If $f$ is $mathbb R^2$-differentiable and the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$...
$begingroup$
Assume $f$ is defined on some domain $Dsubsetmathbb C$, differentiable on $D$ as a function of two real variables, and that, for all $zin D$, the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$ exists and is finite. Does this imply that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$?
This was a task on my exam today, which I didn't manage.
complex-analysis analytic-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume $f$ is defined on some domain $Dsubsetmathbb C$, differentiable on $D$ as a function of two real variables, and that, for all $zin D$, the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$ exists and is finite. Does this imply that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$?
This was a task on my exam today, which I didn't manage.
complex-analysis analytic-functions
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
@MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Nov 29 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
@ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Nov 29 '18 at 20:12
$begingroup$
h is complex of course
$endgroup$
– ryszard eggink
Nov 29 '18 at 20:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume $f$ is defined on some domain $Dsubsetmathbb C$, differentiable on $D$ as a function of two real variables, and that, for all $zin D$, the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$ exists and is finite. Does this imply that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$?
This was a task on my exam today, which I didn't manage.
complex-analysis analytic-functions
$endgroup$
Assume $f$ is defined on some domain $Dsubsetmathbb C$, differentiable on $D$ as a function of two real variables, and that, for all $zin D$, the limit $limlimits_{h to 0} Releft(frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}right)$ exists and is finite. Does this imply that $f$ is holomorphic on $D$?
This was a task on my exam today, which I didn't manage.
complex-analysis analytic-functions
complex-analysis analytic-functions
edited Nov 29 '18 at 21:42
Did
247k23222457
247k23222457
asked Nov 29 '18 at 20:06
ryszard egginkryszard eggink
308110
308110
1
$begingroup$
@MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Nov 29 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
@ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Nov 29 '18 at 20:12
$begingroup$
h is complex of course
$endgroup$
– ryszard eggink
Nov 29 '18 at 20:13
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
@MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Nov 29 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
@ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Nov 29 '18 at 20:12
$begingroup$
h is complex of course
$endgroup$
– ryszard eggink
Nov 29 '18 at 20:13
1
1
$begingroup$
@MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Nov 29 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
@MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Nov 29 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
@ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Nov 29 '18 at 20:12
$begingroup$
@ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Nov 29 '18 at 20:12
$begingroup$
h is complex of course
$endgroup$
– ryszard eggink
Nov 29 '18 at 20:13
$begingroup$
h is complex of course
$endgroup$
– ryszard eggink
Nov 29 '18 at 20:13
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
(+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Nov 30 '18 at 4:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019128%2fif-f-is-mathbb-r2-differentiable-and-the-limit-lim-limits-h-to-0-re%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
(+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Nov 30 '18 at 4:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
(+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Nov 30 '18 at 4:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.
$endgroup$
Let us fix some $z$ in $D$ and use the notations $$h=r+isqquad f_x(z)=a+ibqquad f_y(z)=c+id$$ for some real numbers $r$, $s$, $a$, $b$, $c$ and $d$. Then the $mathbb R^2$-differentiability of the function $f$ at $z$ reads, in the limit $hto0$ or, equivalently, in the limit $(r,s)to(0,0)$, $$f(z+h)-f(z)=(a+ib)r+(c+id)s+o(|h|)$$
that is,
$$frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}h=frac{(f(z+h)-f(z))bar h}{|h|^2}=frac{((a+ib)r+(c+id)s)(r-is)}{r^2+s^2}+o(1)$$
Thus, the hypothesis is exactly the existence of the limit
$$lim_{(r,s)to(0,0)}frac{ar^2+(b+c)rs+ds^2}{r^2+s^2}$$ Considering the limits of this ratio when $rto0$ along the lines $s=rt$, for each $t$ fixed, one sees that $$frac{a+(b+c)t+dt^2}{1+t^2}$$ should be independent of $t$. In particular, the cases $t=0$ and $ttoinfty$ yield the condition $$a=d$$ and the cases $t=pm1$ yield the condition $$b+c=0$$ Since these are Cauchy-Riemann equations for $f$ at $z$, the proof is complete.
edited Dec 1 '18 at 14:12
answered Nov 29 '18 at 21:41
DidDid
247k23222457
247k23222457
1
$begingroup$
(+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Nov 30 '18 at 4:41
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
(+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Nov 30 '18 at 4:41
1
1
$begingroup$
(+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Nov 30 '18 at 4:41
$begingroup$
(+1) Clear and concise. Well written.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Nov 30 '18 at 4:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019128%2fif-f-is-mathbb-r2-differentiable-and-the-limit-lim-limits-h-to-0-re%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
@MisterRiemann That example depends on if $hto 0$ has $h$ on the real line or complex. If $h$ is complex, that would reduce to $\lim_{hto . 0}frac{overline h}{h}=c_z,$ but this limit doesn't converge.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Nov 29 '18 at 20:11
$begingroup$
@ThomasAndrews Good point, thanks for the remark. I shall remove the comment.
$endgroup$
– MisterRiemann
Nov 29 '18 at 20:12
$begingroup$
h is complex of course
$endgroup$
– ryszard eggink
Nov 29 '18 at 20:13