Finite Additivity of the Jordan Measure












0












$begingroup$


I am attempting to prove the finite additivity of the Jordan Measure (meaning if A and B Jordan Measurable and are disjoint then the Jordan Measure of A ∪ B equals the Jordan Measure of A + the Jordan Measure of B).



To clarify, my definition of Jordan Measurable is that the characteristic function defined on the set is Riemann Integrable.



If A and B are separable, it is clear as there will be a partition fine enough that each cube in the partition only intersects A or B (but not both).



However, I am having trouble when A and B are not separable. You should be able to make the volume of the cubes that intersect both A and B arbitrarily small but I am having trouble formally articulating this



Thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am attempting to prove the finite additivity of the Jordan Measure (meaning if A and B Jordan Measurable and are disjoint then the Jordan Measure of A ∪ B equals the Jordan Measure of A + the Jordan Measure of B).



    To clarify, my definition of Jordan Measurable is that the characteristic function defined on the set is Riemann Integrable.



    If A and B are separable, it is clear as there will be a partition fine enough that each cube in the partition only intersects A or B (but not both).



    However, I am having trouble when A and B are not separable. You should be able to make the volume of the cubes that intersect both A and B arbitrarily small but I am having trouble formally articulating this



    Thanks










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am attempting to prove the finite additivity of the Jordan Measure (meaning if A and B Jordan Measurable and are disjoint then the Jordan Measure of A ∪ B equals the Jordan Measure of A + the Jordan Measure of B).



      To clarify, my definition of Jordan Measurable is that the characteristic function defined on the set is Riemann Integrable.



      If A and B are separable, it is clear as there will be a partition fine enough that each cube in the partition only intersects A or B (but not both).



      However, I am having trouble when A and B are not separable. You should be able to make the volume of the cubes that intersect both A and B arbitrarily small but I am having trouble formally articulating this



      Thanks










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am attempting to prove the finite additivity of the Jordan Measure (meaning if A and B Jordan Measurable and are disjoint then the Jordan Measure of A ∪ B equals the Jordan Measure of A + the Jordan Measure of B).



      To clarify, my definition of Jordan Measurable is that the characteristic function defined on the set is Riemann Integrable.



      If A and B are separable, it is clear as there will be a partition fine enough that each cube in the partition only intersects A or B (but not both).



      However, I am having trouble when A and B are not separable. You should be able to make the volume of the cubes that intersect both A and B arbitrarily small but I am having trouble formally articulating this



      Thanks







      measure-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 10 '18 at 0:34







      DSUR

















      asked Mar 10 '18 at 0:27









      DSURDSUR

      294




      294






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I am going to first state an equivalent criterion for Jordan measurability and then work with this criterion.



          Call a set elementary if it is a finite union of boxes. Clearly, elementary sets are Jordan measurable. Suppose $E$ is Jordan measurable. The measure of each elementary set contained in $E$ is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, the supremum of the measures of all elementary sets contained in $E$ (called the Inner Jordan measure of $E$) is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. Similarly, the infimum of the measures of all elementary sets containing $E$ (called the Outer Jordan measure of $E$) is greater than the upper integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, if the inner and outer Jordan measure of $E$ are equal then $E$ is Jordan measurable.



          Conversely, if $E$ is Jordan measurable, then we have a partition for which the upper and lower sums of the characteristic function of $E$ are arbitrarily close. Let $T$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which intersect $E$, and let $S$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which are contained in $E$. The measures of $T$ and $S$ are nothing but the upper and lower sum respectively, so the measure of $T$ and measure of $S$ are arbitrarily close, which means the inner Jordan measure and the outer Jordan measure are equal, and equal to the Jordan measure of $E$.



          Coming back to our disjoint Jordan measurable sets $A$ and $B$, we see that the Jordan outer measure of $Acup B$ is not more than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, since we can have elementary sets containing $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure less than or equal to the sum of their measures.



          We can also have elementary sets contained in $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure equal to the sum of their measures (here we use the fact that $A$ and $B$ are disjoint, and that disjoint elementary sets are seperable). So, the inner Jordan measure of $A cup B$ is not less than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$.



          The inner Jordan measure of any set is less than or equal to its outer Jordan measure, and so we have the result.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2684535%2ffinite-additivity-of-the-jordan-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            I am going to first state an equivalent criterion for Jordan measurability and then work with this criterion.



            Call a set elementary if it is a finite union of boxes. Clearly, elementary sets are Jordan measurable. Suppose $E$ is Jordan measurable. The measure of each elementary set contained in $E$ is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, the supremum of the measures of all elementary sets contained in $E$ (called the Inner Jordan measure of $E$) is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. Similarly, the infimum of the measures of all elementary sets containing $E$ (called the Outer Jordan measure of $E$) is greater than the upper integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, if the inner and outer Jordan measure of $E$ are equal then $E$ is Jordan measurable.



            Conversely, if $E$ is Jordan measurable, then we have a partition for which the upper and lower sums of the characteristic function of $E$ are arbitrarily close. Let $T$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which intersect $E$, and let $S$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which are contained in $E$. The measures of $T$ and $S$ are nothing but the upper and lower sum respectively, so the measure of $T$ and measure of $S$ are arbitrarily close, which means the inner Jordan measure and the outer Jordan measure are equal, and equal to the Jordan measure of $E$.



            Coming back to our disjoint Jordan measurable sets $A$ and $B$, we see that the Jordan outer measure of $Acup B$ is not more than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, since we can have elementary sets containing $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure less than or equal to the sum of their measures.



            We can also have elementary sets contained in $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure equal to the sum of their measures (here we use the fact that $A$ and $B$ are disjoint, and that disjoint elementary sets are seperable). So, the inner Jordan measure of $A cup B$ is not less than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$.



            The inner Jordan measure of any set is less than or equal to its outer Jordan measure, and so we have the result.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              I am going to first state an equivalent criterion for Jordan measurability and then work with this criterion.



              Call a set elementary if it is a finite union of boxes. Clearly, elementary sets are Jordan measurable. Suppose $E$ is Jordan measurable. The measure of each elementary set contained in $E$ is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, the supremum of the measures of all elementary sets contained in $E$ (called the Inner Jordan measure of $E$) is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. Similarly, the infimum of the measures of all elementary sets containing $E$ (called the Outer Jordan measure of $E$) is greater than the upper integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, if the inner and outer Jordan measure of $E$ are equal then $E$ is Jordan measurable.



              Conversely, if $E$ is Jordan measurable, then we have a partition for which the upper and lower sums of the characteristic function of $E$ are arbitrarily close. Let $T$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which intersect $E$, and let $S$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which are contained in $E$. The measures of $T$ and $S$ are nothing but the upper and lower sum respectively, so the measure of $T$ and measure of $S$ are arbitrarily close, which means the inner Jordan measure and the outer Jordan measure are equal, and equal to the Jordan measure of $E$.



              Coming back to our disjoint Jordan measurable sets $A$ and $B$, we see that the Jordan outer measure of $Acup B$ is not more than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, since we can have elementary sets containing $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure less than or equal to the sum of their measures.



              We can also have elementary sets contained in $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure equal to the sum of their measures (here we use the fact that $A$ and $B$ are disjoint, and that disjoint elementary sets are seperable). So, the inner Jordan measure of $A cup B$ is not less than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$.



              The inner Jordan measure of any set is less than or equal to its outer Jordan measure, and so we have the result.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I am going to first state an equivalent criterion for Jordan measurability and then work with this criterion.



                Call a set elementary if it is a finite union of boxes. Clearly, elementary sets are Jordan measurable. Suppose $E$ is Jordan measurable. The measure of each elementary set contained in $E$ is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, the supremum of the measures of all elementary sets contained in $E$ (called the Inner Jordan measure of $E$) is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. Similarly, the infimum of the measures of all elementary sets containing $E$ (called the Outer Jordan measure of $E$) is greater than the upper integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, if the inner and outer Jordan measure of $E$ are equal then $E$ is Jordan measurable.



                Conversely, if $E$ is Jordan measurable, then we have a partition for which the upper and lower sums of the characteristic function of $E$ are arbitrarily close. Let $T$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which intersect $E$, and let $S$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which are contained in $E$. The measures of $T$ and $S$ are nothing but the upper and lower sum respectively, so the measure of $T$ and measure of $S$ are arbitrarily close, which means the inner Jordan measure and the outer Jordan measure are equal, and equal to the Jordan measure of $E$.



                Coming back to our disjoint Jordan measurable sets $A$ and $B$, we see that the Jordan outer measure of $Acup B$ is not more than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, since we can have elementary sets containing $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure less than or equal to the sum of their measures.



                We can also have elementary sets contained in $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure equal to the sum of their measures (here we use the fact that $A$ and $B$ are disjoint, and that disjoint elementary sets are seperable). So, the inner Jordan measure of $A cup B$ is not less than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$.



                The inner Jordan measure of any set is less than or equal to its outer Jordan measure, and so we have the result.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I am going to first state an equivalent criterion for Jordan measurability and then work with this criterion.



                Call a set elementary if it is a finite union of boxes. Clearly, elementary sets are Jordan measurable. Suppose $E$ is Jordan measurable. The measure of each elementary set contained in $E$ is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, the supremum of the measures of all elementary sets contained in $E$ (called the Inner Jordan measure of $E$) is less than the lower integral of the characteristic function of $E$. Similarly, the infimum of the measures of all elementary sets containing $E$ (called the Outer Jordan measure of $E$) is greater than the upper integral of the characteristic function of $E$. So, if the inner and outer Jordan measure of $E$ are equal then $E$ is Jordan measurable.



                Conversely, if $E$ is Jordan measurable, then we have a partition for which the upper and lower sums of the characteristic function of $E$ are arbitrarily close. Let $T$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which intersect $E$, and let $S$ be the union of the boxes of this partition which are contained in $E$. The measures of $T$ and $S$ are nothing but the upper and lower sum respectively, so the measure of $T$ and measure of $S$ are arbitrarily close, which means the inner Jordan measure and the outer Jordan measure are equal, and equal to the Jordan measure of $E$.



                Coming back to our disjoint Jordan measurable sets $A$ and $B$, we see that the Jordan outer measure of $Acup B$ is not more than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, since we can have elementary sets containing $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure less than or equal to the sum of their measures.



                We can also have elementary sets contained in $A$ and $B$ whose measures are arbitrarily close to the Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$, and the union of these elementary sets has measure equal to the sum of their measures (here we use the fact that $A$ and $B$ are disjoint, and that disjoint elementary sets are seperable). So, the inner Jordan measure of $A cup B$ is not less than the sum of Jordan measures of $A$ and $B$.



                The inner Jordan measure of any set is less than or equal to its outer Jordan measure, and so we have the result.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 23 '18 at 12:52









                fgraderboyfgraderboy

                12




                12






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2684535%2ffinite-additivity-of-the-jordan-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...