Solutions check. Find $int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t + ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $x > 0$. Find $$lim_{b to infty} int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t + ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt$$



I solved this problem but I am not quite confident about my steps. So please, could you check my solutions and tell me if there is something wrong??. Thanks in advanced!



First approuch:



Let's just focus on the first member of the integral:
$$int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t + ix} dt =
int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t + ix} Big( frac{t - ix}{t - ix} Big) dt =
int_{-b}^{b} frac{t - ix}{t^2 + x^2} dt$$



where the integrand can be again separated:



$$ = int_{-b}^{b} frac{t}{t^2 + x^2}dt - int_{-b}^{b} frac{ix}{t^2 + x^2}dt$$



Then, since the integral is about a real number $t$, $i$ can be treated as a constant. Now, I notice that the second integrand is an even function so the integral from $-b$ to $b$ is $0$. So we have:



$$ = int_{-b}^{b} frac{t}{t^2 + x^2}dt =
frac{1}{2}lnBig(t^2 + x^2 Big) Bigrvert_{-b}^{b} =
frac{1}{2}lnBig(frac{b^2 + x^2}{b^2 + x^2} Big) = 0$$



Following almost the same steps one can also show that $$int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t - ix} dt= 0$$



So the question reminds as $$lim_{b to infty} (0 + 0) = 0$$



Is this correct?? I mean:




  • Can $i$ be really treated as a constat in an integral which is about a real number??


  • Why would the question ask for about a limit int the infinite if the integral was destined to be $0$??



Second approuch



If $i$ can be really treated as a constant then the integral of the function $frac{1}{t + ix}$ would be $ln(t + ix)$, since $ix$ would be also a constant, so we have:



$$int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t + ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt=
ln(t + ix)Bigrvert_{-b}^{b} - ln(t - ix)Bigrvert_{-b}^{b}$$



Since $ix$ is just a constant then $ln$ fullfills the same properties as the well-known real valued function $ln$, so:



$$ = lnBig(frac{b + ix}{-b + ix} Big) - lnBig(frac{b - ix}{-b - ix} Big) =
lnBig(frac{frac{b + ix}{-b + ix}}{frac{b - ix}{-b - ix}} Big) = ln(1) = 0$$



Soo the answer would be $lim_{b to infty} 0 = 0$. I am really confused with theese steps since $ln$ function was evaluated in $b + ix$ and although I know that there is a counter-part complex version of the real function $ln$, I had accepted $ix$ as a costant, so there wouldn't be nothing wrong, right??



Third approuch



If $i$ can be really treated as a constant, then:



$$int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t+ ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt =
int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{-2ix}{t^2 + x^2} Big) dt$$



because the integrand is an even function, that integral is $0$. So we have again $lim_{b to infty} 0 = 0$



Any comment about what I wrote would be really appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $x > 0$. Find $$lim_{b to infty} int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t + ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt$$



    I solved this problem but I am not quite confident about my steps. So please, could you check my solutions and tell me if there is something wrong??. Thanks in advanced!



    First approuch:



    Let's just focus on the first member of the integral:
    $$int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t + ix} dt =
    int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t + ix} Big( frac{t - ix}{t - ix} Big) dt =
    int_{-b}^{b} frac{t - ix}{t^2 + x^2} dt$$



    where the integrand can be again separated:



    $$ = int_{-b}^{b} frac{t}{t^2 + x^2}dt - int_{-b}^{b} frac{ix}{t^2 + x^2}dt$$



    Then, since the integral is about a real number $t$, $i$ can be treated as a constant. Now, I notice that the second integrand is an even function so the integral from $-b$ to $b$ is $0$. So we have:



    $$ = int_{-b}^{b} frac{t}{t^2 + x^2}dt =
    frac{1}{2}lnBig(t^2 + x^2 Big) Bigrvert_{-b}^{b} =
    frac{1}{2}lnBig(frac{b^2 + x^2}{b^2 + x^2} Big) = 0$$



    Following almost the same steps one can also show that $$int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t - ix} dt= 0$$



    So the question reminds as $$lim_{b to infty} (0 + 0) = 0$$



    Is this correct?? I mean:




    • Can $i$ be really treated as a constat in an integral which is about a real number??


    • Why would the question ask for about a limit int the infinite if the integral was destined to be $0$??



    Second approuch



    If $i$ can be really treated as a constant then the integral of the function $frac{1}{t + ix}$ would be $ln(t + ix)$, since $ix$ would be also a constant, so we have:



    $$int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t + ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt=
    ln(t + ix)Bigrvert_{-b}^{b} - ln(t - ix)Bigrvert_{-b}^{b}$$



    Since $ix$ is just a constant then $ln$ fullfills the same properties as the well-known real valued function $ln$, so:



    $$ = lnBig(frac{b + ix}{-b + ix} Big) - lnBig(frac{b - ix}{-b - ix} Big) =
    lnBig(frac{frac{b + ix}{-b + ix}}{frac{b - ix}{-b - ix}} Big) = ln(1) = 0$$



    Soo the answer would be $lim_{b to infty} 0 = 0$. I am really confused with theese steps since $ln$ function was evaluated in $b + ix$ and although I know that there is a counter-part complex version of the real function $ln$, I had accepted $ix$ as a costant, so there wouldn't be nothing wrong, right??



    Third approuch



    If $i$ can be really treated as a constant, then:



    $$int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t+ ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt =
    int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{-2ix}{t^2 + x^2} Big) dt$$



    because the integrand is an even function, that integral is $0$. So we have again $lim_{b to infty} 0 = 0$



    Any comment about what I wrote would be really appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $x > 0$. Find $$lim_{b to infty} int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t + ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt$$



      I solved this problem but I am not quite confident about my steps. So please, could you check my solutions and tell me if there is something wrong??. Thanks in advanced!



      First approuch:



      Let's just focus on the first member of the integral:
      $$int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t + ix} dt =
      int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t + ix} Big( frac{t - ix}{t - ix} Big) dt =
      int_{-b}^{b} frac{t - ix}{t^2 + x^2} dt$$



      where the integrand can be again separated:



      $$ = int_{-b}^{b} frac{t}{t^2 + x^2}dt - int_{-b}^{b} frac{ix}{t^2 + x^2}dt$$



      Then, since the integral is about a real number $t$, $i$ can be treated as a constant. Now, I notice that the second integrand is an even function so the integral from $-b$ to $b$ is $0$. So we have:



      $$ = int_{-b}^{b} frac{t}{t^2 + x^2}dt =
      frac{1}{2}lnBig(t^2 + x^2 Big) Bigrvert_{-b}^{b} =
      frac{1}{2}lnBig(frac{b^2 + x^2}{b^2 + x^2} Big) = 0$$



      Following almost the same steps one can also show that $$int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t - ix} dt= 0$$



      So the question reminds as $$lim_{b to infty} (0 + 0) = 0$$



      Is this correct?? I mean:




      • Can $i$ be really treated as a constat in an integral which is about a real number??


      • Why would the question ask for about a limit int the infinite if the integral was destined to be $0$??



      Second approuch



      If $i$ can be really treated as a constant then the integral of the function $frac{1}{t + ix}$ would be $ln(t + ix)$, since $ix$ would be also a constant, so we have:



      $$int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t + ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt=
      ln(t + ix)Bigrvert_{-b}^{b} - ln(t - ix)Bigrvert_{-b}^{b}$$



      Since $ix$ is just a constant then $ln$ fullfills the same properties as the well-known real valued function $ln$, so:



      $$ = lnBig(frac{b + ix}{-b + ix} Big) - lnBig(frac{b - ix}{-b - ix} Big) =
      lnBig(frac{frac{b + ix}{-b + ix}}{frac{b - ix}{-b - ix}} Big) = ln(1) = 0$$



      Soo the answer would be $lim_{b to infty} 0 = 0$. I am really confused with theese steps since $ln$ function was evaluated in $b + ix$ and although I know that there is a counter-part complex version of the real function $ln$, I had accepted $ix$ as a costant, so there wouldn't be nothing wrong, right??



      Third approuch



      If $i$ can be really treated as a constant, then:



      $$int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t+ ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt =
      int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{-2ix}{t^2 + x^2} Big) dt$$



      because the integrand is an even function, that integral is $0$. So we have again $lim_{b to infty} 0 = 0$



      Any comment about what I wrote would be really appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $x > 0$. Find $$lim_{b to infty} int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t + ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt$$



      I solved this problem but I am not quite confident about my steps. So please, could you check my solutions and tell me if there is something wrong??. Thanks in advanced!



      First approuch:



      Let's just focus on the first member of the integral:
      $$int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t + ix} dt =
      int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t + ix} Big( frac{t - ix}{t - ix} Big) dt =
      int_{-b}^{b} frac{t - ix}{t^2 + x^2} dt$$



      where the integrand can be again separated:



      $$ = int_{-b}^{b} frac{t}{t^2 + x^2}dt - int_{-b}^{b} frac{ix}{t^2 + x^2}dt$$



      Then, since the integral is about a real number $t$, $i$ can be treated as a constant. Now, I notice that the second integrand is an even function so the integral from $-b$ to $b$ is $0$. So we have:



      $$ = int_{-b}^{b} frac{t}{t^2 + x^2}dt =
      frac{1}{2}lnBig(t^2 + x^2 Big) Bigrvert_{-b}^{b} =
      frac{1}{2}lnBig(frac{b^2 + x^2}{b^2 + x^2} Big) = 0$$



      Following almost the same steps one can also show that $$int_{-b}^{b} frac{1}{t - ix} dt= 0$$



      So the question reminds as $$lim_{b to infty} (0 + 0) = 0$$



      Is this correct?? I mean:




      • Can $i$ be really treated as a constat in an integral which is about a real number??


      • Why would the question ask for about a limit int the infinite if the integral was destined to be $0$??



      Second approuch



      If $i$ can be really treated as a constant then the integral of the function $frac{1}{t + ix}$ would be $ln(t + ix)$, since $ix$ would be also a constant, so we have:



      $$int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t + ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt=
      ln(t + ix)Bigrvert_{-b}^{b} - ln(t - ix)Bigrvert_{-b}^{b}$$



      Since $ix$ is just a constant then $ln$ fullfills the same properties as the well-known real valued function $ln$, so:



      $$ = lnBig(frac{b + ix}{-b + ix} Big) - lnBig(frac{b - ix}{-b - ix} Big) =
      lnBig(frac{frac{b + ix}{-b + ix}}{frac{b - ix}{-b - ix}} Big) = ln(1) = 0$$



      Soo the answer would be $lim_{b to infty} 0 = 0$. I am really confused with theese steps since $ln$ function was evaluated in $b + ix$ and although I know that there is a counter-part complex version of the real function $ln$, I had accepted $ix$ as a costant, so there wouldn't be nothing wrong, right??



      Third approuch



      If $i$ can be really treated as a constant, then:



      $$int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{1}{t+ ix} - frac{1}{t - ix} Big) dt =
      int_{-b}^{b} Big( frac{-2ix}{t^2 + x^2} Big) dt$$



      because the integrand is an even function, that integral is $0$. So we have again $lim_{b to infty} 0 = 0$



      Any comment about what I wrote would be really appreciated!







      complex-analysis proof-verification contour-integration






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 21 at 11:21









      Tianlalu

      3,01021038




      3,01021038










      asked Nov 21 at 11:15









      Aldebaran

      284




      284






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The problem with your first and third approaches is that you wrote that any even function $f(x)$, we get that $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=0$. This statement is true for odd functions. For even functions, $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=2int_0^b f(x) dx$.



          The problem with your second approach is that in the world of complex functions, logarithms are multiple-valued, and as such give you an answer that is true up to a $+2kpi i, kinmathbb{Z}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            If $x=0$, then the integral vanishes. Assume that $xne 0$. Then for $x>0$
            $$
            int_{-b}^bleft(frac{1}{t+ix}-frac{1}{t-ix}right),dt=
            int_{-b}^bfrac{-2ix,dt}{t^2+x^2}=int_{-b}^bfrac{-2i,d(t/x)}{(t/x)^2+1}
            =-2iint_{-b/x}^{b/x}frac{ds}{s^2+1}=-2i big(tan^{-1}(b/x)-tan^{-1}(-b/x)big)=-4itan^{-1}(b/x)to -4icdotfrac{pi}{2}=-2pi i,
            $$

            For $x<0$, the limit is $2pi i$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • wao. thank you so much, but where was I wrong to get a different answer¡?¡?
              – Aldebaran
              Nov 21 at 12:03











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007578%2fsolutions-check-find-int-bb-big-frac1t-ix-frac1t-ix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote













            The problem with your first and third approaches is that you wrote that any even function $f(x)$, we get that $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=0$. This statement is true for odd functions. For even functions, $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=2int_0^b f(x) dx$.



            The problem with your second approach is that in the world of complex functions, logarithms are multiple-valued, and as such give you an answer that is true up to a $+2kpi i, kinmathbb{Z}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              The problem with your first and third approaches is that you wrote that any even function $f(x)$, we get that $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=0$. This statement is true for odd functions. For even functions, $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=2int_0^b f(x) dx$.



              The problem with your second approach is that in the world of complex functions, logarithms are multiple-valued, and as such give you an answer that is true up to a $+2kpi i, kinmathbb{Z}$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                The problem with your first and third approaches is that you wrote that any even function $f(x)$, we get that $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=0$. This statement is true for odd functions. For even functions, $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=2int_0^b f(x) dx$.



                The problem with your second approach is that in the world of complex functions, logarithms are multiple-valued, and as such give you an answer that is true up to a $+2kpi i, kinmathbb{Z}$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                The problem with your first and third approaches is that you wrote that any even function $f(x)$, we get that $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=0$. This statement is true for odd functions. For even functions, $int_{-b}^b f(x) dx=2int_0^b f(x) dx$.



                The problem with your second approach is that in the world of complex functions, logarithms are multiple-valued, and as such give you an answer that is true up to a $+2kpi i, kinmathbb{Z}$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 21 at 12:31









                MoKo19

                1914




                1914






















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    If $x=0$, then the integral vanishes. Assume that $xne 0$. Then for $x>0$
                    $$
                    int_{-b}^bleft(frac{1}{t+ix}-frac{1}{t-ix}right),dt=
                    int_{-b}^bfrac{-2ix,dt}{t^2+x^2}=int_{-b}^bfrac{-2i,d(t/x)}{(t/x)^2+1}
                    =-2iint_{-b/x}^{b/x}frac{ds}{s^2+1}=-2i big(tan^{-1}(b/x)-tan^{-1}(-b/x)big)=-4itan^{-1}(b/x)to -4icdotfrac{pi}{2}=-2pi i,
                    $$

                    For $x<0$, the limit is $2pi i$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • wao. thank you so much, but where was I wrong to get a different answer¡?¡?
                      – Aldebaran
                      Nov 21 at 12:03















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    If $x=0$, then the integral vanishes. Assume that $xne 0$. Then for $x>0$
                    $$
                    int_{-b}^bleft(frac{1}{t+ix}-frac{1}{t-ix}right),dt=
                    int_{-b}^bfrac{-2ix,dt}{t^2+x^2}=int_{-b}^bfrac{-2i,d(t/x)}{(t/x)^2+1}
                    =-2iint_{-b/x}^{b/x}frac{ds}{s^2+1}=-2i big(tan^{-1}(b/x)-tan^{-1}(-b/x)big)=-4itan^{-1}(b/x)to -4icdotfrac{pi}{2}=-2pi i,
                    $$

                    For $x<0$, the limit is $2pi i$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • wao. thank you so much, but where was I wrong to get a different answer¡?¡?
                      – Aldebaran
                      Nov 21 at 12:03













                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    If $x=0$, then the integral vanishes. Assume that $xne 0$. Then for $x>0$
                    $$
                    int_{-b}^bleft(frac{1}{t+ix}-frac{1}{t-ix}right),dt=
                    int_{-b}^bfrac{-2ix,dt}{t^2+x^2}=int_{-b}^bfrac{-2i,d(t/x)}{(t/x)^2+1}
                    =-2iint_{-b/x}^{b/x}frac{ds}{s^2+1}=-2i big(tan^{-1}(b/x)-tan^{-1}(-b/x)big)=-4itan^{-1}(b/x)to -4icdotfrac{pi}{2}=-2pi i,
                    $$

                    For $x<0$, the limit is $2pi i$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    If $x=0$, then the integral vanishes. Assume that $xne 0$. Then for $x>0$
                    $$
                    int_{-b}^bleft(frac{1}{t+ix}-frac{1}{t-ix}right),dt=
                    int_{-b}^bfrac{-2ix,dt}{t^2+x^2}=int_{-b}^bfrac{-2i,d(t/x)}{(t/x)^2+1}
                    =-2iint_{-b/x}^{b/x}frac{ds}{s^2+1}=-2i big(tan^{-1}(b/x)-tan^{-1}(-b/x)big)=-4itan^{-1}(b/x)to -4icdotfrac{pi}{2}=-2pi i,
                    $$

                    For $x<0$, the limit is $2pi i$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 21 at 11:33









                    Yiorgos S. Smyrlis

                    62.4k1383162




                    62.4k1383162












                    • wao. thank you so much, but where was I wrong to get a different answer¡?¡?
                      – Aldebaran
                      Nov 21 at 12:03


















                    • wao. thank you so much, but where was I wrong to get a different answer¡?¡?
                      – Aldebaran
                      Nov 21 at 12:03
















                    wao. thank you so much, but where was I wrong to get a different answer¡?¡?
                    – Aldebaran
                    Nov 21 at 12:03




                    wao. thank you so much, but where was I wrong to get a different answer¡?¡?
                    – Aldebaran
                    Nov 21 at 12:03


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007578%2fsolutions-check-find-int-bb-big-frac1t-ix-frac1t-ix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    Puebla de Zaragoza

                    Musa