Find the equation of the plane containing these lines












-1












$begingroup$


So I was given these lines:
$$frac{x-1}{2} = frac{y-2}{-2} = frac{z}{-1}$$
$$ frac{x}{-2} = y+frac{5}{3} = z-frac{4}{0} $$
And I was asked to find out if they are parallel or perpendicular. Now I found that they are not perpendicular since the determinant of the system is not equal to zero. But I was also asked to find the equation of plane containing these line but honestly don't know even where to start. Any Hints?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
    $endgroup$
    – dantopa
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:28






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
    $endgroup$
    – Mustang
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:38










  • $begingroup$
    @user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:05
















-1












$begingroup$


So I was given these lines:
$$frac{x-1}{2} = frac{y-2}{-2} = frac{z}{-1}$$
$$ frac{x}{-2} = y+frac{5}{3} = z-frac{4}{0} $$
And I was asked to find out if they are parallel or perpendicular. Now I found that they are not perpendicular since the determinant of the system is not equal to zero. But I was also asked to find the equation of plane containing these line but honestly don't know even where to start. Any Hints?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
    $endgroup$
    – dantopa
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:28






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
    $endgroup$
    – Mustang
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:38










  • $begingroup$
    @user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:05














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


So I was given these lines:
$$frac{x-1}{2} = frac{y-2}{-2} = frac{z}{-1}$$
$$ frac{x}{-2} = y+frac{5}{3} = z-frac{4}{0} $$
And I was asked to find out if they are parallel or perpendicular. Now I found that they are not perpendicular since the determinant of the system is not equal to zero. But I was also asked to find the equation of plane containing these line but honestly don't know even where to start. Any Hints?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




So I was given these lines:
$$frac{x-1}{2} = frac{y-2}{-2} = frac{z}{-1}$$
$$ frac{x}{-2} = y+frac{5}{3} = z-frac{4}{0} $$
And I was asked to find out if they are parallel or perpendicular. Now I found that they are not perpendicular since the determinant of the system is not equal to zero. But I was also asked to find the equation of plane containing these line but honestly don't know even where to start. Any Hints?







geometry plane-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 22 '18 at 20:26









dantopa

6,69442245




6,69442245










asked Dec 22 '18 at 20:00









YolaYola

63




63












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
    $endgroup$
    – dantopa
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:28






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
    $endgroup$
    – Mustang
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:38










  • $begingroup$
    @user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:05


















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
    $endgroup$
    – dantopa
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:28






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
    $endgroup$
    – Mustang
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Dec 22 '18 at 20:38










  • $begingroup$
    @user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:05
















$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
$endgroup$
– dantopa
Dec 22 '18 at 20:28




$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! For an improved experience, please use MathJax (math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…).
$endgroup$
– dantopa
Dec 22 '18 at 20:28




3




3




$begingroup$
there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
$endgroup$
– Mustang
Dec 22 '18 at 20:29




$begingroup$
there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation!
$endgroup$
– Mustang
Dec 22 '18 at 20:29




1




1




$begingroup$
$x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 20:38




$begingroup$
$x- frac{4}{0}$ makes no sense. I presume you meant $frac{z- 4}{0}$. But then I don't know whether you really meant $y- frac{5}{3}$ or $frac{y- 5}{3}$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 20:38












$begingroup$
@user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:02




$begingroup$
@user247327 Also $;frac{z-4}0;$ doesn't make any sense...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 22 '18 at 21:02












$begingroup$
Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 21:05




$begingroup$
Yes, it does. That is a standard notation for "symmetric form" when one of the coordinates is constant.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Dec 22 '18 at 21:05










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.



1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.



2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.



3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.



    So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.



    The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
      $endgroup$
      – DonAntonio
      Dec 22 '18 at 21:04












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049797%2ffind-the-equation-of-the-plane-containing-these-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.



    1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.



    2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.



    3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.



      1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.



      2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.



      3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.



        1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.



        2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.



        3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Since there's a $frac{4}{0}$ in the second equation I'll only comment on the general procedure of finding out the solution but not the actual computation.



        1)To check if the lines are perpendicular, do a dot product of vectors parallel to it(hint:its 0 if they were perpendicular and the 2 vectors would be scalar multiples if they were parallel). The equation of a line passing through a point $x_1,x_2,x_3$ and parallel to (a,b,c) in coordinate form is- $frac{x-x_1}{a}=frac{y-x_2}{b}=frac{z-x_3}{c}=constant=lambda (say)$ where x,y,z are any points on the line.



        2) Finding out the point of intersection- Write the equation of the line in the parametric form, from above it'll give $(x,y,z)=(alambda+x_1,blambda +x_2,clambda+ x_3)$ and put this into the equation of the second line to find out the point of intersection.



        3) Now having a point in the plane and 2 lines passing through it you would be able to write the equation of the plane containing the lines with the following procedure- given 2 lines are $frac{x-x_1}{a_1}=frac{y-x_2}{b_1}=frac{z-x_3}{c_1}$ and $frac{x-y_1}{a_2}=frac{y-y_2}{b_2}=frac{z-y_3}{c_2}$ and they pass through the point ($alpha_1,alpha_2,alpha_3$), then the equation of all the points (x,y,z) in the plane would satisfy $(x-alpha_1,y-alpha_2,z-alpha_3).{(a_1,b_1,c_1)times(a_2,b_2,c_2)}=0$, i.e., this is the equaiton of the plane in coordinate form.(it can be interpreted as saying that the dot product of any vector inside the plane with the normal to the plane is always 0 since the vector is parallel to the plane and hence perpendicular to the normal.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 22 '18 at 20:48









        MustangMustang

        3367




        3367























            0












            $begingroup$

            Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.



            So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.



            The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
              $endgroup$
              – DonAntonio
              Dec 22 '18 at 21:04
















            0












            $begingroup$

            Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.



            So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.



            The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
              $endgroup$
              – DonAntonio
              Dec 22 '18 at 21:04














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.



            So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.



            The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Personally, I prefer to write lines in parametric form. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{y- 2}{-2}$ is the same as $1- x= y- 2$ or $y= 3- x$. $frac{x- 1}{2}= frac{z}{-1}$ is the same as $1- x= 2z$ or $x= 1- 2z$. Taking z as parameter, t, we have $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 3- x= 3- 1+ 2t= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$. For the second line, assuming you mean $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}= frac{z- 4}{0}$, from $frac{x}{-2}= frac{y- 5}{3}$ we get $3x= -2y+ 10$ or $2y= 10- 3x$. Taking parameter s such that $x= 2s$, $2y= 10- 6s$ so $y= 5- 3s$. The "$frac{z- 4}{0}$" means that z is the constant, $z= 4$.



            So the two lines are given by $x= 1- 2t$, $y= 2+ 2t$, $z= t$, and $x= 2s$, $y= 5- 3s$, $z= 4$. They are not parallel because the "direction vectors", -2i+ 2k+ z and 2i- 3s are not parallel- one is not a multiple of the other. The only other possibilities are that they intersect pr are skew. If they intersect then there exist two numbers, s and t, such that $x= 1- 2t= 2s$, $y= 2+ 2t= 5- 3s$ and $z= t= 4$. Setting t= 4 in the x-equation, $x= 1- 8= -7= 2s$ so $s= -7/2$. Setting t= 4 and s= -7/2 in the y-equation, $y= 2+ 8= 5+ 21/2$ which is false. There are no values of s and t that make all three equations true so the lines do not intersect.



            The lines are neither parallel nor do they intersect. They are skew. There is no plane that contains both lines.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 22 '18 at 20:59









            user247327user247327

            11.7k1516




            11.7k1516












            • $begingroup$
              From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
              $endgroup$
              – DonAntonio
              Dec 22 '18 at 21:04


















            • $begingroup$
              From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
              $endgroup$
              – DonAntonio
              Dec 22 '18 at 21:04
















            $begingroup$
            From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
            $endgroup$
            – DonAntonio
            Dec 22 '18 at 21:04




            $begingroup$
            From where do you deduce that $;frac{z-4}0;$ means $;z;$ is constant equal to $;4;$ ? Is this a standard notation? I don't know it...
            $endgroup$
            – DonAntonio
            Dec 22 '18 at 21:04


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049797%2ffind-the-equation-of-the-plane-containing-these-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...