If $f(x)$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ and $M=max ; |f(x)|$, is $M=lim limits_{ntoinfty}...












15












$begingroup$


Let $f(x)$ be a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and $M=max{|f(x)| ; :; x in [a,b]}$. Is it true that:
$$
M= lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^n,mathrm dxright)^{1/n} ?
$$



Thanks!






real-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
    $endgroup$
    – Ilya
    Dec 4 '11 at 17:46






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
    $endgroup$
    – Srivatsan
    Dec 4 '11 at 19:09


















15












$begingroup$


Let $f(x)$ be a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and $M=max{|f(x)| ; :; x in [a,b]}$. Is it true that:
$$
M= lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^n,mathrm dxright)^{1/n} ?
$$



Thanks!






real-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
    $endgroup$
    – Ilya
    Dec 4 '11 at 17:46






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
    $endgroup$
    – Srivatsan
    Dec 4 '11 at 19:09
















15












15








15


10



$begingroup$


Let $f(x)$ be a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and $M=max{|f(x)| ; :; x in [a,b]}$. Is it true that:
$$
M= lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^n,mathrm dxright)^{1/n} ?
$$



Thanks!






real-analysis







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f(x)$ be a continuous real-valued function on $[a,b]$ and $M=max{|f(x)| ; :; x in [a,b]}$. Is it true that:
$$
M= lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^n,mathrm dxright)^{1/n} ?
$$



Thanks!






real-analysis




real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 4 '11 at 19:04









Srivatsan

20.9k371125




20.9k371125










asked Dec 4 '11 at 17:45









tomergtomerg

738820




738820








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
    $endgroup$
    – Ilya
    Dec 4 '11 at 17:46






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
    $endgroup$
    – Srivatsan
    Dec 4 '11 at 19:09
















  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
    $endgroup$
    – Ilya
    Dec 4 '11 at 17:46






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
    $endgroup$
    – Srivatsan
    Dec 4 '11 at 19:09










3




3




$begingroup$
Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
$endgroup$
– Ilya
Dec 4 '11 at 17:46




$begingroup$
Did you forget $limlimits_{ntoinfty}$ somewhere?
$endgroup$
– Ilya
Dec 4 '11 at 17:46




6




6




$begingroup$
In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
$endgroup$
– Srivatsan
Dec 4 '11 at 19:09






$begingroup$
In other words, you are asking if $| f |_n to | f |_infty$ for a continuous $f$.
$endgroup$
– Srivatsan
Dec 4 '11 at 19:09












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















18












$begingroup$

Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
$$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
$$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










  • $begingroup$
    Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 23:13



















0












$begingroup$

It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



$$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f88300%2fif-fx-is-continuous-on-a-b-and-m-max-fx-is-m-lim-limits-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    18












    $begingroup$

    Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
    $$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
    Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
    $$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
    for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Davide Giraudo
      Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










    • $begingroup$
      Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 23:13
















    18












    $begingroup$

    Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
    $$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
    Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
    $$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
    for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Davide Giraudo
      Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










    • $begingroup$
      Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 23:13














    18












    18








    18





    $begingroup$

    Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
    $$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
    Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
    $$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
    for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Put $S_{delta}:={xinleft[a,bright], |f(x)|geq M-delta}$ for any $delta>0$. Then we have for all $n$
    $$Mcdot (b-a)^{frac 1n}geqleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq left(int_{S_{delta}}|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq (M-delta)left(lambda(S_{delta})right)^{frac 1n}.$$
    Since $f$ is continuous, the measure of $S_{delta}$ is positive and taking the $liminf$ and $limsup$, we can see that
    $$Mgeq limsup_n left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-deltaquad mbox{and }quad Mgeq liminf_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}geq M-delta$$
    for all $delta>0$, so $lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b|f(x)|^ndxright)^{frac 1n}=M$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 5 '11 at 15:27

























    answered Dec 4 '11 at 18:06









    Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo

    125k16150261




    125k16150261












    • $begingroup$
      Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Davide Giraudo
      Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










    • $begingroup$
      Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 23:13


















    • $begingroup$
      Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 10:42






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
      $endgroup$
      – Davide Giraudo
      Jan 5 '12 at 12:36










    • $begingroup$
      Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
      $endgroup$
      – Patrick Da Silva
      Jan 5 '12 at 23:13
















    $begingroup$
    Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 10:42




    $begingroup$
    Why do you absolutely need to take the lim inf and lim sup? All the limits exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 10:42




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 5 '12 at 12:36




    $begingroup$
    @PatrickDaSilva We don't know a priori that the limit $lim_nleft(int_a^b|f(x)|^nright)^{frac 1n}$ exists.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 5 '12 at 12:36












    $begingroup$
    Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 23:13




    $begingroup$
    Hm. I thought it was a sandwich argument at first, but I noticed the difference. Thanks for pointing it out
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Da Silva
    Jan 5 '12 at 23:13











    0












    $begingroup$

    It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



    $$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



    Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



      $$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



      Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



        $$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



        Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It can be seen as a particular case of Laplace's principle. For simplicity assume that $f(x) ge 0$.



        $$lim_{nrightarrowinfty} log frac{1}{n} int_a^b exp(n log f(x))mathrm d x = max_{xin[a,b]} log f(x)$$



        Taking $exp$ of both sides gives the result.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 29 '18 at 21:38









        beckobecko

        2,34931942




        2,34931942






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f88300%2fif-fx-is-continuous-on-a-b-and-m-max-fx-is-m-lim-limits-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Image
            Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
            Read more

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
            Read more

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

            Image
            1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
            Read more