trigonometry. Nice proof!
          $endgroup$
          – Rahul
          Jun 5 '12 at 7:16










        • $begingroup$
          @RahulNarain Trigonometry is an abbreviation of similiar triangles here because we don't use angle transformation formulas such as $sin(alpha+beta)=cdots$.
          $endgroup$
          – Yai0Phah
          Jun 5 '12 at 7:20












        • $begingroup$
          Indeed; what I meant to say was that the use of trigonometric notation is not needed. It suggests that more powerful machinery is being employed than actually is.
          $endgroup$
          – Rahul
          Jun 5 '12 at 9:12
















        $begingroup$
        That $NB/BE = NC/CB$ follows from the similarity of right triangles $ENB$ and $BNC$ without need for trigonometry. Nice proof!
        $endgroup$
        – Rahul
        Jun 5 '12 at 7:16




        $begingroup$
        That $NB/BE = NC/CB$ follows from the similarity of right triangles $ENB$ and $BNC$ without need for trigonometry. Nice proof!
        $endgroup$
        – Rahul
        Jun 5 '12 at 7:16












        $begingroup$
        @RahulNarain Trigonometry is an abbreviation of similiar triangles here because we don't use angle transformation formulas such as $sin(alpha+beta)=cdots$.
        $endgroup$
        – Yai0Phah
        Jun 5 '12 at 7:20






        $begingroup$
        @RahulNarain Trigonometry is an abbreviation of similiar triangles here because we don't use angle transformation formulas such as $sin(alpha+beta)=cdots$.
        $endgroup$
        – Yai0Phah
        Jun 5 '12 at 7:20














        $begingroup$
        Indeed; what I meant to say was that the use of trigonometric notation is not needed. It suggests that more powerful machinery is being employed than actually is.
        $endgroup$
        – Rahul
        Jun 5 '12 at 9:12




        $begingroup$
        Indeed; what I meant to say was that the use of trigonometric notation is not needed. It suggests that more powerful machinery is being employed than actually is.
        $endgroup$
        – Rahul
        Jun 5 '12 at 9:12











        2












        $begingroup$

        enter image description here



        Firstly We can write

        (1) Oklid relation from $triangle CNB$



        $h^2=m(k+x)$



        (2) Pisagor relation from $triangle DPN$



        $a^2=(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2$



        (3) Pisagor relation from $triangle FRN$



        $b^2=h^2+k^2$



        (4) Pisagor relation from $triangle DCF$



        $c^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$





        if DNF triange is a right triangle,It must satisfy $a^2+b^2=c^2$.



        $(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



        $(x+k)^2+(x+k+m)^2-2h(x+k+m)+h^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



        $(x+k)^2-2h(x+k+m)+2h^2+k^2=x^2$



        $xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+h^2=0$



        $xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+m(k+x)=0$



        $-h(x+k+m)+(k+m)(k+x)=0$



        $frac{x+k}{x+k+m}=frac{h}{k+m}$



        This result is equal to the rates of thales formula for similar triangles $triangle CRN sim triangle CBE$



        Thus $a^2+b^2=c^2$ is correct for $triangle DNF$ .






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          enter image description here



          Firstly We can write

          (1) Oklid relation from $triangle CNB$



          $h^2=m(k+x)$



          (2) Pisagor relation from $triangle DPN$



          $a^2=(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2$



          (3) Pisagor relation from $triangle FRN$



          $b^2=h^2+k^2$



          (4) Pisagor relation from $triangle DCF$



          $c^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$





          if DNF triange is a right triangle,It must satisfy $a^2+b^2=c^2$.



          $(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



          $(x+k)^2+(x+k+m)^2-2h(x+k+m)+h^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



          $(x+k)^2-2h(x+k+m)+2h^2+k^2=x^2$



          $xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+h^2=0$



          $xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+m(k+x)=0$



          $-h(x+k+m)+(k+m)(k+x)=0$



          $frac{x+k}{x+k+m}=frac{h}{k+m}$



          This result is equal to the rates of thales formula for similar triangles $triangle CRN sim triangle CBE$



          Thus $a^2+b^2=c^2$ is correct for $triangle DNF$ .






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            enter image description here



            Firstly We can write

            (1) Oklid relation from $triangle CNB$



            $h^2=m(k+x)$



            (2) Pisagor relation from $triangle DPN$



            $a^2=(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2$



            (3) Pisagor relation from $triangle FRN$



            $b^2=h^2+k^2$



            (4) Pisagor relation from $triangle DCF$



            $c^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$





            if DNF triange is a right triangle,It must satisfy $a^2+b^2=c^2$.



            $(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



            $(x+k)^2+(x+k+m)^2-2h(x+k+m)+h^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



            $(x+k)^2-2h(x+k+m)+2h^2+k^2=x^2$



            $xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+h^2=0$



            $xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+m(k+x)=0$



            $-h(x+k+m)+(k+m)(k+x)=0$



            $frac{x+k}{x+k+m}=frac{h}{k+m}$



            This result is equal to the rates of thales formula for similar triangles $triangle CRN sim triangle CBE$



            Thus $a^2+b^2=c^2$ is correct for $triangle DNF$ .






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            enter image description here



            Firstly We can write

            (1) Oklid relation from $triangle CNB$



            $h^2=m(k+x)$



            (2) Pisagor relation from $triangle DPN$



            $a^2=(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2$



            (3) Pisagor relation from $triangle FRN$



            $b^2=h^2+k^2$



            (4) Pisagor relation from $triangle DCF$



            $c^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$





            if DNF triange is a right triangle,It must satisfy $a^2+b^2=c^2$.



            $(x+k)^2+(x+k+m-h)^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



            $(x+k)^2+(x+k+m)^2-2h(x+k+m)+h^2+h^2+k^2=x^2+(x+k+m)^2$



            $(x+k)^2-2h(x+k+m)+2h^2+k^2=x^2$



            $xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+h^2=0$



            $xk+k^2-h(x+k+m)+m(k+x)=0$



            $-h(x+k+m)+(k+m)(k+x)=0$



            $frac{x+k}{x+k+m}=frac{h}{k+m}$



            This result is equal to the rates of thales formula for similar triangles $triangle CRN sim triangle CBE$



            Thus $a^2+b^2=c^2$ is correct for $triangle DNF$ .







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jun 5 '12 at 14:04

























            answered Jun 5 '12 at 8:45









            MathloverMathlover

            6,27222469




            6,27222469























                1












                $begingroup$

                Let us do it through coordinate geometry. Let $B$ be the origin. Lets fix the coordinates first. $$A = (0,a)\ B = (0,0) \ C = (a,0)\ D = (a,a)$$ Since $E$ and $F$ are equidistant from $B$, lets say $$F = (b,0)\ E = (0,b)$$ where $0 leq b leq a$. The equation of the line $CE$ is $dfrac{x}{a} + dfrac{y}{b} = 1$. The equation of $BN$ is $y = dfrac{a}{b}x$. This gives us the coordinate of $N$ as $left( dfrac{ab^2}{a^2 + b^2},dfrac{a^2b}{a^2 + b^2} right)$.



                The slope of $FN$ is $m_1 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - 0}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-b} = dfrac{a^2}{ab - a^2 - b^2}$.



                The slope of $DN$ is $m_2 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - a}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-a} = dfrac{ab - a^2 - b^2}{b^2 - a^2 - b^2} = - left(dfrac{ab-a^2-b^2}{a^2} right)$.



                Hence, the product of the slopes is $m_1m_2 = -1$. Hence your conjecture is indeed correct. I am waiting for someone to post a nicer geometric argument.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Let us do it through coordinate geometry. Let $B$ be the origin. Lets fix the coordinates first. $$A = (0,a)\ B = (0,0) \ C = (a,0)\ D = (a,a)$$ Since $E$ and $F$ are equidistant from $B$, lets say $$F = (b,0)\ E = (0,b)$$ where $0 leq b leq a$. The equation of the line $CE$ is $dfrac{x}{a} + dfrac{y}{b} = 1$. The equation of $BN$ is $y = dfrac{a}{b}x$. This gives us the coordinate of $N$ as $left( dfrac{ab^2}{a^2 + b^2},dfrac{a^2b}{a^2 + b^2} right)$.



                  The slope of $FN$ is $m_1 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - 0}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-b} = dfrac{a^2}{ab - a^2 - b^2}$.



                  The slope of $DN$ is $m_2 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - a}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-a} = dfrac{ab - a^2 - b^2}{b^2 - a^2 - b^2} = - left(dfrac{ab-a^2-b^2}{a^2} right)$.



                  Hence, the product of the slopes is $m_1m_2 = -1$. Hence your conjecture is indeed correct. I am waiting for someone to post a nicer geometric argument.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    Let us do it through coordinate geometry. Let $B$ be the origin. Lets fix the coordinates first. $$A = (0,a)\ B = (0,0) \ C = (a,0)\ D = (a,a)$$ Since $E$ and $F$ are equidistant from $B$, lets say $$F = (b,0)\ E = (0,b)$$ where $0 leq b leq a$. The equation of the line $CE$ is $dfrac{x}{a} + dfrac{y}{b} = 1$. The equation of $BN$ is $y = dfrac{a}{b}x$. This gives us the coordinate of $N$ as $left( dfrac{ab^2}{a^2 + b^2},dfrac{a^2b}{a^2 + b^2} right)$.



                    The slope of $FN$ is $m_1 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - 0}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-b} = dfrac{a^2}{ab - a^2 - b^2}$.



                    The slope of $DN$ is $m_2 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - a}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-a} = dfrac{ab - a^2 - b^2}{b^2 - a^2 - b^2} = - left(dfrac{ab-a^2-b^2}{a^2} right)$.



                    Hence, the product of the slopes is $m_1m_2 = -1$. Hence your conjecture is indeed correct. I am waiting for someone to post a nicer geometric argument.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Let us do it through coordinate geometry. Let $B$ be the origin. Lets fix the coordinates first. $$A = (0,a)\ B = (0,0) \ C = (a,0)\ D = (a,a)$$ Since $E$ and $F$ are equidistant from $B$, lets say $$F = (b,0)\ E = (0,b)$$ where $0 leq b leq a$. The equation of the line $CE$ is $dfrac{x}{a} + dfrac{y}{b} = 1$. The equation of $BN$ is $y = dfrac{a}{b}x$. This gives us the coordinate of $N$ as $left( dfrac{ab^2}{a^2 + b^2},dfrac{a^2b}{a^2 + b^2} right)$.



                    The slope of $FN$ is $m_1 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - 0}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-b} = dfrac{a^2}{ab - a^2 - b^2}$.



                    The slope of $DN$ is $m_2 = dfrac{a^2b/(a^2+b^2) - a}{ab^2/(a^2+b^2)-a} = dfrac{ab - a^2 - b^2}{b^2 - a^2 - b^2} = - left(dfrac{ab-a^2-b^2}{a^2} right)$.



                    Hence, the product of the slopes is $m_1m_2 = -1$. Hence your conjecture is indeed correct. I am waiting for someone to post a nicer geometric argument.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jun 5 '12 at 5:27







                    user17762






























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        HINT: Try to resort to Homothetic transformation and you're done immediately. Another way is to connect $N$ to the middle of the $DF$ (let's call that point $M$) and prove that you have there $NM$=$DM$=$MF$ (here you may resort to Apollonius' theorem). You also could resort to the cyclic quadrilaterals as another approaching way.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          HINT: Try to resort to Homothetic transformation and you're done immediately. Another way is to connect $N$ to the middle of the $DF$ (let's call that point $M$) and prove that you have there $NM$=$DM$=$MF$ (here you may resort to Apollonius' theorem). You also could resort to the cyclic quadrilaterals as another approaching way.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            HINT: Try to resort to Homothetic transformation and you're done immediately. Another way is to connect $N$ to the middle of the $DF$ (let's call that point $M$) and prove that you have there $NM$=$DM$=$MF$ (here you may resort to Apollonius' theorem). You also could resort to the cyclic quadrilaterals as another approaching way.






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            HINT: Try to resort to Homothetic transformation and you're done immediately. Another way is to connect $N$ to the middle of the $DF$ (let's call that point $M$) and prove that you have there $NM$=$DM$=$MF$ (here you may resort to Apollonius' theorem). You also could resort to the cyclic quadrilaterals as another approaching way.







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited Jun 5 '12 at 22:13

























                            answered Jun 5 '12 at 21:35









                            user 1357113user 1357113

                            22.6k878227




                            22.6k878227






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154087%2fangle-of-a-triangle-inscribed-in-a-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Plaza Victoria

                                Puebla de Zaragoza

                                Musa