How to best display number of hours
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
What would be a better solution when displaying the number of hours required for some task? For example: 1 hours and 30 minutes, in a short way.
1,5h- as 1 and half hour
1,3h- as 1 hour and 30 minutes
Why I listed those two is because I'd prefer to keep it compact and not take too much space.
time data-display
New contributor
aMJay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
What would be a better solution when displaying the number of hours required for some task? For example: 1 hours and 30 minutes, in a short way.
1,5h- as 1 and half hour
1,3h- as 1 hour and 30 minutes
Why I listed those two is because I'd prefer to keep it compact and not take too much space.
time data-display
New contributor
aMJay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
39
Definitely not1,3h. I almost suffered an aneurysm trying to make heads or tails of that because decimals do not reset at1,59
– MonkeyZeus
20 hours ago
14
I have never seen 1,3h used for 1:30, its would be confusing as hell. 1,5h is 1:30, or just stick to 1:30 notation, or add suffixes e.g. 1h 30m.
– Polygnome
20 hours ago
15
In which locale does "1,3h" mean 1 hour and 30 minutes?
– xehpuk
19 hours ago
3
Decimal times like 1,3h (1h18m) are used in German Industrieminuten ("industrial minutes"), mostly for time keeping. It was supposedly easier to handle in early timekeeping system (before computers were used) but I don't see any advantage today. It is confusing to calculate. You have to multiply the decimals by a factor of 6 to get real minutes. Also the notation is also not always that compact. 1h15 is 1,25 - so you don't save much space.
– kapex
16 hours ago
4
Note that, in English, the decimal separator is the period, not the comma.
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
What would be a better solution when displaying the number of hours required for some task? For example: 1 hours and 30 minutes, in a short way.
1,5h- as 1 and half hour
1,3h- as 1 hour and 30 minutes
Why I listed those two is because I'd prefer to keep it compact and not take too much space.
time data-display
New contributor
aMJay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
What would be a better solution when displaying the number of hours required for some task? For example: 1 hours and 30 minutes, in a short way.
1,5h- as 1 and half hour
1,3h- as 1 hour and 30 minutes
Why I listed those two is because I'd prefer to keep it compact and not take too much space.
time data-display
time data-display
New contributor
aMJay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
aMJay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 6 hours ago
Agi Hammerthief
257110
257110
New contributor
aMJay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
aMJay
1287
1287
New contributor
aMJay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
aMJay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
aMJay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
39
Definitely not1,3h. I almost suffered an aneurysm trying to make heads or tails of that because decimals do not reset at1,59
– MonkeyZeus
20 hours ago
14
I have never seen 1,3h used for 1:30, its would be confusing as hell. 1,5h is 1:30, or just stick to 1:30 notation, or add suffixes e.g. 1h 30m.
– Polygnome
20 hours ago
15
In which locale does "1,3h" mean 1 hour and 30 minutes?
– xehpuk
19 hours ago
3
Decimal times like 1,3h (1h18m) are used in German Industrieminuten ("industrial minutes"), mostly for time keeping. It was supposedly easier to handle in early timekeeping system (before computers were used) but I don't see any advantage today. It is confusing to calculate. You have to multiply the decimals by a factor of 6 to get real minutes. Also the notation is also not always that compact. 1h15 is 1,25 - so you don't save much space.
– kapex
16 hours ago
4
Note that, in English, the decimal separator is the period, not the comma.
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
39
Definitely not1,3h. I almost suffered an aneurysm trying to make heads or tails of that because decimals do not reset at1,59
– MonkeyZeus
20 hours ago
14
I have never seen 1,3h used for 1:30, its would be confusing as hell. 1,5h is 1:30, or just stick to 1:30 notation, or add suffixes e.g. 1h 30m.
– Polygnome
20 hours ago
15
In which locale does "1,3h" mean 1 hour and 30 minutes?
– xehpuk
19 hours ago
3
Decimal times like 1,3h (1h18m) are used in German Industrieminuten ("industrial minutes"), mostly for time keeping. It was supposedly easier to handle in early timekeeping system (before computers were used) but I don't see any advantage today. It is confusing to calculate. You have to multiply the decimals by a factor of 6 to get real minutes. Also the notation is also not always that compact. 1h15 is 1,25 - so you don't save much space.
– kapex
16 hours ago
4
Note that, in English, the decimal separator is the period, not the comma.
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
39
39
Definitely not
1,3h. I almost suffered an aneurysm trying to make heads or tails of that because decimals do not reset at 1,59– MonkeyZeus
20 hours ago
Definitely not
1,3h. I almost suffered an aneurysm trying to make heads or tails of that because decimals do not reset at 1,59– MonkeyZeus
20 hours ago
14
14
I have never seen 1,3h used for 1:30, its would be confusing as hell. 1,5h is 1:30, or just stick to 1:30 notation, or add suffixes e.g. 1h 30m.
– Polygnome
20 hours ago
I have never seen 1,3h used for 1:30, its would be confusing as hell. 1,5h is 1:30, or just stick to 1:30 notation, or add suffixes e.g. 1h 30m.
– Polygnome
20 hours ago
15
15
In which locale does "1,3h" mean 1 hour and 30 minutes?
– xehpuk
19 hours ago
In which locale does "1,3h" mean 1 hour and 30 minutes?
– xehpuk
19 hours ago
3
3
Decimal times like 1,3h (1h18m) are used in German Industrieminuten ("industrial minutes"), mostly for time keeping. It was supposedly easier to handle in early timekeeping system (before computers were used) but I don't see any advantage today. It is confusing to calculate. You have to multiply the decimals by a factor of 6 to get real minutes. Also the notation is also not always that compact. 1h15 is 1,25 - so you don't save much space.
– kapex
16 hours ago
Decimal times like 1,3h (1h18m) are used in German Industrieminuten ("industrial minutes"), mostly for time keeping. It was supposedly easier to handle in early timekeeping system (before computers were used) but I don't see any advantage today. It is confusing to calculate. You have to multiply the decimals by a factor of 6 to get real minutes. Also the notation is also not always that compact. 1h15 is 1,25 - so you don't save much space.
– kapex
16 hours ago
4
4
Note that, in English, the decimal separator is the period, not the comma.
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
Note that, in English, the decimal separator is the period, not the comma.
– David Richerby
16 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
36
down vote
accepted
Jira has a great and clear way of doing this when entering time estimates in the task estimate field, simply using 1 letter after the weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m).

By not allowing a user to enter decimals, visualizing and reading the data is much easier.
For example, if a user adds 1,50h would they mean 1 hour and 50 minutes or 1 hour and 30 minutes? Jira solves this cleverly by chopping it up in the various units directly.
Examples of what can be entered:
- 1w 4d 1h 30m
- 4d 1h 30m
- 1h 30m
- 1h
- 30m
You can specify a time unit after a time value 'X', such as Xw, Xd, Xh
or Xm, to represent weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m),
respectively.
From Jiras logging work and time tracking guides
This may differ with each organisation depending on how they set it but its a good, clear example of this.
5
I believe if you do enter1.5h(or with a comma, depending on locale) it does treat that as one-and-a-half hours, but (IIRC) converts it immediately to1h 30mto remove any ambiguity (might vary by version, but I seem to remember being able to do this).
– TripeHound
23 hours ago
3
Beware that such time units don't translate well, especially to non-latin-based languages.
– Jonathan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Standard format for time (and time intervals less than 24 hours in duration) is set by ISO 8601.
Using extended format (hh:mm[:ss]) fits best (note :!), clearly conveying time nature of the value.
From my experience, even though it says:
Decimal fractions may be added to any of the three time elements. However, a fraction may only be added to the lowest order time element in the representation..
using a fraction may lead to ambiguous interpretation.
HH:mm gives you shortest (only 5 charachters in width) and cleanest widely recognizable format.
2
With respect to the last paragraph, this is also the shortest unambiguous way if you want to handle all common intervals less than 24h.10.25is the same number of characters as10:15, but10.25could also be read as10:25. Unicode supports fractions equivalent to 30, 20, 15, 12, 10 and 6 minute intervals, but "1⅖ hours" isn't all that helpful, and you can't do 5 minutes, only 6: "⅒ hour", so this approach isn't much use
– Chris H
4 hours ago
1
It's not cleanest and it's not unambiguous because HH:mm is often indistinguishable from mm:ss. That's why we prefer letter suffixes when i18n isn't a concern. When it is, you'll want some different scheme entirely.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I don't have enough reputation to comment so this answer is intended to add additional context to Astrogator's (Though I do think that Owen Hughes has provided the best answer from a UI perspective).
