Confusion about implicit differentiation $frac{dy}{dx}$
Today I learnt about implicit differentiation using this:
$frac{d}{dx}(f)$ = $frac{df}{dy} times frac{dy}{dx}$
I don't understand when doing implicit differentiation how the d/dy part works for y terms:
$frac{d(y^2)}{dx} = frac{d(y^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}=2yfrac{dy}{dx}$
Why is the derivative of $y^2$ with respect to $y$, $2y$? Do you assume it's a function of something else?
And similarly if you apply this same formula to an $x$ term (even though its not needed) you get:
$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} =frac{d(x^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}$
How does that simplify to the $2x$ I know it is?
Thanks
differential-equations implicit-differentiation
add a comment |
Today I learnt about implicit differentiation using this:
$frac{d}{dx}(f)$ = $frac{df}{dy} times frac{dy}{dx}$
I don't understand when doing implicit differentiation how the d/dy part works for y terms:
$frac{d(y^2)}{dx} = frac{d(y^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}=2yfrac{dy}{dx}$
Why is the derivative of $y^2$ with respect to $y$, $2y$? Do you assume it's a function of something else?
And similarly if you apply this same formula to an $x$ term (even though its not needed) you get:
$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} =frac{d(x^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}$
How does that simplify to the $2x$ I know it is?
Thanks
differential-equations implicit-differentiation
What is $y$ in your last differentiation? Take $y=x$ then it works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:14
@A.Γ. Its just an example, I'm not really sure, I thought of it as $y=x^2$ and $y=f$and did it using the formula at the top.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:16
If $y=x^2$ it still works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:18
add a comment |
Today I learnt about implicit differentiation using this:
$frac{d}{dx}(f)$ = $frac{df}{dy} times frac{dy}{dx}$
I don't understand when doing implicit differentiation how the d/dy part works for y terms:
$frac{d(y^2)}{dx} = frac{d(y^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}=2yfrac{dy}{dx}$
Why is the derivative of $y^2$ with respect to $y$, $2y$? Do you assume it's a function of something else?
And similarly if you apply this same formula to an $x$ term (even though its not needed) you get:
$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} =frac{d(x^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}$
How does that simplify to the $2x$ I know it is?
Thanks
differential-equations implicit-differentiation
Today I learnt about implicit differentiation using this:
$frac{d}{dx}(f)$ = $frac{df}{dy} times frac{dy}{dx}$
I don't understand when doing implicit differentiation how the d/dy part works for y terms:
$frac{d(y^2)}{dx} = frac{d(y^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}=2yfrac{dy}{dx}$
Why is the derivative of $y^2$ with respect to $y$, $2y$? Do you assume it's a function of something else?
And similarly if you apply this same formula to an $x$ term (even though its not needed) you get:
$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} =frac{d(x^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}$
How does that simplify to the $2x$ I know it is?
Thanks
differential-equations implicit-differentiation
differential-equations implicit-differentiation
edited Nov 26 '18 at 18:56
Wesley Strik
1,605422
1,605422
asked Nov 26 '18 at 18:10
DevinJC
937
937
What is $y$ in your last differentiation? Take $y=x$ then it works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:14
@A.Γ. Its just an example, I'm not really sure, I thought of it as $y=x^2$ and $y=f$and did it using the formula at the top.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:16
If $y=x^2$ it still works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:18
add a comment |
What is $y$ in your last differentiation? Take $y=x$ then it works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:14
@A.Γ. Its just an example, I'm not really sure, I thought of it as $y=x^2$ and $y=f$and did it using the formula at the top.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:16
If $y=x^2$ it still works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:18
What is $y$ in your last differentiation? Take $y=x$ then it works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:14
What is $y$ in your last differentiation? Take $y=x$ then it works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:14
@A.Γ. Its just an example, I'm not really sure, I thought of it as $y=x^2$ and $y=f$and did it using the formula at the top.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:16
@A.Γ. Its just an example, I'm not really sure, I thought of it as $y=x^2$ and $y=f$and did it using the formula at the top.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:16
If $y=x^2$ it still works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:18
If $y=x^2$ it still works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:18
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Yes, here they assume that $y$ is a function of something else.
