A sufficient condition for subdifferentiability











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Corollary 9 in here (page 31) states that a proper convex function $g:Yrightarrow mathbb{R}cup{infty}$ (not necessarily continuous) on a locally convex space $Y$ is subdifferentiable on a point $y$ in the quasi-relative interior of its domain whenever $(y,g(y))$ does not belong to the quasi-relative interior of the epigraph of $g$.



I was wondering when it is possible to omit the last condition about $(y,g(y))$ and still have the subdifferentiablility at $y$.



In particular I may assume one or more of the following:





  • $Y$ is a dual space of a Banach space.


  • $g$ is lower semicontinuous.


  • $g$ is sublinear.


  • $g$ is continuous on its domain.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • the link to the paper is not working
    – daw
    2 days ago










  • Fixed. thanks. .
    – MOMO
    2 days ago















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Corollary 9 in here (page 31) states that a proper convex function $g:Yrightarrow mathbb{R}cup{infty}$ (not necessarily continuous) on a locally convex space $Y$ is subdifferentiable on a point $y$ in the quasi-relative interior of its domain whenever $(y,g(y))$ does not belong to the quasi-relative interior of the epigraph of $g$.



I was wondering when it is possible to omit the last condition about $(y,g(y))$ and still have the subdifferentiablility at $y$.



In particular I may assume one or more of the following:





  • $Y$ is a dual space of a Banach space.


  • $g$ is lower semicontinuous.


  • $g$ is sublinear.


  • $g$ is continuous on its domain.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • the link to the paper is not working
    – daw
    2 days ago










  • Fixed. thanks. .
    – MOMO
    2 days ago













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Corollary 9 in here (page 31) states that a proper convex function $g:Yrightarrow mathbb{R}cup{infty}$ (not necessarily continuous) on a locally convex space $Y$ is subdifferentiable on a point $y$ in the quasi-relative interior of its domain whenever $(y,g(y))$ does not belong to the quasi-relative interior of the epigraph of $g$.



I was wondering when it is possible to omit the last condition about $(y,g(y))$ and still have the subdifferentiablility at $y$.



In particular I may assume one or more of the following:





  • $Y$ is a dual space of a Banach space.


  • $g$ is lower semicontinuous.


  • $g$ is sublinear.


  • $g$ is continuous on its domain.










share|cite|improve this question















Corollary 9 in here (page 31) states that a proper convex function $g:Yrightarrow mathbb{R}cup{infty}$ (not necessarily continuous) on a locally convex space $Y$ is subdifferentiable on a point $y$ in the quasi-relative interior of its domain whenever $(y,g(y))$ does not belong to the quasi-relative interior of the epigraph of $g$.



I was wondering when it is possible to omit the last condition about $(y,g(y))$ and still have the subdifferentiablility at $y$.



In particular I may assume one or more of the following:





  • $Y$ is a dual space of a Banach space.


  • $g$ is lower semicontinuous.


  • $g$ is sublinear.


  • $g$ is continuous on its domain.







functional-analysis convex-analysis locally-convex-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago

























asked 2 days ago









MOMO

32519




32519












  • the link to the paper is not working
    – daw
    2 days ago










  • Fixed. thanks. .
    – MOMO
    2 days ago


















  • the link to the paper is not working
    – daw
    2 days ago










  • Fixed. thanks. .
    – MOMO
    2 days ago
















the link to the paper is not working
– daw
2 days ago




the link to the paper is not working
– daw
2 days ago












Fixed. thanks. .
– MOMO
2 days ago




Fixed. thanks. .
– MOMO
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













You need additional assumptions: Let $Y$ be an infinite dimensional Banach space and let $g : V to mathbb{R}$ be a linear, unbounded functional. Then it is clear that $g$ has an empty subdifferential everywhere.



If you add continuity (in $y$), then $partial g(y)$ is not empty (see, e.g., the book by Bauschke&Combettes, Prop. 16.14). However, I feel that this already gives you the condition on $(y,g(y))$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I am interested in the more general case where $g$ is not continuous. I edited the post so it would be more clear.
    – MOMO
    yesterday













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995078%2fa-sufficient-condition-for-subdifferentiability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest
































1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













You need additional assumptions: Let $Y$ be an infinite dimensional Banach space and let $g : V to mathbb{R}$ be a linear, unbounded functional. Then it is clear that $g$ has an empty subdifferential everywhere.



If you add continuity (in $y$), then $partial g(y)$ is not empty (see, e.g., the book by Bauschke&Combettes, Prop. 16.14). However, I feel that this already gives you the condition on $(y,g(y))$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I am interested in the more general case where $g$ is not continuous. I edited the post so it would be more clear.
    – MOMO
    yesterday

















up vote
0
down vote













You need additional assumptions: Let $Y$ be an infinite dimensional Banach space and let $g : V to mathbb{R}$ be a linear, unbounded functional. Then it is clear that $g$ has an empty subdifferential everywhere.



If you add continuity (in $y$), then $partial g(y)$ is not empty (see, e.g., the book by Bauschke&Combettes, Prop. 16.14). However, I feel that this already gives you the condition on $(y,g(y))$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I am interested in the more general case where $g$ is not continuous. I edited the post so it would be more clear.
    – MOMO
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









You need additional assumptions: Let $Y$ be an infinite dimensional Banach space and let $g : V to mathbb{R}$ be a linear, unbounded functional. Then it is clear that $g$ has an empty subdifferential everywhere.



If you add continuity (in $y$), then $partial g(y)$ is not empty (see, e.g., the book by Bauschke&Combettes, Prop. 16.14). However, I feel that this already gives you the condition on $(y,g(y))$.






share|cite|improve this answer












You need additional assumptions: Let $Y$ be an infinite dimensional Banach space and let $g : V to mathbb{R}$ be a linear, unbounded functional. Then it is clear that $g$ has an empty subdifferential everywhere.



If you add continuity (in $y$), then $partial g(y)$ is not empty (see, e.g., the book by Bauschke&Combettes, Prop. 16.14). However, I feel that this already gives you the condition on $(y,g(y))$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered yesterday









gerw

18.6k11133




18.6k11133












  • I am interested in the more general case where $g$ is not continuous. I edited the post so it would be more clear.
    – MOMO
    yesterday




















  • I am interested in the more general case where $g$ is not continuous. I edited the post so it would be more clear.
    – MOMO
    yesterday


















I am interested in the more general case where $g$ is not continuous. I edited the post so it would be more clear.
– MOMO
yesterday






I am interested in the more general case where $g$ is not continuous. I edited the post so it would be more clear.
– MOMO
yesterday




















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995078%2fa-sufficient-condition-for-subdifferentiability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest




















































































Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa