Is there an accessible exposition of Gelfand-Tsetlin theory?
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
I'm hoping to start an undergraduate on a project that involves understanding a bit of Gelfand-Tsetlin theory, and have been tearing my hair out looking for a good reference for them to look at. Basically what I would want is something at the level of Vershik-Okounkov (or the book based on it) but for finite dimensional representations of $GL_n$. I feel like such a book or at least some expository notes should exist, but I have had zero luck finding any.
reference-request co.combinatorics rt.representation-theory lie-algebras
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
I'm hoping to start an undergraduate on a project that involves understanding a bit of Gelfand-Tsetlin theory, and have been tearing my hair out looking for a good reference for them to look at. Basically what I would want is something at the level of Vershik-Okounkov (or the book based on it) but for finite dimensional representations of $GL_n$. I feel like such a book or at least some expository notes should exist, but I have had zero luck finding any.
reference-request co.combinatorics rt.representation-theory lie-algebras
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
I'm hoping to start an undergraduate on a project that involves understanding a bit of Gelfand-Tsetlin theory, and have been tearing my hair out looking for a good reference for them to look at. Basically what I would want is something at the level of Vershik-Okounkov (or the book based on it) but for finite dimensional representations of $GL_n$. I feel like such a book or at least some expository notes should exist, but I have had zero luck finding any.
reference-request co.combinatorics rt.representation-theory lie-algebras
I'm hoping to start an undergraduate on a project that involves understanding a bit of Gelfand-Tsetlin theory, and have been tearing my hair out looking for a good reference for them to look at. Basically what I would want is something at the level of Vershik-Okounkov (or the book based on it) but for finite dimensional representations of $GL_n$. I feel like such a book or at least some expository notes should exist, but I have had zero luck finding any.
reference-request co.combinatorics rt.representation-theory lie-algebras
reference-request co.combinatorics rt.representation-theory lie-algebras
edited 5 hours ago
user21820
721615
721615
asked 14 hours ago
Ben Webster♦
32.4k992204
32.4k992204
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
Good question. I've found this to be a difficult subject to get into myself. An abstract approach can seem arcane, but concrete constructions can be complicated and messy. You might try the paper by Hersh and Lenart as a starting point. They take a concrete approach, which has the advantage that you can start computing with small examples relatively quickly. A disadvantage is that your student might miss the big picture of how all this fits into the general representation theory of classical Lie algebras. For that, perhaps the work of Molev, such as this paper, might be helpful.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
Good question. I've found this to be a difficult subject to get into myself. An abstract approach can seem arcane, but concrete constructions can be complicated and messy. You might try the paper by Hersh and Lenart as a starting point. They take a concrete approach, which has the advantage that you can start computing with small examples relatively quickly. A disadvantage is that your student might miss the big picture of how all this fits into the general representation theory of classical Lie algebras. For that, perhaps the work of Molev, such as this paper, might be helpful.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Good question. I've found this to be a difficult subject to get into myself. An abstract approach can seem arcane, but concrete constructions can be complicated and messy. You might try the paper by Hersh and Lenart as a starting point. They take a concrete approach, which has the advantage that you can start computing with small examples relatively quickly. A disadvantage is that your student might miss the big picture of how all this fits into the general representation theory of classical Lie algebras. For that, perhaps the work of Molev, such as this paper, might be helpful.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
Good question. I've found this to be a difficult subject to get into myself. An abstract approach can seem arcane, but concrete constructions can be complicated and messy. You might try the paper by Hersh and Lenart as a starting point. They take a concrete approach, which has the advantage that you can start computing with small examples relatively quickly. A disadvantage is that your student might miss the big picture of how all this fits into the general representation theory of classical Lie algebras. For that, perhaps the work of Molev, such as this paper, might be helpful.
Good question. I've found this to be a difficult subject to get into myself. An abstract approach can seem arcane, but concrete constructions can be complicated and messy. You might try the paper by Hersh and Lenart as a starting point. They take a concrete approach, which has the advantage that you can start computing with small examples relatively quickly. A disadvantage is that your student might miss the big picture of how all this fits into the general representation theory of classical Lie algebras. For that, perhaps the work of Molev, such as this paper, might be helpful.
answered 12 hours ago
Timothy Chow
33.8k11175303
33.8k11175303
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315268%2fis-there-an-accessible-exposition-of-gelfand-tsetlin-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password