How to avoid a NAS CPU bottleneck when using SMB












0















I have a NAS running Ubuntu connected via gigabit ethernet to a Windows 10 PC. When copying files via SMB from that PC to the NAS, a single CPU core is at 100% usage (it's a rather slow, low power dual core Intel CPU). The speeds I reach this way range from 20-35MB/s. However, when copying the files via SCP using the Ubuntu runtime in windows to that NAS, I reach consistent 100MB/s speeds. When doing that, both cores are at about 50-70% load. My question is, is there anything a I can configure to improve the efficiency of SMB on a slow CPU (using all the cores?) or is there a different way I can conveniently access my NAS from Windows Explorer while still getting the full performance?



NAS specs:
Intel Atom C3338
1x 8GB DDR4
1x SSD for OS
4x 6TB HDD in RAID 5
Ubuntu 18.04
Samba 4.7.6-Ubuntu










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    What version of SMB are you using. Please edit your question and include this vital information necessary to answer your question

    – Ramhound
    Jan 27 at 13:22
















0















I have a NAS running Ubuntu connected via gigabit ethernet to a Windows 10 PC. When copying files via SMB from that PC to the NAS, a single CPU core is at 100% usage (it's a rather slow, low power dual core Intel CPU). The speeds I reach this way range from 20-35MB/s. However, when copying the files via SCP using the Ubuntu runtime in windows to that NAS, I reach consistent 100MB/s speeds. When doing that, both cores are at about 50-70% load. My question is, is there anything a I can configure to improve the efficiency of SMB on a slow CPU (using all the cores?) or is there a different way I can conveniently access my NAS from Windows Explorer while still getting the full performance?



NAS specs:
Intel Atom C3338
1x 8GB DDR4
1x SSD for OS
4x 6TB HDD in RAID 5
Ubuntu 18.04
Samba 4.7.6-Ubuntu










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    What version of SMB are you using. Please edit your question and include this vital information necessary to answer your question

    – Ramhound
    Jan 27 at 13:22














0












0








0








I have a NAS running Ubuntu connected via gigabit ethernet to a Windows 10 PC. When copying files via SMB from that PC to the NAS, a single CPU core is at 100% usage (it's a rather slow, low power dual core Intel CPU). The speeds I reach this way range from 20-35MB/s. However, when copying the files via SCP using the Ubuntu runtime in windows to that NAS, I reach consistent 100MB/s speeds. When doing that, both cores are at about 50-70% load. My question is, is there anything a I can configure to improve the efficiency of SMB on a slow CPU (using all the cores?) or is there a different way I can conveniently access my NAS from Windows Explorer while still getting the full performance?



NAS specs:
Intel Atom C3338
1x 8GB DDR4
1x SSD for OS
4x 6TB HDD in RAID 5
Ubuntu 18.04
Samba 4.7.6-Ubuntu










share|improve this question
















I have a NAS running Ubuntu connected via gigabit ethernet to a Windows 10 PC. When copying files via SMB from that PC to the NAS, a single CPU core is at 100% usage (it's a rather slow, low power dual core Intel CPU). The speeds I reach this way range from 20-35MB/s. However, when copying the files via SCP using the Ubuntu runtime in windows to that NAS, I reach consistent 100MB/s speeds. When doing that, both cores are at about 50-70% load. My question is, is there anything a I can configure to improve the efficiency of SMB on a slow CPU (using all the cores?) or is there a different way I can conveniently access my NAS from Windows Explorer while still getting the full performance?



NAS specs:
Intel Atom C3338
1x 8GB DDR4
1x SSD for OS
4x 6TB HDD in RAID 5
Ubuntu 18.04
Samba 4.7.6-Ubuntu







networking windows-10 ubuntu nas samba






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 27 at 14:42







Andreas Hartmann

















asked Jan 27 at 13:19









Andreas HartmannAndreas Hartmann

7572821




7572821








  • 1





    What version of SMB are you using. Please edit your question and include this vital information necessary to answer your question

    – Ramhound
    Jan 27 at 13:22














  • 1





    What version of SMB are you using. Please edit your question and include this vital information necessary to answer your question

    – Ramhound
    Jan 27 at 13:22








1




1





What version of SMB are you using. Please edit your question and include this vital information necessary to answer your question

– Ramhound
Jan 27 at 13:22





What version of SMB are you using. Please edit your question and include this vital information necessary to answer your question

– Ramhound
Jan 27 at 13:22










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1398928%2fhow-to-avoid-a-nas-cpu-bottleneck-when-using-smb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1398928%2fhow-to-avoid-a-nas-cpu-bottleneck-when-using-smb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Brian Clough

Cáceres