If $f(x)$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ and $M=max ; |f(x)|$, is $M=lim limits_{ntoinfty}...












15












$begingroup$


Let $f(x)$ be a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and $M=max{|f(x)| ; :; x in [a,b]}$. Is it true that:
$$
M= lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^n,mathrm dxright)^{1/n} ?
$$



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
    $endgroup$
    – Ilya
    Dec 4 '11 at 17:46






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
    $endgroup$
    – Srivatsan
    Dec 4 '11 at 19:09


















15












$begingroup$


Let $f(x)$ be a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and $M=max{|f(x)| ; :; x in [a,b]}$. Is it true that:
$$
M= lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^n,mathrm dxright)^{1/n} ?
$$



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
    $endgroup$
    – Ilya
    Dec 4 '11 at 17:46






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
    $endgroup$
    – Srivatsan
    Dec 4 '11 at 19:09
















15












15








15


10



$begingroup$


Let $f(x)$ be a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and $M=max{|f(x)| ; :; x in [a,b]}$. Is it true that:
$$
M= lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^n,mathrm dxright)^{1/n} ?
$$



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f(x)$ be a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and $M=max{|f(x)| ; :; x in [a,b]}$. Is it true that:
$$
M= lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^n,mathrm dxright)^{1/n} ?
$$



Thanks!







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 4 '11 at 19:04









Srivatsan

20.9k371125




20.9k371125










asked Dec 4 '11 at 17:45









tomergtomerg

738820




738820








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
    $endgroup$
    – Ilya
    Dec 4 '11 at 17:46






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
    $endgroup$
    – Srivatsan
    Dec 4 '11 at 19:09
















  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
    $endgroup$
    – Ilya
    Dec 4 '11 at 17:46






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
    $endgroup$
    – Srivatsan
    Dec 4 '11 at 19:09










3




3




$begingroup$
Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
$endgroup$
– Ilya
Dec 4 '11 at 17:46




$begingroup$
Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
$endgroup$
– Ilya
Dec 4 '11 at 17:46




6




6




$begingroup$
In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
$endgroup$
– Srivatsan
Dec 4 '11 at 19:09






$begingroup$
In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
$endgroup$
– Srivatsan
Dec 4 '11 at 19:09












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















18












$begingroup$

Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
$$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
$$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










  • $begingroup$
    Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 23:13



















0












$begingroup$

It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f88300%2fif-fx-is-continuous-on-a-b-and-m-max-fx-is-m-lim-limits-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    18












    $begingroup$

    Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
    $$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
    Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
    $$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
    for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Davide Giraudo
      Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










    • $begingroup$
      Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 23:13
















    18












    $begingroup$

    Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
    $$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
    Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
    $$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
    for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Davide Giraudo
      Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










    • $begingroup$
      Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 23:13














    18












    18








    18





    $begingroup$

    Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
    $$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
    Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
    $$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
    for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
    $$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
    Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
    $$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
    for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 5 '11 at 15:27

























    answered Dec 4 '11 at 18:06









    Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo

    125k16150261




    125k16150261












    • $begingroup$
      Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Davide Giraudo
      Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










    • $begingroup$
      Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 23:13


















    • $begingroup$
      Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Davide Giraudo
      Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










    • $begingroup$
      Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 23:13
















    $begingroup$
    Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 10:42




    $begingroup$
    Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 10:42




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 5 '12 at 12:36




    $begingroup$
    @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 5 '12 at 12:36












    $begingroup$
    Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 23:13




    $begingroup$
    Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 23:13











    0












    $begingroup$

    It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



    $$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



    Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



      $$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



      Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



        $$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



        Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



        $$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



        Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 29 '18 at 21:38









        beckobecko

        2,34931942




        2,34931942






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f88300%2fif-fx-is-continuous-on-a-b-and-m-max-fx-is-m-lim-limits-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa