Gauss and $int frac{dn}{log n}$












1












$begingroup$


In [1], page 2, Edwards shows a tabulated table by Gauss, for $x$ (distinct and uniformly distributed values from $5cdot 10^5$ to $3cdot 10^6$), the count of primes$<x$, the symbol $int frac{dn}{log n}$ and differences of previous computed quantities. In the following page the author discusses what might have understood Gauss by this amount $int dn/log n$. I know a standard topic in numerical analysis: Gauss quadratures. On page 2 is it also noted that Gauss knew the average of the density of prime numbers, and tabulations of primes that were published, thus I imagine that he computed using these informations the first column, this is the count of primes$<x$.



But I'm not sure what was the method for the second column, the symbol $int frac{dn}{log n}$. For this reason I have the following question:




Question. How were these quantities $int frac{dn}{log n}$ computed by Gauss? If you can give some detail, better.




References:



[1] Harold M. Edwards, Riemann's Zeta Function, Dover (edition) 2001.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    In [1], page 2, Edwards shows a tabulated table by Gauss, for $x$ (distinct and uniformly distributed values from $5cdot 10^5$ to $3cdot 10^6$), the count of primes$<x$, the symbol $int frac{dn}{log n}$ and differences of previous computed quantities. In the following page the author discusses what might have understood Gauss by this amount $int dn/log n$. I know a standard topic in numerical analysis: Gauss quadratures. On page 2 is it also noted that Gauss knew the average of the density of prime numbers, and tabulations of primes that were published, thus I imagine that he computed using these informations the first column, this is the count of primes$<x$.



    But I'm not sure what was the method for the second column, the symbol $int frac{dn}{log n}$. For this reason I have the following question:




    Question. How were these quantities $int frac{dn}{log n}$ computed by Gauss? If you can give some detail, better.




    References:



    [1] Harold M. Edwards, Riemann's Zeta Function, Dover (edition) 2001.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      In [1], page 2, Edwards shows a tabulated table by Gauss, for $x$ (distinct and uniformly distributed values from $5cdot 10^5$ to $3cdot 10^6$), the count of primes$<x$, the symbol $int frac{dn}{log n}$ and differences of previous computed quantities. In the following page the author discusses what might have understood Gauss by this amount $int dn/log n$. I know a standard topic in numerical analysis: Gauss quadratures. On page 2 is it also noted that Gauss knew the average of the density of prime numbers, and tabulations of primes that were published, thus I imagine that he computed using these informations the first column, this is the count of primes$<x$.



      But I'm not sure what was the method for the second column, the symbol $int frac{dn}{log n}$. For this reason I have the following question:




      Question. How were these quantities $int frac{dn}{log n}$ computed by Gauss? If you can give some detail, better.




      References:



      [1] Harold M. Edwards, Riemann's Zeta Function, Dover (edition) 2001.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In [1], page 2, Edwards shows a tabulated table by Gauss, for $x$ (distinct and uniformly distributed values from $5cdot 10^5$ to $3cdot 10^6$), the count of primes$<x$, the symbol $int frac{dn}{log n}$ and differences of previous computed quantities. In the following page the author discusses what might have understood Gauss by this amount $int dn/log n$. I know a standard topic in numerical analysis: Gauss quadratures. On page 2 is it also noted that Gauss knew the average of the density of prime numbers, and tabulations of primes that were published, thus I imagine that he computed using these informations the first column, this is the count of primes$<x$.



      But I'm not sure what was the method for the second column, the symbol $int frac{dn}{log n}$. For this reason I have the following question:




      Question. How were these quantities $int frac{dn}{log n}$ computed by Gauss? If you can give some detail, better.




      References:



      [1] Harold M. Edwards, Riemann's Zeta Function, Dover (edition) 2001.







      math-history






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 25 '18 at 16:16







      user243301

















      asked Aug 7 '15 at 8:31









      user243301user243301

      1




      1






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I believe he used the equivalent



          $$
          pi(x) approx frac{x}{log x},
          $$



          and he had access to massive logarithm tables computed by hand by his peers.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1387584%2fgauss-and-int-fracdn-log-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            I believe he used the equivalent



            $$
            pi(x) approx frac{x}{log x},
            $$



            and he had access to massive logarithm tables computed by hand by his peers.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              I believe he used the equivalent



              $$
              pi(x) approx frac{x}{log x},
              $$



              and he had access to massive logarithm tables computed by hand by his peers.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                I believe he used the equivalent



                $$
                pi(x) approx frac{x}{log x},
                $$



                and he had access to massive logarithm tables computed by hand by his peers.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I believe he used the equivalent



                $$
                pi(x) approx frac{x}{log x},
                $$



                and he had access to massive logarithm tables computed by hand by his peers.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 17 '18 at 11:17









                KlangenKlangen

                1,75111334




                1,75111334






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1387584%2fgauss-and-int-fracdn-log-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...