Constructing an infinite chain of subfields of 'hyper' algebraic numbers?












24














This has now been cross posted to MO.



Let $F$ be a subset of $mathbb{R}$ and let $S_F$ denote the set of values which satisfy some generalized polynomial whose exponents and coefficients are drawn from $F$.
That is, we let $S_F$ denote
$$bigg {x in mathbb{R}: 0=sum_{i=1}^n{a_i x^{e_i}}: e_i in F text{ distinct}, a_iin F text{ non-zero}, nin mathbb{N} bigg }$$



Then $S_{mathbb{mathbb{Q}}}$ is the set of algebraic real numbers and we start to see the beginnings of a chain:



$
mathbb{Q}
subsetneq S_mathbb{Q} subsetneq
S_{S_mathbb{Q}} $



Main Question




Does this chain continue forever? That is, we let $A_0= mathbb{Q}$ and let $A_{n+1}=S_{A_{n}}$. Is it the case that $A_n subsetneq A_{n+1}$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$?




Other curiosities:



Is $A_i$ always a field? Perhaps, the argument is analogous to this. Or maybe this is just the case in a more general setting: Is it the case that $F subset mathbb{R}$, a field implies that $S_F$ is a field?



Is it possible to see that $enotin cup A_i$? Perhaps this is just a tweaking of LW Theorem.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    Every set in the chain is countable, so you certainly don't hit $mathbb{R}$ at any point.
    – Patrick Stevens
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:19










  • How do you propose to define $x^alpha$ if $alpha notin mathbb{Q}$?
    – Hans Engler
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:24






  • 1




    I'm still somewhat concerned about the definition of $x^alpha$ when $x<0$ and $alpha$ is not an integer. But, there is a cool question in here (possibly a very difficult one).
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 3 '18 at 4:31






  • 1




    Mason, I had some simple worries in my mind. Like is $S_F$ necessarily closed under negation?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 3 '18 at 14:06






  • 2




    I don’t think we can rule out $ein A_3$. My impression is that we know almost nothing about the transcendence of numbers like $3^sqrt6-4^sqrt3-1$.
    – Matt F.
    Dec 6 '18 at 22:35


















24














This has now been cross posted to MO.



Let $F$ be a subset of $mathbb{R}$ and let $S_F$ denote the set of values which satisfy some generalized polynomial whose exponents and coefficients are drawn from $F$.
That is, we let $S_F$ denote
$$bigg {x in mathbb{R}: 0=sum_{i=1}^n{a_i x^{e_i}}: e_i in F text{ distinct}, a_iin F text{ non-zero}, nin mathbb{N} bigg }$$



Then $S_{mathbb{mathbb{Q}}}$ is the set of algebraic real numbers and we start to see the beginnings of a chain:



$
mathbb{Q}
subsetneq S_mathbb{Q} subsetneq
S_{S_mathbb{Q}} $



Main Question




Does this chain continue forever? That is, we let $A_0= mathbb{Q}$ and let $A_{n+1}=S_{A_{n}}$. Is it the case that $A_n subsetneq A_{n+1}$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$?




Other curiosities:



Is $A_i$ always a field? Perhaps, the argument is analogous to this. Or maybe this is just the case in a more general setting: Is it the case that $F subset mathbb{R}$, a field implies that $S_F$ is a field?



Is it possible to see that $enotin cup A_i$? Perhaps this is just a tweaking of LW Theorem.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    Every set in the chain is countable, so you certainly don't hit $mathbb{R}$ at any point.
    – Patrick Stevens
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:19










  • How do you propose to define $x^alpha$ if $alpha notin mathbb{Q}$?
    – Hans Engler
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:24






  • 1




    I'm still somewhat concerned about the definition of $x^alpha$ when $x<0$ and $alpha$ is not an integer. But, there is a cool question in here (possibly a very difficult one).
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 3 '18 at 4:31






  • 1




    Mason, I had some simple worries in my mind. Like is $S_F$ necessarily closed under negation?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 3 '18 at 14:06






  • 2




    I don’t think we can rule out $ein A_3$. My impression is that we know almost nothing about the transcendence of numbers like $3^sqrt6-4^sqrt3-1$.
    – Matt F.
    Dec 6 '18 at 22:35
















24












24








24


2





This has now been cross posted to MO.



Let $F$ be a subset of $mathbb{R}$ and let $S_F$ denote the set of values which satisfy some generalized polynomial whose exponents and coefficients are drawn from $F$.
That is, we let $S_F$ denote
$$bigg {x in mathbb{R}: 0=sum_{i=1}^n{a_i x^{e_i}}: e_i in F text{ distinct}, a_iin F text{ non-zero}, nin mathbb{N} bigg }$$



Then $S_{mathbb{mathbb{Q}}}$ is the set of algebraic real numbers and we start to see the beginnings of a chain:



$
mathbb{Q}
subsetneq S_mathbb{Q} subsetneq
S_{S_mathbb{Q}} $



Main Question




Does this chain continue forever? That is, we let $A_0= mathbb{Q}$ and let $A_{n+1}=S_{A_{n}}$. Is it the case that $A_n subsetneq A_{n+1}$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$?




Other curiosities:



Is $A_i$ always a field? Perhaps, the argument is analogous to this. Or maybe this is just the case in a more general setting: Is it the case that $F subset mathbb{R}$, a field implies that $S_F$ is a field?



Is it possible to see that $enotin cup A_i$? Perhaps this is just a tweaking of LW Theorem.










share|cite|improve this question















This has now been cross posted to MO.



Let $F$ be a subset of $mathbb{R}$ and let $S_F$ denote the set of values which satisfy some generalized polynomial whose exponents and coefficients are drawn from $F$.
That is, we let $S_F$ denote
$$bigg {x in mathbb{R}: 0=sum_{i=1}^n{a_i x^{e_i}}: e_i in F text{ distinct}, a_iin F text{ non-zero}, nin mathbb{N} bigg }$$



Then $S_{mathbb{mathbb{Q}}}$ is the set of algebraic real numbers and we start to see the beginnings of a chain:



$
mathbb{Q}
subsetneq S_mathbb{Q} subsetneq
S_{S_mathbb{Q}} $



Main Question




Does this chain continue forever? That is, we let $A_0= mathbb{Q}$ and let $A_{n+1}=S_{A_{n}}$. Is it the case that $A_n subsetneq A_{n+1}$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$?




Other curiosities:



Is $A_i$ always a field? Perhaps, the argument is analogous to this. Or maybe this is just the case in a more general setting: Is it the case that $F subset mathbb{R}$, a field implies that $S_F$ is a field?



Is it possible to see that $enotin cup A_i$? Perhaps this is just a tweaking of LW Theorem.







real-analysis field-theory transcendental-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 20 '18 at 21:00

























asked Nov 26 '18 at 18:55









Mason

1,9641530




1,9641530








  • 3




    Every set in the chain is countable, so you certainly don't hit $mathbb{R}$ at any point.
    – Patrick Stevens
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:19










  • How do you propose to define $x^alpha$ if $alpha notin mathbb{Q}$?
    – Hans Engler
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:24






  • 1




    I'm still somewhat concerned about the definition of $x^alpha$ when $x<0$ and $alpha$ is not an integer. But, there is a cool question in here (possibly a very difficult one).
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 3 '18 at 4:31






  • 1




    Mason, I had some simple worries in my mind. Like is $S_F$ necessarily closed under negation?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 3 '18 at 14:06






  • 2




    I don’t think we can rule out $ein A_3$. My impression is that we know almost nothing about the transcendence of numbers like $3^sqrt6-4^sqrt3-1$.
    – Matt F.
    Dec 6 '18 at 22:35
















  • 3




    Every set in the chain is countable, so you certainly don't hit $mathbb{R}$ at any point.
    – Patrick Stevens
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:19










  • How do you propose to define $x^alpha$ if $alpha notin mathbb{Q}$?
    – Hans Engler
    Nov 26 '18 at 19:24






  • 1




    I'm still somewhat concerned about the definition of $x^alpha$ when $x<0$ and $alpha$ is not an integer. But, there is a cool question in here (possibly a very difficult one).
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 3 '18 at 4:31






  • 1




    Mason, I had some simple worries in my mind. Like is $S_F$ necessarily closed under negation?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 3 '18 at 14:06






  • 2




    I don’t think we can rule out $ein A_3$. My impression is that we know almost nothing about the transcendence of numbers like $3^sqrt6-4^sqrt3-1$.
    – Matt F.
    Dec 6 '18 at 22:35










3




3




Every set in the chain is countable, so you certainly don't hit $mathbb{R}$ at any point.
– Patrick Stevens
Nov 26 '18 at 19:19




Every set in the chain is countable, so you certainly don't hit $mathbb{R}$ at any point.
– Patrick Stevens
Nov 26 '18 at 19:19












How do you propose to define $x^alpha$ if $alpha notin mathbb{Q}$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:24




How do you propose to define $x^alpha$ if $alpha notin mathbb{Q}$?
– Hans Engler
Nov 26 '18 at 19:24




1




1




I'm still somewhat concerned about the definition of $x^alpha$ when $x<0$ and $alpha$ is not an integer. But, there is a cool question in here (possibly a very difficult one).
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 3 '18 at 4:31




I'm still somewhat concerned about the definition of $x^alpha$ when $x<0$ and $alpha$ is not an integer. But, there is a cool question in here (possibly a very difficult one).
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 3 '18 at 4:31




1




1




Mason, I had some simple worries in my mind. Like is $S_F$ necessarily closed under negation?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 3 '18 at 14:06




Mason, I had some simple worries in my mind. Like is $S_F$ necessarily closed under negation?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 3 '18 at 14:06




2




2




I don’t think we can rule out $ein A_3$. My impression is that we know almost nothing about the transcendence of numbers like $3^sqrt6-4^sqrt3-1$.
– Matt F.
Dec 6 '18 at 22:35






I don’t think we can rule out $ein A_3$. My impression is that we know almost nothing about the transcendence of numbers like $3^sqrt6-4^sqrt3-1$.
– Matt F.
Dec 6 '18 at 22:35












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014759%2fconstructing-an-infinite-chain-of-subfields-of-hyper-algebraic-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014759%2fconstructing-an-infinite-chain-of-subfields-of-hyper-algebraic-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa