Find all $mathfrak{p}in operatorname{Spec}(mathbb{Z}[zeta])$ such that $mathfrak{p}capmathbb{Z}=7mathbb{Z}$...
$begingroup$
Find all $mathfrak{p}inoperatorname{Spec}(mathbb{Z}[zeta])$ such that $mathfrak{p}capmathbb{Z}=7mathbb{Z}$ where $zeta=e^{(ipi/3)}.$
I determined that the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^2-x+1$. Since $f(zeta)=0$ and $f$ is an irreducible quadratic it must be the minimal polynomial.
Then $mathbb{Z}[zeta]congmathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$. Since this is an integral extension of $mathbb{Z}$ it has the same Krull dimension, namely $1$. Primes of $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$ are primes of $mathbb{Z}[x]$ that contain $(x^2-x+1)$ so all primes in $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$ look like $(q,x^2-x+1)$ where $qinmathbb{Z}$ is prime. Thus there is only a single prime $mathfrak{p}inoperatorname{Spec}(mathbb{Z}[zeta])$ such that $mathfrak{p}capmathbb{Z}=7mathbb{Z}$, namely $(7,x^2-x+1)$, which is the ideal $(7)subset mathbb{Z}[zeta]$.
Somehow the wording of the problem "find all prime ideals and give generators" made me expect more... Is this correct? Many thanks for an answer.
ring-theory extension-field maximal-and-prime-ideals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find all $mathfrak{p}inoperatorname{Spec}(mathbb{Z}[zeta])$ such that $mathfrak{p}capmathbb{Z}=7mathbb{Z}$ where $zeta=e^{(ipi/3)}.$
I determined that the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^2-x+1$. Since $f(zeta)=0$ and $f$ is an irreducible quadratic it must be the minimal polynomial.
Then $mathbb{Z}[zeta]congmathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$. Since this is an integral extension of $mathbb{Z}$ it has the same Krull dimension, namely $1$. Primes of $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$ are primes of $mathbb{Z}[x]$ that contain $(x^2-x+1)$ so all primes in $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$ look like $(q,x^2-x+1)$ where $qinmathbb{Z}$ is prime. Thus there is only a single prime $mathfrak{p}inoperatorname{Spec}(mathbb{Z}[zeta])$ such that $mathfrak{p}capmathbb{Z}=7mathbb{Z}$, namely $(7,x^2-x+1)$, which is the ideal $(7)subset mathbb{Z}[zeta]$.
Somehow the wording of the problem "find all prime ideals and give generators" made me expect more... Is this correct? Many thanks for an answer.
ring-theory extension-field maximal-and-prime-ideals
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Modulo $7$ we have the factorization $x^2-x+1equiv (x-3)(x+2)$ so you have ideals like $(7,x-3)$ that contain $(7,x^2-x+1)$. Clearly $(7,x-3)$ is a prime ideal, but $(7,x^2-x+1)$ is not because of the above factorization.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 23 '17 at 20:13
$begingroup$
Essentially, 7 is not prime in $mathbb{Z}[zeta]$, is the flaw in my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– irh
May 23 '17 at 21:07
$begingroup$
That's another correct way of looking at it! It happens that $Bbb{Z}[zeta]$ is a PID (it's actually a Euclidean domain), but that is usually not the case. This kind of questions are studied extensively in algebraic number theory.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 24 '17 at 4:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find all $mathfrak{p}inoperatorname{Spec}(mathbb{Z}[zeta])$ such that $mathfrak{p}capmathbb{Z}=7mathbb{Z}$ where $zeta=e^{(ipi/3)}.$
I determined that the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^2-x+1$. Since $f(zeta)=0$ and $f$ is an irreducible quadratic it must be the minimal polynomial.
Then $mathbb{Z}[zeta]congmathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$. Since this is an integral extension of $mathbb{Z}$ it has the same Krull dimension, namely $1$. Primes of $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$ are primes of $mathbb{Z}[x]$ that contain $(x^2-x+1)$ so all primes in $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$ look like $(q,x^2-x+1)$ where $qinmathbb{Z}$ is prime. Thus there is only a single prime $mathfrak{p}inoperatorname{Spec}(mathbb{Z}[zeta])$ such that $mathfrak{p}capmathbb{Z}=7mathbb{Z}$, namely $(7,x^2-x+1)$, which is the ideal $(7)subset mathbb{Z}[zeta]$.
Somehow the wording of the problem "find all prime ideals and give generators" made me expect more... Is this correct? Many thanks for an answer.
ring-theory extension-field maximal-and-prime-ideals
$endgroup$
Find all $mathfrak{p}inoperatorname{Spec}(mathbb{Z}[zeta])$ such that $mathfrak{p}capmathbb{Z}=7mathbb{Z}$ where $zeta=e^{(ipi/3)}.$
I determined that the minimal polynomial is $f(x)=x^2-x+1$. Since $f(zeta)=0$ and $f$ is an irreducible quadratic it must be the minimal polynomial.
Then $mathbb{Z}[zeta]congmathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$. Since this is an integral extension of $mathbb{Z}$ it has the same Krull dimension, namely $1$. Primes of $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$ are primes of $mathbb{Z}[x]$ that contain $(x^2-x+1)$ so all primes in $mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^2-x+1)$ look like $(q,x^2-x+1)$ where $qinmathbb{Z}$ is prime. Thus there is only a single prime $mathfrak{p}inoperatorname{Spec}(mathbb{Z}[zeta])$ such that $mathfrak{p}capmathbb{Z}=7mathbb{Z}$, namely $(7,x^2-x+1)$, which is the ideal $(7)subset mathbb{Z}[zeta]$.
Somehow the wording of the problem "find all prime ideals and give generators" made me expect more... Is this correct? Many thanks for an answer.
ring-theory extension-field maximal-and-prime-ideals
ring-theory extension-field maximal-and-prime-ideals
edited Dec 17 '18 at 10:47
Namaste
1
1
asked May 23 '17 at 20:05
irhirh
304115
304115
1
$begingroup$
Modulo $7$ we have the factorization $x^2-x+1equiv (x-3)(x+2)$ so you have ideals like $(7,x-3)$ that contain $(7,x^2-x+1)$. Clearly $(7,x-3)$ is a prime ideal, but $(7,x^2-x+1)$ is not because of the above factorization.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 23 '17 at 20:13
$begingroup$
Essentially, 7 is not prime in $mathbb{Z}[zeta]$, is the flaw in my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– irh
May 23 '17 at 21:07
$begingroup$
That's another correct way of looking at it! It happens that $Bbb{Z}[zeta]$ is a PID (it's actually a Euclidean domain), but that is usually not the case. This kind of questions are studied extensively in algebraic number theory.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 24 '17 at 4:24
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Modulo $7$ we have the factorization $x^2-x+1equiv (x-3)(x+2)$ so you have ideals like $(7,x-3)$ that contain $(7,x^2-x+1)$. Clearly $(7,x-3)$ is a prime ideal, but $(7,x^2-x+1)$ is not because of the above factorization.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 23 '17 at 20:13
$begingroup$
Essentially, 7 is not prime in $mathbb{Z}[zeta]$, is the flaw in my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– irh
May 23 '17 at 21:07
$begingroup$
That's another correct way of looking at it! It happens that $Bbb{Z}[zeta]$ is a PID (it's actually a Euclidean domain), but that is usually not the case. This kind of questions are studied extensively in algebraic number theory.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 24 '17 at 4:24
1
1
$begingroup$
Modulo $7$ we have the factorization $x^2-x+1equiv (x-3)(x+2)$ so you have ideals like $(7,x-3)$ that contain $(7,x^2-x+1)$. Clearly $(7,x-3)$ is a prime ideal, but $(7,x^2-x+1)$ is not because of the above factorization.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 23 '17 at 20:13
$begingroup$
Modulo $7$ we have the factorization $x^2-x+1equiv (x-3)(x+2)$ so you have ideals like $(7,x-3)$ that contain $(7,x^2-x+1)$. Clearly $(7,x-3)$ is a prime ideal, but $(7,x^2-x+1)$ is not because of the above factorization.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 23 '17 at 20:13
$begingroup$
Essentially, 7 is not prime in $mathbb{Z}[zeta]$, is the flaw in my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– irh
May 23 '17 at 21:07
$begingroup$
Essentially, 7 is not prime in $mathbb{Z}[zeta]$, is the flaw in my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– irh
May 23 '17 at 21:07
$begingroup$
That's another correct way of looking at it! It happens that $Bbb{Z}[zeta]$ is a PID (it's actually a Euclidean domain), but that is usually not the case. This kind of questions are studied extensively in algebraic number theory.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 24 '17 at 4:24
$begingroup$
That's another correct way of looking at it! It happens that $Bbb{Z}[zeta]$ is a PID (it's actually a Euclidean domain), but that is usually not the case. This kind of questions are studied extensively in algebraic number theory.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 24 '17 at 4:24
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2293921%2ffind-all-mathfrakp-in-operatornamespec-mathbbz-zeta-such-that-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2293921%2ffind-all-mathfrakp-in-operatornamespec-mathbbz-zeta-such-that-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Modulo $7$ we have the factorization $x^2-x+1equiv (x-3)(x+2)$ so you have ideals like $(7,x-3)$ that contain $(7,x^2-x+1)$. Clearly $(7,x-3)$ is a prime ideal, but $(7,x^2-x+1)$ is not because of the above factorization.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 23 '17 at 20:13
$begingroup$
Essentially, 7 is not prime in $mathbb{Z}[zeta]$, is the flaw in my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– irh
May 23 '17 at 21:07
$begingroup$
That's another correct way of looking at it! It happens that $Bbb{Z}[zeta]$ is a PID (it's actually a Euclidean domain), but that is usually not the case. This kind of questions are studied extensively in algebraic number theory.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
May 24 '17 at 4:24