Find 3D line equation in simplest form.












1












$begingroup$


The line parallel to planes $-5x + y = 0$ and $x + 6y = 0,$ passes through the point $(3,0,2).$

My solution:.

Direction vector of the line: $v (x,y,z).$

Orthogonal vectors of planes: $;p_1(-5,1,0),; p_2(1,6,0).$
$v cdot p_1 = |v| cdot |p_1| cdot cos 90 = -5x + y = 0. tag 1$
$v cdot p_2 = |v| cdot |p_2| cdot cos 90 = x + 6y = 0. tag 2$

Solve $(1)(2) => x = 0, ;y = 0.$

But answer in my book is $v(6, 30, -1).$

What have I done wrong? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It looks like your book is using the planes $-5x+y=0$ and $x+6z=0$. Notice that the second equation has replaced $y$ by $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:39












  • $begingroup$
    Your right. My eyes were fooled by my mind. It is caused by an interesting neurological phenomenon: BRAIN FILTERING.
    $endgroup$
    – Willy
    Dec 7 '18 at 9:06
















1












$begingroup$


The line parallel to planes $-5x + y = 0$ and $x + 6y = 0,$ passes through the point $(3,0,2).$

My solution:.

Direction vector of the line: $v (x,y,z).$

Orthogonal vectors of planes: $;p_1(-5,1,0),; p_2(1,6,0).$
$v cdot p_1 = |v| cdot |p_1| cdot cos 90 = -5x + y = 0. tag 1$
$v cdot p_2 = |v| cdot |p_2| cdot cos 90 = x + 6y = 0. tag 2$

Solve $(1)(2) => x = 0, ;y = 0.$

But answer in my book is $v(6, 30, -1).$

What have I done wrong? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It looks like your book is using the planes $-5x+y=0$ and $x+6z=0$. Notice that the second equation has replaced $y$ by $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:39












  • $begingroup$
    Your right. My eyes were fooled by my mind. It is caused by an interesting neurological phenomenon: BRAIN FILTERING.
    $endgroup$
    – Willy
    Dec 7 '18 at 9:06














1












1








1





$begingroup$


The line parallel to planes $-5x + y = 0$ and $x + 6y = 0,$ passes through the point $(3,0,2).$

My solution:.

Direction vector of the line: $v (x,y,z).$

Orthogonal vectors of planes: $;p_1(-5,1,0),; p_2(1,6,0).$
$v cdot p_1 = |v| cdot |p_1| cdot cos 90 = -5x + y = 0. tag 1$
$v cdot p_2 = |v| cdot |p_2| cdot cos 90 = x + 6y = 0. tag 2$

Solve $(1)(2) => x = 0, ;y = 0.$

But answer in my book is $v(6, 30, -1).$

What have I done wrong? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The line parallel to planes $-5x + y = 0$ and $x + 6y = 0,$ passes through the point $(3,0,2).$

My solution:.

Direction vector of the line: $v (x,y,z).$

Orthogonal vectors of planes: $;p_1(-5,1,0),; p_2(1,6,0).$
$v cdot p_1 = |v| cdot |p_1| cdot cos 90 = -5x + y = 0. tag 1$
$v cdot p_2 = |v| cdot |p_2| cdot cos 90 = x + 6y = 0. tag 2$

Solve $(1)(2) => x = 0, ;y = 0.$

But answer in my book is $v(6, 30, -1).$

What have I done wrong? Thanks!







geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 '18 at 10:08









user376343

3,3382825




3,3382825










asked Nov 29 '18 at 9:34









WillyWilly

414




414








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It looks like your book is using the planes $-5x+y=0$ and $x+6z=0$. Notice that the second equation has replaced $y$ by $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:39












  • $begingroup$
    Your right. My eyes were fooled by my mind. It is caused by an interesting neurological phenomenon: BRAIN FILTERING.
    $endgroup$
    – Willy
    Dec 7 '18 at 9:06














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It looks like your book is using the planes $-5x+y=0$ and $x+6z=0$. Notice that the second equation has replaced $y$ by $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:39












  • $begingroup$
    Your right. My eyes were fooled by my mind. It is caused by an interesting neurological phenomenon: BRAIN FILTERING.
    $endgroup$
    – Willy
    Dec 7 '18 at 9:06








2




2




$begingroup$
It looks like your book is using the planes $-5x+y=0$ and $x+6z=0$. Notice that the second equation has replaced $y$ by $z$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Nov 29 '18 at 9:39






$begingroup$
It looks like your book is using the planes $-5x+y=0$ and $x+6z=0$. Notice that the second equation has replaced $y$ by $z$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Nov 29 '18 at 9:39














$begingroup$
Your right. My eyes were fooled by my mind. It is caused by an interesting neurological phenomenon: BRAIN FILTERING.
$endgroup$
– Willy
Dec 7 '18 at 9:06




$begingroup$
Your right. My eyes were fooled by my mind. It is caused by an interesting neurological phenomenon: BRAIN FILTERING.
$endgroup$
– Willy
Dec 7 '18 at 9:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Your solution is wrong. In fact$$v=p_1times p_2$$which shows the orthogonality therefore$$v=(-5hat i+hat j)times (hat i+6hat j)=-31 hat k$$hence the line is parallel to z-axis (which is expected) and the equation of the line would be$$begin{cases}x=3\y=0\z=tend{cases}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Your answer & mine are both right. Alter solve(1), (2), find out v = (0,0,t), I can conclude the line equation like yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Willy
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:11










  • $begingroup$
    Nice! Good luck!!
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:15











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018406%2ffind-3d-line-equation-in-simplest-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Your solution is wrong. In fact$$v=p_1times p_2$$which shows the orthogonality therefore$$v=(-5hat i+hat j)times (hat i+6hat j)=-31 hat k$$hence the line is parallel to z-axis (which is expected) and the equation of the line would be$$begin{cases}x=3\y=0\z=tend{cases}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Your answer & mine are both right. Alter solve(1), (2), find out v = (0,0,t), I can conclude the line equation like yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Willy
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:11










  • $begingroup$
    Nice! Good luck!!
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:15
















1












$begingroup$

Your solution is wrong. In fact$$v=p_1times p_2$$which shows the orthogonality therefore$$v=(-5hat i+hat j)times (hat i+6hat j)=-31 hat k$$hence the line is parallel to z-axis (which is expected) and the equation of the line would be$$begin{cases}x=3\y=0\z=tend{cases}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Your answer & mine are both right. Alter solve(1), (2), find out v = (0,0,t), I can conclude the line equation like yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Willy
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:11










  • $begingroup$
    Nice! Good luck!!
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:15














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Your solution is wrong. In fact$$v=p_1times p_2$$which shows the orthogonality therefore$$v=(-5hat i+hat j)times (hat i+6hat j)=-31 hat k$$hence the line is parallel to z-axis (which is expected) and the equation of the line would be$$begin{cases}x=3\y=0\z=tend{cases}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your solution is wrong. In fact$$v=p_1times p_2$$which shows the orthogonality therefore$$v=(-5hat i+hat j)times (hat i+6hat j)=-31 hat k$$hence the line is parallel to z-axis (which is expected) and the equation of the line would be$$begin{cases}x=3\y=0\z=tend{cases}$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 29 '18 at 9:56









Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

15.3k3939




15.3k3939












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Your answer & mine are both right. Alter solve(1), (2), find out v = (0,0,t), I can conclude the line equation like yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Willy
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:11










  • $begingroup$
    Nice! Good luck!!
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:15


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Your answer & mine are both right. Alter solve(1), (2), find out v = (0,0,t), I can conclude the line equation like yours.
    $endgroup$
    – Willy
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:11










  • $begingroup$
    Nice! Good luck!!
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:15
















$begingroup$
Thanks! Your answer & mine are both right. Alter solve(1), (2), find out v = (0,0,t), I can conclude the line equation like yours.
$endgroup$
– Willy
Dec 4 '18 at 11:11




$begingroup$
Thanks! Your answer & mine are both right. Alter solve(1), (2), find out v = (0,0,t), I can conclude the line equation like yours.
$endgroup$
– Willy
Dec 4 '18 at 11:11












$begingroup$
Nice! Good luck!!
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Dec 4 '18 at 11:15




$begingroup$
Nice! Good luck!!
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Dec 4 '18 at 11:15


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018406%2ffind-3d-line-equation-in-simplest-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa