Induced homomorphism $p_*: H_1(D_0 - z_0)to H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ by $a(z-z_0)^m$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $D_0 subseteq mathbb{R}^2$ be a closed disc with center at $z_0$ and consider the function $p: D_0 to mathbb{C}$ defined by $p(z):=a(z-z_0)^m$ for $z in D_0$ with $a neq 0$. How can I show that the induced homomorphism $p_*: H_1(D_0 - z_0) to H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ is multiplication by $m$?. I know that $H_1(D_0 - z_0)$ and $H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ are infinite cyclic groups and that the homorphism induced by $z^m$ in $H_1(S^1) to H_1(S^1) $ is multiplication by $m$. I think that I should work with the isomorphism between $H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ and $H_1(S^1)$ and the isomorphism of $H_1(D_0 - z_0)$ with $H_1(partial D_0)$.



Thanks for any help.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I guess you mean $D_0$ when you write $D_1$?
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 18 at 16:42










  • Yes, it was a typo. Thank you.
    – user589291
    Nov 18 at 19:16

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $D_0 subseteq mathbb{R}^2$ be a closed disc with center at $z_0$ and consider the function $p: D_0 to mathbb{C}$ defined by $p(z):=a(z-z_0)^m$ for $z in D_0$ with $a neq 0$. How can I show that the induced homomorphism $p_*: H_1(D_0 - z_0) to H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ is multiplication by $m$?. I know that $H_1(D_0 - z_0)$ and $H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ are infinite cyclic groups and that the homorphism induced by $z^m$ in $H_1(S^1) to H_1(S^1) $ is multiplication by $m$. I think that I should work with the isomorphism between $H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ and $H_1(S^1)$ and the isomorphism of $H_1(D_0 - z_0)$ with $H_1(partial D_0)$.



Thanks for any help.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I guess you mean $D_0$ when you write $D_1$?
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 18 at 16:42










  • Yes, it was a typo. Thank you.
    – user589291
    Nov 18 at 19:16















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $D_0 subseteq mathbb{R}^2$ be a closed disc with center at $z_0$ and consider the function $p: D_0 to mathbb{C}$ defined by $p(z):=a(z-z_0)^m$ for $z in D_0$ with $a neq 0$. How can I show that the induced homomorphism $p_*: H_1(D_0 - z_0) to H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ is multiplication by $m$?. I know that $H_1(D_0 - z_0)$ and $H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ are infinite cyclic groups and that the homorphism induced by $z^m$ in $H_1(S^1) to H_1(S^1) $ is multiplication by $m$. I think that I should work with the isomorphism between $H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ and $H_1(S^1)$ and the isomorphism of $H_1(D_0 - z_0)$ with $H_1(partial D_0)$.



Thanks for any help.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $D_0 subseteq mathbb{R}^2$ be a closed disc with center at $z_0$ and consider the function $p: D_0 to mathbb{C}$ defined by $p(z):=a(z-z_0)^m$ for $z in D_0$ with $a neq 0$. How can I show that the induced homomorphism $p_*: H_1(D_0 - z_0) to H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ is multiplication by $m$?. I know that $H_1(D_0 - z_0)$ and $H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ are infinite cyclic groups and that the homorphism induced by $z^m$ in $H_1(S^1) to H_1(S^1) $ is multiplication by $m$. I think that I should work with the isomorphism between $H_1(mathbb{C}-0)$ and $H_1(S^1)$ and the isomorphism of $H_1(D_0 - z_0)$ with $H_1(partial D_0)$.



Thanks for any help.







algebraic-topology homology-cohomology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 18 at 19:41

























asked Nov 18 at 15:39







user589291



















  • I guess you mean $D_0$ when you write $D_1$?
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 18 at 16:42










  • Yes, it was a typo. Thank you.
    – user589291
    Nov 18 at 19:16




















  • I guess you mean $D_0$ when you write $D_1$?
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 18 at 16:42










  • Yes, it was a typo. Thank you.
    – user589291
    Nov 18 at 19:16


















I guess you mean $D_0$ when you write $D_1$?
– Paul Frost
Nov 18 at 16:42




I guess you mean $D_0$ when you write $D_1$?
– Paul Frost
Nov 18 at 16:42












Yes, it was a typo. Thank you.
– user589291
Nov 18 at 19:16






Yes, it was a typo. Thank you.
– user589291
Nov 18 at 19:16












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
-1
down vote



accepted










Certainly we have $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0) approx mathbb{Z}$ and $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0) approx mathbb{Z}$. However, to see what $p_*$ looks like we must specify generators $a$ of $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $b$ of $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. There are two possible choices for both homology groups. This is equivalent to specifying isomorphisms $f : H_1(S^1) to H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $g : H_1(S^1) to H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. This is done in the following obvious way:



(1) There exists a strong deformation retraction $r : mathbb{C} setminus 0 to S^1, r(z) = z/lVert z rVert$. Hence the inclusion $i : S^1 to mathbb{C} setminus 0$ is a homotopy equivalence and induces the isomorphism $g = i_*$. Its inverse is $g^{-1} = r_*$.



(2) $partial D_0$ is a strong deformation retract of $D_0 setminus z_0$. But there is a canonical homeomorphism $h : S^1 to partial D_0, h(z) = z_0 + dz$, where $d$ is the radius of $D_0$. If $j : partial D_0 to D_0$ denotes inclusion, we take $f = (j circ h)_*$.



You know that the map $mu : S^1 to S^1, mu(z) = z^m,$ induces $mu_*$ = multiplication by $m$.



Now we can check that $g^{-1} circ p_* circ f$ is multiplication by $m$. We have
$$g^{-1} circ p_* circ f = r_* circ p_* circ (j circ h)_* = (r circ p circ j circ h)_*$$
and
$$(r circ p circ j circ h)(z) = r(p(z_0+dz)) = r(adz^m) = frac{a}{lvert a rvert} z^m .$$
Let $varphi = r circ p circ j circ h$ and write $frac{a}{lvert a rvert} = e^{itau}$ with $tau in [0,2pi)$. A homotopy $H : S^1 times [0,1] to S^1$ is defined by
$$H(z,t) = e^{ittau}z^m .$$
Then $H(z,0) = mu(z), H(z,1) = varphi(z)$. Hence $mu$ and $varphi$ are homotopic and we conclude $varphi_* = mu_*$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Downvoting is absolutely okay if somebody is not satisfied with an answer. But it would be interesting to learn what are the defects leading to this vote.
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 22 at 21:32











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003687%2finduced-homomorphism-p-h-1d-0-z-0-to-h-1-mathbbc-0-by-az-z-0m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown
























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
-1
down vote



accepted










Certainly we have $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0) approx mathbb{Z}$ and $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0) approx mathbb{Z}$. However, to see what $p_*$ looks like we must specify generators $a$ of $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $b$ of $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. There are two possible choices for both homology groups. This is equivalent to specifying isomorphisms $f : H_1(S^1) to H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $g : H_1(S^1) to H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. This is done in the following obvious way:



(1) There exists a strong deformation retraction $r : mathbb{C} setminus 0 to S^1, r(z) = z/lVert z rVert$. Hence the inclusion $i : S^1 to mathbb{C} setminus 0$ is a homotopy equivalence and induces the isomorphism $g = i_*$. Its inverse is $g^{-1} = r_*$.



(2) $partial D_0$ is a strong deformation retract of $D_0 setminus z_0$. But there is a canonical homeomorphism $h : S^1 to partial D_0, h(z) = z_0 + dz$, where $d$ is the radius of $D_0$. If $j : partial D_0 to D_0$ denotes inclusion, we take $f = (j circ h)_*$.



You know that the map $mu : S^1 to S^1, mu(z) = z^m,$ induces $mu_*$ = multiplication by $m$.



Now we can check that $g^{-1} circ p_* circ f$ is multiplication by $m$. We have
$$g^{-1} circ p_* circ f = r_* circ p_* circ (j circ h)_* = (r circ p circ j circ h)_*$$
and
$$(r circ p circ j circ h)(z) = r(p(z_0+dz)) = r(adz^m) = frac{a}{lvert a rvert} z^m .$$
Let $varphi = r circ p circ j circ h$ and write $frac{a}{lvert a rvert} = e^{itau}$ with $tau in [0,2pi)$. A homotopy $H : S^1 times [0,1] to S^1$ is defined by
$$H(z,t) = e^{ittau}z^m .$$
Then $H(z,0) = mu(z), H(z,1) = varphi(z)$. Hence $mu$ and $varphi$ are homotopic and we conclude $varphi_* = mu_*$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Downvoting is absolutely okay if somebody is not satisfied with an answer. But it would be interesting to learn what are the defects leading to this vote.
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 22 at 21:32















up vote
-1
down vote



accepted










Certainly we have $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0) approx mathbb{Z}$ and $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0) approx mathbb{Z}$. However, to see what $p_*$ looks like we must specify generators $a$ of $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $b$ of $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. There are two possible choices for both homology groups. This is equivalent to specifying isomorphisms $f : H_1(S^1) to H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $g : H_1(S^1) to H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. This is done in the following obvious way:



(1) There exists a strong deformation retraction $r : mathbb{C} setminus 0 to S^1, r(z) = z/lVert z rVert$. Hence the inclusion $i : S^1 to mathbb{C} setminus 0$ is a homotopy equivalence and induces the isomorphism $g = i_*$. Its inverse is $g^{-1} = r_*$.



(2) $partial D_0$ is a strong deformation retract of $D_0 setminus z_0$. But there is a canonical homeomorphism $h : S^1 to partial D_0, h(z) = z_0 + dz$, where $d$ is the radius of $D_0$. If $j : partial D_0 to D_0$ denotes inclusion, we take $f = (j circ h)_*$.



You know that the map $mu : S^1 to S^1, mu(z) = z^m,$ induces $mu_*$ = multiplication by $m$.



Now we can check that $g^{-1} circ p_* circ f$ is multiplication by $m$. We have
$$g^{-1} circ p_* circ f = r_* circ p_* circ (j circ h)_* = (r circ p circ j circ h)_*$$
and
$$(r circ p circ j circ h)(z) = r(p(z_0+dz)) = r(adz^m) = frac{a}{lvert a rvert} z^m .$$
Let $varphi = r circ p circ j circ h$ and write $frac{a}{lvert a rvert} = e^{itau}$ with $tau in [0,2pi)$. A homotopy $H : S^1 times [0,1] to S^1$ is defined by
$$H(z,t) = e^{ittau}z^m .$$
Then $H(z,0) = mu(z), H(z,1) = varphi(z)$. Hence $mu$ and $varphi$ are homotopic and we conclude $varphi_* = mu_*$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Downvoting is absolutely okay if somebody is not satisfied with an answer. But it would be interesting to learn what are the defects leading to this vote.
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 22 at 21:32













up vote
-1
down vote



accepted







up vote
-1
down vote



accepted






Certainly we have $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0) approx mathbb{Z}$ and $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0) approx mathbb{Z}$. However, to see what $p_*$ looks like we must specify generators $a$ of $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $b$ of $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. There are two possible choices for both homology groups. This is equivalent to specifying isomorphisms $f : H_1(S^1) to H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $g : H_1(S^1) to H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. This is done in the following obvious way:



(1) There exists a strong deformation retraction $r : mathbb{C} setminus 0 to S^1, r(z) = z/lVert z rVert$. Hence the inclusion $i : S^1 to mathbb{C} setminus 0$ is a homotopy equivalence and induces the isomorphism $g = i_*$. Its inverse is $g^{-1} = r_*$.



(2) $partial D_0$ is a strong deformation retract of $D_0 setminus z_0$. But there is a canonical homeomorphism $h : S^1 to partial D_0, h(z) = z_0 + dz$, where $d$ is the radius of $D_0$. If $j : partial D_0 to D_0$ denotes inclusion, we take $f = (j circ h)_*$.



You know that the map $mu : S^1 to S^1, mu(z) = z^m,$ induces $mu_*$ = multiplication by $m$.



Now we can check that $g^{-1} circ p_* circ f$ is multiplication by $m$. We have
$$g^{-1} circ p_* circ f = r_* circ p_* circ (j circ h)_* = (r circ p circ j circ h)_*$$
and
$$(r circ p circ j circ h)(z) = r(p(z_0+dz)) = r(adz^m) = frac{a}{lvert a rvert} z^m .$$
Let $varphi = r circ p circ j circ h$ and write $frac{a}{lvert a rvert} = e^{itau}$ with $tau in [0,2pi)$. A homotopy $H : S^1 times [0,1] to S^1$ is defined by
$$H(z,t) = e^{ittau}z^m .$$
Then $H(z,0) = mu(z), H(z,1) = varphi(z)$. Hence $mu$ and $varphi$ are homotopic and we conclude $varphi_* = mu_*$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Certainly we have $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0) approx mathbb{Z}$ and $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0) approx mathbb{Z}$. However, to see what $p_*$ looks like we must specify generators $a$ of $H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $b$ of $H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. There are two possible choices for both homology groups. This is equivalent to specifying isomorphisms $f : H_1(S^1) to H_1(D_0 setminus z_0)$ and $g : H_1(S^1) to H_1(mathbb{C} setminus 0)$. This is done in the following obvious way:



(1) There exists a strong deformation retraction $r : mathbb{C} setminus 0 to S^1, r(z) = z/lVert z rVert$. Hence the inclusion $i : S^1 to mathbb{C} setminus 0$ is a homotopy equivalence and induces the isomorphism $g = i_*$. Its inverse is $g^{-1} = r_*$.



(2) $partial D_0$ is a strong deformation retract of $D_0 setminus z_0$. But there is a canonical homeomorphism $h : S^1 to partial D_0, h(z) = z_0 + dz$, where $d$ is the radius of $D_0$. If $j : partial D_0 to D_0$ denotes inclusion, we take $f = (j circ h)_*$.



You know that the map $mu : S^1 to S^1, mu(z) = z^m,$ induces $mu_*$ = multiplication by $m$.



Now we can check that $g^{-1} circ p_* circ f$ is multiplication by $m$. We have
$$g^{-1} circ p_* circ f = r_* circ p_* circ (j circ h)_* = (r circ p circ j circ h)_*$$
and
$$(r circ p circ j circ h)(z) = r(p(z_0+dz)) = r(adz^m) = frac{a}{lvert a rvert} z^m .$$
Let $varphi = r circ p circ j circ h$ and write $frac{a}{lvert a rvert} = e^{itau}$ with $tau in [0,2pi)$. A homotopy $H : S^1 times [0,1] to S^1$ is defined by
$$H(z,t) = e^{ittau}z^m .$$
Then $H(z,0) = mu(z), H(z,1) = varphi(z)$. Hence $mu$ and $varphi$ are homotopic and we conclude $varphi_* = mu_*$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 18 at 17:39









Paul Frost

8,1891528




8,1891528












  • Downvoting is absolutely okay if somebody is not satisfied with an answer. But it would be interesting to learn what are the defects leading to this vote.
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 22 at 21:32


















  • Downvoting is absolutely okay if somebody is not satisfied with an answer. But it would be interesting to learn what are the defects leading to this vote.
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 22 at 21:32
















Downvoting is absolutely okay if somebody is not satisfied with an answer. But it would be interesting to learn what are the defects leading to this vote.
– Paul Frost
Nov 22 at 21:32




Downvoting is absolutely okay if somebody is not satisfied with an answer. But it would be interesting to learn what are the defects leading to this vote.
– Paul Frost
Nov 22 at 21:32


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003687%2finduced-homomorphism-p-h-1d-0-z-0-to-h-1-mathbbc-0-by-az-z-0m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...