PTIJ: Why do we make a Lulav holder?












6















The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question























  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    2 days ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    2 days ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    2 days ago
















6















The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question























  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    2 days ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    2 days ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    2 days ago














6












6








6








The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question














The Gemara says:




אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות



One does not make mitzvot into bundles.




But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.



ואם תומר, and if you'll say:



The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.



You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.



Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.



enter image description here



That should definitely be an issue.





This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.







purim-torah-in-jest






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









LeitzLeitz

913212




913212













  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    2 days ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    2 days ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    2 days ago



















  • VTC as not Purim Torah

    – Double AA
    2 days ago











  • @DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

    – Leitz
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

    – Double AA
    2 days ago













  • Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

    – DonielF
    2 days ago

















VTC as not Purim Torah

– Double AA
2 days ago





VTC as not Purim Torah

– Double AA
2 days ago













@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

– Leitz
2 days ago





@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?

– Leitz
2 days ago




2




2





If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

– Double AA
2 days ago







If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?

– Double AA
2 days ago















Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago





Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA

– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago




1




1





@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

– DonielF
2 days ago





@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.

– DonielF
2 days ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6














The proper way to punctuate it is




אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






share|improve this answer
























  • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

    – Asher
    2 days ago



















5














The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.






share|improve this answer

































    3














    In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






    share|improve this answer































      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6














      The proper way to punctuate it is




      אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



      One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




      So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






      share|improve this answer
























      • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

        – Asher
        2 days ago
















      6














      The proper way to punctuate it is




      אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



      One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




      So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






      share|improve this answer
























      • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

        – Asher
        2 days ago














      6












      6








      6







      The proper way to punctuate it is




      אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



      One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




      So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.






      share|improve this answer













      The proper way to punctuate it is




      אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות



      One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles




      So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      Y     e     zY     e     z

      45.4k372203




      45.4k372203













      • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

        – Asher
        2 days ago



















      • +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

        – Asher
        2 days ago

















      +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

      – Asher
      2 days ago





      +1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-

      – Asher
      2 days ago











      5














      The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



      So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.






      share|improve this answer






























        5














        The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



        So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.






        share|improve this answer




























          5












          5








          5







          The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



          So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.






          share|improve this answer















          The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.



          So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago









          Alex

          22.5k155129




          22.5k155129










          answered 2 days ago









          AsherAsher

          1395




          1395























              3














              In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






              share|improve this answer




























                3














                In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






                share|improve this answer


























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.






                  share|improve this answer













                  In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Gershon GoldGershon Gold

                  111k8179425




                  111k8179425















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Brian Clough

                      Cáceres