A function have minimum or maximum
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $f$ be strictly convex or concave on $Bbb R$. $lim_{xto -infty}f'(x)=A<0, lim_{xto+infty}f'(x)=B<0$. Can we show that $f$ attains a global minimum or maximum?
I could not even construct such an example satisfying the assumptions.
calculus convex-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $f$ be strictly convex or concave on $Bbb R$. $lim_{xto -infty}f'(x)=A<0, lim_{xto+infty}f'(x)=B<0$. Can we show that $f$ attains a global minimum or maximum?
I could not even construct such an example satisfying the assumptions.
calculus convex-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $f$ be strictly convex or concave on $Bbb R$. $lim_{xto -infty}f'(x)=A<0, lim_{xto+infty}f'(x)=B<0$. Can we show that $f$ attains a global minimum or maximum?
I could not even construct such an example satisfying the assumptions.
calculus convex-analysis
Let $f$ be strictly convex or concave on $Bbb R$. $lim_{xto -infty}f'(x)=A<0, lim_{xto+infty}f'(x)=B<0$. Can we show that $f$ attains a global minimum or maximum?
I could not even construct such an example satisfying the assumptions.
calculus convex-analysis
calculus convex-analysis
edited Nov 21 at 11:47
asked Nov 21 at 11:16
xldd
1,315510
1,315510
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
If $$f(x)=-ln(1+e^{-x})-2x$$
then
$$f'(x)=-1-frac{1}{1+e^{-x}}$$
and we have $lim_{xto-infty}f'(x)=-1<0$ and $lim_{xtoinfty}f'(x)=-2<0$. The function $f$ is strictly concave because
$$f''(x)=-frac{e^{-x}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}<0$$
for all $xinmathbb{R}$.
The function $f$ has no global maximum or minimum (its derivative is always negative).
Note that I came up with the example by taking $f'$ to be the negative of a logistic function (which is a function with finite limits at $-infty$ and $infty$) and subtracting one (to make both the limits negative).
(You could construct a strictly convex $f$ in a similar way, just by subtracting a larger number from the logistic function.)
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Suppose $f'$ exists for every $xinmathbb R$, if $f$ is strictly convex then $f'$ is strictly crescent so we must have $A<f'(x)<B<0$ and can't have any minimum-maximum because $m$ minimum (maximum) implies $f'(m)=0$. If $f$ is concave then $f'$ is strictly decrescent then it must be $B<f'(x)<A<0$ and so on.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Take a generic function $f(x)$ that meets the required criteria.
Then, using the definition of a limit, we can divide $f(x)$ into three intervals: $(-infty,a)$, where $|f(x)-(C_1+Ax)|<epsilon$; $(b,infty)$, where $|f(x)-(C_2+Bx)|<epsilon$; and $[a,b]$, which is a closed interval, and therefore $f(x)$ has a maximum and a minimum value within it, which we will call $M$ and $N$ respectively. The approximations for the lines both have negative slope, which means that points $a'$ and $b'$ exist such that, $forall x<a', f(x)>M+epsilon>M$ and $forall x>b', f(x)<N-epsilon<N$.
As such, there is no global maximum or minimum, although I also can't think of any examples for functions that actually meet the criteria.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007579%2fa-function-have-minimum-or-maximum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
If $$f(x)=-ln(1+e^{-x})-2x$$
then
$$f'(x)=-1-frac{1}{1+e^{-x}}$$
and we have $lim_{xto-infty}f'(x)=-1<0$ and $lim_{xtoinfty}f'(x)=-2<0$. The function $f$ is strictly concave because
$$f''(x)=-frac{e^{-x}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}<0$$
for all $xinmathbb{R}$.
The function $f$ has no global maximum or minimum (its derivative is always negative).
Note that I came up with the example by taking $f'$ to be the negative of a logistic function (which is a function with finite limits at $-infty$ and $infty$) and subtracting one (to make both the limits negative).
(You could construct a strictly convex $f$ in a similar way, just by subtracting a larger number from the logistic function.)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
If $$f(x)=-ln(1+e^{-x})-2x$$
then
$$f'(x)=-1-frac{1}{1+e^{-x}}$$
and we have $lim_{xto-infty}f'(x)=-1<0$ and $lim_{xtoinfty}f'(x)=-2<0$. The function $f$ is strictly concave because
$$f''(x)=-frac{e^{-x}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}<0$$
for all $xinmathbb{R}$.
The function $f$ has no global maximum or minimum (its derivative is always negative).
Note that I came up with the example by taking $f'$ to be the negative of a logistic function (which is a function with finite limits at $-infty$ and $infty$) and subtracting one (to make both the limits negative).
(You could construct a strictly convex $f$ in a similar way, just by subtracting a larger number from the logistic function.)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
If $$f(x)=-ln(1+e^{-x})-2x$$
then
$$f'(x)=-1-frac{1}{1+e^{-x}}$$
and we have $lim_{xto-infty}f'(x)=-1<0$ and $lim_{xtoinfty}f'(x)=-2<0$. The function $f$ is strictly concave because
$$f''(x)=-frac{e^{-x}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}<0$$
for all $xinmathbb{R}$.
The function $f$ has no global maximum or minimum (its derivative is always negative).
Note that I came up with the example by taking $f'$ to be the negative of a logistic function (which is a function with finite limits at $-infty$ and $infty$) and subtracting one (to make both the limits negative).
(You could construct a strictly convex $f$ in a similar way, just by subtracting a larger number from the logistic function.)
If $$f(x)=-ln(1+e^{-x})-2x$$
then
$$f'(x)=-1-frac{1}{1+e^{-x}}$$
and we have $lim_{xto-infty}f'(x)=-1<0$ and $lim_{xtoinfty}f'(x)=-2<0$. The function $f$ is strictly concave because
$$f''(x)=-frac{e^{-x}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}<0$$
for all $xinmathbb{R}$.
The function $f$ has no global maximum or minimum (its derivative is always negative).
Note that I came up with the example by taking $f'$ to be the negative of a logistic function (which is a function with finite limits at $-infty$ and $infty$) and subtracting one (to make both the limits negative).
(You could construct a strictly convex $f$ in a similar way, just by subtracting a larger number from the logistic function.)
edited Nov 21 at 12:44
answered Nov 21 at 12:38
smcc
4,297517
4,297517
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Suppose $f'$ exists for every $xinmathbb R$, if $f$ is strictly convex then $f'$ is strictly crescent so we must have $A<f'(x)<B<0$ and can't have any minimum-maximum because $m$ minimum (maximum) implies $f'(m)=0$. If $f$ is concave then $f'$ is strictly decrescent then it must be $B<f'(x)<A<0$ and so on.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Suppose $f'$ exists for every $xinmathbb R$, if $f$ is strictly convex then $f'$ is strictly crescent so we must have $A<f'(x)<B<0$ and can't have any minimum-maximum because $m$ minimum (maximum) implies $f'(m)=0$. If $f$ is concave then $f'$ is strictly decrescent then it must be $B<f'(x)<A<0$ and so on.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Suppose $f'$ exists for every $xinmathbb R$, if $f$ is strictly convex then $f'$ is strictly crescent so we must have $A<f'(x)<B<0$ and can't have any minimum-maximum because $m$ minimum (maximum) implies $f'(m)=0$. If $f$ is concave then $f'$ is strictly decrescent then it must be $B<f'(x)<A<0$ and so on.
Suppose $f'$ exists for every $xinmathbb R$, if $f$ is strictly convex then $f'$ is strictly crescent so we must have $A<f'(x)<B<0$ and can't have any minimum-maximum because $m$ minimum (maximum) implies $f'(m)=0$. If $f$ is concave then $f'$ is strictly decrescent then it must be $B<f'(x)<A<0$ and so on.
answered Nov 21 at 12:06
P De Donato
3847
3847
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Take a generic function $f(x)$ that meets the required criteria.
Then, using the definition of a limit, we can divide $f(x)$ into three intervals: $(-infty,a)$, where $|f(x)-(C_1+Ax)|<epsilon$; $(b,infty)$, where $|f(x)-(C_2+Bx)|<epsilon$; and $[a,b]$, which is a closed interval, and therefore $f(x)$ has a maximum and a minimum value within it, which we will call $M$ and $N$ respectively. The approximations for the lines both have negative slope, which means that points $a'$ and $b'$ exist such that, $forall x<a', f(x)>M+epsilon>M$ and $forall x>b', f(x)<N-epsilon<N$.
As such, there is no global maximum or minimum, although I also can't think of any examples for functions that actually meet the criteria.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Take a generic function $f(x)$ that meets the required criteria.
Then, using the definition of a limit, we can divide $f(x)$ into three intervals: $(-infty,a)$, where $|f(x)-(C_1+Ax)|<epsilon$; $(b,infty)$, where $|f(x)-(C_2+Bx)|<epsilon$; and $[a,b]$, which is a closed interval, and therefore $f(x)$ has a maximum and a minimum value within it, which we will call $M$ and $N$ respectively. The approximations for the lines both have negative slope, which means that points $a'$ and $b'$ exist such that, $forall x<a', f(x)>M+epsilon>M$ and $forall x>b', f(x)<N-epsilon<N$.
As such, there is no global maximum or minimum, although I also can't think of any examples for functions that actually meet the criteria.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Take a generic function $f(x)$ that meets the required criteria.
Then, using the definition of a limit, we can divide $f(x)$ into three intervals: $(-infty,a)$, where $|f(x)-(C_1+Ax)|<epsilon$; $(b,infty)$, where $|f(x)-(C_2+Bx)|<epsilon$; and $[a,b]$, which is a closed interval, and therefore $f(x)$ has a maximum and a minimum value within it, which we will call $M$ and $N$ respectively. The approximations for the lines both have negative slope, which means that points $a'$ and $b'$ exist such that, $forall x<a', f(x)>M+epsilon>M$ and $forall x>b', f(x)<N-epsilon<N$.
As such, there is no global maximum or minimum, although I also can't think of any examples for functions that actually meet the criteria.
Take a generic function $f(x)$ that meets the required criteria.
Then, using the definition of a limit, we can divide $f(x)$ into three intervals: $(-infty,a)$, where $|f(x)-(C_1+Ax)|<epsilon$; $(b,infty)$, where $|f(x)-(C_2+Bx)|<epsilon$; and $[a,b]$, which is a closed interval, and therefore $f(x)$ has a maximum and a minimum value within it, which we will call $M$ and $N$ respectively. The approximations for the lines both have negative slope, which means that points $a'$ and $b'$ exist such that, $forall x<a', f(x)>M+epsilon>M$ and $forall x>b', f(x)<N-epsilon<N$.
As such, there is no global maximum or minimum, although I also can't think of any examples for functions that actually meet the criteria.
answered Nov 21 at 12:06
MoKo19
1914
1914
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007579%2fa-function-have-minimum-or-maximum%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown