$I$-torsion functor and $sqrt{I}$
$begingroup$
Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring and $I,Jsubseteq R$ ideals. For any $R$-module $M$, define $Gamma_I(M)={xin Mmid I^n x=0text{ for some }ninmathbb{N}}$. Suppose that $Gamma_I=Gamma_J$. I want to show that $sqrt{I}=sqrt{J}$.
My issue is that I don't know which $R$-module to consider. Picking any $rin sqrt{I}$, I think I want some quotient $R/A$ (where $A$ is an ideal involving $I$, or maybe $r$) such that $rinGamma_I(R/A)=Gamma_J(R/A)$, i.e. such that $(r+A)J^esubseteq A$ for some $e$.
abstract-algebra ring-theory commutative-algebra modules local-cohomology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring and $I,Jsubseteq R$ ideals. For any $R$-module $M$, define $Gamma_I(M)={xin Mmid I^n x=0text{ for some }ninmathbb{N}}$. Suppose that $Gamma_I=Gamma_J$. I want to show that $sqrt{I}=sqrt{J}$.
My issue is that I don't know which $R$-module to consider. Picking any $rin sqrt{I}$, I think I want some quotient $R/A$ (where $A$ is an ideal involving $I$, or maybe $r$) such that $rinGamma_I(R/A)=Gamma_J(R/A)$, i.e. such that $(r+A)J^esubseteq A$ for some $e$.
abstract-algebra ring-theory commutative-algebra modules local-cohomology
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
When you say $Gamma_I = Gamma_J$, do you mean that for all $R$-modules $M$, $Gamma_I(M) = Gamma_J(M)$?
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:08
$begingroup$
@BadamBaplan Yes.
$endgroup$
– user234988
Nov 29 '18 at 23:46
$begingroup$
Sorry that should have been obvious :)
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring and $I,Jsubseteq R$ ideals. For any $R$-module $M$, define $Gamma_I(M)={xin Mmid I^n x=0text{ for some }ninmathbb{N}}$. Suppose that $Gamma_I=Gamma_J$. I want to show that $sqrt{I}=sqrt{J}$.
My issue is that I don't know which $R$-module to consider. Picking any $rin sqrt{I}$, I think I want some quotient $R/A$ (where $A$ is an ideal involving $I$, or maybe $r$) such that $rinGamma_I(R/A)=Gamma_J(R/A)$, i.e. such that $(r+A)J^esubseteq A$ for some $e$.
abstract-algebra ring-theory commutative-algebra modules local-cohomology
$endgroup$
Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring and $I,Jsubseteq R$ ideals. For any $R$-module $M$, define $Gamma_I(M)={xin Mmid I^n x=0text{ for some }ninmathbb{N}}$. Suppose that $Gamma_I=Gamma_J$. I want to show that $sqrt{I}=sqrt{J}$.
My issue is that I don't know which $R$-module to consider. Picking any $rin sqrt{I}$, I think I want some quotient $R/A$ (where $A$ is an ideal involving $I$, or maybe $r$) such that $rinGamma_I(R/A)=Gamma_J(R/A)$, i.e. such that $(r+A)J^esubseteq A$ for some $e$.
abstract-algebra ring-theory commutative-algebra modules local-cohomology
abstract-algebra ring-theory commutative-algebra modules local-cohomology
edited Nov 30 '18 at 17:40
user26857
39.3k124183
39.3k124183
asked Nov 29 '18 at 21:39
user234988user234988
62
62
$begingroup$
When you say $Gamma_I = Gamma_J$, do you mean that for all $R$-modules $M$, $Gamma_I(M) = Gamma_J(M)$?
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:08
$begingroup$
@BadamBaplan Yes.
$endgroup$
– user234988
Nov 29 '18 at 23:46
$begingroup$
Sorry that should have been obvious :)
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When you say $Gamma_I = Gamma_J$, do you mean that for all $R$-modules $M$, $Gamma_I(M) = Gamma_J(M)$?
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:08
$begingroup$
@BadamBaplan Yes.
$endgroup$
– user234988
Nov 29 '18 at 23:46
$begingroup$
Sorry that should have been obvious :)
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:51
$begingroup$
When you say $Gamma_I = Gamma_J$, do you mean that for all $R$-modules $M$, $Gamma_I(M) = Gamma_J(M)$?
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:08
$begingroup$
When you say $Gamma_I = Gamma_J$, do you mean that for all $R$-modules $M$, $Gamma_I(M) = Gamma_J(M)$?
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:08
$begingroup$
@BadamBaplan Yes.
$endgroup$
– user234988
Nov 29 '18 at 23:46
$begingroup$
@BadamBaplan Yes.
$endgroup$
– user234988
Nov 29 '18 at 23:46
$begingroup$
Sorry that should have been obvious :)
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:51
$begingroup$
Sorry that should have been obvious :)
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:51
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First check that we can use the Noetherian hypothesis to rewrite the definition of the $I$-torsion functor as $Gamma_I(M) = {m in M mid I subseteq sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)} }$. I think this well illuminates an approach to the problem by associated primes.
Hint about what module to apply the functor to:
I would look at $Gamma_I(R/I) = Gamma_J(R/I)$.
More details, if it's helpful:
In particular, pick a prime $mathfrak{p}$ minimal over $I$, so that $mathfrak{p}$ is an associate prime of $R/I$. There exists an element $m in R / I$ such that $text{Ann}_R(m) = mathfrak{p}$, hence $I subseteq mathfrak{p} = sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)}$ and $m in Gamma_I(R/I)$. By assumption, $m in Gamma_J(R/I)$, too. Thus $J subseteq mathfrak{p}$ as well. It follows easily that $V(I) subseteq V(J)$. A symmetric argument shows the opposite inclusion.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019255%2fi-torsion-functor-and-sqrti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First check that we can use the Noetherian hypothesis to rewrite the definition of the $I$-torsion functor as $Gamma_I(M) = {m in M mid I subseteq sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)} }$. I think this well illuminates an approach to the problem by associated primes.
Hint about what module to apply the functor to:
I would look at $Gamma_I(R/I) = Gamma_J(R/I)$.
More details, if it's helpful:
In particular, pick a prime $mathfrak{p}$ minimal over $I$, so that $mathfrak{p}$ is an associate prime of $R/I$. There exists an element $m in R / I$ such that $text{Ann}_R(m) = mathfrak{p}$, hence $I subseteq mathfrak{p} = sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)}$ and $m in Gamma_I(R/I)$. By assumption, $m in Gamma_J(R/I)$, too. Thus $J subseteq mathfrak{p}$ as well. It follows easily that $V(I) subseteq V(J)$. A symmetric argument shows the opposite inclusion.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First check that we can use the Noetherian hypothesis to rewrite the definition of the $I$-torsion functor as $Gamma_I(M) = {m in M mid I subseteq sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)} }$. I think this well illuminates an approach to the problem by associated primes.
Hint about what module to apply the functor to:
I would look at $Gamma_I(R/I) = Gamma_J(R/I)$.
More details, if it's helpful:
In particular, pick a prime $mathfrak{p}$ minimal over $I$, so that $mathfrak{p}$ is an associate prime of $R/I$. There exists an element $m in R / I$ such that $text{Ann}_R(m) = mathfrak{p}$, hence $I subseteq mathfrak{p} = sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)}$ and $m in Gamma_I(R/I)$. By assumption, $m in Gamma_J(R/I)$, too. Thus $J subseteq mathfrak{p}$ as well. It follows easily that $V(I) subseteq V(J)$. A symmetric argument shows the opposite inclusion.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First check that we can use the Noetherian hypothesis to rewrite the definition of the $I$-torsion functor as $Gamma_I(M) = {m in M mid I subseteq sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)} }$. I think this well illuminates an approach to the problem by associated primes.
Hint about what module to apply the functor to:
I would look at $Gamma_I(R/I) = Gamma_J(R/I)$.
More details, if it's helpful:
In particular, pick a prime $mathfrak{p}$ minimal over $I$, so that $mathfrak{p}$ is an associate prime of $R/I$. There exists an element $m in R / I$ such that $text{Ann}_R(m) = mathfrak{p}$, hence $I subseteq mathfrak{p} = sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)}$ and $m in Gamma_I(R/I)$. By assumption, $m in Gamma_J(R/I)$, too. Thus $J subseteq mathfrak{p}$ as well. It follows easily that $V(I) subseteq V(J)$. A symmetric argument shows the opposite inclusion.
$endgroup$
First check that we can use the Noetherian hypothesis to rewrite the definition of the $I$-torsion functor as $Gamma_I(M) = {m in M mid I subseteq sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)} }$. I think this well illuminates an approach to the problem by associated primes.
Hint about what module to apply the functor to:
I would look at $Gamma_I(R/I) = Gamma_J(R/I)$.
More details, if it's helpful:
In particular, pick a prime $mathfrak{p}$ minimal over $I$, so that $mathfrak{p}$ is an associate prime of $R/I$. There exists an element $m in R / I$ such that $text{Ann}_R(m) = mathfrak{p}$, hence $I subseteq mathfrak{p} = sqrt{text{Ann}_R(m)}$ and $m in Gamma_I(R/I)$. By assumption, $m in Gamma_J(R/I)$, too. Thus $J subseteq mathfrak{p}$ as well. It follows easily that $V(I) subseteq V(J)$. A symmetric argument shows the opposite inclusion.
answered Nov 30 '18 at 0:44
Badam BaplanBadam Baplan
4,476722
4,476722
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019255%2fi-torsion-functor-and-sqrti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
When you say $Gamma_I = Gamma_J$, do you mean that for all $R$-modules $M$, $Gamma_I(M) = Gamma_J(M)$?
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:08
$begingroup$
@BadamBaplan Yes.
$endgroup$
– user234988
Nov 29 '18 at 23:46
$begingroup$
Sorry that should have been obvious :)
$endgroup$
– Badam Baplan
Nov 29 '18 at 23:51