What are the standard types of Wi-Fi antenna connectors? [closed]












1














What are the standard types of Wi-Fi antenna connectors?



It seems like there is more than one variation of a screw-on type of connector, but I haven't been able to find specifics of what types, sizes, etc. there are.










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Ramhound, Twisty Impersonator, bertieb, music2myear, Rajesh S Dec 5 at 8:58


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:



  • "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question." – Twisty Impersonator, music2myear, Rajesh S

  • "This question is not about computer hardware or software, within the scope defined in the help center." – Ramhound, bertieb


If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    I don't know if there's any "list of standards". Here are some types. For practical purposes: It's whatever is on the hardware already have.
    – dirkt
    Oct 27 at 12:54






  • 2




    Here is another list (both found by googling).
    – dirkt
    Oct 27 at 12:56
















1














What are the standard types of Wi-Fi antenna connectors?



It seems like there is more than one variation of a screw-on type of connector, but I haven't been able to find specifics of what types, sizes, etc. there are.










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Ramhound, Twisty Impersonator, bertieb, music2myear, Rajesh S Dec 5 at 8:58


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:



  • "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question." – Twisty Impersonator, music2myear, Rajesh S

  • "This question is not about computer hardware or software, within the scope defined in the help center." – Ramhound, bertieb


If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    I don't know if there's any "list of standards". Here are some types. For practical purposes: It's whatever is on the hardware already have.
    – dirkt
    Oct 27 at 12:54






  • 2




    Here is another list (both found by googling).
    – dirkt
    Oct 27 at 12:56














1












1








1







What are the standard types of Wi-Fi antenna connectors?



It seems like there is more than one variation of a screw-on type of connector, but I haven't been able to find specifics of what types, sizes, etc. there are.










share|improve this question















What are the standard types of Wi-Fi antenna connectors?



It seems like there is more than one variation of a screw-on type of connector, but I haven't been able to find specifics of what types, sizes, etc. there are.







wireless-networking antenna






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 3 at 0:37

























asked Oct 27 at 12:13









DaveInCaz

18111




18111




closed as off-topic by Ramhound, Twisty Impersonator, bertieb, music2myear, Rajesh S Dec 5 at 8:58


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:



  • "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question." – Twisty Impersonator, music2myear, Rajesh S

  • "This question is not about computer hardware or software, within the scope defined in the help center." – Ramhound, bertieb


If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Ramhound, Twisty Impersonator, bertieb, music2myear, Rajesh S Dec 5 at 8:58


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:



  • "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question." – Twisty Impersonator, music2myear, Rajesh S

  • "This question is not about computer hardware or software, within the scope defined in the help center." – Ramhound, bertieb


If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    I don't know if there's any "list of standards". Here are some types. For practical purposes: It's whatever is on the hardware already have.
    – dirkt
    Oct 27 at 12:54






  • 2




    Here is another list (both found by googling).
    – dirkt
    Oct 27 at 12:56














  • 1




    I don't know if there's any "list of standards". Here are some types. For practical purposes: It's whatever is on the hardware already have.
    – dirkt
    Oct 27 at 12:54






  • 2




    Here is another list (both found by googling).
    – dirkt
    Oct 27 at 12:56








1




1




I don't know if there's any "list of standards". Here are some types. For practical purposes: It's whatever is on the hardware already have.
– dirkt
Oct 27 at 12:54




I don't know if there's any "list of standards". Here are some types. For practical purposes: It's whatever is on the hardware already have.
– dirkt
Oct 27 at 12:54




2




2




Here is another list (both found by googling).
– dirkt
Oct 27 at 12:56




Here is another list (both found by googling).
– dirkt
Oct 27 at 12:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Based on the link that dirkt has provided to DataPro International Inc.’s website in his comment, connectors can be categorized as follows:





  • BNC: Round connector with slotted mating collar – One of the oldest kinds of RF connectors. It is a quick-disconnect used for coaxial cable, meaning it is not only used for Wireless Antenna extensions, but also for video, audio, and networking duties.



    BNC




  • N-Type: Round screw-type connector, large. – The largest of the RF connectors, and very common to see on antennae. N-type connectors are usually rated up to 12.5GHz, making them usable in not just WiFi applications, but also in the higher end of the microwave spectrum.



    N-Type




  • SMA: Round screw-type connector, small.: The smallest common RF connector. SMA was developed in the 1960's and is rated up to 18GHz.



    SMA




  • RP-SMA: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity SMA was designed as a proprietary connector to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products.



    RP-SMA




  • TNC: Round screw-type connector: TNC is similar to BNC except for the connecting method. Where BNC has a slotted mating collar, TNC has a screw-down type connector. TNC's screw-down connector performs better than BNC in the microwave spectrum.



    TNC




  • RP-TNC: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity TNC was designed with the same goals as RP-SMA-- to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products. The designers simply applied this methodology to a different connector.



    RP-TNC








share|improve this answer























  • I'm not sure DataPro got all of the anatomy labels right, unless connectors have gotten into the new "gender identity" options. :-)
    – fixer1234
    Dec 4 at 8:23










  • Yeah, the RP-SMA and RP-TNC seem off. But hey!
    – JakeGould
    Dec 4 at 14:39


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Based on the link that dirkt has provided to DataPro International Inc.’s website in his comment, connectors can be categorized as follows:





  • BNC: Round connector with slotted mating collar – One of the oldest kinds of RF connectors. It is a quick-disconnect used for coaxial cable, meaning it is not only used for Wireless Antenna extensions, but also for video, audio, and networking duties.



    BNC




  • N-Type: Round screw-type connector, large. – The largest of the RF connectors, and very common to see on antennae. N-type connectors are usually rated up to 12.5GHz, making them usable in not just WiFi applications, but also in the higher end of the microwave spectrum.



    N-Type




  • SMA: Round screw-type connector, small.: The smallest common RF connector. SMA was developed in the 1960's and is rated up to 18GHz.



    SMA




  • RP-SMA: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity SMA was designed as a proprietary connector to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products.



    RP-SMA




  • TNC: Round screw-type connector: TNC is similar to BNC except for the connecting method. Where BNC has a slotted mating collar, TNC has a screw-down type connector. TNC's screw-down connector performs better than BNC in the microwave spectrum.



    TNC




  • RP-TNC: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity TNC was designed with the same goals as RP-SMA-- to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products. The designers simply applied this methodology to a different connector.



    RP-TNC








share|improve this answer























  • I'm not sure DataPro got all of the anatomy labels right, unless connectors have gotten into the new "gender identity" options. :-)
    – fixer1234
    Dec 4 at 8:23










  • Yeah, the RP-SMA and RP-TNC seem off. But hey!
    – JakeGould
    Dec 4 at 14:39
















2














Based on the link that dirkt has provided to DataPro International Inc.’s website in his comment, connectors can be categorized as follows:





  • BNC: Round connector with slotted mating collar – One of the oldest kinds of RF connectors. It is a quick-disconnect used for coaxial cable, meaning it is not only used for Wireless Antenna extensions, but also for video, audio, and networking duties.



    BNC




  • N-Type: Round screw-type connector, large. – The largest of the RF connectors, and very common to see on antennae. N-type connectors are usually rated up to 12.5GHz, making them usable in not just WiFi applications, but also in the higher end of the microwave spectrum.



    N-Type




  • SMA: Round screw-type connector, small.: The smallest common RF connector. SMA was developed in the 1960's and is rated up to 18GHz.



    SMA




  • RP-SMA: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity SMA was designed as a proprietary connector to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products.



    RP-SMA




  • TNC: Round screw-type connector: TNC is similar to BNC except for the connecting method. Where BNC has a slotted mating collar, TNC has a screw-down type connector. TNC's screw-down connector performs better than BNC in the microwave spectrum.



    TNC




  • RP-TNC: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity TNC was designed with the same goals as RP-SMA-- to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products. The designers simply applied this methodology to a different connector.



