$BV(Omega)$ is embedded compactly in $L^1 _{mathrm{loc}} (Omega)$
Definition:
We say that a function $u: Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is a function of bounded variation iff $uin L^1(Omega)$ and $supleft{intlimits_{Omega}u operatorname{div}phi : phi in C_c(Omega, mathbb{R}^d), ||phi||_{infty} leq 1right} < +{infty}$.
By definition it is clear that $mathrm{BV}(Omega)subset L^1(Omega)$.
How to show that this embedding is compact when $Omega$ is bounded set?
Seems like this is a very standard result, but I could not find the proof of this in many of the functional analysis book.
functional-analysis analysis pde bounded-variation regularity-theory-of-pdes
add a comment |
Definition:
We say that a function $u: Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is a function of bounded variation iff $uin L^1(Omega)$ and $supleft{intlimits_{Omega}u operatorname{div}phi : phi in C_c(Omega, mathbb{R}^d), ||phi||_{infty} leq 1right} < +{infty}$.
By definition it is clear that $mathrm{BV}(Omega)subset L^1(Omega)$.
How to show that this embedding is compact when $Omega$ is bounded set?
Seems like this is a very standard result, but I could not find the proof of this in many of the functional analysis book.
functional-analysis analysis pde bounded-variation regularity-theory-of-pdes
add a comment |
Definition:
We say that a function $u: Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is a function of bounded variation iff $uin L^1(Omega)$ and $supleft{intlimits_{Omega}u operatorname{div}phi : phi in C_c(Omega, mathbb{R}^d), ||phi||_{infty} leq 1right} < +{infty}$.
By definition it is clear that $mathrm{BV}(Omega)subset L^1(Omega)$.
How to show that this embedding is compact when $Omega$ is bounded set?
Seems like this is a very standard result, but I could not find the proof of this in many of the functional analysis book.
functional-analysis analysis pde bounded-variation regularity-theory-of-pdes
Definition:
We say that a function $u: Omega rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is a function of bounded variation iff $uin L^1(Omega)$ and $supleft{intlimits_{Omega}u operatorname{div}phi : phi in C_c(Omega, mathbb{R}^d), ||phi||_{infty} leq 1right} < +{infty}$.
By definition it is clear that $mathrm{BV}(Omega)subset L^1(Omega)$.
How to show that this embedding is compact when $Omega$ is bounded set?
Seems like this is a very standard result, but I could not find the proof of this in many of the functional analysis book.
functional-analysis analysis pde bounded-variation regularity-theory-of-pdes
functional-analysis analysis pde bounded-variation regularity-theory-of-pdes
edited Nov 26 '18 at 14:08
Davide Giraudo
125k16150260
125k16150260
asked Jul 21 '18 at 11:53
Rosy
1045
1045
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is Theorem 5.3.4 in W.P.Ziemer: Weakly Differentiable Functions or Theorem 5.2.3 in Evans, Gariepy: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858441%2fbv-omega-is-embedded-compactly-in-l1-mathrmloc-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is Theorem 5.3.4 in W.P.Ziemer: Weakly Differentiable Functions or Theorem 5.2.3 in Evans, Gariepy: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions.
add a comment |
This is Theorem 5.3.4 in W.P.Ziemer: Weakly Differentiable Functions or Theorem 5.2.3 in Evans, Gariepy: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions.
add a comment |
This is Theorem 5.3.4 in W.P.Ziemer: Weakly Differentiable Functions or Theorem 5.2.3 in Evans, Gariepy: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions.
This is Theorem 5.3.4 in W.P.Ziemer: Weakly Differentiable Functions or Theorem 5.2.3 in Evans, Gariepy: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions.
answered Jul 21 '18 at 13:42
Thomas
16.7k21631
16.7k21631
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858441%2fbv-omega-is-embedded-compactly-in-l1-mathrmloc-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown