$f$ continuous, moderate decrease and $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(y)e^{-y^{2}}e^{2xy}dy=0$ implies $f=0$.











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Let $f$ a continuous function, moderate decrease and satisfying



begin{equation}
int_{-infty}^{infty}f(y)e^{-y^{2}}e^{2xy}dy=0
end{equation}

for all $xinmathbb{R}$ I need to prove that $f=0$.



The hint is to consider $f*e^{-x^2}$. I know that both $f$ and $e^{-x^{2}}$ are moderate decrease, so the convolution is too, i.e., $exists A>0$ such that $|(f*e^{-x^2})(x)|leqfrac{A}{1+x^{2}}$ for all $xinmathbb{R}.$ So,



$$|(f*e^{-x^2})(x)|=left|int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x-y)e^{-y^{2}}dyright|leqfrac{A}{1+x^{2}} $$



How can I use the $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(y)e^{-y^{2}}e^{2xy}dy=0$ condition?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Let $f$ a continuous function, moderate decrease and satisfying



    begin{equation}
    int_{-infty}^{infty}f(y)e^{-y^{2}}e^{2xy}dy=0
    end{equation}

    for all $xinmathbb{R}$ I need to prove that $f=0$.



    The hint is to consider $f*e^{-x^2}$. I know that both $f$ and $e^{-x^{2}}$ are moderate decrease, so the convolution is too, i.e., $exists A>0$ such that $|(f*e^{-x^2})(x)|leqfrac{A}{1+x^{2}}$ for all $xinmathbb{R}.$ So,



    $$|(f*e^{-x^2})(x)|=left|int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x-y)e^{-y^{2}}dyright|leqfrac{A}{1+x^{2}} $$



    How can I use the $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(y)e^{-y^{2}}e^{2xy}dy=0$ condition?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Let $f$ a continuous function, moderate decrease and satisfying



      begin{equation}
      int_{-infty}^{infty}f(y)e^{-y^{2}}e^{2xy}dy=0
      end{equation}

      for all $xinmathbb{R}$ I need to prove that $f=0$.



      The hint is to consider $f*e^{-x^2}$. I know that both $f$ and $e^{-x^{2}}$ are moderate decrease, so the convolution is too, i.e., $exists A>0$ such that $|(f*e^{-x^2})(x)|leqfrac{A}{1+x^{2}}$ for all $xinmathbb{R}.$ So,



      $$|(f*e^{-x^2})(x)|=left|int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x-y)e^{-y^{2}}dyright|leqfrac{A}{1+x^{2}} $$



      How can I use the $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(y)e^{-y^{2}}e^{2xy}dy=0$ condition?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $f$ a continuous function, moderate decrease and satisfying



      begin{equation}
      int_{-infty}^{infty}f(y)e^{-y^{2}}e^{2xy}dy=0
      end{equation}

      for all $xinmathbb{R}$ I need to prove that $f=0$.



      The hint is to consider $f*e^{-x^2}$. I know that both $f$ and $e^{-x^{2}}$ are moderate decrease, so the convolution is too, i.e., $exists A>0$ such that $|(f*e^{-x^2})(x)|leqfrac{A}{1+x^{2}}$ for all $xinmathbb{R}.$ So,



      $$|(f*e^{-x^2})(x)|=left|int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x-y)e^{-y^{2}}dyright|leqfrac{A}{1+x^{2}} $$



      How can I use the $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(y)e^{-y^{2}}e^{2xy}dy=0$ condition?







      exponential-function convolution






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 16 at 17:44









      Mateus Rocha

      781116




      781116






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Noting $e^{-y^2 + 2xy} = e^{-(y - x)^2 + x^2} = e^{-(x - y)^2}e^{x^2}$, the integral condition implies $f * e^{-x^2} = 0$ for all $x$. Taking the Fourier transform of $f * e^{-x^2}$, using the fact that the Fourier transform of a convolution is the product of the Fourier transforms, deduce that the Fourier transform $hat{f} = 0$. Since $lvert f(x)rvert$ is bounded by a constant times $1/(1 + x^2)$, then $int_{-infty}^infty lvert f(x)rvert , dx < infty$. Since both $f$ and $hat{f}$ are in $L^1(Bbb R)$, by the Fourier inversion theorem $f = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • If the Fourier transform $hat{f}equiv 0$, then doesn't it follow immediately that $fequiv 0$? I am curious about the work after the conclusion that $hat{f}equiv0$, which seems unnecessary.
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:21












          • @Batominovski we would need both $f$ and $hat{f}$ to be in $L^1(Bbb R)$ in order to claim immediately that $f = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:23












          • But $f$ decays moderately, so $f$ is in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Since $hat{f}equiv 0$, $hat{f}$ is also in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Am I right?
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:27












          • @Batominovski indeed, I was being overly careful. Will edit soon.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:29






          • 1




            @MateusRocha since $f*e^{-x^2} = int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-(x-y)^2}, dx = e^{-x^2}int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-y^2+2xy}, dy = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 17 at 22:13











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001432%2ff-continuous-moderate-decrease-and-int-infty-inftyfye-y2e2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Noting $e^{-y^2 + 2xy} = e^{-(y - x)^2 + x^2} = e^{-(x - y)^2}e^{x^2}$, the integral condition implies $f * e^{-x^2} = 0$ for all $x$. Taking the Fourier transform of $f * e^{-x^2}$, using the fact that the Fourier transform of a convolution is the product of the Fourier transforms, deduce that the Fourier transform $hat{f} = 0$. Since $lvert f(x)rvert$ is bounded by a constant times $1/(1 + x^2)$, then $int_{-infty}^infty lvert f(x)rvert , dx < infty$. Since both $f$ and $hat{f}$ are in $L^1(Bbb R)$, by the Fourier inversion theorem $f = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • If the Fourier transform $hat{f}equiv 0$, then doesn't it follow immediately that $fequiv 0$? I am curious about the work after the conclusion that $hat{f}equiv0$, which seems unnecessary.
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:21












          • @Batominovski we would need both $f$ and $hat{f}$ to be in $L^1(Bbb R)$ in order to claim immediately that $f = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:23












          • But $f$ decays moderately, so $f$ is in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Since $hat{f}equiv 0$, $hat{f}$ is also in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Am I right?
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:27












          • @Batominovski indeed, I was being overly careful. Will edit soon.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:29






          • 1




            @MateusRocha since $f*e^{-x^2} = int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-(x-y)^2}, dx = e^{-x^2}int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-y^2+2xy}, dy = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 17 at 22:13















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Noting $e^{-y^2 + 2xy} = e^{-(y - x)^2 + x^2} = e^{-(x - y)^2}e^{x^2}$, the integral condition implies $f * e^{-x^2} = 0$ for all $x$. Taking the Fourier transform of $f * e^{-x^2}$, using the fact that the Fourier transform of a convolution is the product of the Fourier transforms, deduce that the Fourier transform $hat{f} = 0$. Since $lvert f(x)rvert$ is bounded by a constant times $1/(1 + x^2)$, then $int_{-infty}^infty lvert f(x)rvert , dx < infty$. Since both $f$ and $hat{f}$ are in $L^1(Bbb R)$, by the Fourier inversion theorem $f = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • If the Fourier transform $hat{f}equiv 0$, then doesn't it follow immediately that $fequiv 0$? I am curious about the work after the conclusion that $hat{f}equiv0$, which seems unnecessary.
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:21












          • @Batominovski we would need both $f$ and $hat{f}$ to be in $L^1(Bbb R)$ in order to claim immediately that $f = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:23












          • But $f$ decays moderately, so $f$ is in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Since $hat{f}equiv 0$, $hat{f}$ is also in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Am I right?
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:27












          • @Batominovski indeed, I was being overly careful. Will edit soon.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:29






          • 1




            @MateusRocha since $f*e^{-x^2} = int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-(x-y)^2}, dx = e^{-x^2}int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-y^2+2xy}, dy = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 17 at 22:13













          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Noting $e^{-y^2 + 2xy} = e^{-(y - x)^2 + x^2} = e^{-(x - y)^2}e^{x^2}$, the integral condition implies $f * e^{-x^2} = 0$ for all $x$. Taking the Fourier transform of $f * e^{-x^2}$, using the fact that the Fourier transform of a convolution is the product of the Fourier transforms, deduce that the Fourier transform $hat{f} = 0$. Since $lvert f(x)rvert$ is bounded by a constant times $1/(1 + x^2)$, then $int_{-infty}^infty lvert f(x)rvert , dx < infty$. Since both $f$ and $hat{f}$ are in $L^1(Bbb R)$, by the Fourier inversion theorem $f = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Noting $e^{-y^2 + 2xy} = e^{-(y - x)^2 + x^2} = e^{-(x - y)^2}e^{x^2}$, the integral condition implies $f * e^{-x^2} = 0$ for all $x$. Taking the Fourier transform of $f * e^{-x^2}$, using the fact that the Fourier transform of a convolution is the product of the Fourier transforms, deduce that the Fourier transform $hat{f} = 0$. Since $lvert f(x)rvert$ is bounded by a constant times $1/(1 + x^2)$, then $int_{-infty}^infty lvert f(x)rvert , dx < infty$. Since both $f$ and $hat{f}$ are in $L^1(Bbb R)$, by the Fourier inversion theorem $f = 0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 16 at 19:31

























          answered Nov 16 at 19:02









          kobe

          34.5k22247




          34.5k22247












          • If the Fourier transform $hat{f}equiv 0$, then doesn't it follow immediately that $fequiv 0$? I am curious about the work after the conclusion that $hat{f}equiv0$, which seems unnecessary.
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:21












          • @Batominovski we would need both $f$ and $hat{f}$ to be in $L^1(Bbb R)$ in order to claim immediately that $f = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:23












          • But $f$ decays moderately, so $f$ is in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Since $hat{f}equiv 0$, $hat{f}$ is also in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Am I right?
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:27












          • @Batominovski indeed, I was being overly careful. Will edit soon.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:29






          • 1




            @MateusRocha since $f*e^{-x^2} = int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-(x-y)^2}, dx = e^{-x^2}int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-y^2+2xy}, dy = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 17 at 22:13


















          • If the Fourier transform $hat{f}equiv 0$, then doesn't it follow immediately that $fequiv 0$? I am curious about the work after the conclusion that $hat{f}equiv0$, which seems unnecessary.
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:21












          • @Batominovski we would need both $f$ and $hat{f}$ to be in $L^1(Bbb R)$ in order to claim immediately that $f = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:23












          • But $f$ decays moderately, so $f$ is in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Since $hat{f}equiv 0$, $hat{f}$ is also in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Am I right?
            – Batominovski
            Nov 16 at 19:27












          • @Batominovski indeed, I was being overly careful. Will edit soon.
            – kobe
            Nov 16 at 19:29






          • 1




            @MateusRocha since $f*e^{-x^2} = int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-(x-y)^2}, dx = e^{-x^2}int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-y^2+2xy}, dy = 0$.
            – kobe
            Nov 17 at 22:13
















          If the Fourier transform $hat{f}equiv 0$, then doesn't it follow immediately that $fequiv 0$? I am curious about the work after the conclusion that $hat{f}equiv0$, which seems unnecessary.
          – Batominovski
          Nov 16 at 19:21






          If the Fourier transform $hat{f}equiv 0$, then doesn't it follow immediately that $fequiv 0$? I am curious about the work after the conclusion that $hat{f}equiv0$, which seems unnecessary.
          – Batominovski
          Nov 16 at 19:21














          @Batominovski we would need both $f$ and $hat{f}$ to be in $L^1(Bbb R)$ in order to claim immediately that $f = 0$.
          – kobe
          Nov 16 at 19:23






          @Batominovski we would need both $f$ and $hat{f}$ to be in $L^1(Bbb R)$ in order to claim immediately that $f = 0$.
          – kobe
          Nov 16 at 19:23














          But $f$ decays moderately, so $f$ is in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Since $hat{f}equiv 0$, $hat{f}$ is also in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Am I right?
          – Batominovski
          Nov 16 at 19:27






          But $f$ decays moderately, so $f$ is in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Since $hat{f}equiv 0$, $hat{f}$ is also in $L^1(mathbb{R})$. Am I right?
          – Batominovski
          Nov 16 at 19:27














          @Batominovski indeed, I was being overly careful. Will edit soon.
          – kobe
          Nov 16 at 19:29




          @Batominovski indeed, I was being overly careful. Will edit soon.
          – kobe
          Nov 16 at 19:29




          1




          1




          @MateusRocha since $f*e^{-x^2} = int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-(x-y)^2}, dx = e^{-x^2}int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-y^2+2xy}, dy = 0$.
          – kobe
          Nov 17 at 22:13




          @MateusRocha since $f*e^{-x^2} = int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-(x-y)^2}, dx = e^{-x^2}int_{-infty}^infty f(y)e^{-y^2+2xy}, dy = 0$.
          – kobe
          Nov 17 at 22:13


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001432%2ff-continuous-moderate-decrease-and-int-infty-inftyfye-y2e2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa