$operatorname{Aut} (G)$ is isomorphic to $operatorname{Aut} (H)$ then is it necessary that $G$ is isomorphic...
$begingroup$
If $operatorname{Aut} (G)$ is isomorphic to $operatorname{Aut} (H)$ then is it necessary that $G$ is isomorphic to $H$?
My answer is no.
$operatorname{Aut} (mathbb{Z)}$ is isomorphic to $Z_2$ and $operatorname{Aut} (Z_3)$ is also isomorphic to $U(3)$, which is isomorphic to $Z_2$. But $mathbb Z$ is not isomorphic to $Z_3.$ Correct? Thanks
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $operatorname{Aut} (G)$ is isomorphic to $operatorname{Aut} (H)$ then is it necessary that $G$ is isomorphic to $H$?
My answer is no.
$operatorname{Aut} (mathbb{Z)}$ is isomorphic to $Z_2$ and $operatorname{Aut} (Z_3)$ is also isomorphic to $U(3)$, which is isomorphic to $Z_2$. But $mathbb Z$ is not isomorphic to $Z_3.$ Correct? Thanks
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry I meant$Z_3$
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:22
$begingroup$
@Derek Holt I edited it to$Z_3$. Am I correct now?
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. Also there's no need for introducing $U(3)$, $Aut(mathbb{Z}_3)$ has exactly two elements, thus it has to be $mathbb{Z}_2$.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 17 '18 at 11:24
$begingroup$
@freakish thanks
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $operatorname{Aut} (G)$ is isomorphic to $operatorname{Aut} (H)$ then is it necessary that $G$ is isomorphic to $H$?
My answer is no.
$operatorname{Aut} (mathbb{Z)}$ is isomorphic to $Z_2$ and $operatorname{Aut} (Z_3)$ is also isomorphic to $U(3)$, which is isomorphic to $Z_2$. But $mathbb Z$ is not isomorphic to $Z_3.$ Correct? Thanks
abstract-algebra group-theory
$endgroup$
If $operatorname{Aut} (G)$ is isomorphic to $operatorname{Aut} (H)$ then is it necessary that $G$ is isomorphic to $H$?
My answer is no.
$operatorname{Aut} (mathbb{Z)}$ is isomorphic to $Z_2$ and $operatorname{Aut} (Z_3)$ is also isomorphic to $U(3)$, which is isomorphic to $Z_2$. But $mathbb Z$ is not isomorphic to $Z_3.$ Correct? Thanks
abstract-algebra group-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory
edited Dec 17 '18 at 12:26
user1729
17.4k64193
17.4k64193
asked Dec 17 '18 at 11:17
ramanujanramanujan
719713
719713
$begingroup$
Sorry I meant$Z_3$
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:22
$begingroup$
@Derek Holt I edited it to$Z_3$. Am I correct now?
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. Also there's no need for introducing $U(3)$, $Aut(mathbb{Z}_3)$ has exactly two elements, thus it has to be $mathbb{Z}_2$.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 17 '18 at 11:24
$begingroup$
@freakish thanks
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sorry I meant$Z_3$
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:22
$begingroup$
@Derek Holt I edited it to$Z_3$. Am I correct now?
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. Also there's no need for introducing $U(3)$, $Aut(mathbb{Z}_3)$ has exactly two elements, thus it has to be $mathbb{Z}_2$.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 17 '18 at 11:24
$begingroup$
@freakish thanks
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:25
$begingroup$
Sorry I meant$Z_3$
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:22
$begingroup$
Sorry I meant$Z_3$
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:22
$begingroup$
@Derek Holt I edited it to$Z_3$. Am I correct now?
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:23
$begingroup$
@Derek Holt I edited it to$Z_3$. Am I correct now?
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. Also there's no need for introducing $U(3)$, $Aut(mathbb{Z}_3)$ has exactly two elements, thus it has to be $mathbb{Z}_2$.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 17 '18 at 11:24
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. Also there's no need for introducing $U(3)$, $Aut(mathbb{Z}_3)$ has exactly two elements, thus it has to be $mathbb{Z}_2$.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 17 '18 at 11:24
$begingroup$
@freakish thanks
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:25
$begingroup$
@freakish thanks
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:25
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Besides your example, there is even an example with finite groups, as
$$
{rm Aut}(S_3)cong {rm Aut}(C_2times C_2)cong S_3,
$$
but $S_3$ is of course not isomorphic to $C_2times C_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As another example, both the trivial group $Id$ and the cyclic group of order two $C_2$ have trivial automorphism group:
$$operatorname{Aut}(Id)cong Idcongoperatorname{Aut(C_2)}$$
This is the smallest possible example...
(These are the only two groups $G$ with $operatorname{Aut}(G)cong Id$. See here for a proof.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can even use non-isomorphic finite groups of the same order. The smallest example is $Aut(C_4times C_2)cong Aut(D_8)cong D_8$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043820%2foperatornameaut-g-is-isomorphic-to-operatornameaut-h-then-is-it-ne%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Besides your example, there is even an example with finite groups, as
$$
{rm Aut}(S_3)cong {rm Aut}(C_2times C_2)cong S_3,
$$
but $S_3$ is of course not isomorphic to $C_2times C_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Besides your example, there is even an example with finite groups, as
$$
{rm Aut}(S_3)cong {rm Aut}(C_2times C_2)cong S_3,
$$
but $S_3$ is of course not isomorphic to $C_2times C_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Besides your example, there is even an example with finite groups, as
$$
{rm Aut}(S_3)cong {rm Aut}(C_2times C_2)cong S_3,
$$
but $S_3$ is of course not isomorphic to $C_2times C_2$.
$endgroup$
Besides your example, there is even an example with finite groups, as
$$
{rm Aut}(S_3)cong {rm Aut}(C_2times C_2)cong S_3,
$$
but $S_3$ is of course not isomorphic to $C_2times C_2$.
answered Dec 17 '18 at 11:40
Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde
81k648106
81k648106
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As another example, both the trivial group $Id$ and the cyclic group of order two $C_2$ have trivial automorphism group:
$$operatorname{Aut}(Id)cong Idcongoperatorname{Aut(C_2)}$$
This is the smallest possible example...
(These are the only two groups $G$ with $operatorname{Aut}(G)cong Id$. See here for a proof.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As another example, both the trivial group $Id$ and the cyclic group of order two $C_2$ have trivial automorphism group:
$$operatorname{Aut}(Id)cong Idcongoperatorname{Aut(C_2)}$$
This is the smallest possible example...
(These are the only two groups $G$ with $operatorname{Aut}(G)cong Id$. See here for a proof.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As another example, both the trivial group $Id$ and the cyclic group of order two $C_2$ have trivial automorphism group:
$$operatorname{Aut}(Id)cong Idcongoperatorname{Aut(C_2)}$$
This is the smallest possible example...
(These are the only two groups $G$ with $operatorname{Aut}(G)cong Id$. See here for a proof.)
$endgroup$
As another example, both the trivial group $Id$ and the cyclic group of order two $C_2$ have trivial automorphism group:
$$operatorname{Aut}(Id)cong Idcongoperatorname{Aut(C_2)}$$
This is the smallest possible example...
(These are the only two groups $G$ with $operatorname{Aut}(G)cong Id$. See here for a proof.)
answered Dec 17 '18 at 12:20
user1729user1729
17.4k64193
17.4k64193
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can even use non-isomorphic finite groups of the same order. The smallest example is $Aut(C_4times C_2)cong Aut(D_8)cong D_8$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can even use non-isomorphic finite groups of the same order. The smallest example is $Aut(C_4times C_2)cong Aut(D_8)cong D_8$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can even use non-isomorphic finite groups of the same order. The smallest example is $Aut(C_4times C_2)cong Aut(D_8)cong D_8$.
$endgroup$
You can even use non-isomorphic finite groups of the same order. The smallest example is $Aut(C_4times C_2)cong Aut(D_8)cong D_8$.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 1:19
C MonsourC Monsour
6,3041326
6,3041326
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043820%2foperatornameaut-g-is-isomorphic-to-operatornameaut-h-then-is-it-ne%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Sorry I meant$Z_3$
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:22
$begingroup$
@Derek Holt I edited it to$Z_3$. Am I correct now?
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:23
$begingroup$
Yes, you are correct. Also there's no need for introducing $U(3)$, $Aut(mathbb{Z}_3)$ has exactly two elements, thus it has to be $mathbb{Z}_2$.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 17 '18 at 11:24
$begingroup$
@freakish thanks
$endgroup$
– ramanujan
Dec 17 '18 at 11:25