Using vectors to prove midpoints bisect












3












$begingroup$


Solved!
Thank you to those who answered my question. I managed to solve it while I was away. Will edit this question with my solution so that others can check.



Problem: Prove that the line segments joining the midpoints of opposite sides of a
quadrilateral bisect each other.



enter image description here



My work:



$$U + Z = W + V$$



Let the segment from $frac12U$ to $frac12 W$ be vector $AB$.



Let the segment from $frac12 Z$ to $frac12V$ be vector $CD$.



$$frac12(AB) = frac12U + frac12W + V$$



$$frac12(CD) = frac12Z + frac12V + U$$



^I'm not sure if the above will help me, but it seems like the hint that was given:



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Solved!
    Thank you to those who answered my question. I managed to solve it while I was away. Will edit this question with my solution so that others can check.



    Problem: Prove that the line segments joining the midpoints of opposite sides of a
    quadrilateral bisect each other.



    enter image description here



    My work:



    $$U + Z = W + V$$



    Let the segment from $frac12U$ to $frac12 W$ be vector $AB$.



    Let the segment from $frac12 Z$ to $frac12V$ be vector $CD$.



    $$frac12(AB) = frac12U + frac12W + V$$



    $$frac12(CD) = frac12Z + frac12V + U$$



    ^I'm not sure if the above will help me, but it seems like the hint that was given:



    enter image description here










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      Solved!
      Thank you to those who answered my question. I managed to solve it while I was away. Will edit this question with my solution so that others can check.



      Problem: Prove that the line segments joining the midpoints of opposite sides of a
      quadrilateral bisect each other.



      enter image description here



      My work:



      $$U + Z = W + V$$



      Let the segment from $frac12U$ to $frac12 W$ be vector $AB$.



      Let the segment from $frac12 Z$ to $frac12V$ be vector $CD$.



      $$frac12(AB) = frac12U + frac12W + V$$



      $$frac12(CD) = frac12Z + frac12V + U$$



      ^I'm not sure if the above will help me, but it seems like the hint that was given:



      enter image description here










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Solved!
      Thank you to those who answered my question. I managed to solve it while I was away. Will edit this question with my solution so that others can check.



      Problem: Prove that the line segments joining the midpoints of opposite sides of a
      quadrilateral bisect each other.



      enter image description here



      My work:



      $$U + Z = W + V$$



      Let the segment from $frac12U$ to $frac12 W$ be vector $AB$.



      Let the segment from $frac12 Z$ to $frac12V$ be vector $CD$.



      $$frac12(AB) = frac12U + frac12W + V$$



      $$frac12(CD) = frac12Z + frac12V + U$$



      ^I'm not sure if the above will help me, but it seems like the hint that was given:



      enter image description here







      vectors quadrilateral






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 24 '17 at 1:24









      Siong Thye Goh

      102k1468119




      102k1468119










      asked Jan 14 '14 at 2:38









      Quaxton HaleQuaxton Hale

      66111129




      66111129






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



          the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



          since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



            $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              0












              $begingroup$

              Watch the signs of your vectors.
              -U/2+V+w/2=AB



              Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



              Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
              Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
              Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
              You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



              Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
              Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
              Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
              Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
              Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



              2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



              Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



              Now look to the upper right.
              W-Z=-B+C



              In the lower left
              U-V=A-D



              -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



              -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



              U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



              (A+B)=(C+D)



              But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
              B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
              D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



              The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



              A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



              The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



              Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



              If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



              In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$





















                0












                $begingroup$

                Alternative solution: If $A,B,C,D$ are consecutive midpoints of segments, then $AB$ and $CD$ are midline paralell to one diagonal and $BC$ and $AD$ are paralell to second diagonal, so $ABCD$ is paralelogram and thus it diagonal halves each other. But it diagonals are midline of the starting quadrilateral so we are done.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                  Your Answer





                  StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                  return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                  StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                  StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                  });
                  });
                  }, "mathjax-editing");

                  StackExchange.ready(function() {
                  var channelOptions = {
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "69"
                  };
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                  createEditor();
                  });
                  }
                  else {
                  createEditor();
                  }
                  });

                  function createEditor() {
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: true,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: 10,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader: {
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  },
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  });


                  }
                  });














                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function () {
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f637638%2fusing-vectors-to-prove-midpoints-bisect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                  }
                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



                  the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



                  since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$


















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



                    the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



                    since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$
















                      0












                      0








                      0





                      $begingroup$

                      let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



                      the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



                      since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



                      the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



                      since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Jan 14 '14 at 3:03









                      David HoldenDavid Holden

                      14.9k21225




                      14.9k21225























                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



                          $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            0












                            $begingroup$

                            Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



                            $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              0












                              0








                              0





                              $begingroup$

                              Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



                              $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



                              $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Jan 14 '14 at 3:03









                              Igor RivinIgor Rivin

                              16k11234




                              16k11234























                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Watch the signs of your vectors.
                                  -U/2+V+w/2=AB



                                  Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



                                  Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
                                  Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
                                  Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
                                  You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



                                  Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
                                  Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
                                  Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
                                  Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
                                  Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



                                  2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



                                  Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



                                  Now look to the upper right.
                                  W-Z=-B+C



                                  In the lower left
                                  U-V=A-D



                                  -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



                                  -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



                                  U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



                                  (A+B)=(C+D)



                                  But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
                                  B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
                                  D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



                                  The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



                                  A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



                                  The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



                                  Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



                                  If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



                                  In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$


















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Watch the signs of your vectors.
                                    -U/2+V+w/2=AB



                                    Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



                                    Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
                                    Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
                                    Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
                                    You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



                                    Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
                                    Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
                                    Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
                                    Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
                                    Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



                                    2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



                                    Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



                                    Now look to the upper right.
                                    W-Z=-B+C



                                    In the lower left
                                    U-V=A-D



                                    -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



                                    -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



                                    U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



                                    (A+B)=(C+D)



                                    But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
                                    B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
                                    D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



                                    The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



                                    A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



                                    The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



                                    Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



                                    If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



                                    In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$
















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Watch the signs of your vectors.
                                      -U/2+V+w/2=AB



                                      Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



                                      Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
                                      Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
                                      Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
                                      You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



                                      Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
                                      Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
                                      Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
                                      Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
                                      Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



                                      2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



                                      Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



                                      Now look to the upper right.
                                      W-Z=-B+C



                                      In the lower left
                                      U-V=A-D



                                      -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



                                      -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



                                      U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



                                      (A+B)=(C+D)



                                      But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
                                      B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
                                      D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



                                      The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



                                      A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



                                      The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



                                      Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



                                      If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



                                      In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$



                                      Watch the signs of your vectors.
                                      -U/2+V+w/2=AB



                                      Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



                                      Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
                                      Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
                                      Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
                                      You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



                                      Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
                                      Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
                                      Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
                                      Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
                                      Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



                                      2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



                                      Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



                                      Now look to the upper right.
                                      W-Z=-B+C



                                      In the lower left
                                      U-V=A-D



                                      -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



                                      -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



                                      U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



                                      (A+B)=(C+D)



                                      But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
                                      B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
                                      D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



                                      The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



                                      A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



                                      The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



                                      Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



                                      If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



                                      In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer








                                      edited Nov 15 '18 at 9:09

























                                      answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:04









                                      Katherine RogersKatherine Rogers

                                      11




                                      11























                                          0












                                          $begingroup$

                                          Alternative solution: If $A,B,C,D$ are consecutive midpoints of segments, then $AB$ and $CD$ are midline paralell to one diagonal and $BC$ and $AD$ are paralell to second diagonal, so $ABCD$ is paralelogram and thus it diagonal halves each other. But it diagonals are midline of the starting quadrilateral so we are done.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$


















                                            0












                                            $begingroup$

                                            Alternative solution: If $A,B,C,D$ are consecutive midpoints of segments, then $AB$ and $CD$ are midline paralell to one diagonal and $BC$ and $AD$ are paralell to second diagonal, so $ABCD$ is paralelogram and thus it diagonal halves each other. But it diagonals are midline of the starting quadrilateral so we are done.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$
















                                              0












                                              0








                                              0





                                              $begingroup$

                                              Alternative solution: If $A,B,C,D$ are consecutive midpoints of segments, then $AB$ and $CD$ are midline paralell to one diagonal and $BC$ and $AD$ are paralell to second diagonal, so $ABCD$ is paralelogram and thus it diagonal halves each other. But it diagonals are midline of the starting quadrilateral so we are done.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$



                                              Alternative solution: If $A,B,C,D$ are consecutive midpoints of segments, then $AB$ and $CD$ are midline paralell to one diagonal and $BC$ and $AD$ are paralell to second diagonal, so $ABCD$ is paralelogram and thus it diagonal halves each other. But it diagonals are midline of the starting quadrilateral so we are done.







                                              share|cite|improve this answer












                                              share|cite|improve this answer



                                              share|cite|improve this answer










                                              answered Dec 15 '18 at 23:16









                                              Maria MazurMaria Mazur

                                              46.4k1160119




                                              46.4k1160119






























                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded




















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid



                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                  Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function () {
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f637638%2fusing-vectors-to-prove-midpoints-bisect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                  }
                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  Plaza Victoria

                                                  In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                                                  How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...