Best mythical creature to use as livestock? [on hold]












10












$begingroup$


Imagine a world where all the magical and fantastical creatures that exist in mythology or folklore actually exist. Everything from dragons, griffins, goblins, harpies, trolls, etc. - they can taken from any history or culture, and assume that the ecosystem has evolved to accept them all.



In that world, which fantastical creature would be the most likely candidate to be domesticated and used by humans as livestock? What would be a fantasy world's equivalent of cows and sheep?



Mythical creatures rooted in folklore are preferred, but modern fantasy variations are also acceptable. Bonus for any lesser known mythical creatures suggested.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$



put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JBH, Gryphon, Cyn, rek, bilbo_pingouin 19 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
    $endgroup$
    – Logan R. Kearsley
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII I wouldn't say I "specialise" in mythical creatures but I dabble. And from my perspective, this question is unanswerable. Each creature can have so many representations, that each should be considered separate. At the same time some are actually the same creature with different descriptions. So, you can pick and choose traits you want. At this point you are essentially making up a new creature and slapping a mythological name on it.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    21 hours ago
















10












$begingroup$


Imagine a world where all the magical and fantastical creatures that exist in mythology or folklore actually exist. Everything from dragons, griffins, goblins, harpies, trolls, etc. - they can taken from any history or culture, and assume that the ecosystem has evolved to accept them all.



In that world, which fantastical creature would be the most likely candidate to be domesticated and used by humans as livestock? What would be a fantasy world's equivalent of cows and sheep?



Mythical creatures rooted in folklore are preferred, but modern fantasy variations are also acceptable. Bonus for any lesser known mythical creatures suggested.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$



put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JBH, Gryphon, Cyn, rek, bilbo_pingouin 19 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
    $endgroup$
    – Logan R. Kearsley
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII I wouldn't say I "specialise" in mythical creatures but I dabble. And from my perspective, this question is unanswerable. Each creature can have so many representations, that each should be considered separate. At the same time some are actually the same creature with different descriptions. So, you can pick and choose traits you want. At this point you are essentially making up a new creature and slapping a mythological name on it.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    21 hours ago














10












10








10


4



$begingroup$


Imagine a world where all the magical and fantastical creatures that exist in mythology or folklore actually exist. Everything from dragons, griffins, goblins, harpies, trolls, etc. - they can taken from any history or culture, and assume that the ecosystem has evolved to accept them all.



In that world, which fantastical creature would be the most likely candidate to be domesticated and used by humans as livestock? What would be a fantasy world's equivalent of cows and sheep?



Mythical creatures rooted in folklore are preferred, but modern fantasy variations are also acceptable. Bonus for any lesser known mythical creatures suggested.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Imagine a world where all the magical and fantastical creatures that exist in mythology or folklore actually exist. Everything from dragons, griffins, goblins, harpies, trolls, etc. - they can taken from any history or culture, and assume that the ecosystem has evolved to accept them all.



In that world, which fantastical creature would be the most likely candidate to be domesticated and used by humans as livestock? What would be a fantasy world's equivalent of cows and sheep?



Mythical creatures rooted in folklore are preferred, but modern fantasy variations are also acceptable. Bonus for any lesser known mythical creatures suggested.







fantasy-races mythical-creatures domestication low-fantasy livestock






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









CSNCSN

14617




14617




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JBH, Gryphon, Cyn, rek, bilbo_pingouin 19 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JBH, Gryphon, Cyn, rek, bilbo_pingouin 19 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
    $endgroup$
    – Logan R. Kearsley
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII I wouldn't say I "specialise" in mythical creatures but I dabble. And from my perspective, this question is unanswerable. Each creature can have so many representations, that each should be considered separate. At the same time some are actually the same creature with different descriptions. So, you can pick and choose traits you want. At this point you are essentially making up a new creature and slapping a mythological name on it.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    21 hours ago














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
    $endgroup$
    – Logan R. Kearsley
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII I wouldn't say I "specialise" in mythical creatures but I dabble. And from my perspective, this question is unanswerable. Each creature can have so many representations, that each should be considered separate. At the same time some are actually the same creature with different descriptions. So, you can pick and choose traits you want. At this point you are essentially making up a new creature and slapping a mythological name on it.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    21 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
"What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
$endgroup$
– JBH
yesterday




$begingroup$
"What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
$endgroup$
– JBH
yesterday




3




3




$begingroup$
Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
yesterday




$begingroup$
Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
yesterday












$begingroup$
@JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
yesterday




$begingroup$
@JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
$endgroup$
– JBH
yesterday




$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
$endgroup$
– JBH
yesterday




2




2




$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII I wouldn't say I "specialise" in mythical creatures but I dabble. And from my perspective, this question is unanswerable. Each creature can have so many representations, that each should be considered separate. At the same time some are actually the same creature with different descriptions. So, you can pick and choose traits you want. At this point you are essentially making up a new creature and slapping a mythological name on it.
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
21 hours ago




$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII I wouldn't say I "specialise" in mythical creatures but I dabble. And from my perspective, this question is unanswerable. Each creature can have so many representations, that each should be considered separate. At the same time some are actually the same creature with different descriptions. So, you can pick and choose traits you want. At this point you are essentially making up a new creature and slapping a mythological name on it.
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
21 hours ago










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

Perfectly Normal Beast



Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



"Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why would they make a good candidate for domestication, though? They seem like they're basically cows, but all but impossible to domesticate.
    $endgroup$
    – ckersch
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    How do you domesticate something that teleports off on you?
    $endgroup$
    – Thorne
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm not sure it qualifies as mythical.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Who's "Bob"? In the beginning there was Bob & Bob said "let there be light".. "I said let there be light".. "Argh!" [Bob bangs his shin into the coffee table].. CLICK [Bob finds the light switch] & there was light.
    $endgroup$
    – Pelinore
    21 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Thorne It doesn't seem like the beasts have an inherent teleportation ability, it's more that their migratory pattern just happens to pass through some sort of teleportation portal or inter dimensional wormhole. Because the heroes of the story get off Lamuella by hitching a ride on them.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathaddict
    11 hours ago



















8












$begingroup$

The perfect creature



The Sæhrímnir is from Norse mythology




"In Norse mythology, Sæhrímnir is the creature killed and eaten every
night by the Æsir and einherjar. The cook of the gods, Andhrímnir, is
responsible for the slaughter of Sæhrímnir and its preparation in the
cauldron Eldhrímnir. After Sæhrímnir is eaten, the beast is brought
back to life again to provide sustenance for the following day."




Basically it's a pig that comes back to life






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 5




    $begingroup$
    +1 for infinite bacon
    $endgroup$
    – JAQFrost
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's not a very good farm animal for Muslims.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Odin cares not for their problems......
    $endgroup$
    – Thorne
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    There's only one small problem with this answer, it's a unique creature not a species, there's only one, it doesn't reproduce, it belongs to Odin & he's not selling.
    $endgroup$
    – Pelinore
    20 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Didn't Thor have two regenerating goats as well?
    $endgroup$
    – Arcanist Lupus
    19 hours ago



















6












$begingroup$

Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



There are many, many more possibilities...






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Possible useful reference: Order of the Stick: Getting Ahead In Business
    $endgroup$
    – Ed Grimm
    23 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @EdGrimm - You just beat me!
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    23 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Apparently in ancient myth, the Hydra was poisonous anyway, so... meh. It was an interesting idea.
    $endgroup$
    – JBiggs
    2 hours ago



















5












$begingroup$

Humans



(And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, we found the evil emperor...
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, one problem though... When the creature drops to zero hit points the polymorph spell ends and the creature returns to its original form... so you wouldn't be able to slaughter them for resources...
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    yesterday






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII Slaughtering them? You monster! Don't kill them for meat, take some chunks here and there and use healing to keep your cash cow alive
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The spell only affects the contiguous creature, so the bits you chop off revert, too.
    $endgroup$
    – Ed Grimm
    22 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's economically unwise to slaughter any of your customer base to sell to your other customers, you can halve your potential customers each week this way (if you're selling sausages say) until you've none left, then who will you sell stuff to?
    $endgroup$
    – Pelinore
    20 hours ago





















4












$begingroup$

Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce it in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).





  • Update: a number of sources go back to this paper to say that a goose's egg is about $150,cm^3$ or around $2900,g$ of gold (given gold density of $19.32,g/cm^3$. That means about $93,$troy ounces (assuming the golden eggs are the same size as regular goose eggs). At current gold market price it means USD$$,$110,000 per egg. The number of eggs a goose lays per year goes from 5 (for mediocre wild geese) to 50 (for the best domestic geese). So you could get anything from $15$ to $150,kg$ of gold per goose per year worth $0.5$ to $5$ million USD respectively.



    The world's annual gold production is approaching $3000,tons$ (3 million kg). So even a farm with hundreds of geese wouldn't affect the world gold market too heavily. (In the worst case 100 laying geese hens would make $150,kgtimes100,geese=15000,kg=15,tons$ of gold per year.)




    Conclusion: one farm of golden-egg-laying geese would be enough to make you rich, but not enough to disrupt the world gold market.




    Now, if these geese are super abundant/easy to reproduce, that's a different story.




Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
    $endgroup$
    – Thorne
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Gold isn't that valuable if it isn't that rare. That having been said, combine your herd of unicorns with their poison-dispelling horns and a hydra...
    $endgroup$
    – Ed Grimm
    22 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The golden eggs goose would be profitable for a short while. If you have a whole farm of them, shorter still. Once the price of gold plummets from over-supply, they'd be pretty worthless. Or worse - they would be better off dead.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    21 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If the unicorns can only be handled by virgins, then the difficulty of keeping them goes way up. On the other hand, if they tolerate everyone but get really docile with virgins, the difficulty goes way down.
    $endgroup$
    – Arcanist Lupus
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @EdGrimm thanks for the observation, I hadn't really thought about that. I did the numbers. I could be proven wrong, but it seems to me that a farm of golden-laying-geese wouldn't be that disruptive, though. I'd be grateful to hear your thoughts about that!
    $endgroup$
    – Rafael
    13 hours ago



















3












$begingroup$

The Hydra



It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



(There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    yesterday








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
    $endgroup$
    – Thorne
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
    $endgroup$
    – Thorne
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Thorne yeah - SUPER poisonous. Heracles' arrows were one-hit kill on anything. For years after the hydra was slain.
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    21 hours ago



















3












$begingroup$

The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



(In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Dragons



    Of the several varieties of dragons, farming can be greatly adantaged by replacing traditional oxen, cattle or ass with farm dragons to pull the harvest and sowing machines. Agriculture can most definitely be benefited by flying serpants and pest control is an assured, hence minimal crop damage.



    Clearing corn feilds would also be a sinch given a few fire breathers and most dragons are friendly like cattle but can be ridden like horses. There are several more obvious advantages that I'll best leave to your imagination.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    MisterGeeky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$





















      -1












      $begingroup$

      A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
        $endgroup$
        – JBH
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
        $endgroup$
        – SciFiGuy
        yesterday








      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
        $endgroup$
        – JBH
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
        $endgroup$
        – theREALyumdub
        yesterday








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        It doesn't seem to me like a creature that is known for turning things to stone with its gaze, its breath, or its touch is a good choice for live stock, unless your villagers happen to be a bunch of Discworld trolls.
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        22 hours ago


















      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes








      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      9












      $begingroup$

      Perfectly Normal Beast



      Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



      Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



      Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



      Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



      Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



      "Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



      Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Why would they make a good candidate for domestication, though? They seem like they're basically cows, but all but impossible to domesticate.
        $endgroup$
        – ckersch
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        How do you domesticate something that teleports off on you?
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        I'm not sure it qualifies as mythical.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        "Who's "Bob"? In the beginning there was Bob & Bob said "let there be light".. "I said let there be light".. "Argh!" [Bob bangs his shin into the coffee table].. CLICK [Bob finds the light switch] & there was light.
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        21 hours ago








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne It doesn't seem like the beasts have an inherent teleportation ability, it's more that their migratory pattern just happens to pass through some sort of teleportation portal or inter dimensional wormhole. Because the heroes of the story get off Lamuella by hitching a ride on them.
        $endgroup$
        – Mathaddict
        11 hours ago
















      9












      $begingroup$

      Perfectly Normal Beast



      Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



      Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



      Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



      Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



      Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



      "Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



      Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Why would they make a good candidate for domestication, though? They seem like they're basically cows, but all but impossible to domesticate.
        $endgroup$
        – ckersch
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        How do you domesticate something that teleports off on you?
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        I'm not sure it qualifies as mythical.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        "Who's "Bob"? In the beginning there was Bob & Bob said "let there be light".. "I said let there be light".. "Argh!" [Bob bangs his shin into the coffee table].. CLICK [Bob finds the light switch] & there was light.
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        21 hours ago








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne It doesn't seem like the beasts have an inherent teleportation ability, it's more that their migratory pattern just happens to pass through some sort of teleportation portal or inter dimensional wormhole. Because the heroes of the story get off Lamuella by hitching a ride on them.
        $endgroup$
        – Mathaddict
        11 hours ago














      9












      9








      9





      $begingroup$

      Perfectly Normal Beast



      Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



      Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



      Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



      Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



      Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



      "Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



      Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Perfectly Normal Beast



      Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



      Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



      Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



      Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



      Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



      "Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



      Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      MathaddictMathaddict

      4,442532




      4,442532












      • $begingroup$
        Why would they make a good candidate for domestication, though? They seem like they're basically cows, but all but impossible to domesticate.
        $endgroup$
        – ckersch
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        How do you domesticate something that teleports off on you?
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        I'm not sure it qualifies as mythical.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        "Who's "Bob"? In the beginning there was Bob & Bob said "let there be light".. "I said let there be light".. "Argh!" [Bob bangs his shin into the coffee table].. CLICK [Bob finds the light switch] & there was light.
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        21 hours ago








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne It doesn't seem like the beasts have an inherent teleportation ability, it's more that their migratory pattern just happens to pass through some sort of teleportation portal or inter dimensional wormhole. Because the heroes of the story get off Lamuella by hitching a ride on them.
        $endgroup$
        – Mathaddict
        11 hours ago


















      • $begingroup$
        Why would they make a good candidate for domestication, though? They seem like they're basically cows, but all but impossible to domesticate.
        $endgroup$
        – ckersch
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        How do you domesticate something that teleports off on you?
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        I'm not sure it qualifies as mythical.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        "Who's "Bob"? In the beginning there was Bob & Bob said "let there be light".. "I said let there be light".. "Argh!" [Bob bangs his shin into the coffee table].. CLICK [Bob finds the light switch] & there was light.
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        21 hours ago








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne It doesn't seem like the beasts have an inherent teleportation ability, it's more that their migratory pattern just happens to pass through some sort of teleportation portal or inter dimensional wormhole. Because the heroes of the story get off Lamuella by hitching a ride on them.
        $endgroup$
        – Mathaddict
        11 hours ago
















      $begingroup$
      Why would they make a good candidate for domestication, though? They seem like they're basically cows, but all but impossible to domesticate.
      $endgroup$
      – ckersch
      23 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Why would they make a good candidate for domestication, though? They seem like they're basically cows, but all but impossible to domesticate.
      $endgroup$
      – ckersch
      23 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      How do you domesticate something that teleports off on you?
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      23 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      How do you domesticate something that teleports off on you?
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      23 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      I'm not sure it qualifies as mythical.
      $endgroup$
      – VLAZ
      21 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      I'm not sure it qualifies as mythical.
      $endgroup$
      – VLAZ
      21 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      "Who's "Bob"? In the beginning there was Bob & Bob said "let there be light".. "I said let there be light".. "Argh!" [Bob bangs his shin into the coffee table].. CLICK [Bob finds the light switch] & there was light.
      $endgroup$
      – Pelinore
      21 hours ago






      $begingroup$
      "Who's "Bob"? In the beginning there was Bob & Bob said "let there be light".. "I said let there be light".. "Argh!" [Bob bangs his shin into the coffee table].. CLICK [Bob finds the light switch] & there was light.
      $endgroup$
      – Pelinore
      21 hours ago






      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      @Thorne It doesn't seem like the beasts have an inherent teleportation ability, it's more that their migratory pattern just happens to pass through some sort of teleportation portal or inter dimensional wormhole. Because the heroes of the story get off Lamuella by hitching a ride on them.
      $endgroup$
      – Mathaddict
      11 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      @Thorne It doesn't seem like the beasts have an inherent teleportation ability, it's more that their migratory pattern just happens to pass through some sort of teleportation portal or inter dimensional wormhole. Because the heroes of the story get off Lamuella by hitching a ride on them.
      $endgroup$
      – Mathaddict
      11 hours ago











      8












      $begingroup$

      The perfect creature



      The Sæhrímnir is from Norse mythology




      "In Norse mythology, Sæhrímnir is the creature killed and eaten every
      night by the Æsir and einherjar. The cook of the gods, Andhrímnir, is
      responsible for the slaughter of Sæhrímnir and its preparation in the
      cauldron Eldhrímnir. After Sæhrímnir is eaten, the beast is brought
      back to life again to provide sustenance for the following day."




      Basically it's a pig that comes back to life






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 5




        $begingroup$
        +1 for infinite bacon
        $endgroup$
        – JAQFrost
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        It's not a very good farm animal for Muslims.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Odin cares not for their problems......
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        There's only one small problem with this answer, it's a unique creature not a species, there's only one, it doesn't reproduce, it belongs to Odin & he's not selling.
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        20 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Didn't Thor have two regenerating goats as well?
        $endgroup$
        – Arcanist Lupus
        19 hours ago
















      8












      $begingroup$

      The perfect creature



      The Sæhrímnir is from Norse mythology




      "In Norse mythology, Sæhrímnir is the creature killed and eaten every
      night by the Æsir and einherjar. The cook of the gods, Andhrímnir, is
      responsible for the slaughter of Sæhrímnir and its preparation in the
      cauldron Eldhrímnir. After Sæhrímnir is eaten, the beast is brought
      back to life again to provide sustenance for the following day."




      Basically it's a pig that comes back to life






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 5




        $begingroup$
        +1 for infinite bacon
        $endgroup$
        – JAQFrost
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        It's not a very good farm animal for Muslims.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Odin cares not for their problems......
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        There's only one small problem with this answer, it's a unique creature not a species, there's only one, it doesn't reproduce, it belongs to Odin & he's not selling.
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        20 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Didn't Thor have two regenerating goats as well?
        $endgroup$
        – Arcanist Lupus
        19 hours ago














      8












      8








      8





      $begingroup$

      The perfect creature



      The Sæhrímnir is from Norse mythology




      "In Norse mythology, Sæhrímnir is the creature killed and eaten every
      night by the Æsir and einherjar. The cook of the gods, Andhrímnir, is
      responsible for the slaughter of Sæhrímnir and its preparation in the
      cauldron Eldhrímnir. After Sæhrímnir is eaten, the beast is brought
      back to life again to provide sustenance for the following day."




      Basically it's a pig that comes back to life






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      The perfect creature



      The Sæhrímnir is from Norse mythology




      "In Norse mythology, Sæhrímnir is the creature killed and eaten every
      night by the Æsir and einherjar. The cook of the gods, Andhrímnir, is
      responsible for the slaughter of Sæhrímnir and its preparation in the
      cauldron Eldhrímnir. After Sæhrímnir is eaten, the beast is brought
      back to life again to provide sustenance for the following day."




      Basically it's a pig that comes back to life







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      ThorneThorne

      17k42351




      17k42351








      • 5




        $begingroup$
        +1 for infinite bacon
        $endgroup$
        – JAQFrost
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        It's not a very good farm animal for Muslims.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Odin cares not for their problems......
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        There's only one small problem with this answer, it's a unique creature not a species, there's only one, it doesn't reproduce, it belongs to Odin & he's not selling.
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        20 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Didn't Thor have two regenerating goats as well?
        $endgroup$
        – Arcanist Lupus
        19 hours ago














      • 5




        $begingroup$
        +1 for infinite bacon
        $endgroup$
        – JAQFrost
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        It's not a very good farm animal for Muslims.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Odin cares not for their problems......
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        There's only one small problem with this answer, it's a unique creature not a species, there's only one, it doesn't reproduce, it belongs to Odin & he's not selling.
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        20 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Didn't Thor have two regenerating goats as well?
        $endgroup$
        – Arcanist Lupus
        19 hours ago








      5




      5




      $begingroup$
      +1 for infinite bacon
      $endgroup$
      – JAQFrost
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      +1 for infinite bacon
      $endgroup$
      – JAQFrost
      yesterday




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      It's not a very good farm animal for Muslims.
      $endgroup$
      – VLAZ
      21 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      It's not a very good farm animal for Muslims.
      $endgroup$
      – VLAZ
      21 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Odin cares not for their problems......
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      21 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Odin cares not for their problems......
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      21 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      There's only one small problem with this answer, it's a unique creature not a species, there's only one, it doesn't reproduce, it belongs to Odin & he's not selling.
      $endgroup$
      – Pelinore
      20 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      There's only one small problem with this answer, it's a unique creature not a species, there's only one, it doesn't reproduce, it belongs to Odin & he's not selling.
      $endgroup$
      – Pelinore
      20 hours ago




      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      Didn't Thor have two regenerating goats as well?
      $endgroup$
      – Arcanist Lupus
      19 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Didn't Thor have two regenerating goats as well?
      $endgroup$
      – Arcanist Lupus
      19 hours ago











      6












      $begingroup$

      Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



      Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



      Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



      Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



      Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



      There are many, many more possibilities...






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Possible useful reference: Order of the Stick: Getting Ahead In Business
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        23 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @EdGrimm - You just beat me!
        $endgroup$
        – Paul Sinclair
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Apparently in ancient myth, the Hydra was poisonous anyway, so... meh. It was an interesting idea.
        $endgroup$
        – JBiggs
        2 hours ago
















      6












      $begingroup$

      Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



      Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



      Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



      Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



      Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



      There are many, many more possibilities...






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Possible useful reference: Order of the Stick: Getting Ahead In Business
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        23 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @EdGrimm - You just beat me!
        $endgroup$
        – Paul Sinclair
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Apparently in ancient myth, the Hydra was poisonous anyway, so... meh. It was an interesting idea.
        $endgroup$
        – JBiggs
        2 hours ago














      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$

      Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



      Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



      Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



      Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



      Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



      There are many, many more possibilities...






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



      Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



      Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



      Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



      Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



      There are many, many more possibilities...







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      JBiggsJBiggs

      8,81811840




      8,81811840








      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Possible useful reference: Order of the Stick: Getting Ahead In Business
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        23 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @EdGrimm - You just beat me!
        $endgroup$
        – Paul Sinclair
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Apparently in ancient myth, the Hydra was poisonous anyway, so... meh. It was an interesting idea.
        $endgroup$
        – JBiggs
        2 hours ago














      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Possible useful reference: Order of the Stick: Getting Ahead In Business
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        23 hours ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @EdGrimm - You just beat me!
        $endgroup$
        – Paul Sinclair
        23 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Apparently in ancient myth, the Hydra was poisonous anyway, so... meh. It was an interesting idea.
        $endgroup$
        – JBiggs
        2 hours ago








      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      Possible useful reference: Order of the Stick: Getting Ahead In Business
      $endgroup$
      – Ed Grimm
      23 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Possible useful reference: Order of the Stick: Getting Ahead In Business
      $endgroup$
      – Ed Grimm
      23 hours ago




      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      @EdGrimm - You just beat me!
      $endgroup$
      – Paul Sinclair
      23 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      @EdGrimm - You just beat me!
      $endgroup$
      – Paul Sinclair
      23 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Apparently in ancient myth, the Hydra was poisonous anyway, so... meh. It was an interesting idea.
      $endgroup$
      – JBiggs
      2 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Apparently in ancient myth, the Hydra was poisonous anyway, so... meh. It was an interesting idea.
      $endgroup$
      – JBiggs
      2 hours ago











      5












      $begingroup$

      Humans



      (And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



      Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



      It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



      Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Well, we found the evil emperor...
        $endgroup$
        – Arkenstein XII
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Oh, one problem though... When the creature drops to zero hit points the polymorph spell ends and the creature returns to its original form... so you wouldn't be able to slaughter them for resources...
        $endgroup$
        – Arkenstein XII
        yesterday






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @ArkensteinXII Slaughtering them? You monster! Don't kill them for meat, take some chunks here and there and use healing to keep your cash cow alive
        $endgroup$
        – Renan
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        The spell only affects the contiguous creature, so the bits you chop off revert, too.
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        22 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        It's economically unwise to slaughter any of your customer base to sell to your other customers, you can halve your potential customers each week this way (if you're selling sausages say) until you've none left, then who will you sell stuff to?
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        20 hours ago


















      5












      $begingroup$

      Humans



      (And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



      Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



      It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



      Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$









      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Well, we found the evil emperor...
        $endgroup$
        – Arkenstein XII
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Oh, one problem though... When the creature drops to zero hit points the polymorph spell ends and the creature returns to its original form... so you wouldn't be able to slaughter them for resources...
        $endgroup$
        – Arkenstein XII
        yesterday






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @ArkensteinXII Slaughtering them? You monster! Don't kill them for meat, take some chunks here and there and use healing to keep your cash cow alive
        $endgroup$
        – Renan
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        The spell only affects the contiguous creature, so the bits you chop off revert, too.
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        22 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        It's economically unwise to slaughter any of your customer base to sell to your other customers, you can halve your potential customers each week this way (if you're selling sausages say) until you've none left, then who will you sell stuff to?
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        20 hours ago
















      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$

      Humans



      (And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



      Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



      It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



      Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Humans



      (And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



      Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



      It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



      Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      RenanRenan

      49.5k13115250




      49.5k13115250








      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Well, we found the evil emperor...
        $endgroup$
        – Arkenstein XII
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Oh, one problem though... When the creature drops to zero hit points the polymorph spell ends and the creature returns to its original form... so you wouldn't be able to slaughter them for resources...
        $endgroup$
        – Arkenstein XII
        yesterday






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @ArkensteinXII Slaughtering them? You monster! Don't kill them for meat, take some chunks here and there and use healing to keep your cash cow alive
        $endgroup$
        – Renan
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        The spell only affects the contiguous creature, so the bits you chop off revert, too.
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        22 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        It's economically unwise to slaughter any of your customer base to sell to your other customers, you can halve your potential customers each week this way (if you're selling sausages say) until you've none left, then who will you sell stuff to?
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        20 hours ago
















      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Well, we found the evil emperor...
        $endgroup$
        – Arkenstein XII
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Oh, one problem though... When the creature drops to zero hit points the polymorph spell ends and the creature returns to its original form... so you wouldn't be able to slaughter them for resources...
        $endgroup$
        – Arkenstein XII
        yesterday






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @ArkensteinXII Slaughtering them? You monster! Don't kill them for meat, take some chunks here and there and use healing to keep your cash cow alive
        $endgroup$
        – Renan
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        The spell only affects the contiguous creature, so the bits you chop off revert, too.
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        22 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        It's economically unwise to slaughter any of your customer base to sell to your other customers, you can halve your potential customers each week this way (if you're selling sausages say) until you've none left, then who will you sell stuff to?
        $endgroup$
        – Pelinore
        20 hours ago










      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      Well, we found the evil emperor...
      $endgroup$
      – Arkenstein XII
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      Well, we found the evil emperor...
      $endgroup$
      – Arkenstein XII
      yesterday




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      Oh, one problem though... When the creature drops to zero hit points the polymorph spell ends and the creature returns to its original form... so you wouldn't be able to slaughter them for resources...
      $endgroup$
      – Arkenstein XII
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      Oh, one problem though... When the creature drops to zero hit points the polymorph spell ends and the creature returns to its original form... so you wouldn't be able to slaughter them for resources...
      $endgroup$
      – Arkenstein XII
      yesterday




      4




      4




      $begingroup$
      @ArkensteinXII Slaughtering them? You monster! Don't kill them for meat, take some chunks here and there and use healing to keep your cash cow alive
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      @ArkensteinXII Slaughtering them? You monster! Don't kill them for meat, take some chunks here and there and use healing to keep your cash cow alive
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      yesterday




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      The spell only affects the contiguous creature, so the bits you chop off revert, too.
      $endgroup$
      – Ed Grimm
      22 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      The spell only affects the contiguous creature, so the bits you chop off revert, too.
      $endgroup$
      – Ed Grimm
      22 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      It's economically unwise to slaughter any of your customer base to sell to your other customers, you can halve your potential customers each week this way (if you're selling sausages say) until you've none left, then who will you sell stuff to?
      $endgroup$
      – Pelinore
      20 hours ago






      $begingroup$
      It's economically unwise to slaughter any of your customer base to sell to your other customers, you can halve your potential customers each week this way (if you're selling sausages say) until you've none left, then who will you sell stuff to?
      $endgroup$
      – Pelinore
      20 hours ago













      4












      $begingroup$

      Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



      Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce it in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).





      • Update: a number of sources go back to this paper to say that a goose's egg is about $150,cm^3$ or around $2900,g$ of gold (given gold density of $19.32,g/cm^3$. That means about $93,$troy ounces (assuming the golden eggs are the same size as regular goose eggs). At current gold market price it means USD$$,$110,000 per egg. The number of eggs a goose lays per year goes from 5 (for mediocre wild geese) to 50 (for the best domestic geese). So you could get anything from $15$ to $150,kg$ of gold per goose per year worth $0.5$ to $5$ million USD respectively.



        The world's annual gold production is approaching $3000,tons$ (3 million kg). So even a farm with hundreds of geese wouldn't affect the world gold market too heavily. (In the worst case 100 laying geese hens would make $150,kgtimes100,geese=15000,kg=15,tons$ of gold per year.)




        Conclusion: one farm of golden-egg-laying geese would be enough to make you rich, but not enough to disrupt the world gold market.




        Now, if these geese are super abundant/easy to reproduce, that's a different story.




      Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Gold isn't that valuable if it isn't that rare. That having been said, combine your herd of unicorns with their poison-dispelling horns and a hydra...
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        22 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        The golden eggs goose would be profitable for a short while. If you have a whole farm of them, shorter still. Once the price of gold plummets from over-supply, they'd be pretty worthless. Or worse - they would be better off dead.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        If the unicorns can only be handled by virgins, then the difficulty of keeping them goes way up. On the other hand, if they tolerate everyone but get really docile with virgins, the difficulty goes way down.
        $endgroup$
        – Arcanist Lupus
        19 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @EdGrimm thanks for the observation, I hadn't really thought about that. I did the numbers. I could be proven wrong, but it seems to me that a farm of golden-laying-geese wouldn't be that disruptive, though. I'd be grateful to hear your thoughts about that!
        $endgroup$
        – Rafael
        13 hours ago
















      4












      $begingroup$

      Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



      Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce it in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).





      • Update: a number of sources go back to this paper to say that a goose's egg is about $150,cm^3$ or around $2900,g$ of gold (given gold density of $19.32,g/cm^3$. That means about $93,$troy ounces (assuming the golden eggs are the same size as regular goose eggs). At current gold market price it means USD$$,$110,000 per egg. The number of eggs a goose lays per year goes from 5 (for mediocre wild geese) to 50 (for the best domestic geese). So you could get anything from $15$ to $150,kg$ of gold per goose per year worth $0.5$ to $5$ million USD respectively.



        The world's annual gold production is approaching $3000,tons$ (3 million kg). So even a farm with hundreds of geese wouldn't affect the world gold market too heavily. (In the worst case 100 laying geese hens would make $150,kgtimes100,geese=15000,kg=15,tons$ of gold per year.)




        Conclusion: one farm of golden-egg-laying geese would be enough to make you rich, but not enough to disrupt the world gold market.




        Now, if these geese are super abundant/easy to reproduce, that's a different story.




      Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Gold isn't that valuable if it isn't that rare. That having been said, combine your herd of unicorns with their poison-dispelling horns and a hydra...
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        22 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        The golden eggs goose would be profitable for a short while. If you have a whole farm of them, shorter still. Once the price of gold plummets from over-supply, they'd be pretty worthless. Or worse - they would be better off dead.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        If the unicorns can only be handled by virgins, then the difficulty of keeping them goes way up. On the other hand, if they tolerate everyone but get really docile with virgins, the difficulty goes way down.
        $endgroup$
        – Arcanist Lupus
        19 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @EdGrimm thanks for the observation, I hadn't really thought about that. I did the numbers. I could be proven wrong, but it seems to me that a farm of golden-laying-geese wouldn't be that disruptive, though. I'd be grateful to hear your thoughts about that!
        $endgroup$
        – Rafael
        13 hours ago














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



      Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce it in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).





      • Update: a number of sources go back to this paper to say that a goose's egg is about $150,cm^3$ or around $2900,g$ of gold (given gold density of $19.32,g/cm^3$. That means about $93,$troy ounces (assuming the golden eggs are the same size as regular goose eggs). At current gold market price it means USD$$,$110,000 per egg. The number of eggs a goose lays per year goes from 5 (for mediocre wild geese) to 50 (for the best domestic geese). So you could get anything from $15$ to $150,kg$ of gold per goose per year worth $0.5$ to $5$ million USD respectively.



        The world's annual gold production is approaching $3000,tons$ (3 million kg). So even a farm with hundreds of geese wouldn't affect the world gold market too heavily. (In the worst case 100 laying geese hens would make $150,kgtimes100,geese=15000,kg=15,tons$ of gold per year.)




        Conclusion: one farm of golden-egg-laying geese would be enough to make you rich, but not enough to disrupt the world gold market.




        Now, if these geese are super abundant/easy to reproduce, that's a different story.




      Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



      Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce it in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).





      • Update: a number of sources go back to this paper to say that a goose's egg is about $150,cm^3$ or around $2900,g$ of gold (given gold density of $19.32,g/cm^3$. That means about $93,$troy ounces (assuming the golden eggs are the same size as regular goose eggs). At current gold market price it means USD$$,$110,000 per egg. The number of eggs a goose lays per year goes from 5 (for mediocre wild geese) to 50 (for the best domestic geese). So you could get anything from $15$ to $150,kg$ of gold per goose per year worth $0.5$ to $5$ million USD respectively.



        The world's annual gold production is approaching $3000,tons$ (3 million kg). So even a farm with hundreds of geese wouldn't affect the world gold market too heavily. (In the worst case 100 laying geese hens would make $150,kgtimes100,geese=15000,kg=15,tons$ of gold per year.)




        Conclusion: one farm of golden-egg-laying geese would be enough to make you rich, but not enough to disrupt the world gold market.




        Now, if these geese are super abundant/easy to reproduce, that's a different story.




      Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 13 hours ago

























      answered yesterday









      RafaelRafael

      1,750615




      1,750615








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Gold isn't that valuable if it isn't that rare. That having been said, combine your herd of unicorns with their poison-dispelling horns and a hydra...
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        22 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        The golden eggs goose would be profitable for a short while. If you have a whole farm of them, shorter still. Once the price of gold plummets from over-supply, they'd be pretty worthless. Or worse - they would be better off dead.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        If the unicorns can only be handled by virgins, then the difficulty of keeping them goes way up. On the other hand, if they tolerate everyone but get really docile with virgins, the difficulty goes way down.
        $endgroup$
        – Arcanist Lupus
        19 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @EdGrimm thanks for the observation, I hadn't really thought about that. I did the numbers. I could be proven wrong, but it seems to me that a farm of golden-laying-geese wouldn't be that disruptive, though. I'd be grateful to hear your thoughts about that!
        $endgroup$
        – Rafael
        13 hours ago














      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Gold isn't that valuable if it isn't that rare. That having been said, combine your herd of unicorns with their poison-dispelling horns and a hydra...
        $endgroup$
        – Ed Grimm
        22 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        The golden eggs goose would be profitable for a short while. If you have a whole farm of them, shorter still. Once the price of gold plummets from over-supply, they'd be pretty worthless. Or worse - they would be better off dead.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        If the unicorns can only be handled by virgins, then the difficulty of keeping them goes way up. On the other hand, if they tolerate everyone but get really docile with virgins, the difficulty goes way down.
        $endgroup$
        – Arcanist Lupus
        19 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @EdGrimm thanks for the observation, I hadn't really thought about that. I did the numbers. I could be proven wrong, but it seems to me that a farm of golden-laying-geese wouldn't be that disruptive, though. I'd be grateful to hear your thoughts about that!
        $endgroup$
        – Rafael
        13 hours ago








      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      yesterday




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      Gold isn't that valuable if it isn't that rare. That having been said, combine your herd of unicorns with their poison-dispelling horns and a hydra...
      $endgroup$
      – Ed Grimm
      22 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Gold isn't that valuable if it isn't that rare. That having been said, combine your herd of unicorns with their poison-dispelling horns and a hydra...
      $endgroup$
      – Ed Grimm
      22 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      The golden eggs goose would be profitable for a short while. If you have a whole farm of them, shorter still. Once the price of gold plummets from over-supply, they'd be pretty worthless. Or worse - they would be better off dead.
      $endgroup$
      – VLAZ
      21 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      The golden eggs goose would be profitable for a short while. If you have a whole farm of them, shorter still. Once the price of gold plummets from over-supply, they'd be pretty worthless. Or worse - they would be better off dead.
      $endgroup$
      – VLAZ
      21 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      If the unicorns can only be handled by virgins, then the difficulty of keeping them goes way up. On the other hand, if they tolerate everyone but get really docile with virgins, the difficulty goes way down.
      $endgroup$
      – Arcanist Lupus
      19 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      If the unicorns can only be handled by virgins, then the difficulty of keeping them goes way up. On the other hand, if they tolerate everyone but get really docile with virgins, the difficulty goes way down.
      $endgroup$
      – Arcanist Lupus
      19 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      @EdGrimm thanks for the observation, I hadn't really thought about that. I did the numbers. I could be proven wrong, but it seems to me that a farm of golden-laying-geese wouldn't be that disruptive, though. I'd be grateful to hear your thoughts about that!
      $endgroup$
      – Rafael
      13 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      @EdGrimm thanks for the observation, I hadn't really thought about that. I did the numbers. I could be proven wrong, but it seems to me that a farm of golden-laying-geese wouldn't be that disruptive, though. I'd be grateful to hear your thoughts about that!
      $endgroup$
      – Rafael
      13 hours ago











      3












      $begingroup$

      The Hydra



      It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



      (There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
        $endgroup$
        – Tim B
        yesterday








      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne yeah - SUPER poisonous. Heracles' arrows were one-hit kill on anything. For years after the hydra was slain.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago
















      3












      $begingroup$

      The Hydra



      It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



      (There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
        $endgroup$
        – Tim B
        yesterday








      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne yeah - SUPER poisonous. Heracles' arrows were one-hit kill on anything. For years after the hydra was slain.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$

      The Hydra



      It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



      (There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      The Hydra



      It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



      (There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited yesterday

























      answered yesterday









      GeneGene

      86217




      86217












      • $begingroup$
        Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
        $endgroup$
        – Tim B
        yesterday








      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne yeah - SUPER poisonous. Heracles' arrows were one-hit kill on anything. For years after the hydra was slain.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago


















      • $begingroup$
        Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
        $endgroup$
        – Tim B
        yesterday








      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        yesterday






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne yeah - SUPER poisonous. Heracles' arrows were one-hit kill on anything. For years after the hydra was slain.
        $endgroup$
        – VLAZ
        21 hours ago
















      $begingroup$
      Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
      $endgroup$
      – Tim B
      yesterday






      $begingroup$
      Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
      $endgroup$
      – Tim B
      yesterday






      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      yesterday




      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      yesterday




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      @Thorne yeah - SUPER poisonous. Heracles' arrows were one-hit kill on anything. For years after the hydra was slain.
      $endgroup$
      – VLAZ
      21 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      @Thorne yeah - SUPER poisonous. Heracles' arrows were one-hit kill on anything. For years after the hydra was slain.
      $endgroup$
      – VLAZ
      21 hours ago











      3












      $begingroup$

      The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



      An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



      The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



      You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



      (In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



        An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



        The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



        You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



        (In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



          An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



          The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



          You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



          (In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



          An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



          The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



          You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



          (In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          theREALyumdubtheREALyumdub

          3028




          3028























              1












              $begingroup$

              Dragons



              Of the several varieties of dragons, farming can be greatly adantaged by replacing traditional oxen, cattle or ass with farm dragons to pull the harvest and sowing machines. Agriculture can most definitely be benefited by flying serpants and pest control is an assured, hence minimal crop damage.



              Clearing corn feilds would also be a sinch given a few fire breathers and most dragons are friendly like cattle but can be ridden like horses. There are several more obvious advantages that I'll best leave to your imagination.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              MisterGeeky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Dragons



                Of the several varieties of dragons, farming can be greatly adantaged by replacing traditional oxen, cattle or ass with farm dragons to pull the harvest and sowing machines. Agriculture can most definitely be benefited by flying serpants and pest control is an assured, hence minimal crop damage.



                Clearing corn feilds would also be a sinch given a few fire breathers and most dragons are friendly like cattle but can be ridden like horses. There are several more obvious advantages that I'll best leave to your imagination.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                MisterGeeky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Dragons



                  Of the several varieties of dragons, farming can be greatly adantaged by replacing traditional oxen, cattle or ass with farm dragons to pull the harvest and sowing machines. Agriculture can most definitely be benefited by flying serpants and pest control is an assured, hence minimal crop damage.



                  Clearing corn feilds would also be a sinch given a few fire breathers and most dragons are friendly like cattle but can be ridden like horses. There are several more obvious advantages that I'll best leave to your imagination.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  MisterGeeky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$



                  Dragons



                  Of the several varieties of dragons, farming can be greatly adantaged by replacing traditional oxen, cattle or ass with farm dragons to pull the harvest and sowing machines. Agriculture can most definitely be benefited by flying serpants and pest control is an assured, hence minimal crop damage.



                  Clearing corn feilds would also be a sinch given a few fire breathers and most dragons are friendly like cattle but can be ridden like horses. There are several more obvious advantages that I'll best leave to your imagination.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  MisterGeeky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  MisterGeeky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered yesterday









                  MisterGeekyMisterGeeky

                  1113




                  1113




                  New contributor




                  MisterGeeky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  MisterGeeky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  MisterGeeky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                        $endgroup$
                        – SciFiGuy
                        yesterday








                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                        $endgroup$
                        – theREALyumdub
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        It doesn't seem to me like a creature that is known for turning things to stone with its gaze, its breath, or its touch is a good choice for live stock, unless your villagers happen to be a bunch of Discworld trolls.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ed Grimm
                        22 hours ago
















                      -1












                      $begingroup$

                      A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                        $endgroup$
                        – SciFiGuy
                        yesterday








                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                        $endgroup$
                        – theREALyumdub
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        It doesn't seem to me like a creature that is known for turning things to stone with its gaze, its breath, or its touch is a good choice for live stock, unless your villagers happen to be a bunch of Discworld trolls.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ed Grimm
                        22 hours ago














                      -1












                      -1








                      -1





                      $begingroup$

                      A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$



                      A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered yesterday









                      SciFiGuySciFiGuy

                      5906




                      5906




                      New contributor




                      SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.












                      • $begingroup$
                        Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                        $endgroup$
                        – SciFiGuy
                        yesterday








                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                        $endgroup$
                        – theREALyumdub
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        It doesn't seem to me like a creature that is known for turning things to stone with its gaze, its breath, or its touch is a good choice for live stock, unless your villagers happen to be a bunch of Discworld trolls.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ed Grimm
                        22 hours ago


















                      • $begingroup$
                        Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                        $endgroup$
                        – SciFiGuy
                        yesterday








                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JBH
                        yesterday










                      • $begingroup$
                        @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                        $endgroup$
                        – theREALyumdub
                        yesterday








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        It doesn't seem to me like a creature that is known for turning things to stone with its gaze, its breath, or its touch is a good choice for live stock, unless your villagers happen to be a bunch of Discworld trolls.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ed Grimm
                        22 hours ago
















                      $begingroup$
                      Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                      $endgroup$
                      – JBH
                      yesterday




                      $begingroup$
                      Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                      $endgroup$
                      – JBH
                      yesterday












                      $begingroup$
                      Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                      $endgroup$
                      – SciFiGuy
                      yesterday






                      $begingroup$
                      Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                      $endgroup$
                      – SciFiGuy
                      yesterday






                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                      $endgroup$
                      – JBH
                      yesterday




                      $begingroup$
                      The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                      $endgroup$
                      – JBH
                      yesterday












                      $begingroup$
                      @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                      $endgroup$
                      – theREALyumdub
                      yesterday






                      $begingroup$
                      @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                      $endgroup$
                      – theREALyumdub
                      yesterday






                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      It doesn't seem to me like a creature that is known for turning things to stone with its gaze, its breath, or its touch is a good choice for live stock, unless your villagers happen to be a bunch of Discworld trolls.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ed Grimm
                      22 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      It doesn't seem to me like a creature that is known for turning things to stone with its gaze, its breath, or its touch is a good choice for live stock, unless your villagers happen to be a bunch of Discworld trolls.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ed Grimm
                      22 hours ago



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Puebla de Zaragoza

                      Musa