    RP-TNC








share|improve this answer























  • I'm not sure DataPro got all of the anatomy labels right, unless connectors have gotten into the new "gender identity" options. :-)
    – fixer1234
    Dec 4 at 8:23










  • Yeah, the RP-SMA and RP-TNC seem off. But hey!
    – JakeGould
    Dec 4 at 14:39














2












2








2






Based on the link that dirkt has provided to DataPro International Inc.’s website in his comment, connectors can be categorized as follows:





  • BNC: Round connector with slotted mating collar – One of the oldest kinds of RF connectors. It is a quick-disconnect used for coaxial cable, meaning it is not only used for Wireless Antenna extensions, but also for video, audio, and networking duties.



    BNC




  • N-Type: Round screw-type connector, large. – The largest of the RF connectors, and very common to see on antennae. N-type connectors are usually rated up to 12.5GHz, making them usable in not just WiFi applications, but also in the higher end of the microwave spectrum.



    N-Type




  • SMA: Round screw-type connector, small.: The smallest common RF connector. SMA was developed in the 1960's and is rated up to 18GHz.



    SMA




  • RP-SMA: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity SMA was designed as a proprietary connector to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products.



    RP-SMA




  • TNC: Round screw-type connector: TNC is similar to BNC except for the connecting method. Where BNC has a slotted mating collar, TNC has a screw-down type connector. TNC's screw-down connector performs better than BNC in the microwave spectrum.



    TNC




  • RP-TNC: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity TNC was designed with the same goals as RP-SMA-- to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products. The designers simply applied this methodology to a different connector.



    RP-TNC








share|improve this answer














Based on the link that dirkt has provided to DataPro International Inc.’s website in his comment, connectors can be categorized as follows:





  • BNC: Round connector with slotted mating collar – One of the oldest kinds of RF connectors. It is a quick-disconnect used for coaxial cable, meaning it is not only used for Wireless Antenna extensions, but also for video, audio, and networking duties.



    BNC




  • N-Type: Round screw-type connector, large. – The largest of the RF connectors, and very common to see on antennae. N-type connectors are usually rated up to 12.5GHz, making them usable in not just WiFi applications, but also in the higher end of the microwave spectrum.



    N-Type




  • SMA: Round screw-type connector, small.: The smallest common RF connector. SMA was developed in the 1960's and is rated up to 18GHz.



    SMA




  • RP-SMA: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity SMA was designed as a proprietary connector to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products.



    RP-SMA




  • TNC: Round screw-type connector: TNC is similar to BNC except for the connecting method. Where BNC has a slotted mating collar, TNC has a screw-down type connector. TNC's screw-down connector performs better than BNC in the microwave spectrum.



    TNC




  • RP-TNC: Round screw-type connector, Reverse Polarity: Reverse Polarity TNC was designed with the same goals as RP-SMA-- to make it more difficult for consumers to attach larger, potentially illegal antennae to their wireless products. The designers simply applied this methodology to a different connector.



    RP-TNC









share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 at 0:58









DaveInCaz

18111




18111










answered Oct 27 at 19:27









JakeGould

30.9k1093137




30.9k1093137












  • I'm not sure DataPro got all of the anatomy labels right, unless connectors have gotten into the new "gender identity" options. :-)
    – fixer1234
    Dec 4 at 8:23










  • Yeah, the RP-SMA and RP-TNC seem off. But hey!
    – JakeGould
    Dec 4 at 14:39


















  • I'm not sure DataPro got all of the anatomy labels right, unless connectors have gotten into the new "gender identity" options. :-)
    – fixer1234
    Dec 4 at 8:23










  • Yeah, the RP-SMA and RP-TNC seem off. But hey!
    – JakeGould
    Dec 4 at 14:39
















I'm not sure DataPro got all of the anatomy labels right, unless connectors have gotten into the new "gender identity" options. :-)
– fixer1234
Dec 4 at 8:23




I'm not sure DataPro got all of the anatomy labels right, unless connectors have gotten into the new "gender identity" options. :-)
– fixer1234
Dec 4 at 8:23












Yeah, the RP-SMA and RP-TNC seem off. But hey!
– JakeGould
Dec 4 at 14:39




Yeah, the RP-SMA and RP-TNC seem off. But hey!
– JakeGould
Dec 4 at 14:39



Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Brian Clough

Cáceres