What is wrong with my conclusion (compositum of local fields)?












0












$begingroup$


Let $K = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3)$ where $zeta_3$ is a primitive third root of unity, and $F = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3,sqrt[3]{2})$. Furthermore, let $L = mathbb{Q}(zeta_3,beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 sqrt[3]{2}$.



My conclusion: Since $beta^3/zeta_3 = sqrt[3]{2}$, the field $F$ is contained in $L$. Therefore, the compositum $FL$ is $L$ and therefore, $FL/L$ has degree $1$.



Problem: My professor told me briefly that $F$ can not be contained in $L$ because $(frac{beta}{sqrt[3]{2}})^3 = zeta_3$ which means that $FL$ has a primitive ninth root of unity which neither exists in $F$ not in $L$.



Could you please explain me why neither $F$ nor $L$ have a primitive ninth root of unity? And why was my argument wrong? I thought in order to show $Fsubset L$ it enough to show that the elements generating $F$ are in $L$ too, so $zeta_3 in L$ (which is obvious) and $sqrt[3]{2} in L$ (which follows from my computation above).



Any help is really appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 23 '18 at 13:00












  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – Diglett
    Dec 23 '18 at 14:08
















0












$begingroup$


Let $K = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3)$ where $zeta_3$ is a primitive third root of unity, and $F = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3,sqrt[3]{2})$. Furthermore, let $L = mathbb{Q}(zeta_3,beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 sqrt[3]{2}$.



My conclusion: Since $beta^3/zeta_3 = sqrt[3]{2}$, the field $F$ is contained in $L$. Therefore, the compositum $FL$ is $L$ and therefore, $FL/L$ has degree $1$.



Problem: My professor told me briefly that $F$ can not be contained in $L$ because $(frac{beta}{sqrt[3]{2}})^3 = zeta_3$ which means that $FL$ has a primitive ninth root of unity which neither exists in $F$ not in $L$.



Could you please explain me why neither $F$ nor $L$ have a primitive ninth root of unity? And why was my argument wrong? I thought in order to show $Fsubset L$ it enough to show that the elements generating $F$ are in $L$ too, so $zeta_3 in L$ (which is obvious) and $sqrt[3]{2} in L$ (which follows from my computation above).



Any help is really appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 23 '18 at 13:00












  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – Diglett
    Dec 23 '18 at 14:08














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $K = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3)$ where $zeta_3$ is a primitive third root of unity, and $F = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3,sqrt[3]{2})$. Furthermore, let $L = mathbb{Q}(zeta_3,beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 sqrt[3]{2}$.



My conclusion: Since $beta^3/zeta_3 = sqrt[3]{2}$, the field $F$ is contained in $L$. Therefore, the compositum $FL$ is $L$ and therefore, $FL/L$ has degree $1$.



Problem: My professor told me briefly that $F$ can not be contained in $L$ because $(frac{beta}{sqrt[3]{2}})^3 = zeta_3$ which means that $FL$ has a primitive ninth root of unity which neither exists in $F$ not in $L$.



Could you please explain me why neither $F$ nor $L$ have a primitive ninth root of unity? And why was my argument wrong? I thought in order to show $Fsubset L$ it enough to show that the elements generating $F$ are in $L$ too, so $zeta_3 in L$ (which is obvious) and $sqrt[3]{2} in L$ (which follows from my computation above).



Any help is really appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $K = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3)$ where $zeta_3$ is a primitive third root of unity, and $F = mathbb{Q}_2(zeta_3,sqrt[3]{2})$. Furthermore, let $L = mathbb{Q}(zeta_3,beta)$ where $beta$ is defined by $beta^3 = zeta_3 sqrt[3]{2}$.



My conclusion: Since $beta^3/zeta_3 = sqrt[3]{2}$, the field $F$ is contained in $L$. Therefore, the compositum $FL$ is $L$ and therefore, $FL/L$ has degree $1$.



Problem: My professor told me briefly that $F$ can not be contained in $L$ because $(frac{beta}{sqrt[3]{2}})^3 = zeta_3$ which means that $FL$ has a primitive ninth root of unity which neither exists in $F$ not in $L$.



Could you please explain me why neither $F$ nor $L$ have a primitive ninth root of unity? And why was my argument wrong? I thought in order to show $Fsubset L$ it enough to show that the elements generating $F$ are in $L$ too, so $zeta_3 in L$ (which is obvious) and $sqrt[3]{2} in L$ (which follows from my computation above).



Any help is really appreciated!







abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory extension-field local-field






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 23 '18 at 12:58







Diglett

















asked Dec 23 '18 at 12:44









DiglettDiglett

1,1081521




1,1081521








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 23 '18 at 13:00












  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – Diglett
    Dec 23 '18 at 14:08














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 23 '18 at 13:00












  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – Diglett
    Dec 23 '18 at 14:08








2




2




$begingroup$
I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 23 '18 at 13:00






$begingroup$
I don't think $(beta/sqrt[3]2)^3$ equals $zeta_3$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 23 '18 at 13:00














$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 14:08




$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown: Thanks for spotting the issue. It turned out that my professor made a mistake.
$endgroup$
– Diglett
Dec 23 '18 at 14:08










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050317%2fwhat-is-wrong-with-my-conclusion-compositum-of-local-fields%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050317%2fwhat-is-wrong-with-my-conclusion-compositum-of-local-fields%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa