Steadily accumulating number formula












3












$begingroup$


This is quite likely a super simple question, but I lack the descriptive power to be able to find the answer on Google!



Consider the following two number sequences:



00, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90
45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45


Both sequences have a total value of 450, but one accumulates steadily in multiples of 10, whilst the second remains constant at 45.



The second is easy to ascertain, divide the total value by the number of instances in the list. But the first sequence I'm stuck on - can anyone help me understand the formula for ascertaining the accumulation value (in this instance 10) from 0?



My goal is to be able to take any number and divide it x number of times, with the first number in the sequence being 0 and steadily increasing - apportioning greater and greater values to those later in the sequence.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ryan Gillies is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The keywords you need are "arithmetic progression".
    $endgroup$
    – FredH
    Mar 25 at 4:33










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, that instantly helps a lot with my googling!
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:39
















3












$begingroup$


This is quite likely a super simple question, but I lack the descriptive power to be able to find the answer on Google!



Consider the following two number sequences:



00, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90
45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45


Both sequences have a total value of 450, but one accumulates steadily in multiples of 10, whilst the second remains constant at 45.



The second is easy to ascertain, divide the total value by the number of instances in the list. But the first sequence I'm stuck on - can anyone help me understand the formula for ascertaining the accumulation value (in this instance 10) from 0?



My goal is to be able to take any number and divide it x number of times, with the first number in the sequence being 0 and steadily increasing - apportioning greater and greater values to those later in the sequence.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ryan Gillies is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The keywords you need are "arithmetic progression".
    $endgroup$
    – FredH
    Mar 25 at 4:33










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, that instantly helps a lot with my googling!
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:39














3












3








3





$begingroup$


This is quite likely a super simple question, but I lack the descriptive power to be able to find the answer on Google!



Consider the following two number sequences:



00, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90
45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45


Both sequences have a total value of 450, but one accumulates steadily in multiples of 10, whilst the second remains constant at 45.



The second is easy to ascertain, divide the total value by the number of instances in the list. But the first sequence I'm stuck on - can anyone help me understand the formula for ascertaining the accumulation value (in this instance 10) from 0?



My goal is to be able to take any number and divide it x number of times, with the first number in the sequence being 0 and steadily increasing - apportioning greater and greater values to those later in the sequence.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ryan Gillies is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




This is quite likely a super simple question, but I lack the descriptive power to be able to find the answer on Google!



Consider the following two number sequences:



00, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90
45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45, 45


Both sequences have a total value of 450, but one accumulates steadily in multiples of 10, whilst the second remains constant at 45.



The second is easy to ascertain, divide the total value by the number of instances in the list. But the first sequence I'm stuck on - can anyone help me understand the formula for ascertaining the accumulation value (in this instance 10) from 0?



My goal is to be able to take any number and divide it x number of times, with the first number in the sequence being 0 and steadily increasing - apportioning greater and greater values to those later in the sequence.







sequences-and-series






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ryan Gillies is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ryan Gillies is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Ryan Gillies is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 25 at 4:24









Ryan GilliesRyan Gillies

182




182




New contributor




Ryan Gillies is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ryan Gillies is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ryan Gillies is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    The keywords you need are "arithmetic progression".
    $endgroup$
    – FredH
    Mar 25 at 4:33










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, that instantly helps a lot with my googling!
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:39


















  • $begingroup$
    The keywords you need are "arithmetic progression".
    $endgroup$
    – FredH
    Mar 25 at 4:33










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, that instantly helps a lot with my googling!
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:39
















$begingroup$
The keywords you need are "arithmetic progression".
$endgroup$
– FredH
Mar 25 at 4:33




$begingroup$
The keywords you need are "arithmetic progression".
$endgroup$
– FredH
Mar 25 at 4:33












$begingroup$
Thank you, that instantly helps a lot with my googling!
$endgroup$
– Ryan Gillies
Mar 25 at 4:39




$begingroup$
Thank you, that instantly helps a lot with my googling!
$endgroup$
– Ryan Gillies
Mar 25 at 4:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

It's an arithmetic sequence (i. e. every next element is created from the previous with adding the same number) with the well-known formula for its sum



$$a_1 + a_2 + cdots + a_n = {n over 2}(a_1+a_n)$$



So, as $a_1= 0, n = 10, $ and $ a_{10} = 90$ you will obtain



$$00 + 10 +20 + cdots + 90 = {10over2}(0 + 90)= 5cdot 90 = 450$$





Addendum:



If you know the first element ($a_1$), number of elements ($n$) and their sum ($s$), you may obtain the last element ($a_n$) by substituting the known values into the formula, and then isolate $a_n$:



$$a_n = {2sover n}-a_1$$



You may then compute the difference $d$ between adjacent members as



$$d = {a_n-a_1over n-1}$$



to consecutively obtain members between $a_1$ and $a_n$:



begin{aligned}
a_2 &= a_1+d\a_3 &= a_2+d\
&cdots
end{aligned}



(To the question in your comment.)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Using this approach it appears I need to know the answer to an (90) - if I only have a1 (0) and 450, could it still be done?
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Ryan You have the values for n, $a_1$, and the sum. That leaves $a_n$ as the only variable. You can solve for $a_n$ to get $a_n=frac{2}{n}(x)-a_1$ where $x$ is the sum (450 in your case).
    $endgroup$
    – Jacob Jones
    Mar 25 at 4:57










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry yes you're right I forgot to include that in my comment, I will always know number of elements (n) first number in sequence (a1) and the sum (in this example 450). What I don't know is the last number in sequence (an).
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:57










  • $begingroup$
    You need know also the number of elements ($n$) to substitute it to the given formula, because without this you may write the sum $450$ in many different ways, e. g. $450 = 0 + 450 = 0 + 150 + 300 = 0 +45 +90 +135 +180$.
    $endgroup$
    – MarianD
    Mar 25 at 5:00










  • $begingroup$
    Nailed it, understood perfectly! Thank you so much for your help MarianD and @JacobJones!
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 5:01



















0












$begingroup$

$$sumlimits_{i=0}^9 10 i = 10 sumlimits_{i=0}^9 i = 10 left[ frac{(9+0)(9+1)}{2} right] =450$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Ryan Gillies is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161382%2fsteadily-accumulating-number-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    It's an arithmetic sequence (i. e. every next element is created from the previous with adding the same number) with the well-known formula for its sum



    $$a_1 + a_2 + cdots + a_n = {n over 2}(a_1+a_n)$$



    So, as $a_1= 0, n = 10, $ and $ a_{10} = 90$ you will obtain



    $$00 + 10 +20 + cdots + 90 = {10over2}(0 + 90)= 5cdot 90 = 450$$





    Addendum:



    If you know the first element ($a_1$), number of elements ($n$) and their sum ($s$), you may obtain the last element ($a_n$) by substituting the known values into the formula, and then isolate $a_n$:



    $$a_n = {2sover n}-a_1$$



    You may then compute the difference $d$ between adjacent members as



    $$d = {a_n-a_1over n-1}$$



    to consecutively obtain members between $a_1$ and $a_n$:



    begin{aligned}
    a_2 &= a_1+d\a_3 &= a_2+d\
    &cdots
    end{aligned}



    (To the question in your comment.)






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Using this approach it appears I need to know the answer to an (90) - if I only have a1 (0) and 450, could it still be done?
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 4:43










    • $begingroup$
      @Ryan You have the values for n, $a_1$, and the sum. That leaves $a_n$ as the only variable. You can solve for $a_n$ to get $a_n=frac{2}{n}(x)-a_1$ where $x$ is the sum (450 in your case).
      $endgroup$
      – Jacob Jones
      Mar 25 at 4:57










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry yes you're right I forgot to include that in my comment, I will always know number of elements (n) first number in sequence (a1) and the sum (in this example 450). What I don't know is the last number in sequence (an).
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 4:57










    • $begingroup$
      You need know also the number of elements ($n$) to substitute it to the given formula, because without this you may write the sum $450$ in many different ways, e. g. $450 = 0 + 450 = 0 + 150 + 300 = 0 +45 +90 +135 +180$.
      $endgroup$
      – MarianD
      Mar 25 at 5:00










    • $begingroup$
      Nailed it, understood perfectly! Thank you so much for your help MarianD and @JacobJones!
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 5:01
















    2












    $begingroup$

    It's an arithmetic sequence (i. e. every next element is created from the previous with adding the same number) with the well-known formula for its sum



    $$a_1 + a_2 + cdots + a_n = {n over 2}(a_1+a_n)$$



    So, as $a_1= 0, n = 10, $ and $ a_{10} = 90$ you will obtain



    $$00 + 10 +20 + cdots + 90 = {10over2}(0 + 90)= 5cdot 90 = 450$$





    Addendum:



    If you know the first element ($a_1$), number of elements ($n$) and their sum ($s$), you may obtain the last element ($a_n$) by substituting the known values into the formula, and then isolate $a_n$:



    $$a_n = {2sover n}-a_1$$



    You may then compute the difference $d$ between adjacent members as



    $$d = {a_n-a_1over n-1}$$



    to consecutively obtain members between $a_1$ and $a_n$:



    begin{aligned}
    a_2 &= a_1+d\a_3 &= a_2+d\
    &cdots
    end{aligned}



    (To the question in your comment.)






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Using this approach it appears I need to know the answer to an (90) - if I only have a1 (0) and 450, could it still be done?
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 4:43










    • $begingroup$
      @Ryan You have the values for n, $a_1$, and the sum. That leaves $a_n$ as the only variable. You can solve for $a_n$ to get $a_n=frac{2}{n}(x)-a_1$ where $x$ is the sum (450 in your case).
      $endgroup$
      – Jacob Jones
      Mar 25 at 4:57










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry yes you're right I forgot to include that in my comment, I will always know number of elements (n) first number in sequence (a1) and the sum (in this example 450). What I don't know is the last number in sequence (an).
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 4:57










    • $begingroup$
      You need know also the number of elements ($n$) to substitute it to the given formula, because without this you may write the sum $450$ in many different ways, e. g. $450 = 0 + 450 = 0 + 150 + 300 = 0 +45 +90 +135 +180$.
      $endgroup$
      – MarianD
      Mar 25 at 5:00










    • $begingroup$
      Nailed it, understood perfectly! Thank you so much for your help MarianD and @JacobJones!
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 5:01














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    It's an arithmetic sequence (i. e. every next element is created from the previous with adding the same number) with the well-known formula for its sum



    $$a_1 + a_2 + cdots + a_n = {n over 2}(a_1+a_n)$$



    So, as $a_1= 0, n = 10, $ and $ a_{10} = 90$ you will obtain



    $$00 + 10 +20 + cdots + 90 = {10over2}(0 + 90)= 5cdot 90 = 450$$





    Addendum:



    If you know the first element ($a_1$), number of elements ($n$) and their sum ($s$), you may obtain the last element ($a_n$) by substituting the known values into the formula, and then isolate $a_n$:



    $$a_n = {2sover n}-a_1$$



    You may then compute the difference $d$ between adjacent members as



    $$d = {a_n-a_1over n-1}$$



    to consecutively obtain members between $a_1$ and $a_n$:



    begin{aligned}
    a_2 &= a_1+d\a_3 &= a_2+d\
    &cdots
    end{aligned}



    (To the question in your comment.)






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    It's an arithmetic sequence (i. e. every next element is created from the previous with adding the same number) with the well-known formula for its sum



    $$a_1 + a_2 + cdots + a_n = {n over 2}(a_1+a_n)$$



    So, as $a_1= 0, n = 10, $ and $ a_{10} = 90$ you will obtain



    $$00 + 10 +20 + cdots + 90 = {10over2}(0 + 90)= 5cdot 90 = 450$$





    Addendum:



    If you know the first element ($a_1$), number of elements ($n$) and their sum ($s$), you may obtain the last element ($a_n$) by substituting the known values into the formula, and then isolate $a_n$:



    $$a_n = {2sover n}-a_1$$



    You may then compute the difference $d$ between adjacent members as



    $$d = {a_n-a_1over n-1}$$



    to consecutively obtain members between $a_1$ and $a_n$:



    begin{aligned}
    a_2 &= a_1+d\a_3 &= a_2+d\
    &cdots
    end{aligned}



    (To the question in your comment.)







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Mar 25 at 5:24

























    answered Mar 25 at 4:37









    MarianDMarianD

    1,7791617




    1,7791617












    • $begingroup$
      Using this approach it appears I need to know the answer to an (90) - if I only have a1 (0) and 450, could it still be done?
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 4:43










    • $begingroup$
      @Ryan You have the values for n, $a_1$, and the sum. That leaves $a_n$ as the only variable. You can solve for $a_n$ to get $a_n=frac{2}{n}(x)-a_1$ where $x$ is the sum (450 in your case).
      $endgroup$
      – Jacob Jones
      Mar 25 at 4:57










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry yes you're right I forgot to include that in my comment, I will always know number of elements (n) first number in sequence (a1) and the sum (in this example 450). What I don't know is the last number in sequence (an).
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 4:57










    • $begingroup$
      You need know also the number of elements ($n$) to substitute it to the given formula, because without this you may write the sum $450$ in many different ways, e. g. $450 = 0 + 450 = 0 + 150 + 300 = 0 +45 +90 +135 +180$.
      $endgroup$
      – MarianD
      Mar 25 at 5:00










    • $begingroup$
      Nailed it, understood perfectly! Thank you so much for your help MarianD and @JacobJones!
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 5:01


















    • $begingroup$
      Using this approach it appears I need to know the answer to an (90) - if I only have a1 (0) and 450, could it still be done?
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 4:43










    • $begingroup$
      @Ryan You have the values for n, $a_1$, and the sum. That leaves $a_n$ as the only variable. You can solve for $a_n$ to get $a_n=frac{2}{n}(x)-a_1$ where $x$ is the sum (450 in your case).
      $endgroup$
      – Jacob Jones
      Mar 25 at 4:57










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry yes you're right I forgot to include that in my comment, I will always know number of elements (n) first number in sequence (a1) and the sum (in this example 450). What I don't know is the last number in sequence (an).
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 4:57










    • $begingroup$
      You need know also the number of elements ($n$) to substitute it to the given formula, because without this you may write the sum $450$ in many different ways, e. g. $450 = 0 + 450 = 0 + 150 + 300 = 0 +45 +90 +135 +180$.
      $endgroup$
      – MarianD
      Mar 25 at 5:00










    • $begingroup$
      Nailed it, understood perfectly! Thank you so much for your help MarianD and @JacobJones!
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Gillies
      Mar 25 at 5:01
















    $begingroup$
    Using this approach it appears I need to know the answer to an (90) - if I only have a1 (0) and 450, could it still be done?
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:43




    $begingroup$
    Using this approach it appears I need to know the answer to an (90) - if I only have a1 (0) and 450, could it still be done?
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:43












    $begingroup$
    @Ryan You have the values for n, $a_1$, and the sum. That leaves $a_n$ as the only variable. You can solve for $a_n$ to get $a_n=frac{2}{n}(x)-a_1$ where $x$ is the sum (450 in your case).
    $endgroup$
    – Jacob Jones
    Mar 25 at 4:57




    $begingroup$
    @Ryan You have the values for n, $a_1$, and the sum. That leaves $a_n$ as the only variable. You can solve for $a_n$ to get $a_n=frac{2}{n}(x)-a_1$ where $x$ is the sum (450 in your case).
    $endgroup$
    – Jacob Jones
    Mar 25 at 4:57












    $begingroup$
    Sorry yes you're right I forgot to include that in my comment, I will always know number of elements (n) first number in sequence (a1) and the sum (in this example 450). What I don't know is the last number in sequence (an).
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:57




    $begingroup$
    Sorry yes you're right I forgot to include that in my comment, I will always know number of elements (n) first number in sequence (a1) and the sum (in this example 450). What I don't know is the last number in sequence (an).
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 4:57












    $begingroup$
    You need know also the number of elements ($n$) to substitute it to the given formula, because without this you may write the sum $450$ in many different ways, e. g. $450 = 0 + 450 = 0 + 150 + 300 = 0 +45 +90 +135 +180$.
    $endgroup$
    – MarianD
    Mar 25 at 5:00




    $begingroup$
    You need know also the number of elements ($n$) to substitute it to the given formula, because without this you may write the sum $450$ in many different ways, e. g. $450 = 0 + 450 = 0 + 150 + 300 = 0 +45 +90 +135 +180$.
    $endgroup$
    – MarianD
    Mar 25 at 5:00












    $begingroup$
    Nailed it, understood perfectly! Thank you so much for your help MarianD and @JacobJones!
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 5:01




    $begingroup$
    Nailed it, understood perfectly! Thank you so much for your help MarianD and @JacobJones!
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Gillies
    Mar 25 at 5:01











    0












    $begingroup$

    $$sumlimits_{i=0}^9 10 i = 10 sumlimits_{i=0}^9 i = 10 left[ frac{(9+0)(9+1)}{2} right] =450$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      $$sumlimits_{i=0}^9 10 i = 10 sumlimits_{i=0}^9 i = 10 left[ frac{(9+0)(9+1)}{2} right] =450$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        $$sumlimits_{i=0}^9 10 i = 10 sumlimits_{i=0}^9 i = 10 left[ frac{(9+0)(9+1)}{2} right] =450$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $$sumlimits_{i=0}^9 10 i = 10 sumlimits_{i=0}^9 i = 10 left[ frac{(9+0)(9+1)}{2} right] =450$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 25 at 4:34









        David G. StorkDavid G. Stork

        11.5k41533




        11.5k41533






















            Ryan Gillies is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ryan Gillies is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Ryan Gillies is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ryan Gillies is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161382%2fsteadily-accumulating-number-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa