Determine homogeneous transformation matrix for reflection about the line $y = mx + b$, or specifically $y =...
Determine the homogeneous transformation matrix for reflection about the line
$y = mx + b$, or specifically $ y = 2x – 6$.
I use $mx - y +b =0$: $text{slope} = m$, $tan(theta)= m$
intersection with the axes:
$x =0$ is $y = -b$ and $y =0$ is $x = dfrac{b}{m}$
My question is, what can I do next?
linear-algebra
add a comment |
Determine the homogeneous transformation matrix for reflection about the line
$y = mx + b$, or specifically $ y = 2x – 6$.
I use $mx - y +b =0$: $text{slope} = m$, $tan(theta)= m$
intersection with the axes:
$x =0$ is $y = -b$ and $y =0$ is $x = dfrac{b}{m}$
My question is, what can I do next?
linear-algebra
1
What are your thoughts on the problem so far? What have you tried?
– Cameron Buie
Nov 4 '13 at 22:21
1
zebragraph.com/Geometers_Corner_files/Reflection.pdf
– Mickey Tin
Apr 2 '14 at 15:14
Your question is not clear. Do you want to reflect in the line $y=mx+b$ or $y=2x-6$?
– Rory Daulton
Dec 31 '14 at 4:29
add a comment |
Determine the homogeneous transformation matrix for reflection about the line
$y = mx + b$, or specifically $ y = 2x – 6$.
I use $mx - y +b =0$: $text{slope} = m$, $tan(theta)= m$
intersection with the axes:
$x =0$ is $y = -b$ and $y =0$ is $x = dfrac{b}{m}$
My question is, what can I do next?
linear-algebra
Determine the homogeneous transformation matrix for reflection about the line
$y = mx + b$, or specifically $ y = 2x – 6$.
I use $mx - y +b =0$: $text{slope} = m$, $tan(theta)= m$
intersection with the axes:
$x =0$ is $y = -b$ and $y =0$ is $x = dfrac{b}{m}$
My question is, what can I do next?
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
edited Aug 7 '15 at 6:27
coldnumber
3,2941820
3,2941820
asked Nov 4 '13 at 22:18
Adel Hassan
9317
9317
1
What are your thoughts on the problem so far? What have you tried?
– Cameron Buie
Nov 4 '13 at 22:21
1
zebragraph.com/Geometers_Corner_files/Reflection.pdf
– Mickey Tin
Apr 2 '14 at 15:14
Your question is not clear. Do you want to reflect in the line $y=mx+b$ or $y=2x-6$?
– Rory Daulton
Dec 31 '14 at 4:29
add a comment |
1
What are your thoughts on the problem so far? What have you tried?
– Cameron Buie
Nov 4 '13 at 22:21
1
zebragraph.com/Geometers_Corner_files/Reflection.pdf
– Mickey Tin
Apr 2 '14 at 15:14
Your question is not clear. Do you want to reflect in the line $y=mx+b$ or $y=2x-6$?
– Rory Daulton
Dec 31 '14 at 4:29
1
1
What are your thoughts on the problem so far? What have you tried?
– Cameron Buie
Nov 4 '13 at 22:21
What are your thoughts on the problem so far? What have you tried?
– Cameron Buie
Nov 4 '13 at 22:21
1
1
zebragraph.com/Geometers_Corner_files/Reflection.pdf
– Mickey Tin
Apr 2 '14 at 15:14
zebragraph.com/Geometers_Corner_files/Reflection.pdf
– Mickey Tin
Apr 2 '14 at 15:14
Your question is not clear. Do you want to reflect in the line $y=mx+b$ or $y=2x-6$?
– Rory Daulton
Dec 31 '14 at 4:29
Your question is not clear. Do you want to reflect in the line $y=mx+b$ or $y=2x-6$?
– Rory Daulton
Dec 31 '14 at 4:29
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Write down the transform in vector form and you can derive it from scratch. The line can be written as $mx-y=-b$. The normal to the line is $vec{n}=(m,-1)$. Let's also introduce some initial point on the line -- let's say $vec{r}_0=(x,y)=(0,b)$. How do you reflect about a line through the center? Easy - subtract twice the projection to the normal. How about if it's not through the center? Move to the center, transform, and move back. The transform is:
$$vec{r} mapsto (vec{r}-vec{r}_0)-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdot(vec{r}-vec{r}_0))+vec{r}_0$$
I normalized the normal, $hat{n}=frac{vec{n}}{|n|}=frac{(m,-1)}{sqrt{m^2+1}}$.
This can be simplified to:
$$vec{r}-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r})-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r}_0)$$
The first two terms are the standard reflection matrix in 2D and represents the 2×2 block of your homogeneous 3×3 matrix. The last term is the offset that contributes to both components of the result, and is in the homogeneous coordinates obtained from the last column (which multiplies the constant third coordinate).
Observe that because $vec{r}_0$ is on the line, it satisfies the original equation $vec{n}cdotvec{r}_0=-b$, so our choice of the origin point is irrelevant.
Now, you can simply write the matrix out:
$$begin{bmatrix}x'\y'\1end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1-2n_x^2/|n|^2 & -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 2n_xb/|n|^2 \ -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 1-2n_y^2/|n|^2 & 2n_yb/|n|^2 \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}x\y\1end{bmatrix}$$
In our specific case:
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2m^2/(m^2+1) & 2m/(m^2+1) & 2mb/(m^2+1) \ 2m/(m^2+1) & 1-2/(m^2+1) & -2b/(m^2+1) \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
You can see it's way easier, if you use the canonical implicit form for the line. If you have
$$ax+by=c$$
where $a^2+b^2=1$, then the matrix simplifies to
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2a^2 & -2ab & -2ac \ -2ab & 1-2b^2 & -2bc \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
or, if you want, $I-2(a,b,0)^T(a,b,c)$.
add a comment |
Note that any matrix $mathbf Acdot vec{0}=vec{0}$, so there is no matrix that can flip over $y=2x-6$ as it must map $vec 0 to (4 frac{4}{5},-2frac{2}{5})$. You might want to do something about that.
We're talking about homogeneous coordinates. All affine transforms can be written as homogeneous matrices. So we're working with vectors in the form (x,y,1).
– orion
Feb 19 '16 at 8:03
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f552129%2fdetermine-homogeneous-transformation-matrix-for-reflection-about-the-line-y-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Write down the transform in vector form and you can derive it from scratch. The line can be written as $mx-y=-b$. The normal to the line is $vec{n}=(m,-1)$. Let's also introduce some initial point on the line -- let's say $vec{r}_0=(x,y)=(0,b)$. How do you reflect about a line through the center? Easy - subtract twice the projection to the normal. How about if it's not through the center? Move to the center, transform, and move back. The transform is:
$$vec{r} mapsto (vec{r}-vec{r}_0)-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdot(vec{r}-vec{r}_0))+vec{r}_0$$
I normalized the normal, $hat{n}=frac{vec{n}}{|n|}=frac{(m,-1)}{sqrt{m^2+1}}$.
This can be simplified to:
$$vec{r}-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r})-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r}_0)$$
The first two terms are the standard reflection matrix in 2D and represents the 2×2 block of your homogeneous 3×3 matrix. The last term is the offset that contributes to both components of the result, and is in the homogeneous coordinates obtained from the last column (which multiplies the constant third coordinate).
Observe that because $vec{r}_0$ is on the line, it satisfies the original equation $vec{n}cdotvec{r}_0=-b$, so our choice of the origin point is irrelevant.
Now, you can simply write the matrix out:
$$begin{bmatrix}x'\y'\1end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1-2n_x^2/|n|^2 & -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 2n_xb/|n|^2 \ -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 1-2n_y^2/|n|^2 & 2n_yb/|n|^2 \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}x\y\1end{bmatrix}$$
In our specific case:
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2m^2/(m^2+1) & 2m/(m^2+1) & 2mb/(m^2+1) \ 2m/(m^2+1) & 1-2/(m^2+1) & -2b/(m^2+1) \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
You can see it's way easier, if you use the canonical implicit form for the line. If you have
$$ax+by=c$$
where $a^2+b^2=1$, then the matrix simplifies to
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2a^2 & -2ab & -2ac \ -2ab & 1-2b^2 & -2bc \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
or, if you want, $I-2(a,b,0)^T(a,b,c)$.
add a comment |
Write down the transform in vector form and you can derive it from scratch. The line can be written as $mx-y=-b$. The normal to the line is $vec{n}=(m,-1)$. Let's also introduce some initial point on the line -- let's say $vec{r}_0=(x,y)=(0,b)$. How do you reflect about a line through the center? Easy - subtract twice the projection to the normal. How about if it's not through the center? Move to the center, transform, and move back. The transform is:
$$vec{r} mapsto (vec{r}-vec{r}_0)-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdot(vec{r}-vec{r}_0))+vec{r}_0$$
I normalized the normal, $hat{n}=frac{vec{n}}{|n|}=frac{(m,-1)}{sqrt{m^2+1}}$.
This can be simplified to:
$$vec{r}-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r})-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r}_0)$$
The first two terms are the standard reflection matrix in 2D and represents the 2×2 block of your homogeneous 3×3 matrix. The last term is the offset that contributes to both components of the result, and is in the homogeneous coordinates obtained from the last column (which multiplies the constant third coordinate).
Observe that because $vec{r}_0$ is on the line, it satisfies the original equation $vec{n}cdotvec{r}_0=-b$, so our choice of the origin point is irrelevant.
Now, you can simply write the matrix out:
$$begin{bmatrix}x'\y'\1end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1-2n_x^2/|n|^2 & -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 2n_xb/|n|^2 \ -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 1-2n_y^2/|n|^2 & 2n_yb/|n|^2 \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}x\y\1end{bmatrix}$$
In our specific case:
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2m^2/(m^2+1) & 2m/(m^2+1) & 2mb/(m^2+1) \ 2m/(m^2+1) & 1-2/(m^2+1) & -2b/(m^2+1) \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
You can see it's way easier, if you use the canonical implicit form for the line. If you have
$$ax+by=c$$
where $a^2+b^2=1$, then the matrix simplifies to
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2a^2 & -2ab & -2ac \ -2ab & 1-2b^2 & -2bc \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
or, if you want, $I-2(a,b,0)^T(a,b,c)$.
add a comment |
Write down the transform in vector form and you can derive it from scratch. The line can be written as $mx-y=-b$. The normal to the line is $vec{n}=(m,-1)$. Let's also introduce some initial point on the line -- let's say $vec{r}_0=(x,y)=(0,b)$. How do you reflect about a line through the center? Easy - subtract twice the projection to the normal. How about if it's not through the center? Move to the center, transform, and move back. The transform is:
$$vec{r} mapsto (vec{r}-vec{r}_0)-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdot(vec{r}-vec{r}_0))+vec{r}_0$$
I normalized the normal, $hat{n}=frac{vec{n}}{|n|}=frac{(m,-1)}{sqrt{m^2+1}}$.
This can be simplified to:
$$vec{r}-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r})-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r}_0)$$
The first two terms are the standard reflection matrix in 2D and represents the 2×2 block of your homogeneous 3×3 matrix. The last term is the offset that contributes to both components of the result, and is in the homogeneous coordinates obtained from the last column (which multiplies the constant third coordinate).
Observe that because $vec{r}_0$ is on the line, it satisfies the original equation $vec{n}cdotvec{r}_0=-b$, so our choice of the origin point is irrelevant.
Now, you can simply write the matrix out:
$$begin{bmatrix}x'\y'\1end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1-2n_x^2/|n|^2 & -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 2n_xb/|n|^2 \ -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 1-2n_y^2/|n|^2 & 2n_yb/|n|^2 \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}x\y\1end{bmatrix}$$
In our specific case:
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2m^2/(m^2+1) & 2m/(m^2+1) & 2mb/(m^2+1) \ 2m/(m^2+1) & 1-2/(m^2+1) & -2b/(m^2+1) \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
You can see it's way easier, if you use the canonical implicit form for the line. If you have
$$ax+by=c$$
where $a^2+b^2=1$, then the matrix simplifies to
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2a^2 & -2ab & -2ac \ -2ab & 1-2b^2 & -2bc \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
or, if you want, $I-2(a,b,0)^T(a,b,c)$.
Write down the transform in vector form and you can derive it from scratch. The line can be written as $mx-y=-b$. The normal to the line is $vec{n}=(m,-1)$. Let's also introduce some initial point on the line -- let's say $vec{r}_0=(x,y)=(0,b)$. How do you reflect about a line through the center? Easy - subtract twice the projection to the normal. How about if it's not through the center? Move to the center, transform, and move back. The transform is:
$$vec{r} mapsto (vec{r}-vec{r}_0)-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdot(vec{r}-vec{r}_0))+vec{r}_0$$
I normalized the normal, $hat{n}=frac{vec{n}}{|n|}=frac{(m,-1)}{sqrt{m^2+1}}$.
This can be simplified to:
$$vec{r}-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r})-2hat{n}( hat{n}cdotvec{r}_0)$$
The first two terms are the standard reflection matrix in 2D and represents the 2×2 block of your homogeneous 3×3 matrix. The last term is the offset that contributes to both components of the result, and is in the homogeneous coordinates obtained from the last column (which multiplies the constant third coordinate).
Observe that because $vec{r}_0$ is on the line, it satisfies the original equation $vec{n}cdotvec{r}_0=-b$, so our choice of the origin point is irrelevant.
Now, you can simply write the matrix out:
$$begin{bmatrix}x'\y'\1end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}1-2n_x^2/|n|^2 & -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 2n_xb/|n|^2 \ -2n_xn_y/|n|^2 & 1-2n_y^2/|n|^2 & 2n_yb/|n|^2 \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}x\y\1end{bmatrix}$$
In our specific case:
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2m^2/(m^2+1) & 2m/(m^2+1) & 2mb/(m^2+1) \ 2m/(m^2+1) & 1-2/(m^2+1) & -2b/(m^2+1) \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
You can see it's way easier, if you use the canonical implicit form for the line. If you have
$$ax+by=c$$
where $a^2+b^2=1$, then the matrix simplifies to
$$begin{bmatrix}1-2a^2 & -2ab & -2ac \ -2ab & 1-2b^2 & -2bc \0 & 0& 1end{bmatrix}$$
or, if you want, $I-2(a,b,0)^T(a,b,c)$.
edited Feb 19 '16 at 8:32
answered Feb 19 '16 at 8:19
orion
13k11836
13k11836
add a comment |
add a comment |
Note that any matrix $mathbf Acdot vec{0}=vec{0}$, so there is no matrix that can flip over $y=2x-6$ as it must map $vec 0 to (4 frac{4}{5},-2frac{2}{5})$. You might want to do something about that.
We're talking about homogeneous coordinates. All affine transforms can be written as homogeneous matrices. So we're working with vectors in the form (x,y,1).
– orion
Feb 19 '16 at 8:03
add a comment |
Note that any matrix $mathbf Acdot vec{0}=vec{0}$, so there is no matrix that can flip over $y=2x-6$ as it must map $vec 0 to (4 frac{4}{5},-2frac{2}{5})$. You might want to do something about that.
We're talking about homogeneous coordinates. All affine transforms can be written as homogeneous matrices. So we're working with vectors in the form (x,y,1).
– orion
Feb 19 '16 at 8:03
add a comment |
Note that any matrix $mathbf Acdot vec{0}=vec{0}$, so there is no matrix that can flip over $y=2x-6$ as it must map $vec 0 to (4 frac{4}{5},-2frac{2}{5})$. You might want to do something about that.
Note that any matrix $mathbf Acdot vec{0}=vec{0}$, so there is no matrix that can flip over $y=2x-6$ as it must map $vec 0 to (4 frac{4}{5},-2frac{2}{5})$. You might want to do something about that.
answered Nov 4 '13 at 22:50
Tim Ratigan
6,1151028
6,1151028
We're talking about homogeneous coordinates. All affine transforms can be written as homogeneous matrices. So we're working with vectors in the form (x,y,1).
– orion
Feb 19 '16 at 8:03
add a comment |
We're talking about homogeneous coordinates. All affine transforms can be written as homogeneous matrices. So we're working with vectors in the form (x,y,1).
– orion
Feb 19 '16 at 8:03
We're talking about homogeneous coordinates. All affine transforms can be written as homogeneous matrices. So we're working with vectors in the form (x,y,1).
– orion
Feb 19 '16 at 8:03
We're talking about homogeneous coordinates. All affine transforms can be written as homogeneous matrices. So we're working with vectors in the form (x,y,1).
– orion
Feb 19 '16 at 8:03
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f552129%2fdetermine-homogeneous-transformation-matrix-for-reflection-about-the-line-y-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
What are your thoughts on the problem so far? What have you tried?
– Cameron Buie
Nov 4 '13 at 22:21
1
zebragraph.com/Geometers_Corner_files/Reflection.pdf
– Mickey Tin
Apr 2 '14 at 15:14
Your question is not clear. Do you want to reflect in the line $y=mx+b$ or $y=2x-6$?
– Rory Daulton
Dec 31 '14 at 4:29