Let $V=mathbb{R}^3$ and $W={ (x,y,z): x+y+z=0}$ Describe $V/W$ geometrically and contrsuct an explicit...












0












$begingroup$


For an isomorphism I let $phi:W^perpto V/W$ be defined as $phi(x)=[x]$



To show $phi$ is injective suppose $xneq y$ for $x,y in W^perp$.



Since $W={ (x,y,z): x+y+z=0}$, $(1,1,1)$ is the vector normal to the plane $W$.



And so $x=a(1,1,1)$ and $y=b(1,1,1)$ where $aneq b$.



Then $x-y=(a-b,a-b,a-b)$ and $a-b+a-b+a-b=3(a-b)neq 0$



so $x-y notin W$ and $[x]neq [y]$. Thus $phi$ is injective.



I'm not sure how to show it's onto.



To show $phi$ is onto, let $[y] in V/W$



then maybe I have that $y=w+v$ for some vector $win W$ and $vin V$. So that $phi (w+v)=[w+v]=[y]$?



I think describing V/W geometrically would mean showing $V/W=[span(1,1,1)]$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You get surjectivity "for free" due to rank nullity and I'm pretty sure describing $V/W$ geometrically is as you said.
    $endgroup$
    – Dionel Jaime
    Dec 9 '18 at 22:04












  • $begingroup$
    Why do I get onto for free? From this $dim(V)=dim(V/W)+dim(W)$? I guess I don't understand.
    $endgroup$
    – AColoredReptile
    Dec 9 '18 at 22:09
















0












$begingroup$


For an isomorphism I let $phi:W^perpto V/W$ be defined as $phi(x)=[x]$



To show $phi$ is injective suppose $xneq y$ for $x,y in W^perp$.



Since $W={ (x,y,z): x+y+z=0}$, $(1,1,1)$ is the vector normal to the plane $W$.



And so $x=a(1,1,1)$ and $y=b(1,1,1)$ where $aneq b$.



Then $x-y=(a-b,a-b,a-b)$ and $a-b+a-b+a-b=3(a-b)neq 0$



so $x-y notin W$ and $[x]neq [y]$. Thus $phi$ is injective.



I'm not sure how to show it's onto.



To show $phi$ is onto, let $[y] in V/W$



then maybe I have that $y=w+v$ for some vector $win W$ and $vin V$. So that $phi (w+v)=[w+v]=[y]$?



I think describing V/W geometrically would mean showing $V/W=[span(1,1,1)]$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You get surjectivity "for free" due to rank nullity and I'm pretty sure describing $V/W$ geometrically is as you said.
    $endgroup$
    – Dionel Jaime
    Dec 9 '18 at 22:04












  • $begingroup$
    Why do I get onto for free? From this $dim(V)=dim(V/W)+dim(W)$? I guess I don't understand.
    $endgroup$
    – AColoredReptile
    Dec 9 '18 at 22:09














0












0








0





$begingroup$


For an isomorphism I let $phi:W^perpto V/W$ be defined as $phi(x)=[x]$



To show $phi$ is injective suppose $xneq y$ for $x,y in W^perp$.



Since $W={ (x,y,z): x+y+z=0}$, $(1,1,1)$ is the vector normal to the plane $W$.



And so $x=a(1,1,1)$ and $y=b(1,1,1)$ where $aneq b$.



Then $x-y=(a-b,a-b,a-b)$ and $a-b+a-b+a-b=3(a-b)neq 0$



so $x-y notin W$ and $[x]neq [y]$. Thus $phi$ is injective.



I'm not sure how to show it's onto.



To show $phi$ is onto, let $[y] in V/W$



then maybe I have that $y=w+v$ for some vector $win W$ and $vin V$. So that $phi (w+v)=[w+v]=[y]$?



I think describing V/W geometrically would mean showing $V/W=[span(1,1,1)]$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




For an isomorphism I let $phi:W^perpto V/W$ be defined as $phi(x)=[x]$



To show $phi$ is injective suppose $xneq y$ for $x,y in W^perp$.



Since $W={ (x,y,z): x+y+z=0}$, $(1,1,1)$ is the vector normal to the plane $W$.



And so $x=a(1,1,1)$ and $y=b(1,1,1)$ where $aneq b$.



Then $x-y=(a-b,a-b,a-b)$ and $a-b+a-b+a-b=3(a-b)neq 0$



so $x-y notin W$ and $[x]neq [y]$. Thus $phi$ is injective.



I'm not sure how to show it's onto.



To show $phi$ is onto, let $[y] in V/W$



then maybe I have that $y=w+v$ for some vector $win W$ and $vin V$. So that $phi (w+v)=[w+v]=[y]$?



I think describing V/W geometrically would mean showing $V/W=[span(1,1,1)]$







linear-algebra quotient-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 9 '18 at 21:38









AColoredReptileAColoredReptile

23728




23728












  • $begingroup$
    You get surjectivity "for free" due to rank nullity and I'm pretty sure describing $V/W$ geometrically is as you said.
    $endgroup$
    – Dionel Jaime
    Dec 9 '18 at 22:04












  • $begingroup$
    Why do I get onto for free? From this $dim(V)=dim(V/W)+dim(W)$? I guess I don't understand.
    $endgroup$
    – AColoredReptile
    Dec 9 '18 at 22:09


















  • $begingroup$
    You get surjectivity "for free" due to rank nullity and I'm pretty sure describing $V/W$ geometrically is as you said.
    $endgroup$
    – Dionel Jaime
    Dec 9 '18 at 22:04












  • $begingroup$
    Why do I get onto for free? From this $dim(V)=dim(V/W)+dim(W)$? I guess I don't understand.
    $endgroup$
    – AColoredReptile
    Dec 9 '18 at 22:09
















$begingroup$
You get surjectivity "for free" due to rank nullity and I'm pretty sure describing $V/W$ geometrically is as you said.
$endgroup$
– Dionel Jaime
Dec 9 '18 at 22:04






$begingroup$
You get surjectivity "for free" due to rank nullity and I'm pretty sure describing $V/W$ geometrically is as you said.
$endgroup$
– Dionel Jaime
Dec 9 '18 at 22:04














$begingroup$
Why do I get onto for free? From this $dim(V)=dim(V/W)+dim(W)$? I guess I don't understand.
$endgroup$
– AColoredReptile
Dec 9 '18 at 22:09




$begingroup$
Why do I get onto for free? From this $dim(V)=dim(V/W)+dim(W)$? I guess I don't understand.
$endgroup$
– AColoredReptile
Dec 9 '18 at 22:09










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$W^perp$ is one dimensional since it's isomorphic to a one dimensional space, namely, $span{(1,1,1)}$.



Since $dim(W) = 2$, we have that $dim(V/W) = 1$



You have an injective map, $phi$, between two one dimensional spaces, $W^perp $ and $V/W$



Rank nullity says the the dimension of the image of $phi$ is one and hence is all of $V/W$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    As Jaime pointed out, surjectivity is free via rank-nullity. If you want a more elementary proof, here it is: Let $[x]inmathbb{R}^3/W$. If $yin W$ then $[x+y]=[x]$. Hence, we need only show that $W^perp+W=mathbb{R}^3$. Indeed, suppose $(a,b,c)inmathbb{R}^3$. Set $d:=frac{a+b+c}{3}$, and observe that $(d,d,d)+(a-d,b-d,c-d)=(a,b,c)$ with $a-d+b-d+c-d=0$.



    As for the geometry, well, there is no natural geometric description of $mathbb{R}^3/W$, as it does not sit in any natural geometric space. However since $mathbb{R}^3/W$ is isomorphic to $W^perp$, and $W^perp$ is just $mathbb{R}(1,1,1)$, that is as good as a geometric description.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      Geometrically, you can think of W as the plane through the origin with normal vector (1,1,1). You can think of the quotient space as translates of this plane along the normal vector. So you have this infinite family of parallel planes indexed by how far it's translated from W, which will be a scalar multiple of (1,1,1). Thats why it's 1-dimensional.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033057%2flet-v-mathbbr3-and-w-x-y-z-xyz-0-describe-v-w-geometrically%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        1












        $begingroup$

        $W^perp$ is one dimensional since it's isomorphic to a one dimensional space, namely, $span{(1,1,1)}$.



        Since $dim(W) = 2$, we have that $dim(V/W) = 1$



        You have an injective map, $phi$, between two one dimensional spaces, $W^perp $ and $V/W$



        Rank nullity says the the dimension of the image of $phi$ is one and hence is all of $V/W$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          1












          $begingroup$

          $W^perp$ is one dimensional since it's isomorphic to a one dimensional space, namely, $span{(1,1,1)}$.



          Since $dim(W) = 2$, we have that $dim(V/W) = 1$



          You have an injective map, $phi$, between two one dimensional spaces, $W^perp $ and $V/W$



          Rank nullity says the the dimension of the image of $phi$ is one and hence is all of $V/W$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            $W^perp$ is one dimensional since it's isomorphic to a one dimensional space, namely, $span{(1,1,1)}$.



            Since $dim(W) = 2$, we have that $dim(V/W) = 1$



            You have an injective map, $phi$, between two one dimensional spaces, $W^perp $ and $V/W$



            Rank nullity says the the dimension of the image of $phi$ is one and hence is all of $V/W$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            $W^perp$ is one dimensional since it's isomorphic to a one dimensional space, namely, $span{(1,1,1)}$.



            Since $dim(W) = 2$, we have that $dim(V/W) = 1$



            You have an injective map, $phi$, between two one dimensional spaces, $W^perp $ and $V/W$



            Rank nullity says the the dimension of the image of $phi$ is one and hence is all of $V/W$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 9 '18 at 22:14









            Dionel JaimeDionel Jaime

            1,748514




            1,748514























                0












                $begingroup$

                As Jaime pointed out, surjectivity is free via rank-nullity. If you want a more elementary proof, here it is: Let $[x]inmathbb{R}^3/W$. If $yin W$ then $[x+y]=[x]$. Hence, we need only show that $W^perp+W=mathbb{R}^3$. Indeed, suppose $(a,b,c)inmathbb{R}^3$. Set $d:=frac{a+b+c}{3}$, and observe that $(d,d,d)+(a-d,b-d,c-d)=(a,b,c)$ with $a-d+b-d+c-d=0$.



                As for the geometry, well, there is no natural geometric description of $mathbb{R}^3/W$, as it does not sit in any natural geometric space. However since $mathbb{R}^3/W$ is isomorphic to $W^perp$, and $W^perp$ is just $mathbb{R}(1,1,1)$, that is as good as a geometric description.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  As Jaime pointed out, surjectivity is free via rank-nullity. If you want a more elementary proof, here it is: Let $[x]inmathbb{R}^3/W$. If $yin W$ then $[x+y]=[x]$. Hence, we need only show that $W^perp+W=mathbb{R}^3$. Indeed, suppose $(a,b,c)inmathbb{R}^3$. Set $d:=frac{a+b+c}{3}$, and observe that $(d,d,d)+(a-d,b-d,c-d)=(a,b,c)$ with $a-d+b-d+c-d=0$.



                  As for the geometry, well, there is no natural geometric description of $mathbb{R}^3/W$, as it does not sit in any natural geometric space. However since $mathbb{R}^3/W$ is isomorphic to $W^perp$, and $W^perp$ is just $mathbb{R}(1,1,1)$, that is as good as a geometric description.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    As Jaime pointed out, surjectivity is free via rank-nullity. If you want a more elementary proof, here it is: Let $[x]inmathbb{R}^3/W$. If $yin W$ then $[x+y]=[x]$. Hence, we need only show that $W^perp+W=mathbb{R}^3$. Indeed, suppose $(a,b,c)inmathbb{R}^3$. Set $d:=frac{a+b+c}{3}$, and observe that $(d,d,d)+(a-d,b-d,c-d)=(a,b,c)$ with $a-d+b-d+c-d=0$.



                    As for the geometry, well, there is no natural geometric description of $mathbb{R}^3/W$, as it does not sit in any natural geometric space. However since $mathbb{R}^3/W$ is isomorphic to $W^perp$, and $W^perp$ is just $mathbb{R}(1,1,1)$, that is as good as a geometric description.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    As Jaime pointed out, surjectivity is free via rank-nullity. If you want a more elementary proof, here it is: Let $[x]inmathbb{R}^3/W$. If $yin W$ then $[x+y]=[x]$. Hence, we need only show that $W^perp+W=mathbb{R}^3$. Indeed, suppose $(a,b,c)inmathbb{R}^3$. Set $d:=frac{a+b+c}{3}$, and observe that $(d,d,d)+(a-d,b-d,c-d)=(a,b,c)$ with $a-d+b-d+c-d=0$.



                    As for the geometry, well, there is no natural geometric description of $mathbb{R}^3/W$, as it does not sit in any natural geometric space. However since $mathbb{R}^3/W$ is isomorphic to $W^perp$, and $W^perp$ is just $mathbb{R}(1,1,1)$, that is as good as a geometric description.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 9 '18 at 22:11









                    Ben WBen W

                    2,283615




                    2,283615























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Geometrically, you can think of W as the plane through the origin with normal vector (1,1,1). You can think of the quotient space as translates of this plane along the normal vector. So you have this infinite family of parallel planes indexed by how far it's translated from W, which will be a scalar multiple of (1,1,1). Thats why it's 1-dimensional.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Geometrically, you can think of W as the plane through the origin with normal vector (1,1,1). You can think of the quotient space as translates of this plane along the normal vector. So you have this infinite family of parallel planes indexed by how far it's translated from W, which will be a scalar multiple of (1,1,1). Thats why it's 1-dimensional.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Geometrically, you can think of W as the plane through the origin with normal vector (1,1,1). You can think of the quotient space as translates of this plane along the normal vector. So you have this infinite family of parallel planes indexed by how far it's translated from W, which will be a scalar multiple of (1,1,1). Thats why it's 1-dimensional.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Geometrically, you can think of W as the plane through the origin with normal vector (1,1,1). You can think of the quotient space as translates of this plane along the normal vector. So you have this infinite family of parallel planes indexed by how far it's translated from W, which will be a scalar multiple of (1,1,1). Thats why it's 1-dimensional.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 9 '18 at 22:25









                            Joel PereiraJoel Pereira

                            75919




                            75919






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033057%2flet-v-mathbbr3-and-w-x-y-z-xyz-0-describe-v-w-geometrically%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Plaza Victoria

                                Puebla de Zaragoza

                                Musa