Quadrilaterals with equal sides












17












$begingroup$


Quadrilateral




$AC = BD$



$EC = ED$



$AF = FB$



Angle CAF = 70 deg



Angle DBF = 60 deg



We are looking for angle EFA.




I have found through Geogebra that the required angle is 85 deg.
Any ideas how to prove it? I am not so familiar with Geometry :(










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    17












    $begingroup$


    Quadrilateral




    $AC = BD$



    $EC = ED$



    $AF = FB$



    Angle CAF = 70 deg



    Angle DBF = 60 deg



    We are looking for angle EFA.




    I have found through Geogebra that the required angle is 85 deg.
    Any ideas how to prove it? I am not so familiar with Geometry :(










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      17












      17








      17


      7



      $begingroup$


      Quadrilateral




      $AC = BD$



      $EC = ED$



      $AF = FB$



      Angle CAF = 70 deg



      Angle DBF = 60 deg



      We are looking for angle EFA.




      I have found through Geogebra that the required angle is 85 deg.
      Any ideas how to prove it? I am not so familiar with Geometry :(










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Quadrilateral




      $AC = BD$



      $EC = ED$



      $AF = FB$



      Angle CAF = 70 deg



      Angle DBF = 60 deg



      We are looking for angle EFA.




      I have found through Geogebra that the required angle is 85 deg.
      Any ideas how to prove it? I am not so familiar with Geometry :(







      geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 19 at 8:57









      SamuelSamuel

      532412




      532412






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9












          $begingroup$

          Consider the following triangle:-



          enter image description here



          Let $JM = a, JN = b $ . In this particular $triangle$, $MK=NL =$ say $x$.



          Draw the angle bisector of $angle J$ , $JO$.



          WLOG $a<b$.



          Then , by the internal angle bisector theorem , $MR = k_1a , RN = k_1b , KO= k_2(a+x) , OL = k_2(b+x) $.



          Obviously , $MN=k_1(a+b) $ and $KL =k_2(a+b+2x)$



          Now , locate a point $J'$ along $JL$ , such that $JJ'=frac{b-a}{2}$ . While this may seem arbitrary , things will become clear soon.



          Draw $J'Q$ parallel to $JO$ .



          $J'N=JN-JJ'=frac{a+b}{2}$.



          Using similarity in $triangle $s $JRN$ and $J'SN$ , $SN$ = $frac{k_1(a+b)}{2}$



          This implies that $S$ is the midpoint of $MN$ !



          Similarly , we find $QL$ to equal $k_2(frac{a+b}{2}+x)$ , proving that $Q$ is the midpoint of $KL$ .



          Recall that by construction, $J'Q$ is parallel to $JO$.



          Thus , we have discovered the fact , that :-



          The line joining the midpoints of the opposite sides of a quadrilateral ,when its other sides are equal , is parallel to the angle bisector of the angle formed by extending the other two sides.



          Your problem is now trivial .



          In your case , $angle MKL=70 , angle KLN =60 $



          $therefore angle KJL = 50 implies angle RJN = angle QJ'N = 25$



          External angle $J'QK = 25+60 = boxed{85} $






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Hope you retained OP's labels of intersection points.
            $endgroup$
            – Narasimham
            Apr 19 at 13:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Narasimham No , I'm sorry , I haven't ;) . I can change all the labels , and the image , if you desire, but it would take a while.
            $endgroup$
            – Sinπ
            Apr 19 at 13:06












          • $begingroup$
            @Sinπ thank you very much!! No need to change any labels; everything is very clear!!
            $endgroup$
            – Samuel
            Apr 19 at 13:38












          • $begingroup$
            Your result was apparently new, I up-voted. In good time you may consider relabelling for an answer that corresponds, esp. it is accepted now :)
            $endgroup$
            – Narasimham
            Apr 19 at 13:44



















          0












          $begingroup$

          Here' is another solution. Let $alpha$ and $beta$ be the angles at $A$ and $B$, resp., let $a$ and $b$ be the length of $AF$ and $AC$, resp. Consider a coordinate system with origin $F$ and let $FB$ the direction of the abscissa. Let $varphi$ be the angle in question.



          Then
          $$FC=begin{pmatrix}-a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
          cos(alpha)\ sin(alpha)end{pmatrix}text{ and }
          FD=begin{pmatrix}a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
          -cos(beta)\ sin(beta)end{pmatrix},$$

          hence $FE$ the midpoint of $C$ and $D$ is
          $$frac12bbegin{pmatrix}
          cos(alpha)-cos(beta)\ sin(alpha)+sin(beta)end{pmatrix}.$$

          Therefore the slope of $FE$ is
          $$tan(180-varphi)=frac{sin(alpha)+sin(beta)}{cos(alpha)-cos(beta)}
          =frac{2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)cos(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}{-2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)sin(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}
          =-frac{1}{tanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)},$$

          that is
          $$tan(varphi)cdottanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)=-1,$$
          hence the line $FE$ is perpendicular to one with an angle of $(alpha-beta)2$. Thus, $180-varphi$ and $(alpha-beta)/2$ differ by $90$.



          In our case $(alpha-beta)/2=5$, so the perpendicular line must have an angle of $95$, that is $180-varphi=95$.



          NB: I'm sure there is a simpler way to achieve this general result.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193339%2fquadrilaterals-with-equal-sides%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            9












            $begingroup$

            Consider the following triangle:-



            enter image description here



            Let $JM = a, JN = b $ . In this particular $triangle$, $MK=NL =$ say $x$.



            Draw the angle bisector of $angle J$ , $JO$.



            WLOG $a<b$.



            Then , by the internal angle bisector theorem , $MR = k_1a , RN = k_1b , KO= k_2(a+x) , OL = k_2(b+x) $.



            Obviously , $MN=k_1(a+b) $ and $KL =k_2(a+b+2x)$



            Now , locate a point $J'$ along $JL$ , such that $JJ'=frac{b-a}{2}$ . While this may seem arbitrary , things will become clear soon.



            Draw $J'Q$ parallel to $JO$ .



            $J'N=JN-JJ'=frac{a+b}{2}$.



            Using similarity in $triangle $s $JRN$ and $J'SN$ , $SN$ = $frac{k_1(a+b)}{2}$



            This implies that $S$ is the midpoint of $MN$ !



            Similarly , we find $QL$ to equal $k_2(frac{a+b}{2}+x)$ , proving that $Q$ is the midpoint of $KL$ .



            Recall that by construction, $J'Q$ is parallel to $JO$.



            Thus , we have discovered the fact , that :-



            The line joining the midpoints of the opposite sides of a quadrilateral ,when its other sides are equal , is parallel to the angle bisector of the angle formed by extending the other two sides.



            Your problem is now trivial .



            In your case , $angle MKL=70 , angle KLN =60 $



            $therefore angle KJL = 50 implies angle RJN = angle QJ'N = 25$



            External angle $J'QK = 25+60 = boxed{85} $






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Hope you retained OP's labels of intersection points.
              $endgroup$
              – Narasimham
              Apr 19 at 13:02










            • $begingroup$
              @Narasimham No , I'm sorry , I haven't ;) . I can change all the labels , and the image , if you desire, but it would take a while.
              $endgroup$
              – Sinπ
              Apr 19 at 13:06












            • $begingroup$
              @Sinπ thank you very much!! No need to change any labels; everything is very clear!!
              $endgroup$
              – Samuel
              Apr 19 at 13:38












            • $begingroup$
              Your result was apparently new, I up-voted. In good time you may consider relabelling for an answer that corresponds, esp. it is accepted now :)
              $endgroup$
              – Narasimham
              Apr 19 at 13:44
















            9












            $begingroup$

            Consider the following triangle:-



            enter image description here



            Let $JM = a, JN = b $ . In this particular $triangle$, $MK=NL =$ say $x$.



            Draw the angle bisector of $angle J$ , $JO$.



            WLOG $a<b$.



            Then , by the internal angle bisector theorem , $MR = k_1a , RN = k_1b , KO= k_2(a+x) , OL = k_2(b+x) $.



            Obviously , $MN=k_1(a+b) $ and $KL =k_2(a+b+2x)$



            Now , locate a point $J'$ along $JL$ , such that $JJ'=frac{b-a}{2}$ . While this may seem arbitrary , things will become clear soon.



            Draw $J'Q$ parallel to $JO$ .



            $J'N=JN-JJ'=frac{a+b}{2}$.



            Using similarity in $triangle $s $JRN$ and $J'SN$ , $SN$ = $frac{k_1(a+b)}{2}$



            This implies that $S$ is the midpoint of $MN$ !



            Similarly , we find $QL$ to equal $k_2(frac{a+b}{2}+x)$ , proving that $Q$ is the midpoint of $KL$ .



            Recall that by construction, $J'Q$ is parallel to $JO$.



            Thus , we have discovered the fact , that :-



            The line joining the midpoints of the opposite sides of a quadrilateral ,when its other sides are equal , is parallel to the angle bisector of the angle formed by extending the other two sides.



            Your problem is now trivial .



            In your case , $angle MKL=70 , angle KLN =60 $



            $therefore angle KJL = 50 implies angle RJN = angle QJ'N = 25$



            External angle $J'QK = 25+60 = boxed{85} $






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Hope you retained OP's labels of intersection points.
              $endgroup$
              – Narasimham
              Apr 19 at 13:02










            • $begingroup$
              @Narasimham No , I'm sorry , I haven't ;) . I can change all the labels , and the image , if you desire, but it would take a while.
              $endgroup$
              – Sinπ
              Apr 19 at 13:06












            • $begingroup$
              @Sinπ thank you very much!! No need to change any labels; everything is very clear!!
              $endgroup$
              – Samuel
              Apr 19 at 13:38












            • $begingroup$
              Your result was apparently new, I up-voted. In good time you may consider relabelling for an answer that corresponds, esp. it is accepted now :)
              $endgroup$
              – Narasimham
              Apr 19 at 13:44














            9












            9








            9





            $begingroup$

            Consider the following triangle:-



            enter image description here



            Let $JM = a, JN = b $ . In this particular $triangle$, $MK=NL =$ say $x$.



            Draw the angle bisector of $angle J$ , $JO$.



            WLOG $a<b$.



            Then , by the internal angle bisector theorem , $MR = k_1a , RN = k_1b , KO= k_2(a+x) , OL = k_2(b+x) $.



            Obviously , $MN=k_1(a+b) $ and $KL =k_2(a+b+2x)$



            Now , locate a point $J'$ along $JL$ , such that $JJ'=frac{b-a}{2}$ . While this may seem arbitrary , things will become clear soon.



            Draw $J'Q$ parallel to $JO$ .



            $J'N=JN-JJ'=frac{a+b}{2}$.



            Using similarity in $triangle $s $JRN$ and $J'SN$ , $SN$ = $frac{k_1(a+b)}{2}$



            This implies that $S$ is the midpoint of $MN$ !



            Similarly , we find $QL$ to equal $k_2(frac{a+b}{2}+x)$ , proving that $Q$ is the midpoint of $KL$ .



            Recall that by construction, $J'Q$ is parallel to $JO$.



            Thus , we have discovered the fact , that :-



            The line joining the midpoints of the opposite sides of a quadrilateral ,when its other sides are equal , is parallel to the angle bisector of the angle formed by extending the other two sides.



            Your problem is now trivial .



            In your case , $angle MKL=70 , angle KLN =60 $



            $therefore angle KJL = 50 implies angle RJN = angle QJ'N = 25$



            External angle $J'QK = 25+60 = boxed{85} $






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Consider the following triangle:-



            enter image description here



            Let $JM = a, JN = b $ . In this particular $triangle$, $MK=NL =$ say $x$.



            Draw the angle bisector of $angle J$ , $JO$.



            WLOG $a<b$.



            Then , by the internal angle bisector theorem , $MR = k_1a , RN = k_1b , KO= k_2(a+x) , OL = k_2(b+x) $.



            Obviously , $MN=k_1(a+b) $ and $KL =k_2(a+b+2x)$



            Now , locate a point $J'$ along $JL$ , such that $JJ'=frac{b-a}{2}$ . While this may seem arbitrary , things will become clear soon.



            Draw $J'Q$ parallel to $JO$ .



            $J'N=JN-JJ'=frac{a+b}{2}$.



            Using similarity in $triangle $s $JRN$ and $J'SN$ , $SN$ = $frac{k_1(a+b)}{2}$



            This implies that $S$ is the midpoint of $MN$ !



            Similarly , we find $QL$ to equal $k_2(frac{a+b}{2}+x)$ , proving that $Q$ is the midpoint of $KL$ .



            Recall that by construction, $J'Q$ is parallel to $JO$.



            Thus , we have discovered the fact , that :-



            The line joining the midpoints of the opposite sides of a quadrilateral ,when its other sides are equal , is parallel to the angle bisector of the angle formed by extending the other two sides.



            Your problem is now trivial .



            In your case , $angle MKL=70 , angle KLN =60 $



            $therefore angle KJL = 50 implies angle RJN = angle QJ'N = 25$



            External angle $J'QK = 25+60 = boxed{85} $







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Apr 19 at 12:48

























            answered Apr 19 at 12:37









            SinπSinπ

            75212




            75212












            • $begingroup$
              Hope you retained OP's labels of intersection points.
              $endgroup$
              – Narasimham
              Apr 19 at 13:02










            • $begingroup$
              @Narasimham No , I'm sorry , I haven't ;) . I can change all the labels , and the image , if you desire, but it would take a while.
              $endgroup$
              – Sinπ
              Apr 19 at 13:06












            • $begingroup$
              @Sinπ thank you very much!! No need to change any labels; everything is very clear!!
              $endgroup$
              – Samuel
              Apr 19 at 13:38












            • $begingroup$
              Your result was apparently new, I up-voted. In good time you may consider relabelling for an answer that corresponds, esp. it is accepted now :)
              $endgroup$
              – Narasimham
              Apr 19 at 13:44


















            • $begingroup$
              Hope you retained OP's labels of intersection points.
              $endgroup$
              – Narasimham
              Apr 19 at 13:02










            • $begingroup$
              @Narasimham No , I'm sorry , I haven't ;) . I can change all the labels , and the image , if you desire, but it would take a while.
              $endgroup$
              – Sinπ
              Apr 19 at 13:06












            • $begingroup$
              @Sinπ thank you very much!! No need to change any labels; everything is very clear!!
              $endgroup$
              – Samuel
              Apr 19 at 13:38












            • $begingroup$
              Your result was apparently new, I up-voted. In good time you may consider relabelling for an answer that corresponds, esp. it is accepted now :)
              $endgroup$
              – Narasimham
              Apr 19 at 13:44
















            $begingroup$
            Hope you retained OP's labels of intersection points.
            $endgroup$
            – Narasimham
            Apr 19 at 13:02




            $begingroup$
            Hope you retained OP's labels of intersection points.
            $endgroup$
            – Narasimham
            Apr 19 at 13:02












            $begingroup$
            @Narasimham No , I'm sorry , I haven't ;) . I can change all the labels , and the image , if you desire, but it would take a while.
            $endgroup$
            – Sinπ
            Apr 19 at 13:06






            $begingroup$
            @Narasimham No , I'm sorry , I haven't ;) . I can change all the labels , and the image , if you desire, but it would take a while.
            $endgroup$
            – Sinπ
            Apr 19 at 13:06














            $begingroup$
            @Sinπ thank you very much!! No need to change any labels; everything is very clear!!
            $endgroup$
            – Samuel
            Apr 19 at 13:38






            $begingroup$
            @Sinπ thank you very much!! No need to change any labels; everything is very clear!!
            $endgroup$
            – Samuel
            Apr 19 at 13:38














            $begingroup$
            Your result was apparently new, I up-voted. In good time you may consider relabelling for an answer that corresponds, esp. it is accepted now :)
            $endgroup$
            – Narasimham
            Apr 19 at 13:44




            $begingroup$
            Your result was apparently new, I up-voted. In good time you may consider relabelling for an answer that corresponds, esp. it is accepted now :)
            $endgroup$
            – Narasimham
            Apr 19 at 13:44











            0












            $begingroup$

            Here' is another solution. Let $alpha$ and $beta$ be the angles at $A$ and $B$, resp., let $a$ and $b$ be the length of $AF$ and $AC$, resp. Consider a coordinate system with origin $F$ and let $FB$ the direction of the abscissa. Let $varphi$ be the angle in question.



            Then
            $$FC=begin{pmatrix}-a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
            cos(alpha)\ sin(alpha)end{pmatrix}text{ and }
            FD=begin{pmatrix}a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
            -cos(beta)\ sin(beta)end{pmatrix},$$

            hence $FE$ the midpoint of $C$ and $D$ is
            $$frac12bbegin{pmatrix}
            cos(alpha)-cos(beta)\ sin(alpha)+sin(beta)end{pmatrix}.$$

            Therefore the slope of $FE$ is
            $$tan(180-varphi)=frac{sin(alpha)+sin(beta)}{cos(alpha)-cos(beta)}
            =frac{2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)cos(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}{-2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)sin(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}
            =-frac{1}{tanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)},$$

            that is
            $$tan(varphi)cdottanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)=-1,$$
            hence the line $FE$ is perpendicular to one with an angle of $(alpha-beta)2$. Thus, $180-varphi$ and $(alpha-beta)/2$ differ by $90$.



            In our case $(alpha-beta)/2=5$, so the perpendicular line must have an angle of $95$, that is $180-varphi=95$.



            NB: I'm sure there is a simpler way to achieve this general result.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Here' is another solution. Let $alpha$ and $beta$ be the angles at $A$ and $B$, resp., let $a$ and $b$ be the length of $AF$ and $AC$, resp. Consider a coordinate system with origin $F$ and let $FB$ the direction of the abscissa. Let $varphi$ be the angle in question.



              Then
              $$FC=begin{pmatrix}-a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
              cos(alpha)\ sin(alpha)end{pmatrix}text{ and }
              FD=begin{pmatrix}a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
              -cos(beta)\ sin(beta)end{pmatrix},$$

              hence $FE$ the midpoint of $C$ and $D$ is
              $$frac12bbegin{pmatrix}
              cos(alpha)-cos(beta)\ sin(alpha)+sin(beta)end{pmatrix}.$$

              Therefore the slope of $FE$ is
              $$tan(180-varphi)=frac{sin(alpha)+sin(beta)}{cos(alpha)-cos(beta)}
              =frac{2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)cos(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}{-2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)sin(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}
              =-frac{1}{tanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)},$$

              that is
              $$tan(varphi)cdottanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)=-1,$$
              hence the line $FE$ is perpendicular to one with an angle of $(alpha-beta)2$. Thus, $180-varphi$ and $(alpha-beta)/2$ differ by $90$.



              In our case $(alpha-beta)/2=5$, so the perpendicular line must have an angle of $95$, that is $180-varphi=95$.



              NB: I'm sure there is a simpler way to achieve this general result.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Here' is another solution. Let $alpha$ and $beta$ be the angles at $A$ and $B$, resp., let $a$ and $b$ be the length of $AF$ and $AC$, resp. Consider a coordinate system with origin $F$ and let $FB$ the direction of the abscissa. Let $varphi$ be the angle in question.



                Then
                $$FC=begin{pmatrix}-a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
                cos(alpha)\ sin(alpha)end{pmatrix}text{ and }
                FD=begin{pmatrix}a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
                -cos(beta)\ sin(beta)end{pmatrix},$$

                hence $FE$ the midpoint of $C$ and $D$ is
                $$frac12bbegin{pmatrix}
                cos(alpha)-cos(beta)\ sin(alpha)+sin(beta)end{pmatrix}.$$

                Therefore the slope of $FE$ is
                $$tan(180-varphi)=frac{sin(alpha)+sin(beta)}{cos(alpha)-cos(beta)}
                =frac{2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)cos(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}{-2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)sin(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}
                =-frac{1}{tanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)},$$

                that is
                $$tan(varphi)cdottanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)=-1,$$
                hence the line $FE$ is perpendicular to one with an angle of $(alpha-beta)2$. Thus, $180-varphi$ and $(alpha-beta)/2$ differ by $90$.



                In our case $(alpha-beta)/2=5$, so the perpendicular line must have an angle of $95$, that is $180-varphi=95$.



                NB: I'm sure there is a simpler way to achieve this general result.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Here' is another solution. Let $alpha$ and $beta$ be the angles at $A$ and $B$, resp., let $a$ and $b$ be the length of $AF$ and $AC$, resp. Consider a coordinate system with origin $F$ and let $FB$ the direction of the abscissa. Let $varphi$ be the angle in question.



                Then
                $$FC=begin{pmatrix}-a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
                cos(alpha)\ sin(alpha)end{pmatrix}text{ and }
                FD=begin{pmatrix}a\0end{pmatrix}+bbegin{pmatrix}
                -cos(beta)\ sin(beta)end{pmatrix},$$

                hence $FE$ the midpoint of $C$ and $D$ is
                $$frac12bbegin{pmatrix}
                cos(alpha)-cos(beta)\ sin(alpha)+sin(beta)end{pmatrix}.$$

                Therefore the slope of $FE$ is
                $$tan(180-varphi)=frac{sin(alpha)+sin(beta)}{cos(alpha)-cos(beta)}
                =frac{2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)cos(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}{-2sinbigl((alpha+beta)/2bigr)sin(bigl((alpha-beta)2bigr)}
                =-frac{1}{tanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)},$$

                that is
                $$tan(varphi)cdottanbigl((alpha-beta)/2)bigr)=-1,$$
                hence the line $FE$ is perpendicular to one with an angle of $(alpha-beta)2$. Thus, $180-varphi$ and $(alpha-beta)/2$ differ by $90$.



                In our case $(alpha-beta)/2=5$, so the perpendicular line must have an angle of $95$, that is $180-varphi=95$.



                NB: I'm sure there is a simpler way to achieve this general result.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago

























                answered Apr 20 at 15:15









                Michael HoppeMichael Hoppe

                11.3k31837




                11.3k31837






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3193339%2fquadrilaterals-with-equal-sides%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...