Estimate the remainder term of an unusual interpolation: $f(-1)=f(1)=f'(0)=f''(0)=0$
$begingroup$
Suppose that $f(x)in C^{4}[-1,1]$ and
$$f(-1)=f(1)=f'(0)=f''(0)=0$$
Show that for every $xin[-1,1]$, there exist a $xi_xin[-1,1]$, such that
$$f(x)=frac{x^4-1}{4!}f^{(4)}(xi_x)$$
where $f^{(4)}(x)$ denoted the forth derivative of $f(x)$.
The question is relevant to interpolation, for the only polynomial $p(x)$ satisfying
$$p(-1)=p(1)=p'(0)=p''(0)=0$$
is $x^4-1$ and the question gives an estimate of the remainder term of this interpolation.
I tried Taylor but failed because Taylor is a Hermite interpolation on one point but this question is not a pure Hermite interpolation.
real-analysis interpolation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that $f(x)in C^{4}[-1,1]$ and
$$f(-1)=f(1)=f'(0)=f''(0)=0$$
Show that for every $xin[-1,1]$, there exist a $xi_xin[-1,1]$, such that
$$f(x)=frac{x^4-1}{4!}f^{(4)}(xi_x)$$
where $f^{(4)}(x)$ denoted the forth derivative of $f(x)$.
The question is relevant to interpolation, for the only polynomial $p(x)$ satisfying
$$p(-1)=p(1)=p'(0)=p''(0)=0$$
is $x^4-1$ and the question gives an estimate of the remainder term of this interpolation.
I tried Taylor but failed because Taylor is a Hermite interpolation on one point but this question is not a pure Hermite interpolation.
real-analysis interpolation
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Try using Rolle's Theorem on $f$ then $f'$ then $f''$ finally on $f^{(3)}$. You should also use the Mean Value Thoerem and the $cin[-1,1]$ should be $xi_x$
$endgroup$
– TheD0ubleT
Dec 11 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
@TheD0ubleT It doesn't work. Maybe you can post an answer if you've solved it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 18 '18 at 3:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that $f(x)in C^{4}[-1,1]$ and
$$f(-1)=f(1)=f'(0)=f''(0)=0$$
Show that for every $xin[-1,1]$, there exist a $xi_xin[-1,1]$, such that
$$f(x)=frac{x^4-1}{4!}f^{(4)}(xi_x)$$
where $f^{(4)}(x)$ denoted the forth derivative of $f(x)$.
The question is relevant to interpolation, for the only polynomial $p(x)$ satisfying
$$p(-1)=p(1)=p'(0)=p''(0)=0$$
is $x^4-1$ and the question gives an estimate of the remainder term of this interpolation.
I tried Taylor but failed because Taylor is a Hermite interpolation on one point but this question is not a pure Hermite interpolation.
real-analysis interpolation
$endgroup$
Suppose that $f(x)in C^{4}[-1,1]$ and
$$f(-1)=f(1)=f'(0)=f''(0)=0$$
Show that for every $xin[-1,1]$, there exist a $xi_xin[-1,1]$, such that
$$f(x)=frac{x^4-1}{4!}f^{(4)}(xi_x)$$
where $f^{(4)}(x)$ denoted the forth derivative of $f(x)$.
The question is relevant to interpolation, for the only polynomial $p(x)$ satisfying
$$p(-1)=p(1)=p'(0)=p''(0)=0$$
is $x^4-1$ and the question gives an estimate of the remainder term of this interpolation.
I tried Taylor but failed because Taylor is a Hermite interpolation on one point but this question is not a pure Hermite interpolation.
real-analysis interpolation
real-analysis interpolation
edited Dec 11 '18 at 2:39
Lau
asked Dec 11 '18 at 2:05
LauLau
517315
517315
$begingroup$
Try using Rolle's Theorem on $f$ then $f'$ then $f''$ finally on $f^{(3)}$. You should also use the Mean Value Thoerem and the $cin[-1,1]$ should be $xi_x$
$endgroup$
– TheD0ubleT
Dec 11 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
@TheD0ubleT It doesn't work. Maybe you can post an answer if you've solved it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 18 '18 at 3:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Try using Rolle's Theorem on $f$ then $f'$ then $f''$ finally on $f^{(3)}$. You should also use the Mean Value Thoerem and the $cin[-1,1]$ should be $xi_x$
$endgroup$
– TheD0ubleT
Dec 11 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
@TheD0ubleT It doesn't work. Maybe you can post an answer if you've solved it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 18 '18 at 3:02
$begingroup$
Try using Rolle's Theorem on $f$ then $f'$ then $f''$ finally on $f^{(3)}$. You should also use the Mean Value Thoerem and the $cin[-1,1]$ should be $xi_x$
$endgroup$
– TheD0ubleT
Dec 11 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
Try using Rolle's Theorem on $f$ then $f'$ then $f''$ finally on $f^{(3)}$. You should also use the Mean Value Thoerem and the $cin[-1,1]$ should be $xi_x$
$endgroup$
– TheD0ubleT
Dec 11 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
@TheD0ubleT It doesn't work. Maybe you can post an answer if you've solved it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 18 '18 at 3:02
$begingroup$
@TheD0ubleT It doesn't work. Maybe you can post an answer if you've solved it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 18 '18 at 3:02
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Emmm... I think I've worked it out on my own.
And this kind of interpolation is called Birkhoff interpolation.
For $x=1$ and $x=-1$, we're done. For $xin(-1,1)$, define
$$phi(t)=f(t)-frac{f(x)}{x^4-1}(t^4-1),quad tin[-1,1]$$
is a $C^4[-1,1]$ function and
$$phi(1)=phi(-1)=phi(x)=phi'(0)=phi''(0)=0$$
If $x=0$, then we can solve it by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If $xnotin{-1,0,1}$, say $xin(-1,0)$, by Rolle's Theorem:
There exist a $xi_1in(-1,0)$, such that $phi'(xi_1)=0$.
There exist a $xi_2in(xi_1,0)$, such that $phi''(xi_2)=0$.
There exist a $xi_3in(xi_2,0)$, such that $phi'''(xi_3)=0$.
Now, Consider the following claims:
(a) All nulls of $phi(t)$ are $-1,x,1$.
(b) All nulls of $phi'(t)$ are $xi_1,0$.
(c) All nulls of $phi''(t)$ are $xi_2,0$.
(d) All nulls of $phi'''(t)$ are $xi_3$.
If one of the claims is false, then we can reach the conclusion by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If all the claims are true, then by (b) $phi(t)$ is monotonic respectively on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$.
By (a), we know $phi(t)$ has different monotonicity on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$, so $phi'(t)$ changes sign at $0$.
By (c), $phi''(t)$ doesn't change sign at $0$, hence we know $phi'''(t)=0$, which contradicts to (d).
So we've done, the situation where $xin(0,1)$ is similar.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why should $phi(0)$ be zero? Is that a typo or does your proof rely on it?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Dec 20 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
@MartinR Thanks to point it out. I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 21 '18 at 1:58
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034778%2festimate-the-remainder-term-of-an-unusual-interpolation-f-1-f1-f0-f0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Emmm... I think I've worked it out on my own.
And this kind of interpolation is called Birkhoff interpolation.
For $x=1$ and $x=-1$, we're done. For $xin(-1,1)$, define
$$phi(t)=f(t)-frac{f(x)}{x^4-1}(t^4-1),quad tin[-1,1]$$
is a $C^4[-1,1]$ function and
$$phi(1)=phi(-1)=phi(x)=phi'(0)=phi''(0)=0$$
If $x=0$, then we can solve it by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If $xnotin{-1,0,1}$, say $xin(-1,0)$, by Rolle's Theorem:
There exist a $xi_1in(-1,0)$, such that $phi'(xi_1)=0$.
There exist a $xi_2in(xi_1,0)$, such that $phi''(xi_2)=0$.
There exist a $xi_3in(xi_2,0)$, such that $phi'''(xi_3)=0$.
Now, Consider the following claims:
(a) All nulls of $phi(t)$ are $-1,x,1$.
(b) All nulls of $phi'(t)$ are $xi_1,0$.
(c) All nulls of $phi''(t)$ are $xi_2,0$.
(d) All nulls of $phi'''(t)$ are $xi_3$.
If one of the claims is false, then we can reach the conclusion by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If all the claims are true, then by (b) $phi(t)$ is monotonic respectively on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$.
By (a), we know $phi(t)$ has different monotonicity on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$, so $phi'(t)$ changes sign at $0$.
By (c), $phi''(t)$ doesn't change sign at $0$, hence we know $phi'''(t)=0$, which contradicts to (d).
So we've done, the situation where $xin(0,1)$ is similar.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why should $phi(0)$ be zero? Is that a typo or does your proof rely on it?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Dec 20 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
@MartinR Thanks to point it out. I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 21 '18 at 1:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Emmm... I think I've worked it out on my own.
And this kind of interpolation is called Birkhoff interpolation.
For $x=1$ and $x=-1$, we're done. For $xin(-1,1)$, define
$$phi(t)=f(t)-frac{f(x)}{x^4-1}(t^4-1),quad tin[-1,1]$$
is a $C^4[-1,1]$ function and
$$phi(1)=phi(-1)=phi(x)=phi'(0)=phi''(0)=0$$
If $x=0$, then we can solve it by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If $xnotin{-1,0,1}$, say $xin(-1,0)$, by Rolle's Theorem:
There exist a $xi_1in(-1,0)$, such that $phi'(xi_1)=0$.
There exist a $xi_2in(xi_1,0)$, such that $phi''(xi_2)=0$.
There exist a $xi_3in(xi_2,0)$, such that $phi'''(xi_3)=0$.
Now, Consider the following claims:
(a) All nulls of $phi(t)$ are $-1,x,1$.
(b) All nulls of $phi'(t)$ are $xi_1,0$.
(c) All nulls of $phi''(t)$ are $xi_2,0$.
(d) All nulls of $phi'''(t)$ are $xi_3$.
If one of the claims is false, then we can reach the conclusion by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If all the claims are true, then by (b) $phi(t)$ is monotonic respectively on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$.
By (a), we know $phi(t)$ has different monotonicity on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$, so $phi'(t)$ changes sign at $0$.
By (c), $phi''(t)$ doesn't change sign at $0$, hence we know $phi'''(t)=0$, which contradicts to (d).
So we've done, the situation where $xin(0,1)$ is similar.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why should $phi(0)$ be zero? Is that a typo or does your proof rely on it?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Dec 20 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
@MartinR Thanks to point it out. I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 21 '18 at 1:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Emmm... I think I've worked it out on my own.
And this kind of interpolation is called Birkhoff interpolation.
For $x=1$ and $x=-1$, we're done. For $xin(-1,1)$, define
$$phi(t)=f(t)-frac{f(x)}{x^4-1}(t^4-1),quad tin[-1,1]$$
is a $C^4[-1,1]$ function and
$$phi(1)=phi(-1)=phi(x)=phi'(0)=phi''(0)=0$$
If $x=0$, then we can solve it by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If $xnotin{-1,0,1}$, say $xin(-1,0)$, by Rolle's Theorem:
There exist a $xi_1in(-1,0)$, such that $phi'(xi_1)=0$.
There exist a $xi_2in(xi_1,0)$, such that $phi''(xi_2)=0$.
There exist a $xi_3in(xi_2,0)$, such that $phi'''(xi_3)=0$.
Now, Consider the following claims:
(a) All nulls of $phi(t)$ are $-1,x,1$.
(b) All nulls of $phi'(t)$ are $xi_1,0$.
(c) All nulls of $phi''(t)$ are $xi_2,0$.
(d) All nulls of $phi'''(t)$ are $xi_3$.
If one of the claims is false, then we can reach the conclusion by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If all the claims are true, then by (b) $phi(t)$ is monotonic respectively on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$.
By (a), we know $phi(t)$ has different monotonicity on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$, so $phi'(t)$ changes sign at $0$.
By (c), $phi''(t)$ doesn't change sign at $0$, hence we know $phi'''(t)=0$, which contradicts to (d).
So we've done, the situation where $xin(0,1)$ is similar.
$endgroup$
Emmm... I think I've worked it out on my own.
And this kind of interpolation is called Birkhoff interpolation.
For $x=1$ and $x=-1$, we're done. For $xin(-1,1)$, define
$$phi(t)=f(t)-frac{f(x)}{x^4-1}(t^4-1),quad tin[-1,1]$$
is a $C^4[-1,1]$ function and
$$phi(1)=phi(-1)=phi(x)=phi'(0)=phi''(0)=0$$
If $x=0$, then we can solve it by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If $xnotin{-1,0,1}$, say $xin(-1,0)$, by Rolle's Theorem:
There exist a $xi_1in(-1,0)$, such that $phi'(xi_1)=0$.
There exist a $xi_2in(xi_1,0)$, such that $phi''(xi_2)=0$.
There exist a $xi_3in(xi_2,0)$, such that $phi'''(xi_3)=0$.
Now, Consider the following claims:
(a) All nulls of $phi(t)$ are $-1,x,1$.
(b) All nulls of $phi'(t)$ are $xi_1,0$.
(c) All nulls of $phi''(t)$ are $xi_2,0$.
(d) All nulls of $phi'''(t)$ are $xi_3$.
If one of the claims is false, then we can reach the conclusion by repeatedly using Rolle's Theorem.
If all the claims are true, then by (b) $phi(t)$ is monotonic respectively on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$.
By (a), we know $phi(t)$ has different monotonicity on $(x,0)$ and $(0,1)$, so $phi'(t)$ changes sign at $0$.
By (c), $phi''(t)$ doesn't change sign at $0$, hence we know $phi'''(t)=0$, which contradicts to (d).
So we've done, the situation where $xin(0,1)$ is similar.
edited Dec 21 '18 at 1:57
answered Dec 20 '18 at 1:54
LauLau
517315
517315
$begingroup$
Why should $phi(0)$ be zero? Is that a typo or does your proof rely on it?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Dec 20 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
@MartinR Thanks to point it out. I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 21 '18 at 1:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why should $phi(0)$ be zero? Is that a typo or does your proof rely on it?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Dec 20 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
@MartinR Thanks to point it out. I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 21 '18 at 1:58
$begingroup$
Why should $phi(0)$ be zero? Is that a typo or does your proof rely on it?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Dec 20 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
Why should $phi(0)$ be zero? Is that a typo or does your proof rely on it?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Dec 20 '18 at 19:34
$begingroup$
@MartinR Thanks to point it out. I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 21 '18 at 1:58
$begingroup$
@MartinR Thanks to point it out. I've fixed it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 21 '18 at 1:58
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034778%2festimate-the-remainder-term-of-an-unusual-interpolation-f-1-f1-f0-f0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Try using Rolle's Theorem on $f$ then $f'$ then $f''$ finally on $f^{(3)}$. You should also use the Mean Value Thoerem and the $cin[-1,1]$ should be $xi_x$
$endgroup$
– TheD0ubleT
Dec 11 '18 at 8:55
$begingroup$
@TheD0ubleT It doesn't work. Maybe you can post an answer if you've solved it.
$endgroup$
– Lau
Dec 18 '18 at 3:02