What is wrong with my conclusion (compositum of local fields)?
$begingroup$
Let $K = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3)$ where $zeta_3$ is a primitive third root of unity, and $F = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3,sqrt[3]{2})$. Furthermore, let $L = mathbb{Q}(zeta_3,beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 sqrt[3]{2}$.
My conclusion: Since $beta^3/zeta_3 = sqrt[3]{2}$, the field $F$ is contained in $L$. Therefore, the compositum $FL$ is $L$ and therefore, $FL/L$ has degree $1$.
Problem: My professor told me briefly that $F$ can not be contained in $L$ because $(frac{beta}{sqrt[3]{2}})^3 = zeta_3$ which means that $FL$ has a primitive ninth root of unity which neither exists in $F$ not in $L$.
Could you please explain me why neither $F$ nor $L$ have a primitive ninth root of unity? And why was my argument wrong? I thought in order to show $Fsubset L$ it enough to show that the elements generating $F$ are in $L$ too, so $zeta_3 in L$ (which is obvious) and $sqrt[3]{2} in L$ (which follows from my computation above).
Any help is really appreciated!
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $K = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3)$ where $zeta_3$ is a primitive third root of unity, and $F = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3,sqrt[3]{2})$. Furthermore, let $L = mathbb{Q}(zeta_3,beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 sqrt[3]{2}$.
My conclusion: Since $beta^3/zeta_3 = sqrt[3]{2}$, the field $F$ is contained in $L$. Therefore, the compositum $FL$ is $L$ and therefore, $FL/L$ has degree $1$.
Problem: My professor told me briefly that $F$ can not be contained in $L$ because $(frac{beta}{sqrt[3]{2}})^3 = zeta_3$ which means that $FL$ has a primitive ninth root of unity which neither exists in $F$ not in $L$.
Could you please explain me why neither $F$ nor $L$ have a primitive ninth root of unity? And why was my argument wrong? I thought in order to show $Fsubset L$ it enough to show that the elements generating $F$ are in $L$ too, so $zeta_3 in L$ (which is obvious) and $sqrt[3]{2} in L$ (which follows from my computation above).
Any help is really appreciated!
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 23 '18 at 13:00
$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 14:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $K = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3)$ where $zeta_3$ is a primitive third root of unity, and $F = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3,sqrt[3]{2})$. Furthermore, let $L = mathbb{Q}(zeta_3,beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 sqrt[3]{2}$.
My conclusion: Since $beta^3/zeta_3 = sqrt[3]{2}$, the field $F$ is contained in $L$. Therefore, the compositum $FL$ is $L$ and therefore, $FL/L$ has degree $1$.
Problem: My professor told me briefly that $F$ can not be contained in $L$ because $(frac{beta}{sqrt[3]{2}})^3 = zeta_3$ which means that $FL$ has a primitive ninth root of unity which neither exists in $F$ not in $L$.
Could you please explain me why neither $F$ nor $L$ have a primitive ninth root of unity? And why was my argument wrong? I thought in order to show $Fsubset L$ it enough to show that the elements generating $F$ are in $L$ too, so $zeta_3 in L$ (which is obvious) and $sqrt[3]{2} in L$ (which follows from my computation above).
Any help is really appreciated!
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field
$endgroup$
Let $K = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3)$ where $zeta_3$ is a primitive third root of unity, and $F = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3,sqrt[3]{2})$. Furthermore, let $L = mathbb{Q}(zeta_3,beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 sqrt[3]{2}$.
My conclusion: Since $beta^3/zeta_3 = sqrt[3]{2}$, the field $F$ is contained in $L$. Therefore, the compositum $FL$ is $L$ and therefore, $FL/L$ has degree $1$.
Problem: My professor told me briefly that $F$ can not be contained in $L$ because $(frac{beta}{sqrt[3]{2}})^3 = zeta_3$ which means that $FL$ has a primitive ninth root of unity which neither exists in $F$ not in $L$.
Could you please explain me why neither $F$ nor $L$ have a primitive ninth root of unity? And why was my argument wrong? I thought in order to show $Fsubset L$ it enough to show that the elements generating $F$ are in $L$ too, so $zeta_3 in L$ (which is obvious) and $sqrt[3]{2} in L$ (which follows from my computation above).
Any help is really appreciated!
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field
abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field
edited Dec 23 '18 at 12:58
Diglett
asked Dec 23 '18 at 12:44
DiglettDiglett
1,1081521
1,1081521
2
$begingroup$
I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 23 '18 at 13:00
$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 14:08
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 23 '18 at 13:00
$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 14:08
2
2
$begingroup$
I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 23 '18 at 13:00
$begingroup$
I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 23 '18 at 13:00
$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 14:08
$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 14:08
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050317%2fwhat-is-wrong-with-my-conclusion-compositum-of-local-fields%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050317%2fwhat-is-wrong-with-my-conclusion-compositum-of-local-fields%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 23 '18 at 13:00
$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 14:08