Astrogator's answer is misleading in that it conflates "time" (the absolute value of the time of day in a given time zone) with "duration" (the amount of time that something may take to complete)
ISO 8601 defines the following standard format for a time duration:
PnYnMnDTnHnMnS
where:
- P denotes that this is a duration (period) of time
- n is the amount of that size interval that is included
- Y/M/D designate Years, Months and Days respectively (also W for Week)
- T separates the day and larger units from sub-day units (time)
- H/M/S designate Hours, Minutes and Seconds respectively
- Any unit with a zero value can be excluded (eg. P1D can be read as P0Y0M1DT0H0M0S) so long as at least one is included (eg. P is not valid for a zero-length period but P0S is)
In addition T must be included if the days and lager are zero in order to avoid ambiguity, this means that P1M describes 1 Month while PT1M describes 1 minute. Decimals are also accepted as P1.5H = P1H30M. It is valid as well to include a value greater than the size of the next unit, with the caution that P1DT1H and P25H may not be the same where the interval falls over a change in daylight-savings time - a duration of P1D takes you to the same time the following day but a duration of P24D would have an extra hour consumed or an hour skipped leaving you an hour different.
The end result of all this is that the ISO standard description of a 1 hour 30 minute duration would be P1H30M. However, whilst this format is great if you are familiar with the standard, it is obtuse to unfamiliar users and I believe as a result that the Jira approach recommended by Owen Hughes is the best approach for your use-case.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
1:30 hrs
I most commonly see time with colon characters, for example: "1:30 hrs" to mean 1 hour and 30 minutes. I think this is even the format that my car sat nav displays.
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
36
down vote
accepted
Jira has a great and clear way of doing this when entering time estimates in the task estimate field, simply using 1 letter after the weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m).

By not allowing a user to enter decimals, visualizing and reading the data is much easier.
For example, if a user adds 1,50h would they mean 1 hour and 50 minutes or 1 hour and 30 minutes? Jira solves this cleverly by chopping it up in the various units directly.
Examples of what can be entered:
- 1w 4d 1h 30m
- 4d 1h 30m
- 1h 30m
- 1h
- 30m
You can specify a time unit after a time value 'X', such as Xw, Xd, Xh
or Xm, to represent weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m),
respectively.
From Jiras logging work and time tracking guides
This may differ with each organisation depending on how they set it but its a good, clear example of this.
5
I believe if you do enter1.5h(or with a comma, depending on locale) it does treat that as one-and-a-half hours, but (IIRC) converts it immediately to1h 30mto remove any ambiguity (might vary by version, but I seem to remember being able to do this).
– TripeHound
23 hours ago
3
Beware that such time units don't translate well, especially to non-latin-based languages.
– Jonathan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
36
down vote
accepted
Jira has a great and clear way of doing this when entering time estimates in the task estimate field, simply using 1 letter after the weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m).

By not allowing a user to enter decimals, visualizing and reading the data is much easier.
For example, if a user adds 1,50h would they mean 1 hour and 50 minutes or 1 hour and 30 minutes? Jira solves this cleverly by chopping it up in the various units directly.
Examples of what can be entered:
- 1w 4d 1h 30m
- 4d 1h 30m
- 1h 30m
- 1h
- 30m
You can specify a time unit after a time value 'X', such as Xw, Xd, Xh
or Xm, to represent weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m),
respectively.
From Jiras logging work and time tracking guides
This may differ with each organisation depending on how they set it but its a good, clear example of this.
5
I believe if you do enter1.5h(or with a comma, depending on locale) it does treat that as one-and-a-half hours, but (IIRC) converts it immediately to1h 30mto remove any ambiguity (might vary by version, but I seem to remember being able to do this).
– TripeHound
23 hours ago
3
Beware that such time units don't translate well, especially to non-latin-based languages.
– Jonathan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
36
down vote
accepted
up vote
36
down vote
accepted
Jira has a great and clear way of doing this when entering time estimates in the task estimate field, simply using 1 letter after the weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m).

By not allowing a user to enter decimals, visualizing and reading the data is much easier.
For example, if a user adds 1,50h would they mean 1 hour and 50 minutes or 1 hour and 30 minutes? Jira solves this cleverly by chopping it up in the various units directly.
Examples of what can be entered:
- 1w 4d 1h 30m
- 4d 1h 30m
- 1h 30m
- 1h
- 30m
You can specify a time unit after a time value 'X', such as Xw, Xd, Xh
or Xm, to represent weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m),
respectively.
From Jiras logging work and time tracking guides
This may differ with each organisation depending on how they set it but its a good, clear example of this.
Jira has a great and clear way of doing this when entering time estimates in the task estimate field, simply using 1 letter after the weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m).

By not allowing a user to enter decimals, visualizing and reading the data is much easier.
For example, if a user adds 1,50h would they mean 1 hour and 50 minutes or 1 hour and 30 minutes? Jira solves this cleverly by chopping it up in the various units directly.
Examples of what can be entered:
- 1w 4d 1h 30m
- 4d 1h 30m
- 1h 30m
- 1h
- 30m
You can specify a time unit after a time value 'X', such as Xw, Xd, Xh
or Xm, to represent weeks (w), days (d), hours (h) and minutes (m),
respectively.
From Jiras logging work and time tracking guides
This may differ with each organisation depending on how they set it but its a good, clear example of this.
edited 23 hours ago
Matthijs Mali
390112
390112
answered 23 hours ago
Owen Hughes
2,102819
2,102819
5
I believe if you do enter1.5h(or with a comma, depending on locale) it does treat that as one-and-a-half hours, but (IIRC) converts it immediately to1h 30mto remove any ambiguity (might vary by version, but I seem to remember being able to do this).
– TripeHound
23 hours ago
3
Beware that such time units don't translate well, especially to non-latin-based languages.
– Jonathan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
5
I believe if you do enter1.5h(or with a comma, depending on locale) it does treat that as one-and-a-half hours, but (IIRC) converts it immediately to1h 30mto remove any ambiguity (might vary by version, but I seem to remember being able to do this).
– TripeHound
23 hours ago
3
Beware that such time units don't translate well, especially to non-latin-based languages.
– Jonathan
4 hours ago
5
5
I believe if you do enter
1.5h (or with a comma, depending on locale) it does treat that as one-and-a-half hours, but (IIRC) converts it immediately to 1h 30m to remove any ambiguity (might vary by version, but I seem to remember being able to do this).– TripeHound
23 hours ago
I believe if you do enter
1.5h (or with a comma, depending on locale) it does treat that as one-and-a-half hours, but (IIRC) converts it immediately to 1h 30m to remove any ambiguity (might vary by version, but I seem to remember being able to do this).– TripeHound
23 hours ago
3
3
Beware that such time units don't translate well, especially to non-latin-based languages.
– Jonathan
4 hours ago
Beware that such time units don't translate well, especially to non-latin-based languages.
– Jonathan
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Standard format for time (and time intervals less than 24 hours in duration) is set by ISO 8601.
Using extended format (hh:mm[:ss]) fits best (note :!), clearly conveying time nature of the value.
From my experience, even though it says:
Decimal fractions may be added to any of the three time elements. However, a fraction may only be added to the lowest order time element in the representation..
using a fraction may lead to ambiguous interpretation.
HH:mm gives you shortest (only 5 charachters in width) and cleanest widely recognizable format.
2
With respect to the last paragraph, this is also the shortest unambiguous way if you want to handle all common intervals less than 24h.10.25is the same number of characters as10:15, but10.25could also be read as10:25. Unicode supports fractions equivalent to 30, 20, 15, 12, 10 and 6 minute intervals, but "1⅖ hours" isn't all that helpful, and you can't do 5 minutes, only 6: "⅒ hour", so this approach isn't much use
– Chris H
4 hours ago
1
It's not cleanest and it's not unambiguous because HH:mm is often indistinguishable from mm:ss. That's why we prefer letter suffixes when i18n isn't a concern. When it is, you'll want some different scheme entirely.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Standard format for time (and time intervals less than 24 hours in duration) is set by ISO 8601.
Using extended format (hh:mm[:ss]) fits best (note :!), clearly conveying time nature of the value.
From my experience, even though it says:
Decimal fractions may be added to any of the three time elements. However, a fraction may only be added to the lowest order time element in the representation..
using a fraction may lead to ambiguous interpretation.
HH:mm gives you shortest (only 5 charachters in width) and cleanest widely recognizable format.
2
With respect to the last paragraph, this is also the shortest unambiguous way if you want to handle all common intervals less than 24h.10.25is the same number of characters as10:15, but10.25could also be read as10:25. Unicode supports fractions equivalent to 30, 20, 15, 12, 10 and 6 minute intervals, but "1⅖ hours" isn't all that helpful, and you can't do 5 minutes, only 6: "⅒ hour", so this approach isn't much use
– Chris H
4 hours ago
1
It's not cleanest and it's not unambiguous because HH:mm is often indistinguishable from mm:ss. That's why we prefer letter suffixes when i18n isn't a concern. When it is, you'll want some different scheme entirely.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
Standard format for time (and time intervals less than 24 hours in duration) is set by ISO 8601.
Using extended format (hh:mm[:ss]) fits best (note :!), clearly conveying time nature of the value.
From my experience, even though it says:
Decimal fractions may be added to any of the three time elements. However, a fraction may only be added to the lowest order time element in the representation..
using a fraction may lead to ambiguous interpretation.
HH:mm gives you shortest (only 5 charachters in width) and cleanest widely recognizable format.
Standard format for time (and time intervals less than 24 hours in duration) is set by ISO 8601.
Using extended format (hh:mm[:ss]) fits best (note :!), clearly conveying time nature of the value.
From my experience, even though it says:
Decimal fractions may be added to any of the three time elements. However, a fraction may only be added to the lowest order time element in the representation..
using a fraction may lead to ambiguous interpretation.
HH:mm gives you shortest (only 5 charachters in width) and cleanest widely recognizable format.
answered 19 hours ago
Astrogator
22913
22913
2
With respect to the last paragraph, this is also the shortest unambiguous way if you want to handle all common intervals less than 24h.10.25is the same number of characters as10:15, but10.25could also be read as10:25. Unicode supports fractions equivalent to 30, 20, 15, 12, 10 and 6 minute intervals, but "1⅖ hours" isn't all that helpful, and you can't do 5 minutes, only 6: "⅒ hour", so this approach isn't much use
– Chris H
4 hours ago
1
It's not cleanest and it's not unambiguous because HH:mm is often indistinguishable from mm:ss. That's why we prefer letter suffixes when i18n isn't a concern. When it is, you'll want some different scheme entirely.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
With respect to the last paragraph, this is also the shortest unambiguous way if you want to handle all common intervals less than 24h.10.25is the same number of characters as10:15, but10.25could also be read as10:25. Unicode supports fractions equivalent to 30, 20, 15, 12, 10 and 6 minute intervals, but "1⅖ hours" isn't all that helpful, and you can't do 5 minutes, only 6: "⅒ hour", so this approach isn't much use
– Chris H
4 hours ago
1
It's not cleanest and it's not unambiguous because HH:mm is often indistinguishable from mm:ss. That's why we prefer letter suffixes when i18n isn't a concern. When it is, you'll want some different scheme entirely.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 hours ago
2
2
With respect to the last paragraph, this is also the shortest unambiguous way if you want to handle all common intervals less than 24h.
10.25 is the same number of characters as 10:15, but 10.25 could also be read as 10:25. Unicode supports fractions equivalent to 30, 20, 15, 12, 10 and 6 minute intervals, but "1⅖ hours" isn't all that helpful, and you can't do 5 minutes, only 6: "⅒ hour", so this approach isn't much use– Chris H
4 hours ago
With respect to the last paragraph, this is also the shortest unambiguous way if you want to handle all common intervals less than 24h.
10.25 is the same number of characters as 10:15, but 10.25 could also be read as 10:25. Unicode supports fractions equivalent to 30, 20, 15, 12, 10 and 6 minute intervals, but "1⅖ hours" isn't all that helpful, and you can't do 5 minutes, only 6: "⅒ hour", so this approach isn't much use– Chris H
4 hours ago
1
1
It's not cleanest and it's not unambiguous because HH:mm is often indistinguishable from mm:ss. That's why we prefer letter suffixes when i18n isn't a concern. When it is, you'll want some different scheme entirely.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 hours ago
It's not cleanest and it's not unambiguous because HH:mm is often indistinguishable from mm:ss. That's why we prefer letter suffixes when i18n isn't a concern. When it is, you'll want some different scheme entirely.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I don't have enough reputation to comment so this answer is intended to add additional context to Astrogator's (Though I do think that Owen Hughes has provided the best answer from a UI perspective).
Astrogator's answer is misleading in that it conflates "time" (the absolute value of the time of day in a given time zone) with "duration" (the amount of time that something may take to complete)
ISO 8601 defines the following standard format for a time duration:
PnYnMnDTnHnMnS
where:
- P denotes that this is a duration (period) of time
- n is the amount of that size interval that is included
- Y/M/D designate Years, Months and Days respectively (also W for Week)
- T separates the day and larger units from sub-day units (time)
- H/M/S designate Hours, Minutes and Seconds respectively
- Any unit with a zero value can be excluded (eg. P1D can be read as P0Y0M1DT0H0M0S) so long as at least one is included (eg. P is not valid for a zero-length period but P0S is)
In addition T must be included if the days and lager are zero in order to avoid ambiguity, this means that P1M describes 1 Month while PT1M describes 1 minute. Decimals are also accepted as P1.5H = P1H30M. It is valid as well to include a value greater than the size of the next unit, with the caution that P1DT1H and P25H may not be the same where the interval falls over a change in daylight-savings time - a duration of P1D takes you to the same time the following day but a duration of P24D would have an extra hour consumed or an hour skipped leaving you an hour different.
The end result of all this is that the ISO standard description of a 1 hour 30 minute duration would be P1H30M. However, whilst this format is great if you are familiar with the standard, it is obtuse to unfamiliar users and I believe as a result that the Jira approach recommended by Owen Hughes is the best approach for your use-case.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I don't have enough reputation to comment so this answer is intended to add additional context to Astrogator's (Though I do think that Owen Hughes has provided the best answer from a UI perspective).
Astrogator's answer is misleading in that it conflates "time" (the absolute value of the time of day in a given time zone) with "duration" (the amount of time that something may take to complete)
ISO 8601 defines the following standard format for a time duration:
PnYnMnDTnHnMnS
where:
- P denotes that this is a duration (period) of time
- n is the amount of that size interval that is included
- Y/M/D designate Years, Months and Days respectively (also W for Week)
- T separates the day and larger units from sub-day units (time)
- H/M/S designate Hours, Minutes and Seconds respectively
- Any unit with a zero value can be excluded (eg. P1D can be read as P0Y0M1DT0H0M0S) so long as at least one is included (eg. P is not valid for a zero-length period but P0S is)
In addition T must be included if the days and lager are zero in order to avoid ambiguity, this means that P1M describes 1 Month while PT1M describes 1 minute. Decimals are also accepted as P1.5H = P1H30M. It is valid as well to include a value greater than the size of the next unit, with the caution that P1DT1H and P25H may not be the same where the interval falls over a change in daylight-savings time - a duration of P1D takes you to the same time the following day but a duration of P24D would have an extra hour consumed or an hour skipped leaving you an hour different.
The end result of all this is that the ISO standard description of a 1 hour 30 minute duration would be P1H30M. However, whilst this format is great if you are familiar with the standard, it is obtuse to unfamiliar users and I believe as a result that the Jira approach recommended by Owen Hughes is the best approach for your use-case.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I don't have enough reputation to comment so this answer is intended to add additional context to Astrogator's (Though I do think that Owen Hughes has provided the best answer from a UI perspective).
Astrogator's answer is misleading in that it conflates "time" (the absolute value of the time of day in a given time zone) with "duration" (the amount of time that something may take to complete)
ISO 8601 defines the following standard format for a time duration:
PnYnMnDTnHnMnS
where:
- P denotes that this is a duration (period) of time
- n is the amount of that size interval that is included
- Y/M/D designate Years, Months and Days respectively (also W for Week)
- T separates the day and larger units from sub-day units (time)
- H/M/S designate Hours, Minutes and Seconds respectively
- Any unit with a zero value can be excluded (eg. P1D can be read as P0Y0M1DT0H0M0S) so long as at least one is included (eg. P is not valid for a zero-length period but P0S is)
In addition T must be included if the days and lager are zero in order to avoid ambiguity, this means that P1M describes 1 Month while PT1M describes 1 minute. Decimals are also accepted as P1.5H = P1H30M. It is valid as well to include a value greater than the size of the next unit, with the caution that P1DT1H and P25H may not be the same where the interval falls over a change in daylight-savings time - a duration of P1D takes you to the same time the following day but a duration of P24D would have an extra hour consumed or an hour skipped leaving you an hour different.
The end result of all this is that the ISO standard description of a 1 hour 30 minute duration would be P1H30M. However, whilst this format is great if you are familiar with the standard, it is obtuse to unfamiliar users and I believe as a result that the Jira approach recommended by Owen Hughes is the best approach for your use-case.
I don't have enough reputation to comment so this answer is intended to add additional context to Astrogator's (Though I do think that Owen Hughes has provided the best answer from a UI perspective).
Astrogator's answer is misleading in that it conflates "time" (the absolute value of the time of day in a given time zone) with "duration" (the amount of time that something may take to complete)
ISO 8601 defines the following standard format for a time duration:
PnYnMnDTnHnMnS
where:
- P denotes that this is a duration (period) of time
- n is the amount of that size interval that is included
- Y/M/D designate Years, Months and Days respectively (also W for Week)
- T separates the day and larger units from sub-day units (time)
- H/M/S designate Hours, Minutes and Seconds respectively
- Any unit with a zero value can be excluded (eg. P1D can be read as P0Y0M1DT0H0M0S) so long as at least one is included (eg. P is not valid for a zero-length period but P0S is)
In addition T must be included if the days and lager are zero in order to avoid ambiguity, this means that P1M describes 1 Month while PT1M describes 1 minute. Decimals are also accepted as P1.5H = P1H30M. It is valid as well to include a value greater than the size of the next unit, with the caution that P1DT1H and P25H may not be the same where the interval falls over a change in daylight-savings time - a duration of P1D takes you to the same time the following day but a duration of P24D would have an extra hour consumed or an hour skipped leaving you an hour different.
The end result of all this is that the ISO standard description of a 1 hour 30 minute duration would be P1H30M. However, whilst this format is great if you are familiar with the standard, it is obtuse to unfamiliar users and I believe as a result that the Jira approach recommended by Owen Hughes is the best approach for your use-case.
answered 1 hour ago
lakevna
312
312
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
1:30 hrs
I most commonly see time with colon characters, for example: "1:30 hrs" to mean 1 hour and 30 minutes. I think this is even the format that my car sat nav displays.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
1:30 hrs
I most commonly see time with colon characters, for example: "1:30 hrs" to mean 1 hour and 30 minutes. I think this is even the format that my car sat nav displays.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
1:30 hrs
I most commonly see time with colon characters, for example: "1:30 hrs" to mean 1 hour and 30 minutes. I think this is even the format that my car sat nav displays.
1:30 hrs
I most commonly see time with colon characters, for example: "1:30 hrs" to mean 1 hour and 30 minutes. I think this is even the format that my car sat nav displays.
answered 54 mins ago
StalePhish
1012
1012
add a comment |
add a comment |
aMJay is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
aMJay is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
aMJay is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
aMJay is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fux.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122135%2fhow-to-best-display-number-of-hours%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
39
Definitely not
1,3h. I almost suffered an aneurysm trying to make heads or tails of that because decimals do not reset at1,59– MonkeyZeus
20 hours ago
14
I have never seen 1,3h used for 1:30, its would be confusing as hell. 1,5h is 1:30, or just stick to 1:30 notation, or add suffixes e.g. 1h 30m.
– Polygnome
20 hours ago
15
In which locale does "1,3h" mean 1 hour and 30 minutes?
– xehpuk
19 hours ago
3
Decimal times like 1,3h (1h18m) are used in German Industrieminuten ("industrial minutes"), mostly for time keeping. It was supposedly easier to handle in early timekeeping system (before computers were used) but I don't see any advantage today. It is confusing to calculate. You have to multiply the decimals by a factor of 6 to get real minutes. Also the notation is also not always that compact. 1h15 is 1,25 - so you don't save much space.
– kapex
16 hours ago
4
Note that, in English, the decimal separator is the period, not the comma.
– David Richerby
16 hours ago