Number of points in the fibers of étale morphisms.
$begingroup$
Consider the following theorem$^{*}$:
Theorem of conservation of number: Suppose $f:X longrightarrow Y$ is an étale
covering, and $Y$ is connected. Then the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$.
The way of proof is that locally on $Y$, the variety $X$
can be defined in $mathbb{A}^1 times Y$ by one equation, say $T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$,
where the $a_i in K[Y]$. Now, since $f$ is étale, all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them.
My question is why all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them $Longrightarrow$ the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$? How to connect the simple $m$ roots of the equation with the number of points in a fiber?
$^*$Algebraic Geometry I - Algebraic Curves - Algebraic Manifolds and Schemes (I. R. Shafarevich). Section 5.5.
thanks
algebraic-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the following theorem$^{*}$:
Theorem of conservation of number: Suppose $f:X longrightarrow Y$ is an étale
covering, and $Y$ is connected. Then the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$.
The way of proof is that locally on $Y$, the variety $X$
can be defined in $mathbb{A}^1 times Y$ by one equation, say $T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$,
where the $a_i in K[Y]$. Now, since $f$ is étale, all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them.
My question is why all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them $Longrightarrow$ the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$? How to connect the simple $m$ roots of the equation with the number of points in a fiber?
$^*$Algebraic Geometry I - Algebraic Curves - Algebraic Manifolds and Schemes (I. R. Shafarevich). Section 5.5.
thanks
algebraic-geometry
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 19 '18 at 15:36
$begingroup$
@jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
$endgroup$
– Manoel
Dec 20 '18 at 1:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the following theorem$^{*}$:
Theorem of conservation of number: Suppose $f:X longrightarrow Y$ is an étale
covering, and $Y$ is connected. Then the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$.
The way of proof is that locally on $Y$, the variety $X$
can be defined in $mathbb{A}^1 times Y$ by one equation, say $T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$,
where the $a_i in K[Y]$. Now, since $f$ is étale, all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them.
My question is why all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them $Longrightarrow$ the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$? How to connect the simple $m$ roots of the equation with the number of points in a fiber?
$^*$Algebraic Geometry I - Algebraic Curves - Algebraic Manifolds and Schemes (I. R. Shafarevich). Section 5.5.
thanks
algebraic-geometry
$endgroup$
Consider the following theorem$^{*}$:
Theorem of conservation of number: Suppose $f:X longrightarrow Y$ is an étale
covering, and $Y$ is connected. Then the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$.
The way of proof is that locally on $Y$, the variety $X$
can be defined in $mathbb{A}^1 times Y$ by one equation, say $T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$,
where the $a_i in K[Y]$. Now, since $f$ is étale, all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them.
My question is why all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them $Longrightarrow$ the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$? How to connect the simple $m$ roots of the equation with the number of points in a fiber?
$^*$Algebraic Geometry I - Algebraic Curves - Algebraic Manifolds and Schemes (I. R. Shafarevich). Section 5.5.
thanks
algebraic-geometry
algebraic-geometry
asked Dec 18 '18 at 19:08
ManoelManoel
930518
930518
1
$begingroup$
A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 19 '18 at 15:36
$begingroup$
@jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
$endgroup$
– Manoel
Dec 20 '18 at 1:59
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 19 '18 at 15:36
$begingroup$
@jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
$endgroup$
– Manoel
Dec 20 '18 at 1:59
1
1
$begingroup$
A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 19 '18 at 15:36
$begingroup$
A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 19 '18 at 15:36
$begingroup$
@jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
$endgroup$
– Manoel
Dec 20 '18 at 1:59
$begingroup$
@jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
$endgroup$
– Manoel
Dec 20 '18 at 1:59
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045564%2fnumber-of-points-in-the-fibers-of-%25c3%25a9tale-morphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045564%2fnumber-of-points-in-the-fibers-of-%25c3%25a9tale-morphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 19 '18 at 15:36
$begingroup$
@jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
$endgroup$
– Manoel
Dec 20 '18 at 1:59