large x and small x expansion for gamma-like function











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Find two approximations for the integral ($x>0$)
begin{equation}
I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta
end{equation}

one for small $x$ (keeping up to linear order in $x$) and one for large values of $x$ (keeping only the leading order term).





For the small x expansion, I tried using a Maclaurin series for the function in the exponential, and it seemed to work...I am unsure what to do for large x or how to check my answer. I know this is likely related to the Gamma/Gaussian function, but am fairly novice at problems of this form. Any help deeply appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 17 at 21:48












  • Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
    – niagarajohn
    Nov 17 at 21:52






  • 1




    Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 17 at 21:53










  • Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
    – Antonio Vargas
    Nov 18 at 3:13










  • My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
    – niagarajohn
    Nov 18 at 14:53

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Find two approximations for the integral ($x>0$)
begin{equation}
I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta
end{equation}

one for small $x$ (keeping up to linear order in $x$) and one for large values of $x$ (keeping only the leading order term).





For the small x expansion, I tried using a Maclaurin series for the function in the exponential, and it seemed to work...I am unsure what to do for large x or how to check my answer. I know this is likely related to the Gamma/Gaussian function, but am fairly novice at problems of this form. Any help deeply appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 17 at 21:48












  • Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
    – niagarajohn
    Nov 17 at 21:52






  • 1




    Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 17 at 21:53










  • Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
    – Antonio Vargas
    Nov 18 at 3:13










  • My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
    – niagarajohn
    Nov 18 at 14:53















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





Find two approximations for the integral ($x>0$)
begin{equation}
I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta
end{equation}

one for small $x$ (keeping up to linear order in $x$) and one for large values of $x$ (keeping only the leading order term).





For the small x expansion, I tried using a Maclaurin series for the function in the exponential, and it seemed to work...I am unsure what to do for large x or how to check my answer. I know this is likely related to the Gamma/Gaussian function, but am fairly novice at problems of this form. Any help deeply appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question















Find two approximations for the integral ($x>0$)
begin{equation}
I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta
end{equation}

one for small $x$ (keeping up to linear order in $x$) and one for large values of $x$ (keeping only the leading order term).





For the small x expansion, I tried using a Maclaurin series for the function in the exponential, and it seemed to work...I am unsure what to do for large x or how to check my answer. I know this is likely related to the Gamma/Gaussian function, but am fairly novice at problems of this form. Any help deeply appreciated!







sequences-and-series complex-analysis asymptotics gamma-function






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 0:52

























asked Nov 17 at 21:44









niagarajohn

186




186








  • 1




    For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 17 at 21:48












  • Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
    – niagarajohn
    Nov 17 at 21:52






  • 1




    Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 17 at 21:53










  • Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
    – Antonio Vargas
    Nov 18 at 3:13










  • My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
    – niagarajohn
    Nov 18 at 14:53
















  • 1




    For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 17 at 21:48












  • Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
    – niagarajohn
    Nov 17 at 21:52






  • 1




    Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 17 at 21:53










  • Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
    – Antonio Vargas
    Nov 18 at 3:13










  • My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
    – niagarajohn
    Nov 18 at 14:53










1




1




For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:48






For large $x$ check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_method
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:48














Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 21:52




Thanks @Yuriy. I haven't been exposed to this method, so I think I'd like to solve using asymptotic series. Still working through a few trials, but am interested in easier ways to solve problems like these outside of my current situation.
– niagarajohn
Nov 17 at 21:52




1




1




Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:53




Laplace's method is the standard one for such situations, and it's really simple. But of course, you can choose to try some other way
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 21:53












Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
– Antonio Vargas
Nov 18 at 3:13




Seconding @Yuriy's suggestion.
– Antonio Vargas
Nov 18 at 3:13












My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:53






My attempt for small x: begin{align} I(x) &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + xcos^2{theta} + order{x^2}]\ &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}} dtheta [1 + frac{x}{2}(1+cos{2theta}) + order{x^2}]\ &approx frac{1}{2pi} [pi + frac{x}{2}(pi)] end{align} Therefore, begin{align} &boxed{ I(x)approx frac{1}{2} + frac{x}{4} text{for small $x$}} end{align}
– niagarajohn
Nov 18 at 14:53












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.



Let's transform the integral first:



$$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$



Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).



Using the notation from the article, we have:



$$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$



Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.



Then we can represent:



$$int_0^1
frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    How about this:
    $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
    $$theta=pi/2-phi$$
    $$dtheta=-dphi$$
    $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$



    EDIT:



    taking the other approach, I have:
    $$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
    then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
    $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
    now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
    $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
    which can be re-written as:
    $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
    if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
    $$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
    so:
    $$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      How does this help find the asymptotic?
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 17 at 21:58










    • You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
      – Henry Lee
      Nov 17 at 21:59






    • 1




      I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
      – niagarajohn
      Nov 17 at 23:26










    • ^That didn't work...
      – niagarajohn
      Nov 18 at 14:56










    • Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
      – Henry Lee
      Nov 18 at 15:35











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002851%2flarge-x-and-small-x-expansion-for-gamma-like-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.



    Let's transform the integral first:



    $$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
    e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
    e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
    e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
    frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
    frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$



    Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).



    Using the notation from the article, we have:



    $$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$



    Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.



    Then we can represent:



    $$int_0^1
    frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.



      Let's transform the integral first:



      $$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
      e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
      e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
      e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
      frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
      frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$



      Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).



      Using the notation from the article, we have:



      $$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$



      Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.



      Then we can represent:



      $$int_0^1
      frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.



        Let's transform the integral first:



        $$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
        e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
        e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
        e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
        frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
        frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$



        Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).



        Using the notation from the article, we have:



        $$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$



        Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.



        Then we can represent:



        $$int_0^1
        frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        For large $x$, Laplace's method seems like the best option. Or its counterpart, the Watson's lemma.



        Let's transform the integral first:



        $$ I(x) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^{frac{pi}{2}}
        e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta =frac{1}{pi}int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
        e^{x cos^2(theta)}dtheta=frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^{frac{pi}{2}}
        e^{-x sin^2(theta)}dtheta= \ =frac{e^{x}}{pi} int_0^1
        frac{e^{-x s^2}}{sqrt{1-s^2}} d s=frac{e^{x}}{2pi} int_0^1
        frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t$$



        Now for the latter integral, the main contribution for $x to infty$ will be given by $t to0$. And the form of it allows us to use the Watson's lemma directly (see the Wikipedia link).



        Using the notation from the article, we have:



        $$phi(t)=frac{1}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}}=t^{-1/2} g(t)$$



        Where $g(t)$ can be expanded into Taylor series around $0$. Additionally, $int_0^1 |phi(t)| dt=pi<infty$. So the lemma conditions are satisfied.



        Then we can represent:



        $$int_0^1
        frac{e^{-x t}}{sqrt{t}sqrt{1-t}} d t asymp sum_{n=0}^infty frac{Gamma(n+1/2) g^{(n)}(0)}{n! ~x^{n+1/2}} $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 19 at 11:31

























        answered Nov 19 at 10:59









        Yuriy S

        15.4k433115




        15.4k433115






















            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            How about this:
            $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
            $$theta=pi/2-phi$$
            $$dtheta=-dphi$$
            $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$



            EDIT:



            taking the other approach, I have:
            $$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
            then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
            now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
            which can be re-written as:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
            if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
            $$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
            so:
            $$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              How does this help find the asymptotic?
              – Yuriy S
              Nov 17 at 21:58










            • You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
              – Henry Lee
              Nov 17 at 21:59






            • 1




              I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
              – niagarajohn
              Nov 17 at 23:26










            • ^That didn't work...
              – niagarajohn
              Nov 18 at 14:56










            • Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
              – Henry Lee
              Nov 18 at 15:35















            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            How about this:
            $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
            $$theta=pi/2-phi$$
            $$dtheta=-dphi$$
            $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$



            EDIT:



            taking the other approach, I have:
            $$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
            then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
            now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
            which can be re-written as:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
            if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
            $$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
            so:
            $$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              How does this help find the asymptotic?
              – Yuriy S
              Nov 17 at 21:58










            • You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
              – Henry Lee
              Nov 17 at 21:59






            • 1




              I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
              – niagarajohn
              Nov 17 at 23:26










            • ^That didn't work...
              – niagarajohn
              Nov 18 at 14:56










            • Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
              – Henry Lee
              Nov 18 at 15:35













            up vote
            -1
            down vote










            up vote
            -1
            down vote









            How about this:
            $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
            $$theta=pi/2-phi$$
            $$dtheta=-dphi$$
            $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$



            EDIT:



            taking the other approach, I have:
            $$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
            then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
            now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
            which can be re-written as:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
            if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
            $$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
            so:
            $$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            How about this:
            $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}e^{x(1-sin^2theta)}dtheta$$
            $$theta=pi/2-phi$$
            $$dtheta=-dphi$$
            $$I(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_0^pi e^{xsin^2phi}dphi$$



            EDIT:



            taking the other approach, I have:
            $$I'(x)=frac{1}{2pi}int_{-pi/2}^{pi/2}cos^2theta e^{xcos^2theta}dtheta$$
            then using $u=costheta$ you can obtain:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1frac{u^2}{sqrt{1-u^2}}e^{xu^2}du$$
            now using $v=sqrt{1-u^2}$ we can get:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{x(1-v^2)}dv$$
            which can be re-written as:
            $$I'(x)=frac1piint_0^1sqrt{1-v^2}e^{-(sqrt{x}v)^2}dv$$
            if you continue and differentiate once again you get:
            $$I''(x)=frac{1}{2pi x^2}int_0^xbeta e^beta dbeta$$
            so:
            $$I(x)=frac1{2pi}iintfrac{(x-1)e^x+1}{x^2}dxdx$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 18 at 17:08

























            answered Nov 17 at 21:57









            Henry Lee

            1,684218




            1,684218








            • 1




              How does this help find the asymptotic?
              – Yuriy S
              Nov 17 at 21:58










            • You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
              – Henry Lee
              Nov 17 at 21:59






            • 1




              I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
              – niagarajohn
              Nov 17 at 23:26










            • ^That didn't work...
              – niagarajohn
              Nov 18 at 14:56










            • Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
              – Henry Lee
              Nov 18 at 15:35














            • 1




              How does this help find the asymptotic?
              – Yuriy S
              Nov 17 at 21:58










            • You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
              – Henry Lee
              Nov 17 at 21:59






            • 1




              I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
              – niagarajohn
              Nov 17 at 23:26










            • ^That didn't work...
              – niagarajohn
              Nov 18 at 14:56










            • Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
              – Henry Lee
              Nov 18 at 15:35








            1




            1




            How does this help find the asymptotic?
            – Yuriy S
            Nov 17 at 21:58




            How does this help find the asymptotic?
            – Yuriy S
            Nov 17 at 21:58












            You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
            – Henry Lee
            Nov 17 at 21:59




            You could try to get a term for $I^2(x)$ then use polar coordinates
            – Henry Lee
            Nov 17 at 21:59




            1




            1




            I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
            – niagarajohn
            Nov 17 at 23:26




            I think you are onto something here. I've seen large and small x expansions for the erf function and this could be the trick to get it into that form. Will take a look!
            – niagarajohn
            Nov 17 at 23:26












            ^That didn't work...
            – niagarajohn
            Nov 18 at 14:56




            ^That didn't work...
            – niagarajohn
            Nov 18 at 14:56












            Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
            – Henry Lee
            Nov 18 at 15:35




            Ok try and find $I’(x)$ then make a substitution, find a term for $I’(x)$ in terms of x then integrate this
            – Henry Lee
            Nov 18 at 15:35


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002851%2flarge-x-and-small-x-expansion-for-gamma-like-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...