Monotone Convergence for Decreasing Functions












4














I'm trying to prove the Monotone Convergence Theorem for decreasing sequences, namely if



Let $(X,mathcal{M},mu)$ be a measure space and suppose ${f_n}$ are non-negative measurable functions decreasing pointwise to $f$. Suppose also that $f_1 in mathscr{L}(mu)$. Then $$int_X f~dmu = lim_{ntoinfty}int_X f_n~dmu.$$



Why does this statement not follow from LDCT with $f_n$ being dominated by $f_1$?



I'm also aware of the solutions with $g_n=f_1-f_n$, but the question asks to prove it using Fatou's lemma










share|cite|improve this question
























  • In Fatou's lemma, the inequality goes the other way. So the inequality $limint f_n,dmuleint f,dmu$ doesn't follow from Fatou.
    – grand_chat
    Oct 9 '15 at 1:26












  • @grand_chat why does the statement not follow from LDCT with $g=f_1$?
    – Anthony Peter
    Oct 9 '15 at 1:59






  • 3




    I think it does follow from LDCT.
    – user99914
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:01










  • @JohnMa Then why does every solution use the $g_n=f_1-f_n$ trick and MCT?
    – Anthony Peter
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:03












  • I guess that's because LDCT is an overkill? (It seems that LDCT is the last theorem to prove, either Fatou or MCT comes first)
    – user99914
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:05
















4














I'm trying to prove the Monotone Convergence Theorem for decreasing sequences, namely if



Let $(X,mathcal{M},mu)$ be a measure space and suppose ${f_n}$ are non-negative measurable functions decreasing pointwise to $f$. Suppose also that $f_1 in mathscr{L}(mu)$. Then $$int_X f~dmu = lim_{ntoinfty}int_X f_n~dmu.$$



Why does this statement not follow from LDCT with $f_n$ being dominated by $f_1$?



I'm also aware of the solutions with $g_n=f_1-f_n$, but the question asks to prove it using Fatou's lemma










share|cite|improve this question
























  • In Fatou's lemma, the inequality goes the other way. So the inequality $limint f_n,dmuleint f,dmu$ doesn't follow from Fatou.
    – grand_chat
    Oct 9 '15 at 1:26












  • @grand_chat why does the statement not follow from LDCT with $g=f_1$?
    – Anthony Peter
    Oct 9 '15 at 1:59






  • 3




    I think it does follow from LDCT.
    – user99914
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:01










  • @JohnMa Then why does every solution use the $g_n=f_1-f_n$ trick and MCT?
    – Anthony Peter
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:03












  • I guess that's because LDCT is an overkill? (It seems that LDCT is the last theorem to prove, either Fatou or MCT comes first)
    – user99914
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:05














4












4








4


1





I'm trying to prove the Monotone Convergence Theorem for decreasing sequences, namely if



Let $(X,mathcal{M},mu)$ be a measure space and suppose ${f_n}$ are non-negative measurable functions decreasing pointwise to $f$. Suppose also that $f_1 in mathscr{L}(mu)$. Then $$int_X f~dmu = lim_{ntoinfty}int_X f_n~dmu.$$



Why does this statement not follow from LDCT with $f_n$ being dominated by $f_1$?



I'm also aware of the solutions with $g_n=f_1-f_n$, but the question asks to prove it using Fatou's lemma










share|cite|improve this question















I'm trying to prove the Monotone Convergence Theorem for decreasing sequences, namely if



Let $(X,mathcal{M},mu)$ be a measure space and suppose ${f_n}$ are non-negative measurable functions decreasing pointwise to $f$. Suppose also that $f_1 in mathscr{L}(mu)$. Then $$int_X f~dmu = lim_{ntoinfty}int_X f_n~dmu.$$



Why does this statement not follow from LDCT with $f_n$ being dominated by $f_1$?



I'm also aware of the solutions with $g_n=f_1-f_n$, but the question asks to prove it using Fatou's lemma







real-analysis analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 9 '15 at 2:03

























asked Oct 9 '15 at 0:28









Anthony Peter

3,23711451




3,23711451












  • In Fatou's lemma, the inequality goes the other way. So the inequality $limint f_n,dmuleint f,dmu$ doesn't follow from Fatou.
    – grand_chat
    Oct 9 '15 at 1:26












  • @grand_chat why does the statement not follow from LDCT with $g=f_1$?
    – Anthony Peter
    Oct 9 '15 at 1:59






  • 3




    I think it does follow from LDCT.
    – user99914
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:01










  • @JohnMa Then why does every solution use the $g_n=f_1-f_n$ trick and MCT?
    – Anthony Peter
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:03












  • I guess that's because LDCT is an overkill? (It seems that LDCT is the last theorem to prove, either Fatou or MCT comes first)
    – user99914
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:05


















  • In Fatou's lemma, the inequality goes the other way. So the inequality $limint f_n,dmuleint f,dmu$ doesn't follow from Fatou.
    – grand_chat
    Oct 9 '15 at 1:26












  • @grand_chat why does the statement not follow from LDCT with $g=f_1$?
    – Anthony Peter
    Oct 9 '15 at 1:59






  • 3




    I think it does follow from LDCT.
    – user99914
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:01










  • @JohnMa Then why does every solution use the $g_n=f_1-f_n$ trick and MCT?
    – Anthony Peter
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:03












  • I guess that's because LDCT is an overkill? (It seems that LDCT is the last theorem to prove, either Fatou or MCT comes first)
    – user99914
    Oct 9 '15 at 3:05
















In Fatou's lemma, the inequality goes the other way. So the inequality $limint f_n,dmuleint f,dmu$ doesn't follow from Fatou.
– grand_chat
Oct 9 '15 at 1:26






In Fatou's lemma, the inequality goes the other way. So the inequality $limint f_n,dmuleint f,dmu$ doesn't follow from Fatou.
– grand_chat
Oct 9 '15 at 1:26














@grand_chat why does the statement not follow from LDCT with $g=f_1$?
– Anthony Peter
Oct 9 '15 at 1:59




@grand_chat why does the statement not follow from LDCT with $g=f_1$?
– Anthony Peter
Oct 9 '15 at 1:59




3




3




I think it does follow from LDCT.
– user99914
Oct 9 '15 at 3:01




I think it does follow from LDCT.
– user99914
Oct 9 '15 at 3:01












@JohnMa Then why does every solution use the $g_n=f_1-f_n$ trick and MCT?
– Anthony Peter
Oct 9 '15 at 3:03






@JohnMa Then why does every solution use the $g_n=f_1-f_n$ trick and MCT?
– Anthony Peter
Oct 9 '15 at 3:03














I guess that's because LDCT is an overkill? (It seems that LDCT is the last theorem to prove, either Fatou or MCT comes first)
– user99914
Oct 9 '15 at 3:05




I guess that's because LDCT is an overkill? (It seems that LDCT is the last theorem to prove, either Fatou or MCT comes first)
– user99914
Oct 9 '15 at 3:05










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














As the OP says in the comments, the problem is posed at the end of the first chapter of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, so it is not clear whether he intends the student to use the Monotone Convergence Theorem, Fatou's Lemma or the Dominated Convergence Theorem.



You are right that the proof is a trivial application of DCT. However, it is certainly an instructive exercise to prove it using just MCT or Fatou's Lemma.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1471212%2fmonotone-convergence-for-decreasing-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    As the OP says in the comments, the problem is posed at the end of the first chapter of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, so it is not clear whether he intends the student to use the Monotone Convergence Theorem, Fatou's Lemma or the Dominated Convergence Theorem.



    You are right that the proof is a trivial application of DCT. However, it is certainly an instructive exercise to prove it using just MCT or Fatou's Lemma.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      0














      As the OP says in the comments, the problem is posed at the end of the first chapter of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, so it is not clear whether he intends the student to use the Monotone Convergence Theorem, Fatou's Lemma or the Dominated Convergence Theorem.



      You are right that the proof is a trivial application of DCT. However, it is certainly an instructive exercise to prove it using just MCT or Fatou's Lemma.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        As the OP says in the comments, the problem is posed at the end of the first chapter of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, so it is not clear whether he intends the student to use the Monotone Convergence Theorem, Fatou's Lemma or the Dominated Convergence Theorem.



        You are right that the proof is a trivial application of DCT. However, it is certainly an instructive exercise to prove it using just MCT or Fatou's Lemma.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        As the OP says in the comments, the problem is posed at the end of the first chapter of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, so it is not clear whether he intends the student to use the Monotone Convergence Theorem, Fatou's Lemma or the Dominated Convergence Theorem.



        You are right that the proof is a trivial application of DCT. However, it is certainly an instructive exercise to prove it using just MCT or Fatou's Lemma.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 26 '18 at 14:07


























        community wiki





        2 revs
        Brahadeesh































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1471212%2fmonotone-convergence-for-decreasing-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa