An application of a variation of the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem
$begingroup$
I'm working on Part D of the following question:
I am trying to use the following variation on Stone-Weierstrass:
Let $U$ be a non-compact locally compact hausdorff space. If $mathcal{A}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ (the continuous functions from $U$ to $mathbb{R}$ which vanish at infinity) which separates points. Then $mathcal{A}=C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ or $mathcal{A}={f in C_0(U,mathbb{R}):f(x_0)=0}$ for some $x_oin U$
I'm having trouble seeing how to use the theorem and why $U$ should not be compact. Thoughts?
A solution is given here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b602/17d061e2f6ca4c592edf5efb7bcb19320b04.pdf
I am having trouble following it though.
real-analysis functional-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm working on Part D of the following question:
I am trying to use the following variation on Stone-Weierstrass:
Let $U$ be a non-compact locally compact hausdorff space. If $mathcal{A}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ (the continuous functions from $U$ to $mathbb{R}$ which vanish at infinity) which separates points. Then $mathcal{A}=C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ or $mathcal{A}={f in C_0(U,mathbb{R}):f(x_0)=0}$ for some $x_oin U$
I'm having trouble seeing how to use the theorem and why $U$ should not be compact. Thoughts?
A solution is given here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b602/17d061e2f6ca4c592edf5efb7bcb19320b04.pdf
I am having trouble following it though.
real-analysis functional-analysis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
$endgroup$
– yoshi
Nov 7 '18 at 19:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm working on Part D of the following question:
I am trying to use the following variation on Stone-Weierstrass:
Let $U$ be a non-compact locally compact hausdorff space. If $mathcal{A}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ (the continuous functions from $U$ to $mathbb{R}$ which vanish at infinity) which separates points. Then $mathcal{A}=C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ or $mathcal{A}={f in C_0(U,mathbb{R}):f(x_0)=0}$ for some $x_oin U$
I'm having trouble seeing how to use the theorem and why $U$ should not be compact. Thoughts?
A solution is given here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b602/17d061e2f6ca4c592edf5efb7bcb19320b04.pdf
I am having trouble following it though.
real-analysis functional-analysis
$endgroup$
I'm working on Part D of the following question:
I am trying to use the following variation on Stone-Weierstrass:
Let $U$ be a non-compact locally compact hausdorff space. If $mathcal{A}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ (the continuous functions from $U$ to $mathbb{R}$ which vanish at infinity) which separates points. Then $mathcal{A}=C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ or $mathcal{A}={f in C_0(U,mathbb{R}):f(x_0)=0}$ for some $x_oin U$
I'm having trouble seeing how to use the theorem and why $U$ should not be compact. Thoughts?
A solution is given here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b602/17d061e2f6ca4c592edf5efb7bcb19320b04.pdf
I am having trouble following it though.
real-analysis functional-analysis
real-analysis functional-analysis
edited Nov 7 '18 at 18:35
Luca Carai
31119
31119
asked Nov 7 '18 at 18:09
yoshiyoshi
1,181817
1,181817
$begingroup$
I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
$endgroup$
– yoshi
Nov 7 '18 at 19:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
$endgroup$
– yoshi
Nov 7 '18 at 19:19
$begingroup$
I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
$endgroup$
– yoshi
Nov 7 '18 at 19:19
$begingroup$
I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
$endgroup$
– yoshi
Nov 7 '18 at 19:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)
c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.
Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.
Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.
For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.
Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
$$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.
The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2988876%2fan-application-of-a-variation-of-the-stone-weierstrass-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)
c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.
Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.
Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.
For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.
Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
$$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.
The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)
c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.
Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.
Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.
For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.
Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
$$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.
The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)
c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.
Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.
Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.
For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.
Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
$$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.
The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.
$endgroup$
The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)
c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.
Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.
Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.
For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.
Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
$$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.
The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.
answered Dec 1 '18 at 9:02
p4schp4sch
4,995217
4,995217
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2988876%2fan-application-of-a-variation-of-the-stone-weierstrass-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
$endgroup$
– yoshi
Nov 7 '18 at 19:19