Defining Bott Class by relative $K$-theory
$begingroup$
I am really confused with this construction of Bott Class in Page 127, Example 8.4.12
If $V$ is a complex vector space of dimension $n$, we form the complex
$$ 0 rightarrow wedge^0 V rightarrow wedge^1 V rightarrow cdots rightarrow wedge ^nV rightarrow 0 $$
of trivial vector bundles over $V$.
What does this mean? So we have $n$ trivial vector bundles, $V times Bbb C^{binom{n}{k}}$?
The map $wedge^pV rightarrow wedge^{p+1}V$ is given by $w mapsto v wedge w$. Now we pass to complex conjugate bundles. IT is clear that if $f:V rightarrow W$ is a $Bbb C$ linear map then $f:bar{V} rightarrow bar{W}$.
What does $bar{V}$ mean? Where do we use "passing to the complex conjugate"?
Denote the resulting class $b_V in K^0(DV,DS)$.
(i) How is $b_V$ induced from all the things above? Is this by the wrapping defined on pg 126?
(ii) how is $b_V$ dependent on $f$ or $W$.
algebraic-topology differential-topology k-theory topological-k-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am really confused with this construction of Bott Class in Page 127, Example 8.4.12
If $V$ is a complex vector space of dimension $n$, we form the complex
$$ 0 rightarrow wedge^0 V rightarrow wedge^1 V rightarrow cdots rightarrow wedge ^nV rightarrow 0 $$
of trivial vector bundles over $V$.
What does this mean? So we have $n$ trivial vector bundles, $V times Bbb C^{binom{n}{k}}$?
The map $wedge^pV rightarrow wedge^{p+1}V$ is given by $w mapsto v wedge w$. Now we pass to complex conjugate bundles. IT is clear that if $f:V rightarrow W$ is a $Bbb C$ linear map then $f:bar{V} rightarrow bar{W}$.
What does $bar{V}$ mean? Where do we use "passing to the complex conjugate"?
Denote the resulting class $b_V in K^0(DV,DS)$.
(i) How is $b_V$ induced from all the things above? Is this by the wrapping defined on pg 126?
(ii) how is $b_V$ dependent on $f$ or $W$.
algebraic-topology differential-topology k-theory topological-k-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 10 '18 at 10:33
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
$endgroup$
– vap
Dec 12 '18 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am really confused with this construction of Bott Class in Page 127, Example 8.4.12
If $V$ is a complex vector space of dimension $n$, we form the complex
$$ 0 rightarrow wedge^0 V rightarrow wedge^1 V rightarrow cdots rightarrow wedge ^nV rightarrow 0 $$
of trivial vector bundles over $V$.
What does this mean? So we have $n$ trivial vector bundles, $V times Bbb C^{binom{n}{k}}$?
The map $wedge^pV rightarrow wedge^{p+1}V$ is given by $w mapsto v wedge w$. Now we pass to complex conjugate bundles. IT is clear that if $f:V rightarrow W$ is a $Bbb C$ linear map then $f:bar{V} rightarrow bar{W}$.
What does $bar{V}$ mean? Where do we use "passing to the complex conjugate"?
Denote the resulting class $b_V in K^0(DV,DS)$.
(i) How is $b_V$ induced from all the things above? Is this by the wrapping defined on pg 126?
(ii) how is $b_V$ dependent on $f$ or $W$.
algebraic-topology differential-topology k-theory topological-k-theory
$endgroup$
I am really confused with this construction of Bott Class in Page 127, Example 8.4.12
If $V$ is a complex vector space of dimension $n$, we form the complex
$$ 0 rightarrow wedge^0 V rightarrow wedge^1 V rightarrow cdots rightarrow wedge ^nV rightarrow 0 $$
of trivial vector bundles over $V$.
What does this mean? So we have $n$ trivial vector bundles, $V times Bbb C^{binom{n}{k}}$?
The map $wedge^pV rightarrow wedge^{p+1}V$ is given by $w mapsto v wedge w$. Now we pass to complex conjugate bundles. IT is clear that if $f:V rightarrow W$ is a $Bbb C$ linear map then $f:bar{V} rightarrow bar{W}$.
What does $bar{V}$ mean? Where do we use "passing to the complex conjugate"?
Denote the resulting class $b_V in K^0(DV,DS)$.
(i) How is $b_V$ induced from all the things above? Is this by the wrapping defined on pg 126?
(ii) how is $b_V$ dependent on $f$ or $W$.
algebraic-topology differential-topology k-theory topological-k-theory
algebraic-topology differential-topology k-theory topological-k-theory
edited Dec 9 '18 at 22:09
CL.
asked Dec 9 '18 at 21:49
CL.CL.
2,2152825
2,2152825
$begingroup$
Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 10 '18 at 10:33
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
$endgroup$
– vap
Dec 12 '18 at 18:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 10 '18 at 10:33
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
$endgroup$
– vap
Dec 12 '18 at 18:40
$begingroup$
Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 10 '18 at 10:33
$begingroup$
Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 10 '18 at 10:33
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
$endgroup$
– vap
Dec 12 '18 at 18:40
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
$endgroup$
– vap
Dec 12 '18 at 18:40
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033070%2fdefining-bott-class-by-relative-k-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033070%2fdefining-bott-class-by-relative-k-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Although I do not see the purpose of the bundle $wedge^i V$, it is obvious that it stands for the product bundle $V times wedge^i V$. The map $wedge^i V to wedge^{i+1} V$ is defined fiberwise by $omega mapsto v wedge omega$ for all $v in V$. Any complex vector space $V$ can be given the complex conjugate structure by defining a new scalar multiplication via $lambda * v = overline{lambda} cdot v$. This vector space is denoted by $overline{V}$. The same construction applies to vector bundles (fiberwise). But it is not clear to me what the "resulting class" $b_V$ should be.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 10 '18 at 10:33
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/642167/… $bar{V}$ is the complex conjugate of a vector space, you can look it up on Wikipedia. Please note that there is a typo: $DS$ should be $SV$. The sequence is exact everywhere outside zero, so gives a class in $(V,Vsmallsetminus {0})cong(DV,SV)$. The passage to conjugate is related to the fact the the Bott generator is defined of index $-1$, so in this picture the section $zmapsto bar{z}$. This answers your (i). Question (ii): $f$ and $W$ were only examples
$endgroup$
– vap
Dec 12 '18 at 18:40