Whenever we apply implicit differentiation like with $frac{dy^2(x)}{dx}$, we sort of first forget it is a function of something else, say $x$, we just derive it using the chain rule and then we need to correct for this via the familiar additional factor:
$$ frac{d y^2(x)}{d x} =2 y(x) cdotfrac{d y(x) }{dx}$$
Actually implict differentiation often boils down to just using the chain rule. Notice that if $y$ is not a function of $x$, we get that $frac{ d y}{dx} =0$ and the equation just reads $0=0$.
For your second case where you state:
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} =frac{d(x^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}$$
We could call $y=x^2$ because you really need to tell the reader what this new variable $y$ is in relation to the old variable $x$, else the derivative could be anything. We then get:
$$ frac{dy}{dx} =frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{d x^2 }{dx}= 1 cdot 2x $$
In general we use implicit differentiation when there is some complicated variable dependence and you cannot directly express some variable explicitly in terms of the other. An example of such an equation would be:
$$t+ t^2 + 3z^2 + z^3 = 6$$
Using implicit differentiation we could construct the tangent line for $(t,z)=(1,1)$, we will derive both sides with respect to $t$, we do not know if $z$ is is a function of $t$ so we need to use the chain rule.
We would get:
$$1+ 2t + 6z frac{dz}{dt} + 3 z^2 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Now we plug in the value at (1,1) to get:
$$1+ 2 + 6 frac{dz}{dt} + 3 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Or after rearranging:
$$9 frac{dz}{dt} = -3 rightarrow frac{dz}{dt}= -frac{1}{3}$$
We get the tangent line $z= -frac{1}{3}(t-1) +1$
Thanks a lot this really helped.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:35
any time ;) we're all here to help
– Wesley Strik
Nov 26 '18 at 18:36
Hello, I just saw your edit. why dont the $frac{dy}{dx}$ terms cancel out for the y terms as the $ frac{dx}{dy}$ terms for the x terms. Or do we just not do that otherwise we can't rearrange for what we want ($frac{dy/dx}$)
– DevinJC
Nov 27 '18 at 10:10
Maybe I should use different letters to make clear that $y$ is not always equal to $x^2$
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 12:53
1
It automatically IS, because the function is a relation between $x$ and $y$, but we only derive with respect to $x$. If you would use the chain rule like this for $X=x$: $$ frac{d}{dx} (X(x)^2)= 2X cdot frac{dx}{dx}=2X=2x$$ I think you get what you mean by using the chain rule for a variable you don't need to use it for. Here I mean that $X$ is a function of $x$ (clearly).
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 14:30
|
show 6 more comments
You implicitly utilize the formula of derivative of a composite functions or a chain rule:
$$
f = y(x)^2, qquadfrac{df}{dx}=frac{d(y^2)}{dx},\
f=g(y(x)),qquad g(y)=y^2,\
frac{d}{dx}g(y(x))=frac{dg(y(x))}{dy}frac{dy(x)}{dx}=(2y(x))frac{dy}{dx}
$$
add a comment |
The derivative of $y^2$ with respect to $y$ is $2y$ because of the definition of derivative:
$$lim_{h to 0} frac{(y+h)^2-y^2}{h} = 2y.$$
In the last expression you write
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} = frac{d(x^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx}$$
but this is meaningful only when $x$ is a function of $y$. So assume $x = f(y)$. Then, by the first equation you mention in the question, the right hand side is
$$frac{d(f^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2f(y)f'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xf'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dx} = 2x.$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014696%2fconfusion-about-implicit-differentiation-fracdydx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, here they assume that $y$ is a function of something else.
Whenever we apply implicit differentiation like with $frac{dy^2(x)}{dx}$, we sort of first forget it is a function of something else, say $x$, we just derive it using the chain rule and then we need to correct for this via the familiar additional factor:
$$ frac{d y^2(x)}{d x} =2 y(x) cdotfrac{d y(x) }{dx}$$
Actually implict differentiation often boils down to just using the chain rule. Notice that if $y$ is not a function of $x$, we get that $frac{ d y}{dx} =0$ and the equation just reads $0=0$.
For your second case where you state:
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} =frac{d(x^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}$$
We could call $y=x^2$ because you really need to tell the reader what this new variable $y$ is in relation to the old variable $x$, else the derivative could be anything. We then get:
$$ frac{dy}{dx} =frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{d x^2 }{dx}= 1 cdot 2x $$
In general we use implicit differentiation when there is some complicated variable dependence and you cannot directly express some variable explicitly in terms of the other. An example of such an equation would be:
$$t+ t^2 + 3z^2 + z^3 = 6$$
Using implicit differentiation we could construct the tangent line for $(t,z)=(1,1)$, we will derive both sides with respect to $t$, we do not know if $z$ is is a function of $t$ so we need to use the chain rule.
We would get:
$$1+ 2t + 6z frac{dz}{dt} + 3 z^2 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Now we plug in the value at (1,1) to get:
$$1+ 2 + 6 frac{dz}{dt} + 3 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Or after rearranging:
$$9 frac{dz}{dt} = -3 rightarrow frac{dz}{dt}= -frac{1}{3}$$
We get the tangent line $z= -frac{1}{3}(t-1) +1$
Thanks a lot this really helped.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:35
any time ;) we're all here to help
– Wesley Strik
Nov 26 '18 at 18:36
Hello, I just saw your edit. why dont the $frac{dy}{dx}$ terms cancel out for the y terms as the $ frac{dx}{dy}$ terms for the x terms. Or do we just not do that otherwise we can't rearrange for what we want ($frac{dy/dx}$)
– DevinJC
Nov 27 '18 at 10:10
Maybe I should use different letters to make clear that $y$ is not always equal to $x^2$
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 12:53
1
It automatically IS, because the function is a relation between $x$ and $y$, but we only derive with respect to $x$. If you would use the chain rule like this for $X=x$: $$ frac{d}{dx} (X(x)^2)= 2X cdot frac{dx}{dx}=2X=2x$$ I think you get what you mean by using the chain rule for a variable you don't need to use it for. Here I mean that $X$ is a function of $x$ (clearly).
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 14:30
|
show 6 more comments
Yes, here they assume that $y$ is a function of something else.
Whenever we apply implicit differentiation like with $frac{dy^2(x)}{dx}$, we sort of first forget it is a function of something else, say $x$, we just derive it using the chain rule and then we need to correct for this via the familiar additional factor:
$$ frac{d y^2(x)}{d x} =2 y(x) cdotfrac{d y(x) }{dx}$$
Actually implict differentiation often boils down to just using the chain rule. Notice that if $y$ is not a function of $x$, we get that $frac{ d y}{dx} =0$ and the equation just reads $0=0$.
For your second case where you state:
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} =frac{d(x^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}$$
We could call $y=x^2$ because you really need to tell the reader what this new variable $y$ is in relation to the old variable $x$, else the derivative could be anything. We then get:
$$ frac{dy}{dx} =frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{d x^2 }{dx}= 1 cdot 2x $$
In general we use implicit differentiation when there is some complicated variable dependence and you cannot directly express some variable explicitly in terms of the other. An example of such an equation would be:
$$t+ t^2 + 3z^2 + z^3 = 6$$
Using implicit differentiation we could construct the tangent line for $(t,z)=(1,1)$, we will derive both sides with respect to $t$, we do not know if $z$ is is a function of $t$ so we need to use the chain rule.
We would get:
$$1+ 2t + 6z frac{dz}{dt} + 3 z^2 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Now we plug in the value at (1,1) to get:
$$1+ 2 + 6 frac{dz}{dt} + 3 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Or after rearranging:
$$9 frac{dz}{dt} = -3 rightarrow frac{dz}{dt}= -frac{1}{3}$$
We get the tangent line $z= -frac{1}{3}(t-1) +1$
Thanks a lot this really helped.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:35
any time ;) we're all here to help
– Wesley Strik
Nov 26 '18 at 18:36
Hello, I just saw your edit. why dont the $frac{dy}{dx}$ terms cancel out for the y terms as the $ frac{dx}{dy}$ terms for the x terms. Or do we just not do that otherwise we can't rearrange for what we want ($frac{dy/dx}$)
– DevinJC
Nov 27 '18 at 10:10
Maybe I should use different letters to make clear that $y$ is not always equal to $x^2$
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 12:53
1
It automatically IS, because the function is a relation between $x$ and $y$, but we only derive with respect to $x$. If you would use the chain rule like this for $X=x$: $$ frac{d}{dx} (X(x)^2)= 2X cdot frac{dx}{dx}=2X=2x$$ I think you get what you mean by using the chain rule for a variable you don't need to use it for. Here I mean that $X$ is a function of $x$ (clearly).
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 14:30
|
show 6 more comments
Yes, here they assume that $y$ is a function of something else.
Whenever we apply implicit differentiation like with $frac{dy^2(x)}{dx}$, we sort of first forget it is a function of something else, say $x$, we just derive it using the chain rule and then we need to correct for this via the familiar additional factor:
$$ frac{d y^2(x)}{d x} =2 y(x) cdotfrac{d y(x) }{dx}$$
Actually implict differentiation often boils down to just using the chain rule. Notice that if $y$ is not a function of $x$, we get that $frac{ d y}{dx} =0$ and the equation just reads $0=0$.
For your second case where you state:
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} =frac{d(x^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}$$
We could call $y=x^2$ because you really need to tell the reader what this new variable $y$ is in relation to the old variable $x$, else the derivative could be anything. We then get:
$$ frac{dy}{dx} =frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{d x^2 }{dx}= 1 cdot 2x $$
In general we use implicit differentiation when there is some complicated variable dependence and you cannot directly express some variable explicitly in terms of the other. An example of such an equation would be:
$$t+ t^2 + 3z^2 + z^3 = 6$$
Using implicit differentiation we could construct the tangent line for $(t,z)=(1,1)$, we will derive both sides with respect to $t$, we do not know if $z$ is is a function of $t$ so we need to use the chain rule.
We would get:
$$1+ 2t + 6z frac{dz}{dt} + 3 z^2 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Now we plug in the value at (1,1) to get:
$$1+ 2 + 6 frac{dz}{dt} + 3 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Or after rearranging:
$$9 frac{dz}{dt} = -3 rightarrow frac{dz}{dt}= -frac{1}{3}$$
We get the tangent line $z= -frac{1}{3}(t-1) +1$
Yes, here they assume that $y$ is a function of something else.
Whenever we apply implicit differentiation like with $frac{dy^2(x)}{dx}$, we sort of first forget it is a function of something else, say $x$, we just derive it using the chain rule and then we need to correct for this via the familiar additional factor:
$$ frac{d y^2(x)}{d x} =2 y(x) cdotfrac{d y(x) }{dx}$$
Actually implict differentiation often boils down to just using the chain rule. Notice that if $y$ is not a function of $x$, we get that $frac{ d y}{dx} =0$ and the equation just reads $0=0$.
For your second case where you state:
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} =frac{d(x^2)}{dy}timesfrac{dy}{dx}$$
We could call $y=x^2$ because you really need to tell the reader what this new variable $y$ is in relation to the old variable $x$, else the derivative could be anything. We then get:
$$ frac{dy}{dx} =frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{d x^2 }{dx}= 1 cdot 2x $$
In general we use implicit differentiation when there is some complicated variable dependence and you cannot directly express some variable explicitly in terms of the other. An example of such an equation would be:
$$t+ t^2 + 3z^2 + z^3 = 6$$
Using implicit differentiation we could construct the tangent line for $(t,z)=(1,1)$, we will derive both sides with respect to $t$, we do not know if $z$ is is a function of $t$ so we need to use the chain rule.
We would get:
$$1+ 2t + 6z frac{dz}{dt} + 3 z^2 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Now we plug in the value at (1,1) to get:
$$1+ 2 + 6 frac{dz}{dt} + 3 frac{dz}{dt} = 0$$
Or after rearranging:
$$9 frac{dz}{dt} = -3 rightarrow frac{dz}{dt}= -frac{1}{3}$$
We get the tangent line $z= -frac{1}{3}(t-1) +1$
edited Nov 27 '18 at 12:56
community wiki
5 revs
WesleyGroupshaveFeelingsToo
Thanks a lot this really helped.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:35
any time ;) we're all here to help
– Wesley Strik
Nov 26 '18 at 18:36
Hello, I just saw your edit. why dont the $frac{dy}{dx}$ terms cancel out for the y terms as the $ frac{dx}{dy}$ terms for the x terms. Or do we just not do that otherwise we can't rearrange for what we want ($frac{dy/dx}$)
– DevinJC
Nov 27 '18 at 10:10
Maybe I should use different letters to make clear that $y$ is not always equal to $x^2$
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 12:53
1
It automatically IS, because the function is a relation between $x$ and $y$, but we only derive with respect to $x$. If you would use the chain rule like this for $X=x$: $$ frac{d}{dx} (X(x)^2)= 2X cdot frac{dx}{dx}=2X=2x$$ I think you get what you mean by using the chain rule for a variable you don't need to use it for. Here I mean that $X$ is a function of $x$ (clearly).
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 14:30
|
show 6 more comments
Thanks a lot this really helped.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:35
any time ;) we're all here to help
– Wesley Strik
Nov 26 '18 at 18:36
Hello, I just saw your edit. why dont the $frac{dy}{dx}$ terms cancel out for the y terms as the $ frac{dx}{dy}$ terms for the x terms. Or do we just not do that otherwise we can't rearrange for what we want ($frac{dy/dx}$)
– DevinJC
Nov 27 '18 at 10:10
Maybe I should use different letters to make clear that $y$ is not always equal to $x^2$
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 12:53
1
It automatically IS, because the function is a relation between $x$ and $y$, but we only derive with respect to $x$. If you would use the chain rule like this for $X=x$: $$ frac{d}{dx} (X(x)^2)= 2X cdot frac{dx}{dx}=2X=2x$$ I think you get what you mean by using the chain rule for a variable you don't need to use it for. Here I mean that $X$ is a function of $x$ (clearly).
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 14:30
Thanks a lot this really helped.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:35
Thanks a lot this really helped.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:35
any time ;) we're all here to help
– Wesley Strik
Nov 26 '18 at 18:36
any time ;) we're all here to help
– Wesley Strik
Nov 26 '18 at 18:36
Hello, I just saw your edit. why dont the $frac{dy}{dx}$ terms cancel out for the y terms as the $ frac{dx}{dy}$ terms for the x terms. Or do we just not do that otherwise we can't rearrange for what we want ($frac{dy/dx}$)
– DevinJC
Nov 27 '18 at 10:10
Hello, I just saw your edit. why dont the $frac{dy}{dx}$ terms cancel out for the y terms as the $ frac{dx}{dy}$ terms for the x terms. Or do we just not do that otherwise we can't rearrange for what we want ($frac{dy/dx}$)
– DevinJC
Nov 27 '18 at 10:10
Maybe I should use different letters to make clear that $y$ is not always equal to $x^2$
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 12:53
Maybe I should use different letters to make clear that $y$ is not always equal to $x^2$
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 12:53
1
1
It automatically IS, because the function is a relation between $x$ and $y$, but we only derive with respect to $x$. If you would use the chain rule like this for $X=x$: $$ frac{d}{dx} (X(x)^2)= 2X cdot frac{dx}{dx}=2X=2x$$ I think you get what you mean by using the chain rule for a variable you don't need to use it for. Here I mean that $X$ is a function of $x$ (clearly).
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 14:30
It automatically IS, because the function is a relation between $x$ and $y$, but we only derive with respect to $x$. If you would use the chain rule like this for $X=x$: $$ frac{d}{dx} (X(x)^2)= 2X cdot frac{dx}{dx}=2X=2x$$ I think you get what you mean by using the chain rule for a variable you don't need to use it for. Here I mean that $X$ is a function of $x$ (clearly).
– Wesley Strik
Nov 27 '18 at 14:30
|
show 6 more comments
You implicitly utilize the formula of derivative of a composite functions or a chain rule:
$$
f = y(x)^2, qquadfrac{df}{dx}=frac{d(y^2)}{dx},\
f=g(y(x)),qquad g(y)=y^2,\
frac{d}{dx}g(y(x))=frac{dg(y(x))}{dy}frac{dy(x)}{dx}=(2y(x))frac{dy}{dx}
$$
add a comment |
You implicitly utilize the formula of derivative of a composite functions or a chain rule:
$$
f = y(x)^2, qquadfrac{df}{dx}=frac{d(y^2)}{dx},\
f=g(y(x)),qquad g(y)=y^2,\
frac{d}{dx}g(y(x))=frac{dg(y(x))}{dy}frac{dy(x)}{dx}=(2y(x))frac{dy}{dx}
$$
add a comment |
You implicitly utilize the formula of derivative of a composite functions or a chain rule:
$$
f = y(x)^2, qquadfrac{df}{dx}=frac{d(y^2)}{dx},\
f=g(y(x)),qquad g(y)=y^2,\
frac{d}{dx}g(y(x))=frac{dg(y(x))}{dy}frac{dy(x)}{dx}=(2y(x))frac{dy}{dx}
$$
You implicitly utilize the formula of derivative of a composite functions or a chain rule:
$$
f = y(x)^2, qquadfrac{df}{dx}=frac{d(y^2)}{dx},\
f=g(y(x)),qquad g(y)=y^2,\
frac{d}{dx}g(y(x))=frac{dg(y(x))}{dy}frac{dy(x)}{dx}=(2y(x))frac{dy}{dx}
$$
answered Nov 26 '18 at 18:21
Vasily Mitch
1,33837
1,33837
add a comment |
add a comment |
The derivative of $y^2$ with respect to $y$ is $2y$ because of the definition of derivative:
$$lim_{h to 0} frac{(y+h)^2-y^2}{h} = 2y.$$
In the last expression you write
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} = frac{d(x^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx}$$
but this is meaningful only when $x$ is a function of $y$. So assume $x = f(y)$. Then, by the first equation you mention in the question, the right hand side is
$$frac{d(f^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2f(y)f'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xf'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dx} = 2x.$$
add a comment |
The derivative of $y^2$ with respect to $y$ is $2y$ because of the definition of derivative:
$$lim_{h to 0} frac{(y+h)^2-y^2}{h} = 2y.$$
In the last expression you write
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} = frac{d(x^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx}$$
but this is meaningful only when $x$ is a function of $y$. So assume $x = f(y)$. Then, by the first equation you mention in the question, the right hand side is
$$frac{d(f^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2f(y)f'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xf'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dx} = 2x.$$
add a comment |
The derivative of $y^2$ with respect to $y$ is $2y$ because of the definition of derivative:
$$lim_{h to 0} frac{(y+h)^2-y^2}{h} = 2y.$$
In the last expression you write
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} = frac{d(x^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx}$$
but this is meaningful only when $x$ is a function of $y$. So assume $x = f(y)$. Then, by the first equation you mention in the question, the right hand side is
$$frac{d(f^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2f(y)f'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xf'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dx} = 2x.$$
The derivative of $y^2$ with respect to $y$ is $2y$ because of the definition of derivative:
$$lim_{h to 0} frac{(y+h)^2-y^2}{h} = 2y.$$
In the last expression you write
$$frac{d(x^2)}{dx} = frac{d(x^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx}$$
but this is meaningful only when $x$ is a function of $y$. So assume $x = f(y)$. Then, by the first equation you mention in the question, the right hand side is
$$frac{d(f^2)}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2f(y)f'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xf'(y)frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dy}frac{dy}{dx} = 2xfrac{dx}{dx} = 2x.$$
answered Nov 26 '18 at 18:28
Gibbs
4,7583726
4,7583726
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014696%2fconfusion-about-implicit-differentiation-fracdydx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What is $y$ in your last differentiation? Take $y=x$ then it works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:14
@A.Γ. Its just an example, I'm not really sure, I thought of it as $y=x^2$ and $y=f$and did it using the formula at the top.
– DevinJC
Nov 26 '18 at 18:16
If $y=x^2$ it still works perfectly.
– A.Γ.
Nov 26 '18 at 18:18