Understanding Proposition $3.14$ in Ullrich's Complex Made Simple












0












$begingroup$


In Ullrich's Complex Made Simple, Proposition $3.14$ part $ii$ states





If $f in H(D'(z,r))$ (holomorphic in the punctured disk) has an essential singularity at $z$ if and only if $f(D'(z,rho))$ is dense in $mathbb C$ for all $rho in (0,r)$.





I understand the if part which refers as Casorati–Weierstrass theorem. But in the proof to only if part I am having trouble to fill a gap. The proof proceeds by contradiction.



If $f$ has a pole or removable singularity at $z$ then $f(w)$ has (finite or infinite) limit as $ w to z$. [This part is OK. The limit would be $0$ if $z$ is removable singularity and infinite if $z$ is a pole.] Then it claims the range $f(D'(z, rho))$ would be obviously not dense. I am having trouble to understand the 'obvious part'.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    In Ullrich's Complex Made Simple, Proposition $3.14$ part $ii$ states





    If $f in H(D'(z,r))$ (holomorphic in the punctured disk) has an essential singularity at $z$ if and only if $f(D'(z,rho))$ is dense in $mathbb C$ for all $rho in (0,r)$.





    I understand the if part which refers as Casorati–Weierstrass theorem. But in the proof to only if part I am having trouble to fill a gap. The proof proceeds by contradiction.



    If $f$ has a pole or removable singularity at $z$ then $f(w)$ has (finite or infinite) limit as $ w to z$. [This part is OK. The limit would be $0$ if $z$ is removable singularity and infinite if $z$ is a pole.] Then it claims the range $f(D'(z, rho))$ would be obviously not dense. I am having trouble to understand the 'obvious part'.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      In Ullrich's Complex Made Simple, Proposition $3.14$ part $ii$ states





      If $f in H(D'(z,r))$ (holomorphic in the punctured disk) has an essential singularity at $z$ if and only if $f(D'(z,rho))$ is dense in $mathbb C$ for all $rho in (0,r)$.





      I understand the if part which refers as Casorati–Weierstrass theorem. But in the proof to only if part I am having trouble to fill a gap. The proof proceeds by contradiction.



      If $f$ has a pole or removable singularity at $z$ then $f(w)$ has (finite or infinite) limit as $ w to z$. [This part is OK. The limit would be $0$ if $z$ is removable singularity and infinite if $z$ is a pole.] Then it claims the range $f(D'(z, rho))$ would be obviously not dense. I am having trouble to understand the 'obvious part'.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In Ullrich's Complex Made Simple, Proposition $3.14$ part $ii$ states





      If $f in H(D'(z,r))$ (holomorphic in the punctured disk) has an essential singularity at $z$ if and only if $f(D'(z,rho))$ is dense in $mathbb C$ for all $rho in (0,r)$.





      I understand the if part which refers as Casorati–Weierstrass theorem. But in the proof to only if part I am having trouble to fill a gap. The proof proceeds by contradiction.



      If $f$ has a pole or removable singularity at $z$ then $f(w)$ has (finite or infinite) limit as $ w to z$. [This part is OK. The limit would be $0$ if $z$ is removable singularity and infinite if $z$ is a pole.] Then it claims the range $f(D'(z, rho))$ would be obviously not dense. I am having trouble to understand the 'obvious part'.







      complex-analysis singularity






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 18 '18 at 19:55









      José Carlos Santos

      171k23132240




      171k23132240










      asked Dec 18 '18 at 19:33









      user1101010user1101010

      9011830




      9011830






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Suppose that $lim_{wto z}f(w)=l(inmathbb{C})$. Take $varepsilon>0$. There is the a $delta>0$ such that $lvert w-zrvert<deltawedge wneq zimpliesbigllvert f(w)-lbigrrvert<1$. That is,$$fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)subset D(l,1).$$But then$$overline{fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)}subsetoverline{D(l,1)}varsubsetneqmathbb C.$$Can we deal with case in which $f$ has a pole on $z$ now?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            If the limit is $L$ (finite), then $f(w)$ is within distance $1$ of $L$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$. The disk of radius $1$ around $L$ is not dense in $mathbb C$.
            Similarly, if the limit is $infty$, then $|f(w)| > 1$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045593%2funderstanding-proposition-3-14-in-ullrichs-complex-made-simple%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              Suppose that $lim_{wto z}f(w)=l(inmathbb{C})$. Take $varepsilon>0$. There is the a $delta>0$ such that $lvert w-zrvert<deltawedge wneq zimpliesbigllvert f(w)-lbigrrvert<1$. That is,$$fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)subset D(l,1).$$But then$$overline{fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)}subsetoverline{D(l,1)}varsubsetneqmathbb C.$$Can we deal with case in which $f$ has a pole on $z$ now?






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Suppose that $lim_{wto z}f(w)=l(inmathbb{C})$. Take $varepsilon>0$. There is the a $delta>0$ such that $lvert w-zrvert<deltawedge wneq zimpliesbigllvert f(w)-lbigrrvert<1$. That is,$$fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)subset D(l,1).$$But then$$overline{fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)}subsetoverline{D(l,1)}varsubsetneqmathbb C.$$Can we deal with case in which $f$ has a pole on $z$ now?






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Suppose that $lim_{wto z}f(w)=l(inmathbb{C})$. Take $varepsilon>0$. There is the a $delta>0$ such that $lvert w-zrvert<deltawedge wneq zimpliesbigllvert f(w)-lbigrrvert<1$. That is,$$fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)subset D(l,1).$$But then$$overline{fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)}subsetoverline{D(l,1)}varsubsetneqmathbb C.$$Can we deal with case in which $f$ has a pole on $z$ now?






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Suppose that $lim_{wto z}f(w)=l(inmathbb{C})$. Take $varepsilon>0$. There is the a $delta>0$ such that $lvert w-zrvert<deltawedge wneq zimpliesbigllvert f(w)-lbigrrvert<1$. That is,$$fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)subset D(l,1).$$But then$$overline{fbigl(D'(z,delta)bigr)}subsetoverline{D(l,1)}varsubsetneqmathbb C.$$Can we deal with case in which $f$ has a pole on $z$ now?







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 18 '18 at 19:50









                  José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                  171k23132240




                  171k23132240























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      If the limit is $L$ (finite), then $f(w)$ is within distance $1$ of $L$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$. The disk of radius $1$ around $L$ is not dense in $mathbb C$.
                      Similarly, if the limit is $infty$, then $|f(w)| > 1$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        If the limit is $L$ (finite), then $f(w)$ is within distance $1$ of $L$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$. The disk of radius $1$ around $L$ is not dense in $mathbb C$.
                        Similarly, if the limit is $infty$, then $|f(w)| > 1$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          If the limit is $L$ (finite), then $f(w)$ is within distance $1$ of $L$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$. The disk of radius $1$ around $L$ is not dense in $mathbb C$.
                          Similarly, if the limit is $infty$, then $|f(w)| > 1$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          If the limit is $L$ (finite), then $f(w)$ is within distance $1$ of $L$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$. The disk of radius $1$ around $L$ is not dense in $mathbb C$.
                          Similarly, if the limit is $infty$, then $|f(w)| > 1$ if $w$ is sufficiently close to $z$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 18 '18 at 19:49









                          Robert IsraelRobert Israel

                          330k23218473




                          330k23218473






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045593%2funderstanding-proposition-3-14-in-ullrichs-complex-made-simple%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Plaza Victoria

                              Puebla de Zaragoza

                              Musa