General question about Convexity of Multivariate Functions (Convexity in only some (i.e. not all) of the...












0












$begingroup$


Let a general multivariate function of $n$ variables, $f : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ say, be given.



Suppose we want to prove that $f$ is convex (concave) in just some of the $n$ variables, not all.



In general, if one wants to prove that a function is convex (concave) in all variables, one should use the Hessian of the function.



So, I suspect that if one wants to prove that a function is convex (concave) in only some of the variables, one should again use a matrix of second-order partial derivatives of the function but in this case ONLY with respect to the variables for one wishes to confirm convexity (concavity).



Is my supposition correct?



In my case I am dealing with a function $f : mathbb{R}^4 to mathbb{R}, f(t,x,u,p) = 1 + x - u^2 + p(x + u)$ where I (only) want to show that it is concave in $(x,u)$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just fix $t, p$ and consider the function $$g(x, u)=f(t,x,u,p).$$ You want to prove that $g$ is concave on $mathbb R^2$. Then, study its second derivatives etc etc... This amounts to considering only the derivatives in $x, u$, as you conjecture.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 16 '18 at 17:02












  • $begingroup$
    @GiuseppeNegro Thank you, that is precisely that I wanted to know (whether you could do that).
    $endgroup$
    – Anna
    Dec 16 '18 at 17:07
















0












$begingroup$


Let a general multivariate function of $n$ variables, $f : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ say, be given.



Suppose we want to prove that $f$ is convex (concave) in just some of the $n$ variables, not all.



In general, if one wants to prove that a function is convex (concave) in all variables, one should use the Hessian of the function.



So, I suspect that if one wants to prove that a function is convex (concave) in only some of the variables, one should again use a matrix of second-order partial derivatives of the function but in this case ONLY with respect to the variables for one wishes to confirm convexity (concavity).



Is my supposition correct?



In my case I am dealing with a function $f : mathbb{R}^4 to mathbb{R}, f(t,x,u,p) = 1 + x - u^2 + p(x + u)$ where I (only) want to show that it is concave in $(x,u)$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just fix $t, p$ and consider the function $$g(x, u)=f(t,x,u,p).$$ You want to prove that $g$ is concave on $mathbb R^2$. Then, study its second derivatives etc etc... This amounts to considering only the derivatives in $x, u$, as you conjecture.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 16 '18 at 17:02












  • $begingroup$
    @GiuseppeNegro Thank you, that is precisely that I wanted to know (whether you could do that).
    $endgroup$
    – Anna
    Dec 16 '18 at 17:07














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let a general multivariate function of $n$ variables, $f : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ say, be given.



Suppose we want to prove that $f$ is convex (concave) in just some of the $n$ variables, not all.



In general, if one wants to prove that a function is convex (concave) in all variables, one should use the Hessian of the function.



So, I suspect that if one wants to prove that a function is convex (concave) in only some of the variables, one should again use a matrix of second-order partial derivatives of the function but in this case ONLY with respect to the variables for one wishes to confirm convexity (concavity).



Is my supposition correct?



In my case I am dealing with a function $f : mathbb{R}^4 to mathbb{R}, f(t,x,u,p) = 1 + x - u^2 + p(x + u)$ where I (only) want to show that it is concave in $(x,u)$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let a general multivariate function of $n$ variables, $f : mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ say, be given.



Suppose we want to prove that $f$ is convex (concave) in just some of the $n$ variables, not all.



In general, if one wants to prove that a function is convex (concave) in all variables, one should use the Hessian of the function.



So, I suspect that if one wants to prove that a function is convex (concave) in only some of the variables, one should again use a matrix of second-order partial derivatives of the function but in this case ONLY with respect to the variables for one wishes to confirm convexity (concavity).



Is my supposition correct?



In my case I am dealing with a function $f : mathbb{R}^4 to mathbb{R}, f(t,x,u,p) = 1 + x - u^2 + p(x + u)$ where I (only) want to show that it is concave in $(x,u)$.







convex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 16 '18 at 16:55







Anna

















asked Dec 16 '18 at 16:48









AnnaAnna

7619




7619








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just fix $t, p$ and consider the function $$g(x, u)=f(t,x,u,p).$$ You want to prove that $g$ is concave on $mathbb R^2$. Then, study its second derivatives etc etc... This amounts to considering only the derivatives in $x, u$, as you conjecture.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 16 '18 at 17:02












  • $begingroup$
    @GiuseppeNegro Thank you, that is precisely that I wanted to know (whether you could do that).
    $endgroup$
    – Anna
    Dec 16 '18 at 17:07














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just fix $t, p$ and consider the function $$g(x, u)=f(t,x,u,p).$$ You want to prove that $g$ is concave on $mathbb R^2$. Then, study its second derivatives etc etc... This amounts to considering only the derivatives in $x, u$, as you conjecture.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 16 '18 at 17:02












  • $begingroup$
    @GiuseppeNegro Thank you, that is precisely that I wanted to know (whether you could do that).
    $endgroup$
    – Anna
    Dec 16 '18 at 17:07








1




1




$begingroup$
Just fix $t, p$ and consider the function $$g(x, u)=f(t,x,u,p).$$ You want to prove that $g$ is concave on $mathbb R^2$. Then, study its second derivatives etc etc... This amounts to considering only the derivatives in $x, u$, as you conjecture.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 16 '18 at 17:02






$begingroup$
Just fix $t, p$ and consider the function $$g(x, u)=f(t,x,u,p).$$ You want to prove that $g$ is concave on $mathbb R^2$. Then, study its second derivatives etc etc... This amounts to considering only the derivatives in $x, u$, as you conjecture.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 16 '18 at 17:02














$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro Thank you, that is precisely that I wanted to know (whether you could do that).
$endgroup$
– Anna
Dec 16 '18 at 17:07




$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro Thank you, that is precisely that I wanted to know (whether you could do that).
$endgroup$
– Anna
Dec 16 '18 at 17:07










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042824%2fgeneral-question-about-convexity-of-multivariate-functions-convexity-in-only-so%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3042824%2fgeneral-question-about-convexity-of-multivariate-functions-convexity-in-only-so%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa